Ann Coulter on the Newton Tragedy: 'I Have Never Seen People Enjoying their Children's Death So Much'
Ann Coulter writes of the parents of children killed in Newton
These parents are lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzies. I have never seen people enjoying their children's death so much.
To speak out using the fact they are parents of killed children. This is the left’s doctrine of infallibility. If they have a point to make about gun control, about how to handle school violence, how about sending in somebody we are allowed to respond to. No. No. No. We have to respond to someone who had a family member die. Because then if we respond, oh you are questioning their authenticity.
Don’t use the fact that you lost a child as the basis for being able to talk about, while preventing people from responding. Let Joe Biden make the point. Let Bill Clinton make the point. Don’t put up someone I am not allowed to respond to without questioning the authenticity of their grief.
That is the point of liberal infallibility. Of putting up these Newton parents, of putting out these mothers, of putting out fathers. No, no, no. You can’t respond. It’s their doctrine of infallibility. Have someone else make the argument then.
|by Anonymous||reply 102||12/15/2014|
I hate her, but she's right on this.
WEHT the "Let's pretend we're a high school shooting tragedy" thread.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||03/22/2013|
Yeah, I generally loathe her too, but I agree with her on this.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||03/22/2013|
This is just like when she cunted all over the 9/11 widows. She simply cannot stand it when anyone gets more attention than her.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||03/22/2013|
She's been enjoying her brain's death for years.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||03/22/2013|
This had a bigger effect when she said it after 9/11. Just like the inappropriately long for a 50 year old woman' hairstyle, she'll never change.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||03/22/2013|
Some will erase this woman.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||03/22/2013|
Can she mention "liberal infallibility' one more time? Um...conservatives use the same "strategy" all the time. Ann is such an absolute delight though I just have to overlook the double standard.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||03/22/2013|
She must have another book coming out.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||03/22/2013|
What is her point? Why can't people with an opposing point of view respond to the parents?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||03/22/2013|
Translation: Stop hogging the camera, bitches! The camera and attention should be on me, me alone!
|by Anonymous||reply 12||03/22/2013|
How can you agree with her on this? She is advocating that people who want something harmful (more guns, anti-gay legislation) should be able to debate it with people not affected by it?
Are you serious? No, if you want to discuss gun control, if you want to discuss outlawing abortion or taking away gay peoples civil rights then you need to own up and face the people who your ideology harms.
It's like 'we want to promote an ideology but don't want to see the KNOWN consequences'.
Everybody who agrees with her can fuck off.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||03/22/2013|
It's the same ideology as "We support the war, but we don't want to be made uncomfortable by seeing the pictures of our soldiers coming back in body bags."
|by Anonymous||reply 14||03/22/2013|
She says she can't respond to the parents about political issues because it would question the "authenticity of their grief," yet here she explicitly questions their grief in the most insulting way possible - claiming that they enjoy their children's deaths. Just another example of Republican "logic."
|by Anonymous||reply 16||03/22/2013|
Who told Miss Cray-cray she wasn't allowed to respond?? She did respond, using her oversized megaphone which few people enjoy. What is it with these right wing freaks always screaming about not having rights? They're such a bunch of delusional babies.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||03/22/2013|
Her basic message is she doesn't care that children get shot and killed. She wants what she wants and she will steamroller anyone who tries to prevent her from getting it.
She's a perfect token blonde spokeswoman for Bibi Netanyahu and Ehud Barak and all the other Likudniks whose world-view she is paid to disseminate.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||03/22/2013|
Ignore the bitch and she'll go away.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||03/22/2013|
Didn't they say that about HITLER, R19?
Actually, silence = implicit agreement.
Dear Abbey was right about that.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||03/22/2013|
Actually it's silence = tacit consent. If Abby said it the other way she was wrong.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||03/22/2013|
R20, she's no Hitler.
She's a washed up old slag who at least did the world a favor by not reproducing.
There's nothing unique about her. She's a dime a dozen: Loudmouth, rightwing idiot.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||03/22/2013|
R20 I don't know - I wasn't alive in 1939.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||03/22/2013|
On this issue, Ann is correct.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||03/22/2013|
Anyone agreeing with Ann is as sick as she is. How on earth are they enjoying their children's death???
|by Anonymous||reply 26||03/22/2013|
I'm curious, if MIchelle Shocked had said it, would it be ok? Because the double standard is ridiculous sometimes. Michelle Shocked says blatantly, can't possibly be misinterpreted, anti gay shit and many people excuse her because maybe she's mentally ill oh and some think it's cool that she is honest about it..Meanwhile this actually makes sense, somewhat, but since Coulter says it she is a cunt, etc.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||03/22/2013|
She is not correct. "Have someone else make the arguement for them" is hysterical, given that the NRA are the biggest bunch of fucking cowards out there.
Nothing has stopped the head of the NRA from going down there and debating with these parents on gun control. They have been free to go down there and talk to them at anytime in the last few months.
Instead, they release a statement to the news organizations.
How many times has the head of the NRA come out of his office to meet with the victims of these tragedies and tell them why gun control is a bad idea? Oh, right. NONE.
For an organization so tyrannical and stringent in their opinions, what are they so afraid of?
|by Anonymous||reply 28||03/22/2013|
[quote]Can somebody get r18 into therapy?
(Just make sure it's not a Jewish therapist - baby steps, you know?)
|by Anonymous||reply 30||03/22/2013|
You sick fucks. If the cunt had a point, she should point out that the Right screamed throughout the Iraq War that challenging the war was tantamount to treason.
Victims of crime have every right to advocate against the causes of such crimes.
She's not correct, and I question both the intelligence and sanity of anyone who believes she is.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||03/22/2013|
Where the fuck are these parents? I haven't seen them. If they're using this to advocate for gun control, then GOOD! Tough shit for this useless rancid bitch that she has to look at people whose children were riddled with bullets.
This revolting cunt has nerve talking about others being out there for attention. This asshole has been trying to hang onto relevance for 20 years.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||03/22/2013|
It must be time for her to release a new book.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||03/22/2013|
I see the disease is working its way upward from her pussy to her brain.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||03/22/2013|
I don't usually wish physical harm on anyone, but if someone were to smash this bitch in the mouth with a brick I wouldn't shed a tear.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||03/22/2013|
This thing is a skank. Just ignore it.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||03/22/2013|
R20, nobody wants to waste time and energy playing defense against Coultergeist. It's simply draining, and we have work to do.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||03/22/2013|
"Meanwhile this actually makes sense, somewhat,"
No, it does not.
It makes no sense.
Perhaps you two are retarded soul mates?
|by Anonymous||reply 38||03/22/2013|
Nice throwing around the word retarded r28, class act. I mean the Newtown kids need to stop being exploited with choirs and superbowl sings, etc. But I don't need to prove anything to you, when people throw around the word retarded as a derogatory term they speak for themselves, Keep being angry about this though. Hypocrite.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||03/22/2013|
oops I meant r38, but I'm retarded so you will excuse me.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||03/22/2013|
On the other side, the NRA and gun manufacturers and sellers LOVE a violent tragedy because it provides them with a rush of gun and ammo sales.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||03/22/2013|
The maxim is "Qui tacet consentire"
|by Anonymous||reply 42||03/22/2013|
Wow. Who knew Ann's soul mate was such a sensitive flower.
You don't like grieving families...you don't like people calling you retarded....
Why are you so controlling?
|by Anonymous||reply 43||03/22/2013|
So Ann, what is stopping anyone from saying to the parent, "I am horrified about what happened to your child, but here is why your proposed law won't work..."?
|by Anonymous||reply 44||03/22/2013|
She's an idiotic cunt.
If you "agree with her on this" then so are you.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||03/22/2013|
FUck off r43. I don't like the word retarded being thrown around as a pejorative and you know I am right. If you do think it's ok then you're probably more like Anne than I am.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||03/22/2013|
So "fuck off" is fine, but "retarded" is not...on a board where cunt is ubiquitous.
Yeah, you have issues...
|by Anonymous||reply 47||03/22/2013|
You sir or madame, are correct. R47
|by Anonymous||reply 48||03/22/2013|
I hope r43 does not go on an anti-violence shooting spree.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||03/22/2013|
Don't split hairs, R21.
It's one of your least attractive qualities.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||03/22/2013|
She could team up with Fred Phelps. I'm surprised she didn't show up to insult families at their kids' funerals.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||03/22/2013|
So let me get this straight -- some you seem to think that victims of crimes are not allowed to speak out and advocate. That, being a victim, they then lose their voice.
How far do we take this? Do people with HIV no longer have the right to speak out about health care? Do cancer victims no longer get to lobby for funds for research?
Are you people COMPLETE idiots??
|by Anonymous||reply 53||03/22/2013|
She's not right about this or about anything else. I can't believe some of you bitches are agreeing with her.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||03/22/2013|
What can I say, she's the world's meanest drunk.
|by Anonymous||reply 55||03/22/2013|
Why doesn't someone just shoot the bitch?
|by Anonymous||reply 56||03/22/2013|
[quote]Why doesn't someone just shoot the bitch?
A GOOD person with a gun.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||03/22/2013|
She is one of a select group of people on earth for whom the pejorative "cunt" simply isn't powerful enough.
|by Anonymous||reply 58||03/22/2013|
The thing about ignoring Ann is that she takes silence as agreement with her position -- which is convenient for her, because she also takes arguing with her as agreement with her position, and goes around saying liberals hate her because they know she's right. Well, the appropriate reaction, then, is (forgive the reference) hissssss, no? If every time a thinking person saw Ann, they just hissed, she'd eventually get the message... ok, maybe not, she's not the brightest bulb in the box. But it would drive her crazy. And that would be a good thing.
No one enjoys a tragedy more than Ann.
|by Anonymous||reply 59||03/22/2013|
No, r59. She's an attention whore. She couldn't get work in porn so she became a right wing pundit.
The worst thing you can do to her is ignore her.
|by Anonymous||reply 60||03/22/2013|
"Her" penis was too small for porn, R60.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||03/22/2013|
Wonder what she is going to say about the Obama press conference today, with parents of children murdered by guns.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||03/28/2013|
She plans to rip up those green ribbons if she ever gets sent one.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||04/10/2013|
I have to agree with this.
Some of the Newtown families have become the new 9/11 widows.
The sister of the young teacher murdered was on CNN the other say with Wolf Blitzer and most of the interview was her talking about meeting all the Senators in their offices and her trip on Air Force One and how incredible it was, etc.
|by Anonymous||reply 64||04/10/2013|
Nothing the Newtown parents are doing now compares with how vile, cruel and heartless the gun lovers have been towards them and everyone who thinks there should be tighter restrictions, Coulter needs to STFU.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||04/10/2013|
According to Annie, if you are a holocaust survivor, you are not allowed to talk about it?
|by Anonymous||reply 66||04/10/2013|
[quote]Some of the Newtown families have become the new 9/11 widows.
The nerve of those uppity widows to demand a federal investigation into the events of 9/11!
Don't they know US citizens are supposed to lay down and die for the Neo-cons to get their war on, no questions asked?
|by Anonymous||reply 67||04/10/2013|
I hate this bitch with a dick stuck in her mouth. Ugly cunt needs some adult education.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||04/10/2013|
"Have someone else make the argument for them"
Oh, so now Ann Cooter is the arbiter of who may have an opinion on gun violence? And it's not the families of people who have been killed by guns? Anybody else can have an opinion, sure. But not parents of machine gunned kids.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||04/10/2013|
Ann Coulter, stamping feet:
No, no, no, no, no!
I said, not faiiir!
Because I SAID SO! !
|by Anonymous||reply 70||04/10/2013|
She used the same line about the 9/11 widows … really, Ann, I know you'll say just about ANYTHING to get your horse-face in a newspaper, but could you update your schtick just a little?
|by Anonymous||reply 71||04/10/2013|
They have every right and every reason to advocate for gun control. She's not right, not even a little.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||04/10/2013|
R4 is correct, this is just Ann recycling something that garnered her the attention she craves.
She got coverage for insulting and denigrating 9/11 widows, she's getting it for insulting and denigrating Sandy Hook parents.
She's a rancid cunt and anyone who says "oh she's right about this" is also a rancid cunt. She's wrong about this, just as she's wrong about everything else.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||04/10/2013|
She's the only one in all of this that refuses. to. go. the. fuck. away.
How anyone can listen to this slimeball talk about others essentially overstaying their welcome is laughable.
She's a tired turd who needed to be off the radar years ago.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||04/10/2013|
Link, r65? She's absolutely correct. The gun rights advocates are the real nuts. If you hate our country so much then move somewhere else. If you were in front of me I'd blow your fucking head off.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||04/10/2013|
She is like the Westboro Baptist Church, all show. She says controversial things, gets her name out there, gets harassed by her detractors and then she cries that she is a victim of the hateful left.
It's all showbiz. She is a fame whore. And suffering from an intense narcissistic personality disorder, sacrificing dignity for publicity.
|by Anonymous||reply 77||04/10/2013|
R75? was your post meant to disprove R65? Oh yeah, you're sane, loser.
Fucking gun nut. You're a psychotic moron. It'll be a good day when someone else comes along to blow your fucking head off, but I'm sure you're Rambo, idiot.
BTW, turd, the families were heckled by low life animals LIKE YOU. You have google. Look for the link yourself, fuckface.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||04/10/2013|
She sounds like my ex, who broke up with me over the phone one week after I got laid off my job; then got upset with me the next day when I went over to get my stuff and return his key. He got pissed because I didn't cry or ask him why he didn't love me any more.
Like my ex, Ann wants to piss on someone else's feelings, then get absolution from the wounded party. God forbid she should feel bad for doing a bad thing in a cruel way.
It is possible to argue against gun control without saying hurtful things about victims of gun violence.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||04/10/2013|
I would enjoy Ann Coulter's death so much more.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||04/10/2013|
Ann Coulter: Liberals go crazy for the mentally ill
The victims of gun violence are the left's latest "human shields" — a term coined by me in "Godless: The Church of Liberalism" — for their idiotic ideas. At least it's not the godawful Jersey Girls this time.
The one clear thread that unites all the mass murders currently being exploited by the Democrats is that they were committed by visibly crazy people who were unaccountably not institutionalized. But Democrats refuse to do anything about crazy people. Apparently, the views of families with relatives murdered by severely disturbed individuals are no longer relevant when it comes to institutionalizing the mentally ill.
If liberals had a decent argument for taking guns away from the law-abiding while doing nothing to prevent schizophrenics from getting guns, they'd make it.
Manifestly, they don't, so they send out victims to make the argument for them, knowing no one will argue with a person whose child has just been murdered.
This allows liberals to act as if Republicans' only counter-argument to their idiotic gun control proposals is: We don't mind dead children.
The truth is the opposite. Republicans are pushing policies that will reduce gun violence; Democrats are pushing policies that will increase gun violence.
The Democrats' argument for doing absolutely nothing about the dangerously mentally ill, while disarming crime-preventing armed citizens is: Tell it to this weeping mother.
If the Democrats' "gun safety" bill passes, there'll be plenty more weeping mothers to tell it to.
|by Anonymous||reply 81||04/15/2013|
[quote]visibly crazy people who were unaccountably not institutionalized
Fuck this bitch. Her god Reagan and his acolytes have slashed at mental health funding for decades.
|by Anonymous||reply 82||04/15/2013|
I wonder if Ann will accuse the families of those killed at the Boston Marathon of enjoying their loved ones' deaths.
|by Anonymous||reply 83||04/16/2013|
This bitch deserves to have someone walk right up to her and punt her in the cunt.
|by Anonymous||reply 84||04/16/2013|
I'd like to see her tell grieving parents and widows to their faces how much she thinks they're enjoying their loved ones' deaths. But I don't think she'd have the guts.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||04/16/2013|
A while back one of the 9/11 widows gave her a letter at a book signing. Coulter ripped it up in her face.
|by Anonymous||reply 86||04/16/2013|
Coulter is protecting the real perpetrators of 9/11.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||04/16/2013|
She's the epitome of the heartless, self-absorbed white bitch.
|by Anonymous||reply 88||04/16/2013|
The world would be a lot better if she had never existence. We don't need this kind of hate speech.
Polemic people don't care about anything or anyone. They're bomb throwers. Everything that comes out of their mouths is intended to shock people. She's been around for almost 2 decades now and I think that the shock has worn out. I'm no longer amused. No longer enraged.
|by Anonymous||reply 89||04/16/2013|
She must feel pretty smug right now
|by Anonymous||reply 90||04/17/2013|
Somebody should shooter in the cooter.
|by Anonymous||reply 91||04/17/2013|
Her books are bought by right wing organizations and then disposed of. They only buy the books so each book will go to number one on the best seller list,then dump them. Even they don't read her books.
|by Anonymous||reply 92||04/17/2013|
Back when there were bookstores to go to, I used to turn hers over so people couldn't see the cover. Same with Sandra Lee.
|by Anonymous||reply 93||04/17/2013|
Ann Coulter: Gun Control Will "Lead To More Dead Kids"
"Democrats will exploit and play with" the Newtown victims
|by Anonymous||reply 94||04/18/2013|
I honestly don't think she believes half of what she says.
|by Anonymous||reply 95||04/18/2013|
Sandy Hook anniversary coming up
|by Anonymous||reply 96||12/08/2014|
R95 She doesn't. She's just trying to sell books and make money. Most of the Fox "personalities" don't believe a single thing they're saying, but they know there are lots of people out there who will believe them and happily give up their money.
|by Anonymous||reply 98||12/08/2014|
IS there any lower she can go?
|by Anonymous||reply 99||12/12/2014|
Ann Coulter “demand that we listen to them out of pity,” when they should just “take their money and shut up about it.”
|by Anonymous||reply 101||12/15/2014|
Do you ever wonder why Ann isn't dead? I see her name and I think of her ugly face...then I wonder why someone doesn't just step on the roach?
|by Anonymous||reply 102||12/15/2014|