I don't believe it was due to alien visitors from outer space or the influence of God on natural creativity.
DL Scientists, Why do some cultures develop far superior architecture, styles of dance, music, art, etc?
|by Anonymous||reply 24||05/10/2013|
Its related to how much and what kind of contact one culture has with another. The more contact the more likely they are going to advance. The more isolated a civilization or culture, the less likely it is going to advance beyond what it needs to simply survive. Also the idea that something like ones dance or music or art is superior over others is subjective.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||05/08/2013|
Civilization in locations where natural resources like animals that could be domesticated and crops that could be grown in large quantities produced enough surplus food that many workers were able to focus on other, specialized crafts and trades. Once discovered, these agricultural techniques spread, but only to nearby places with similar climate.
Populations in locations that did not have such animals or the right climate to grow grains remained hunter-gatherer societies where all of the group's work had to go to getting enough food to survive. Groups that were isolated from innovation elsewhere were also held back.
The longer a society was rich enough to dedicate labor to the arts, the more these arts flourished.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||05/08/2013|
"Far superior" in art by what standard?
Why do Andy Wharhol's traced Campbell's soup can images command millions of dollars vs. the original output of many thousands of artists and craftspeople?
|by Anonymous||reply 3||05/08/2013|
R3, I was originally thinking of the ancient work done in Maachu Picchu (sp) that was debunked as the result of "alien visitors" re the History Channel's programming.
Of course money does not equal talent or superiority of skill.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||05/08/2013|
According to ancient astronaut theorists...
|by Anonymous||reply 5||05/08/2013|
Materials OP. Most of the ancient world built in perishable materials so their shit didn't last.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||05/09/2013|
Even better R5, "most leading ancient astronaut theorists now believe...."
|by Anonymous||reply 7||05/09/2013|
They were building houses with built-in furniture in the north of Scotland 5,500 years ago, some of the villages and settlements still remain. Nobody thought that was aliens. Maybe that's because there's a strong tradition of respect for education there, very few people who believe the earth is 6000 years old.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||05/09/2013|
Or R7, "Is it possible that...? I think so!"
|by Anonymous||reply 9||05/09/2013|
The luck of Pangaea?
|by Anonymous||reply 10||05/09/2013|
Also necessity - you don't need a stone shelter to protect you from the cold if you live in a moderate climate.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||05/09/2013|
Societies which promote individuality always do well with creativity.
Societies who promote conformity don't do well.
Both types have music, art and dance.
America has become very conformist in the last 15 years. Hence Taylor Swift, Reality TV etc.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||05/09/2013|
America was more conformist fifteen years ago than it is now R12. Try again.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||05/09/2013|
The question is who measures the superiority of culture? Judging by DL, the standards are highly subjective and often perverse.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||05/09/2013|
Do you have a link about that, R8?
(I don't disbelieve you, I just find it interesting.)
|by Anonymous||reply 15||05/10/2013|
The PC cultural relavtivists always get pissy when cultures get evaluated. Then they start lying about proportion (or pretending there's no such thing).
|by Anonymous||reply 16||05/10/2013|
OK, so how come some societies are more militaristic? It can't just be about scarce resources.
Again I acknowledge that I should have chosen another word other than "superior." Would "advanced" have been better for what I was trying to convey?
|by Anonymous||reply 17||05/10/2013|
Leadership can form culture. Hitler had terrible taste in art, good artists were driven away and bad art became popular.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||05/10/2013|
r18, you realize claiming your idea of art is "good" and someone else's is "bad" is totally arbitrary, right?
|by Anonymous||reply 19||05/10/2013|
I follow a Greek Art and Architecture page on facebook and am constantly stunned by how even the failed concrete monstrosities lingering unfinished due to the current economic collapse are SO COOL. And things like Santorini and the Meteora monasteries aren't even really put out there as "Greek's contribution to architecture." That is just stuff that happened when they were not really trying.
I am going to have to just throw out the idea that when it comes to architecture, location is key.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||05/10/2013|
Ironically, R18, Hitler was an artist himself. A mediocre one, unfortunately. Had he been more skilled, world history might have turned out differently.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||05/10/2013|
R19, yes I do. Let's pretend for a minute that you had to choose either "Mob Wives" or "The Godfather" as an enduring representation of our artistic abilities. Because it is subjective, is its quality or value impossible to measure?
|by Anonymous||reply 22||05/10/2013|
R15. There's too many to link to, but you could start with Googling Skara Brae. There's also Knap of Howar, Barnhouse Settlement, Maeshowe, Broch of Mousa, lots of places - there's a list of the worlds oldest buildings on Wikipedia.
All these places predate the pyramids. I used to think the most ancient buildings were all around the Mediterranean but turns out the oldest are in Northern Europe.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||05/10/2013|
R23, The things that you can learn on DL are truly "amazing." (What a trite word that has become today IMHO.) Now why do you think that ancient society developed such a sophisticated form of architecture? Alien super-beings from outer space? LOL
|by Anonymous||reply 24||05/10/2013|