Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Thomas Roberts, David Shuster Trade Twitter Jabs

David Shuster is a nasty little bitch. Take a look at this Twitter exchange:

by Anonymousreply 3105/23/2013

Who and who????

by Anonymousreply 105/21/2013

I saw this earlier and didn't understand why Shuster got so unhinged. Thomas Roberts was trying to cool things down but Shuster just got angrier.

by Anonymousreply 205/21/2013

Shuster must post on DL where people go from zero to 100 over [italic]nothing[/italic]. The kind of outsized outrage that clearly indicates mental problems.

Maybe he's a conflicted homosexual. He's seen the photos of Tom's fine cakes and knows he will never get to sample them.

by Anonymousreply 305/21/2013

I'm astonished how some relatively successful and intelligent people are so immature on Twitter. I've lost interest in quite a few people after reading the things they post.

My brother once told me that successful people are good at what they do; BUT outside of their profession, they're idiots just like the majority of people. I tend to agree.

My attorney friend is one such person. Very nice person, but quite oblivious. She couldn't carry a political discussion if her life depended on it.

by Anonymousreply 405/21/2013

[quote]He's seen the photos of Tom's fine cakes and knows he will never get to sample them.

Makes perfect sense to me.

by Anonymousreply 505/21/2013

It doesn't seem that Shuster can agree to disagree. It seems as if he has to win--and in trying to do so, he becomes rather mean.

by Anonymousreply 605/21/2013

Well, to be fair, Thomas did take a jab at Shuster's newest gig as radio host. That was a low shot.

by Anonymousreply 705/21/2013

Schuster was suspended by MSNBC for saying that Hillary was "pimping out" Chelsea during the 2008 primary campaign. He was let go soon after that. There are plenty of plain Janes and Joes on MSNBC, but Schuster seems to be implying that Roberts has his show solely because of his looks, since he has no head for political discourse. What a pity party.

by Anonymousreply 805/21/2013

What? Gay man taking a low shot? Like that has never happened before.

by Anonymousreply 905/21/2013

Is it Roberts fault if Schuster has a face made for radio, r7?

by Anonymousreply 1005/21/2013

Thomas Roberts is not attractive

by Anonymousreply 1105/21/2013

He is when compared to David Schuster.

by Anonymousreply 1205/21/2013

r8 if you want me to be honest, I think MSNBC got rid of Shuster because he was so closely aligned with Keith Olbermann. Phil Griffin hated/hates Keith. Perhaps he wanted to be rid of the Olbermann legacy, and that included DS. Sure enough, after Olbermann went to Current, David became his chief go-to man. He even subbed for KO.

by Anonymousreply 1305/21/2013

R11, and who is your modeling agency? Instagram?

by Anonymousreply 1405/21/2013

They fired David Shuster because he went and filmed some test footage for a potential show on CNN while he was still under contract to MSNBC.

by Anonymousreply 1505/21/2013

[quote] to be fair, Thomas did take a jab at Shuster's newest gig as radio host.

That was only after Shuster called him idiotic and said he should leave politics to others "who know the basics". Shuster took the low road first. And a jab over a radio gig pales next to calling a colleague an idiot.

by Anonymousreply 1605/21/2013

I like Shuster even more...thanks OP

by Anonymousreply 1705/21/2013

[quote]It seems as if he has to win--and in trying to do so, he becomes rather mean.

BREAKING NEWS - People who choose careers in journalism are frequently sociopaths.

by Anonymousreply 1805/21/2013

Girls! Girls! You're both chunky.

by Anonymousreply 1905/21/2013

[quote] but Schuster seems to be implying that Roberts has his show solely because of his looks

Truth hurts.

by Anonymousreply 2005/21/2013

They are both narcissistic douchebags.

by Anonymousreply 2105/21/2013

r18 - people who want to be on TV, maybe. All journalists, no.

by Anonymousreply 2205/21/2013

Someone on TV got their job because of the way they look?

Someone -- please -- pick me up off the floor!

by Anonymousreply 2305/21/2013

Oh, R22. How naive you are. Because print journalists have never committed plagiarism or fabricated story elements or even entire stories? Yes, they're paragons of virtue compared to all those other smug, muckraking reporters.

by Anonymousreply 2405/21/2013

Can you trust anyone who trades their soul to tow the party line on Fox news? Yea, Shuster is a douchebag.

by Anonymousreply 2505/21/2013

Keith Olberman = Regina George

David Shuster = Gretchen Weiners

Thomas Roberts = Damian

Rachel Maddow = Janis Ian

by Anonymousreply 2605/21/2013

Miss Shuster is a big raging CUNT.

by Anonymousreply 2705/22/2013

Shuster is still convinced that Karl Rove will, in fact, be indicted within the next few days.

by Anonymousreply 2805/22/2013

Shuster sounds like he has a very large stick up his ass...

the jealousy stick! It kills him that his ugly mug isn't on TV any more.

by Anonymousreply 2905/22/2013

any more back and forth?

by Anonymousreply 3005/22/2013

Girls! Girls! You're both prissy cunts!

by Anonymousreply 3105/23/2013
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.