Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Medical "ethics" is just another way of preventing advancement designed by the church

Agree or disagree.

All this oh you shouldn't experiment on a person whether alive or dead. Heck how the hell will the person feel it when they are dead? Why is everyone bent on not experimenting on human beings?

Discuss.

by Anonymousreply 606/21/2013

W to the T to the F ???

by Anonymousreply 106/21/2013

Um, no.

Medical ethics is based on four principles:

Respect for autonomy - the patient has the right to refuse or choose their treatment. (Voluntas aegroti suprema lex.)

Beneficence - a practitioner should act in the best interest of the patient. (Salus aegroti suprema lex.)

Non-maleficence - "first, do no harm" (primum non nocere).

Justice - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment (fairness and equality).

You probably need to understand the difference between medical ethics and bioethics: Bioethicists are concerned with the ethical questions that arise in the relationships among life sciences, biotechnology, medicine, politics, law, and philosophy. Bioethics, at its core, recognizes inherent conflicts between several disciplines and tries to reconcile conflicting interests.

by Anonymousreply 206/21/2013

Send in the clones.

by Anonymousreply 306/21/2013

Exactly what R2 said.

by Anonymousreply 406/21/2013

TWO threads about this? OP needs to get fucked.

by Anonymousreply 506/21/2013

I have no idea why anyone would have a problem with experiments on humans.

by Anonymousreply 606/21/2013
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.