Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

NYT: Learning to (Re)Love Tom Cruise

How odd that our shiniest celebrity, the man whose image once flashed most easily into our heads when we thought of the words “movie star,” a man who, throughout his career, has grappled with all sorts of questions of privacy and secrecy and image control and damage control, has somehow emerged at this late date as the movie world’s most unlikely symbol of old-fashioned authenticity...

By the time the young Cruise pervaded our consciousness in “Risky Business” in 1983, he seemed already too famous, too swoon-inducing to even go to the shopping mall unmolested. By the time he was entangled with Kelly McGillis in “Top Gun” in 1986, he was on full celebrity-lockdown. He seemed to live entirely behind the golden gates of Hollywood. Go ahead, try to picture in your mind’s eye Tom Cruise in a normal environment of any kind, anywhere, doing anything normal. For that matter, try to imagine him not smiling.

So the fog of secrecy that has always surrounded him came to seem natural, even inevitable. He’s so weird, right? Remember that jumping on the couch? It seemed like he was being coached by a publicist on how to act like a human in love. Or have you heard that he may interview prospective wives in his living room? (Though how would you date if you were Tom Cruise? JDate?) Maybe he wears lifts. Maybe he has Xenu on speed dial. Though let me suggest that if we’re not insisting that Mel Gibson show up to award shows muzzled and restrained to a dolly, Hannibal Lecter-style, then perhaps we should just give Cruise some peace for his religious beliefs...

By all accounts, he is the hardest-working megastar in the business. A man who seems to understand that for the ridiculous rate of compensation he receives, he’ll do anything that’s asked of him: the smallest talk show, the hardest stunt, the most intense run. Hard work equals success equals hard work in a loop forever. Authenticity equals value. These colors don’t run. Tom Cruise runs. You get my point.

And sure, not all of the films will be bull’s-eyes. But taken together, they prove we still need him. We need Tom Cruise!

(more at link)

by Anonymousreply 1404/20/2013

I didn't think the NYT was pro-Scientology. Who knew?

Check yet another way in which the NYT has turned against the gay community.

(Scientology still promotes a cure for homosexuality).

by Anonymousreply 104/19/2013

Still won't pay to see his new "film".

Won't even watch it on a torrent for nothing.

And doesn't the Smith creature have a new "film" coming out soon? - same as above...

by Anonymousreply 204/19/2013

There is too much information spilling out about human exploitation -actual slavery, and abduction - from inside the CoS for this article to be anything less than specious. RIP NY Times

by Anonymousreply 304/19/2013

Tom is too old.

by Anonymousreply 404/19/2013

Fuck that shit. He's an asshole.

by Anonymousreply 504/19/2013

This is very weird. Imdb published a rare editorial about how irresistable Cruise is just the other day. I'm just surprised his pr is so obvious and has talons deep into the NYT.

by Anonymousreply 604/19/2013

No. He needs to disappear.

by Anonymousreply 704/19/2013

I wonder just how much he pays his PR people to get something like that in the NYT???

by Anonymousreply 804/19/2013

Makes a nice contract to the review of his new film today in the NY Times which basically states that he is washed up.

by Anonymousreply 904/19/2013

I really enjoyed "Jack Reacher", and "MI4:Ghost Protocol". So sue me.

by Anonymousreply 1004/19/2013

The New York Times is a 1 percenter rag from a bygone era.

by Anonymousreply 1104/20/2013

I can't watch a Tom Cruise movie because

1. he is a one-note actor, like Denzel Washington.

2. I can't help but think, their is that crazy motherfucker Tom Cruise trying to act like someone else.

by Anonymousreply 1204/20/2013

I find it hard to take seriously an article written by someone named "Taffy".

by Anonymousreply 1304/20/2013

Tom is damaged goods and I can't stand to watch him anymore.

by Anonymousreply 1404/20/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!