Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Now that Congress has repealed the 22nd Ammendment, will you vote for President Obama in 2016?

I plan to, unless something really drastic happens, which I doubt.

by Anonymousreply 2005/21/2013

Congress can't repeal an amendment alone.

by Anonymousreply 105/19/2013

OP, please read the Constitution you are attempting to use for a weak-and-trolly thread before posting. Otherwise your stupidity is more apparent than even the chimp you are likely wishes.

by Anonymousreply 205/19/2013

It's always hilarious when freeper trolls try to pass themselves off as liberals. They always get it dead wrong.

by Anonymousreply 305/19/2013

Why would the cuckoo-laden House of Representatives go along with such a scheme? OP must think Congress is controlled by Democrats.

by Anonymousreply 405/19/2013

IF the amendment were repealed, and IF Obama were to run for a third term, and IF he won the primaries, then YES, I'd vote for him without hesitation.

by Anonymousreply 505/19/2013

What? Is this supposed to be funny? IS IT?

by Anonymousreply 605/19/2013

Umm.. I'm pretty sure that I'm in line for a third term before Barack.

by Anonymousreply 705/19/2013

That was our demonstration for tonight, youngsters, "How to make DL'ers mad and huffy in a couple of short keystrokes." hee-hee

by Anonymousreply 805/20/2013

This is like when Howard Stern's goon staff asks people on the street about a news story that didn't really happen (and usually couldn't really happen) just to get a rise out of them and make people reveal their foolishness.

by Anonymousreply 905/20/2013

Like Judge Judy being nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court. I used that one a few times too.

by Anonymousreply 1005/20/2013

If Obama would become more FDR-like, yes.

by Anonymousreply 1105/20/2013

Golly, yeah OP. I'm just going to keep on voting for him until Malia is old enough to take office.

Thanks for sharing this great news!

by Anonymousreply 1205/20/2013

OP they will find you in a field in your underwear.

by Anonymousreply 1305/20/2013

They would exclude any sitting president from a repeal of the 22nd Amendment to prove that it was not done to extend his or her presidency.

The reverse was done when the 22nd Amendment was added to the Constitution. The then-current President Truman was given the right to run for a third term as it had been his right to do so when he was inaugurated in 1949.

Obama will not be allowed to run again under any circumstances.

by Anonymousreply 1405/20/2013

Not if there is a progressive alternative.

by Anonymousreply 1505/20/2013

But consider this angle, sports fans. Do you think Barack is simply going to depart in January 2017 and work on his library? He will only be 56 years old, the absolute prime age for running for President. And he'll have 4 years to get the repeal passed in 3/4 states.

by Anonymousreply 1605/21/2013

[quote]Like Judge Judy being nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court. I used that one a few times too.

That sounds like a good rumor to get people riled up.

by Anonymousreply 1705/21/2013

Eh, I'd prefer Judge Judy to Judge Antonin.

by Anonymousreply 1805/21/2013

If that happened, then I could prove once and for all that he is a Stealth Republican. They need their yes-boy in there so Hillary can't ever win.

Hasn't he done everything the Neocons and the Illuminati wanted him to?

by Anonymousreply 1905/21/2013


by Anonymousreply 2005/21/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!