Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

NSA Spied on Senators Obama, McCain, Feinstein, Powell, Petraeus and a current SCOTUS justice

NSA whistle blower Russ Tice details NSA actions against politicians, cabinet members, and civil rights groups:

"The abuse is rampant and everyone is pretending that it's never happened, and it couldn't happen. ... I know [there was abuse] because I had my hands on the papers for these sorts of things: They went after high-ranking military officers; they went after members of congress — Senate and the House — especially on the intelligence committees and the armed services committees, lawyers, law firms, judges, State Department officials, part of the White House, multinational companies, financial firms, NGOs, civil rights groups ..."

by Anonymousreply 3005/29/2014

Those documents would go a long way toward waking up the public and some of those officials. I'd love someone to show Feinstein that she's being watched. She'd have a cow.

by Anonymousreply 106/22/2013

Whistleblower charged with espionage reportedly claims US authorities accessed millions of private text messages in China.

by Anonymousreply 206/23/2013

The NSA is out of control and needs to be stopped.

by Anonymousreply 306/23/2013

Now the shit will hit the fan. They won't have cared about spying on everyone else, but on the elite themselves?

by Anonymousreply 406/23/2013

I call BS on this guy. Could he have access to some classified information...yes, but all of this? no way. When you get classified clearance it is specific to a certain set of information, not the whole shebang.

by Anonymousreply 506/23/2013


He said he had looked at orders to intercept those people. He hasn't said he looked at the material itself, has he?

by Anonymousreply 606/23/2013

"When it comes to respecting the Constitution and the privacy rights of Americans, for Sen. Dianne Feinstein, what's good for the goose is an outrageous violation of the gander's rights," said U.S. Senate candidate Murray Sabrin. "It's no skin off her nose when the National Security Agency does it to us, but when the Central Intelligence Agency does it to her, it's a constitutional crisis."

"Shouldn't the same rules apply to both the goose and the gander?" questioned Sabrin.

In the wake of revelations that the CIA may have rooted through U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee files as part of an ongoing congressional review of agency practices, Feinstein, a California Democrat and chair of the committee, took to the Senate floor on Tuesday to fulminate against it for violating "principles embodied in the United States Constitution."

In her speech she accused the agency of violating "Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches, as well as laws against domestic surveillance."

All well and good and, when the facts are revealed, perhaps entirely justified, but Ms. Feinstein sang a markedly different tune last month when she offered what one report called "a full-throated defense of the (NSA's) collection of data on billions of American phone calls."

"There's no question but what the NSA's monitoring of the private communications of law-abiding Americans is unconstitutional," said Sabrin. "And this view is shared across the political spectrum - even former Vice President Al Gore agrees with it."

"Yes, there are real threats, and we must be cognizant of them, remaining vigilant at all times. The best way to do that is to start in our own backyard by respecting and zealously guarding our constitutionally protected civil liberties, including the right to be free from unwarranted government snooping," said Sabrin.

"If the purpose of our national intelligence effort is to protect our freedom and liberty, it makes absolutely no sense to destroy them in the process. That thinking tosses the baby out with the bath water," he said. "My next door neighbor on her cell phone is no less deserving of constitutional protection than Sen. Feinstein."

Feinstein has a track record of double dealing on constitutionally protected civil liberties. For years, she's been one of the Senate's leading advocates of harsh and punitive gun-control legislation, never seeing a restriction on or the outlawing of a type of firearm she didn't like. But in the meantime, she didn't think twice about arming herself when faced with threats against herself and her family, a right she doesn't think Americans deserve as if they can't be trusted with it.

And what of New Jersey's junior Sen. Cory Booker, the politician Sabrin seeks to replace this coming Election Day - how has he weighed in on the important issue of safeguarding the constitutional liberties of Americans? Apparently, he's a complete MIA.

A search of online news sources revealed that Booker has been silent on Fourth Amendment and surveillance issues since last October's Senate Special Election campaign, where he was harshly criticized by fellow New Jersey Democrats who ran against him in the primary for being all over the lot on the issue in a seeming effort to please whomever he was speaking with at the moment. This time around, he's completely silent.

"While issues of violations of our constitutionally protected civil liberties are being debated in the U.S. Senate and throughout the country, Cory Booker is dropping F-bombs on Twitter and talking about driving to Hawaii ," said Sabrin. "He's not even bothering to phone it in. Maybe he's afraid the NSA will listen in."

by Anonymousreply 703/13/2014

Of course they do.

It's so they can catch these folks doing something and then blackmail them with it so they don't get in the CIA's way or assist them with the power they have.

Not sure what they caught Obama doing, but they have to have something embarrassing on him for him to keep the turds like Clapper and Brennan in charge of things.

by Anonymousreply 803/13/2014

Where's all our little DL fascists tonight?

by Anonymousreply 903/13/2014


They are sucking Kerry's dick.

by Anonymousreply 1003/14/2014


by Anonymousreply 1103/14/2014

[quote] Now the shit will hit the fan. They won't have cared about spying on everyone else, but on the elite themselves?

Of course they will care when it might have been done to them, but they sure didnt' care when they approved the bill on allowing this in 2002

This is not new. And I'm sick of the media acting like this spying program was started by Obama

by Anonymousreply 1203/14/2014

Now this is a great example of a thread that should be bumped. Perfectly timed with Feinstein's explosion this week.

by Anonymousreply 1303/14/2014

That hypocritical CUNT Feinstein should be in jail.

She's made millions off the laws she has helped pass, and then supported spying Stasi-style on citizens of the USA--- and has the audacity to bitch when it turns out the NSA was also spying on her.

I hope they release every embarrassing phone call and email that CUNT has ever made, and follow it with every call and email from McCain, Kerry, Biden, Clinton, Bush, Bohner, Graham...well, every fucking thug in the congress.

Our government is evil.

by Anonymousreply 1403/15/2014

How can anyone that isn't a moron justify this shit?

by Anonymousreply 1503/17/2014

I LOVE that Cuntstain, I mean Feinstein, is being hoisted on her own petard!


It’s a dark and quiet night on the University’s campus, until all computers flip on and their hard drives are erased. All research files and information incriminating several companies have disappeared. Sound crazy? The way you feel reading this is how Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., felt when the CIA hacked and deleted some of her committee’s files.

Last week, Feinstein — chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee — made a speech on the Senate floor condemning the CIA and demanding an apology for the CIA hacking into Senate computers to delete incriminating evidence against the agency in regard to the Bush-era torture scandals.

Feinstein has been a staunch defender of the intelligence community for years. When Edward Snowden leaked the NSA’s PRISM program, Feinstein was quick to defend the NSA and condemn Snowden’s action.

It is only ironic how upset Feinstein is that her Fourth Amendment right to privacy was violated by the CIA, the agency she defended, yet she had no problem with, and in fact supported, the mass Fourth Amendment violations of hundreds of millions of Americans by the NSA.

by Anonymousreply 1603/18/2014

Still no reply from the people who defended McCain and Feinstein?


by Anonymousreply 1703/19/2014

Waitress: Morning!

Man: Well, what've you got?

Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam;

Vikings: Spam spam spam spam...

Waitress: ...spam spam spam egg and spam; spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam spam...

Vikings: Spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam!

Waitress: ...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and spam.

Wife: Have you got anything without spam?

Waitress: Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.

Wife: I don't want ANY spam!

Man: Why can't she have egg bacon spam and sausage?

Wife: THAT'S got spam in it!

Man: Hasn't got as much spam in it as spam egg sausage and spam, has it?

Vikings: Spam spam spam spam... (Crescendo through next few lines...)

Wife: Could you do the egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam then?

Waitress: Urgghh!

Wife: What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like spam!

Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!

Waitress: Shut up!

Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!

Waitress: Shut up! (Vikings stop) Bloody Vikings! You can't have egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam.

Wife: I don't like spam!

Man: Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it. I'm having spam spam spam spam spam spam spam beaked beans spam spam spam and spam!

Vikings: Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!

Waitress: Shut up!! Baked beans are off.

Man: Well could I have her spam instead of the baked beans then?

Waitress: You mean spam spam spam spam spam spam... (but it is too late and the Vikings drown her words)

Vikings: (Singing elaborately...) Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam spam spam!

by Anonymousreply 1803/21/2014


Please give it up.

by Anonymousreply 1903/21/2014


Are you one of the people being paid by the CIA to post pro-government propaganda?

by Anonymousreply 2003/24/2014

Yes, R18-

Please come out, come out wherever you are...since you are obviously in DC.

You're just another government drone.

by Anonymousreply 2103/25/2014

Why aren't more people pissed about the NSA spying on every phone call, every email, every purchase?

Fucking sheep.

by Anonymousreply 2203/26/2014

[quote]Why aren't more people pissed about the NSA spying on every phone call, every email, every purchase?

What type of stuff are you buying that you feel a need to keep it a secret? Do you have a trunk filled with dildos?

Perhaps the non-pissed people have nothing to hide.

by Anonymousreply 2303/26/2014

I'm so PROUD of you!

by Anonymousreply 2403/26/2014

[quote]What type of stuff are you buying that you feel a need to keep it a secret? Do you have a trunk filled with dildos?

He's an expat living god-knows-where, so if I had to guess I'd say hundreds of gigs of kiddie porn.

by Anonymousreply 2503/26/2014

So, government officials shouldn't be spied on, but "the little people" are fair game.

by Anonymousreply 2605/29/2014

[quote] and a current SCOTUS justice

OMG! I hope it wasn't Mike Branson!

by Anonymousreply 2705/29/2014

OK, uh, why would the NSA need to spy on other politicians? Sorry if this is a foolish question, but why would the NSA waste their time to spy on all these different people when it would provide no intelliegence on any possible terrorism?

by Anonymousreply 2805/29/2014


by Anonymousreply 2905/29/2014


[quote]OK, uh, why would the NSA need to spy on other politicians?

The spying is NOT to "stop the bad guys and terrorists" but to keep anyone from revealing information that would expose the evil rot at the core of our government. That is why they spy on everyone.

[quote]Sorry if this is a foolish question, but why would the NSA waste their time to spy on all these different people when it would provide no intelliegence on any possible terrorism?

Since the internet has exposed how dangerous and sick and disturbed our government is, anyone who dissents is de facto an "enemy of the state" and must be monitored lest they expose even more evil behavior by the government.

by Anonymousreply 3005/29/2014
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!