Actors with counter clockwise hair swirls.
Here is my list so far:
Charlie Hunnam - definite counter-clockwise hair swirl.
Joel Kinnaman - probably counter-clockwise hair swirl. Hair too long to ascertain for sure.
Jensen Ackles - more counter-clockwise than clockwise, although his swirl is not as defined.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||10/15/2013|
obsessive-compulsive much, OP?
|by Anonymous||reply 1||07/30/2013|
The fuck are you talking about, OP?
|by Anonymous||reply 4||07/30/2013|
Which actors have counter clockwise hair swirls and yellow skin?
|by Anonymous||reply 5||07/30/2013|
What does a counter-clockwise hair swirl mean, OP?
In utero trauma? Vitamin deficiency? Mark of the devil?
|by Anonymous||reply 6||07/30/2013|
They'd have to be clockwise in the photo for you to tell?
|by Anonymous||reply 7||07/30/2013|
It means that they're apple dream cyborgs rife with enchantchentry from the planet Demetron.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||07/30/2013|
Make sure the pics aren't selfies. Those mirrors can be so confusing.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||07/30/2013|
Counter clockwise hair swirls mean gay, or more precisely, men with counter clockwise swirls are more likely to be gay. I don't think it's 100% accurate, though.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||07/30/2013|
"Counter clockwise hair swirls mean gay, or more precisely, men with counter clockwise swirls are more likely to be gay. I don't think it's 100% accurate, though."
When you try to think, does it hurt?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||07/30/2013|
Can you list actors people may actually know, OP?
|by Anonymous||reply 12||07/30/2013|
Hey, it's a scientific study performed by a gay man on a Rehoboth beach.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||07/30/2013|
I don't know about his hair whorl but I saw Jared Padalecki dressed as a sailor in the style of Jean-Paul Gaultier and carrying a tiny little dog.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||07/30/2013|
Perhaps there are a dozen possible routes to homosexuality, any combination of which might produce a number of the traits associated with homosexuality.
It might be that there is no single thing called homosexuality—that there are instead dozens of homosexualities, scores of potential outcomes in terms of personality, and endless potentials for describing them.
“For example, do gay men who have older brothers show more or less feminine? Do gay men with counterclockwise hair have more masculine traits? One cause might create a more feminine homosexuality than another.”
The men listed are all masculine to one degree or another, hence, homosexuals with reverse hair whorls may present more masculine than homosexuals without reverse hair whorls.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||07/30/2013|
If you take two independently defined groups and compare them against each other choosing freely from an essentially infinite set of metrics, of course you'll find things that are statistically significant. I bet you that comparing people from Arkansas against people from Iowa you could do the same (their third toe is wider than their second toe and the Iowans are the other way around!).
This sort of physical anthropology is just weird. If there was some significance to hair whorls and ring fingers, it may be interesting. Instead, it just shows that given the ability to choose any possible metric by which to compare groups, it is possible to construct one that seems significant.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||07/30/2013|