David Shuster is a nasty little bitch. Take a look at this Twitter exchange:
Thomas Roberts, David Shuster Trade Twitter Jabs
|by Anonymous||reply 31||05/23/2013|
Who and who????
|by Anonymous||reply 1||05/21/2013|
I saw this earlier and didn't understand why Shuster got so unhinged. Thomas Roberts was trying to cool things down but Shuster just got angrier.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||05/21/2013|
Shuster must post on DL where people go from zero to 100 over [italic]nothing[/italic]. The kind of outsized outrage that clearly indicates mental problems.
Maybe he's a conflicted homosexual. He's seen the photos of Tom's fine cakes and knows he will never get to sample them.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||05/21/2013|
I'm astonished how some relatively successful and intelligent people are so immature on Twitter. I've lost interest in quite a few people after reading the things they post.
My brother once told me that successful people are good at what they do; BUT outside of their profession, they're idiots just like the majority of people. I tend to agree.
My attorney friend is one such person. Very nice person, but quite oblivious. She couldn't carry a political discussion if her life depended on it.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||05/21/2013|
[quote]He's seen the photos of Tom's fine cakes and knows he will never get to sample them.
Makes perfect sense to me.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||05/21/2013|
It doesn't seem that Shuster can agree to disagree. It seems as if he has to win--and in trying to do so, he becomes rather mean.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||05/21/2013|
Well, to be fair, Thomas did take a jab at Shuster's newest gig as radio host. That was a low shot.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||05/21/2013|
Schuster was suspended by MSNBC for saying that Hillary was "pimping out" Chelsea during the 2008 primary campaign. He was let go soon after that. There are plenty of plain Janes and Joes on MSNBC, but Schuster seems to be implying that Roberts has his show solely because of his looks, since he has no head for political discourse. What a pity party.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||05/21/2013|
What? Gay man taking a low shot? Like that has never happened before.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||05/21/2013|
Is it Roberts fault if Schuster has a face made for radio, r7?
|by Anonymous||reply 10||05/21/2013|
Thomas Roberts is not attractive
|by Anonymous||reply 11||05/21/2013|
He is when compared to David Schuster.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||05/21/2013|
r8 if you want me to be honest, I think MSNBC got rid of Shuster because he was so closely aligned with Keith Olbermann. Phil Griffin hated/hates Keith. Perhaps he wanted to be rid of the Olbermann legacy, and that included DS. Sure enough, after Olbermann went to Current, David became his chief go-to man. He even subbed for KO.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||05/21/2013|
R11, and who is your modeling agency? Instagram?
|by Anonymous||reply 14||05/21/2013|
They fired David Shuster because he went and filmed some test footage for a potential show on CNN while he was still under contract to MSNBC.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||05/21/2013|
[quote] to be fair, Thomas did take a jab at Shuster's newest gig as radio host.
That was only after Shuster called him idiotic and said he should leave politics to others "who know the basics". Shuster took the low road first. And a jab over a radio gig pales next to calling a colleague an idiot.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||05/21/2013|
I like Shuster even more...thanks OP
|by Anonymous||reply 17||05/21/2013|
[quote]It seems as if he has to win--and in trying to do so, he becomes rather mean.
BREAKING NEWS - People who choose careers in journalism are frequently sociopaths.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||05/21/2013|
Girls! Girls! You're both chunky.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||05/21/2013|
[quote] but Schuster seems to be implying that Roberts has his show solely because of his looks
|by Anonymous||reply 20||05/21/2013|
They are both narcissistic douchebags.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||05/21/2013|
r18 - people who want to be on TV, maybe. All journalists, no.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||05/21/2013|
Someone on TV got their job because of the way they look?
Someone -- please -- pick me up off the floor!
|by Anonymous||reply 23||05/21/2013|
Oh, R22. How naive you are. Because print journalists have never committed plagiarism or fabricated story elements or even entire stories? Yes, they're paragons of virtue compared to all those other smug, muckraking reporters.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||05/21/2013|
Can you trust anyone who trades their soul to tow the party line on Fox news? Yea, Shuster is a douchebag.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||05/21/2013|
Keith Olberman = Regina George
David Shuster = Gretchen Weiners
Thomas Roberts = Damian
Rachel Maddow = Janis Ian
|by Anonymous||reply 26||05/21/2013|
Miss Shuster is a big raging CUNT.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||05/22/2013|
Shuster is still convinced that Karl Rove will, in fact, be indicted within the next few days.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||05/22/2013|
Shuster sounds like he has a very large stick up his ass...
the jealousy stick! It kills him that his ugly mug isn't on TV any more.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||05/22/2013|
any more back and forth?
|by Anonymous||reply 30||05/22/2013|
Girls! Girls! You're both prissy cunts!
|by Anonymous||reply 31||05/23/2013|