Did they actually leak onto the web? Is that how Anonymous found out? I saw that Instagram pic of them holding the drunk girl by the arms and legs at the party. I just read the text message transcripts from the trial. I can't believe this is the first I'm hearing about the case.
Steubenville Rape Case Photos
|by Anonymous||reply 68||03/22/2013|
Yeah, but did they RAPE her? Really? They fingered her. This was called "3rd base" in my day when Eisenhower was president. Has it changed?
And get the fuck off my lawn!
|by Anonymous||reply 1||03/17/2013|
I think one of them came on her chest, and one may have urinated on her.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||03/17/2013|
But did they rape her? Cumming on her is not rape.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||03/17/2013|
Digital penetration, which was filmed, is rape.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||03/18/2013|
R1 is truly a moron.
Yes, unwanted digital penetration is still rape.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||03/18/2013|
Oh R1, I wish I was as ignorant as you and didn't know about various horrific objects used in rapes. Suffice to say, it's not a matter of quibbling about what gets put into the orifice to qualify as 'rape' in your eyes, it's about the fact that a person had something jammed in a vagina or anus without consent.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||03/18/2013|
The definition of rape is intercourse. Under the law, I have no idea. I also don't know the full extent of what they did.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||03/18/2013|
Get a load of those losers. It's the only way they could get sum....
|by Anonymous||reply 8||03/18/2013|
They were hot, what was she doing at a frat party if she didn't want to get down? Idiot!
|by Anonymous||reply 9||03/18/2013|
[quote] it's about the fact that a person had something jammed in a vagina or anus without consent.
Or a mouth
|by Anonymous||reply 10||03/18/2013|
If I gave your ear a wet willy, would that be rape?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||03/19/2013|
No one was at a frat party, dumbass!
|by Anonymous||reply 12||03/19/2013|
I can't play videos at work, anyone have links to pictures?
|by Anonymous||reply 13||03/19/2013|
Any flip-flops pics of the hot white one?
|by Anonymous||reply 14||03/19/2013|
Why are you all so fucking stupid? It was not just rape, it was hours of appalling violation, a dehumanizing attack. Here (from the linked NEW STATESMAN article):
"It lasted for hours. The pictures circulated online show the unconscious teenage girl hung like a shot steer between two laughing young men, Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond, who were convicted this week of driving her from party to party, raping her, assaulting her, and filming themselves doing so. Videos from the night include an extended tape of a friend of the attackers in drunken spasms of joy about just how ‘dead’ the girl looked as she was handed around. 'She’s deader than OJ’s wife!' he giggles to himself as his mates film him. It was sadistic young men like this with whom the mainstream media expressed immediate sympathy following the guilty verdict."
|by Anonymous||reply 15||03/19/2013|
Yes, yes, boys. Of course it's hilarious that a mere woman was sexually assaulted and publicly humiliated over an extended period of time but a couple of assholes.
But don't act like it wasn't rape and don't think your humanity will bear too many acid burns from such humor.
Assuming you want to remain human.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||03/19/2013|
Yes it was rape.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||03/19/2013|
So no link to the rape pics?
|by Anonymous||reply 18||03/19/2013|
[quote]Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond, who were convicted this week of driving her from party to party,
I didn't read about this part. They were lucky to not get charged with kidnapping.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||03/20/2013|
[quote]The definition of rape is intercourse.
You may wish to consult a dictionary. Any dictionary.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||03/20/2013|
Or the legal codes of the 50 states.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||03/20/2013|
Anyway, this thread has gotten sidetracked. I'm interested in the OP's question, as well. How did Anonymous get the photos and publicize the case?
|by Anonymous||reply 22||03/20/2013|
I believe the rapists posted them online. They were proud of their work.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||03/20/2013|
More man bashing. So not surprised.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||03/20/2013|
I believe Anonymous hacked into Facebook and email accounts of some of the perps and perhaps their cell phones as well.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||03/20/2013|
What would you know about man-bashing, R24? You're a limp-wristed pansy.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||03/20/2013|
R24 please point out the man bashing.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||03/20/2013|
I happen to know one of the defense attorneys on this case. He chalked it up to "immature minds" and "boys will be boys."
|by Anonymous||reply 28||03/20/2013|
Anyone have the pictures to share?
|by Anonymous||reply 29||03/20/2013|
So it's about penetration.
But if she was penetrated with a penis, and impregnated while she was unconscious, and she didn't want a baby, the state would (if GOP lawmakers have their way) order a transvaginal probe to penetrate her so she could see the little zygote she might want to expel.
Guess it's like the old song by The Fixx: One rape leads to another.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||03/20/2013|
I wonder if she was drugged as well? It is very scary to think how drunk she was that she could not move for that long of a time while being physically violated.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||03/20/2013|
I read that she was roofied. She was set up by boys who wanted revenge on her because she had broken up with one of them.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||03/20/2013|
There are a couple of high school wrestling vids of the white rapist (Trent Mays) available online.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||03/20/2013|
You won't be able to find them because they are all underage.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||03/20/2013|
Yes, R32, apparently her former boyfriend, Cody Saltsman, set up the whole thing to get back at her, saying via text, "Nobody breaks up with Cody Saltsman!"
Trent Mays later whined in a text that he was about to get in deep trouble for doing his friend a "favor," referring to raping the drugged girl.
Cody Saltsman and his parents began to sue the blogger who captured screen shots of all the deleted texts for defamation of character. They dropped the case, presumably because Cody Saltsman decided he didn't want the evidence the blogger had at her disposal to be heard in open court.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||03/20/2013|
I'm too lazy to look it up right now but most modern criminal codes distinguish levels of sexual abuse. Digital penetration is a lesser degree of sexual abuse in my jurisdiction.
So to paraphrase Whoopi - rape isn't always RAPE.
Still pretty awful. The circumstances seem like they would qualify as serious aggravating circumstances as well.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||03/20/2013|
R36 Law in Ohio:
Rape is a sexual assault that includes but is not limited to forced vaginal, anal, and oral penetration. Rape is a violent act. It is not sex or passion. Its purpose is to control, humiliate, and intimidate a victim through the use of force. The rapist's force can be physical or verbal and can occur without use of weapons. Different kinds of rape include acquaintance rape, date rape, marital rape, child molestation, and stranger rape. The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) #2907.02 defines rape in the following manner: "No person shall engage in sexual conduct with another when the offender purposely compels the other person to submit by force or threat of force, the offender substantially impairs the other person's judgment or control by administering any drug or intoxicant to the other person, surreptitiously or by force, threat of force or deception, or when the other person is less than 13 years of age" (codes.ohio.gov).
So yes, digital penetration IS rape.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||03/20/2013|
R36 What is the criminal code for urolagnia?
|by Anonymous||reply 38||03/20/2013|
The boys completely deserved their punishment, which actually wasn't that bad, all things considered (2 years in juvenile for one, 1 year for the other, though they could be held until they're 21.)
The girl is still a trashy drunk, but I guess that's besides the point. Her mom's post-trial statement was pretty lame - her daughter is more than this, she's going to move on and blossom. She'll be drunk off her ass again in no time.
What about the coach, and also the assistant coach who hosted the party. Sports were important where I grew up, but not to this extent, where literally everyone is super-invested in the high school teams. That's so fucking lame.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||03/20/2013|
The cunt is more than a trashy drunk
|by Anonymous||reply 40||03/20/2013|
R40, you are probably correct about the girl getting drunk again soon. But it will never be tolerable for anyone to rape her or to rape anyone else merely because that person is drunk and/or unconscious.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||03/20/2013|
You weren't fucking there. Nobody knows what really went down.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||03/20/2013|
I completely agree, R41. She didn't deserve any of this, no matter how drunk she was, or how many times she's been drunk in the past. I was pointing out that with her history of drinking, she's hardly out of the woods in terms of potential trouble, as her mom seems to think she's really an angel.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||03/20/2013|
The girl is not a trashy drunk, she was set up and roofied for fuck sake.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||03/20/2013|
Actually, she was a trashy drunk. Her friends commented on her history of binge drinking. "On Point" on NPR recently had a segment about Stuebenville and this was mentioned.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||03/20/2013|
Just an FYI, in NY State rape is limited to vaginal sex. The reasoning seems to be that juries do not consider anything that does not involve a penis and a vagina to be rape;so, the courts often do not get convictions for rape for any other kind of sexual assault. Sexual Assault has the same penalties as rape, but women's advocates argue that women need the closure of being able to say raped rather than than the more ambiguous "sexual assault". The was a bill in the state senate to change the definition of rape, but last I heard it was stalled.
And, no I don't understand why the juries simply don't follow the judges instructions.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||03/20/2013|
I don't see anything remotely resembling "man-bashing," but I do see the usual woman-bashing. Referring to a rape victim as a cunt? Is that supposed to be witty and edgy?
|by Anonymous||reply 47||03/20/2013|
R42 yes but there are photos and videos.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||03/20/2013|
R45 liking to drink does not justify being kidnapped and rape no more than it justifies being shot.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||03/20/2013|
[quote]They were hot, what was she doing at a frat party if she didn't want to get down? Idiot!
Sure, anybody who goes to a party is just asking to be raped, you shithead.
[quote]More man bashing. So not surprised.
Scumbag men being punished for rape is just the hight of unjustice, yes.
R40/R42 reads like some closeted jock trying to suppress his gayness by sticking up his "bros".
So much human filth on this thread.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||03/20/2013|
Is it okay to rape drunks? What about internet attention trolls?
|by Anonymous||reply 51||03/20/2013|
R37, most of what you posted sounds like legislative history rather than specific code sections.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||03/20/2013|
If true, so the fuck WHAT r46.
Take a guess at how many dl posters are trashy binge drinkers.
Take a guess at how many college students, male and female, are trashy binge drinkers.
Last time I was at a bar a passed out guy was getting beers cans stacked on his head, but no one tried to ram a pool stick up his ass or stick a dick in his mouth.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||03/20/2013|
[quote]liking to drink does not justify being kidnapped and rape no more than it justifies being shot.
I never said it did.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||03/20/2013|
make that r45
|by Anonymous||reply 55||03/20/2013|
So this happened in my town.
|by Anonymous||reply 56||03/20/2013|
And this was the upshot.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||03/20/2013|
Amen to r53, that is the extent of nonsense one should expect when passed out in a public place. I cannot believe that in 2013 this behavior is seen as anything as animalistic.
|by Anonymous||reply 58||03/20/2013|
"More man bashing. So not surprised"
Don't act like an uncivilized human being and no one will hold you accountable for your actions.
"Accountability" or "man bashing", as losers like to call it.
|by Anonymous||reply 59||03/20/2013|
R29, ask one more time for the underaged rape pics. I think it only takes 3x before Anonymous comes after YOU next.
|by Anonymous||reply 60||03/20/2013|
R56, I recall that story. That was a big story in Louisiana.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||03/20/2013|
I didn't realize that the boys set her up as retaliation for their friend. Under these circumstances, I wonder why they weren't charged kidnapping.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||03/21/2013|
They also could have been charged with conspiracy to commit rape. Those boys got off very, very, easy.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||03/21/2013|
Does anyone know if there were any consequences for the coach who had the party at his home and the other one who told the perpetrator that he had his back? The former was serving alcohol to minors in his home I take it?
|by Anonymous||reply 64||03/21/2013|
So the prosecutor is going to call a grand jury to investigate a lot of the other aspects of the case we've discussed (giving alcohol to a minor. Hopefully, the coaches won't be off the hook
What DeWine also saw though, were myriad unresolved issues surrounding the case, including reasonable questions coming from the people of Steubenville.
Where did underage kids get the alcohol? Were others involved in some way? Was there a resistance by local authorities to investigate a case involving players from the high-profile Steubenville High Big Red football program? "The further we got into it, I said, ‘We need a separate investigation,'" DeWine told Yahoo! Sports on Thursday.
So DeWine called the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and told the organization that the Steubenville rape case was going to need a second investigation, eventually with a special grand jury called, even if it didn't lead to the prosecution of anyone. The goal was simply to determine the truth of what went on August 11-12, 2012.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||03/21/2013|
Will they be sex offenders for life?
I hope so.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||03/22/2013|
she should've just gotten into it, they're both hot!
|by Anonymous||reply 67||03/22/2013|
I stand corrected on the law in my jurisdiction. It differentiates in terms of "sexual act" and " sexual contact" - it doesn't matter what is used to effectuate the act. Obviously an "act" is a higher level offense than a "contact". First degree sexual assault would be by force, use of weapon, threat or disabling the victim, i.e. unable to give consent. If they found her disabled and did not cause it (e.g., by drugging her) then that would be second degree sexual assault - up to 20 years incarceration. Though it's a bit more complicated that's essentially it.
What I don't understand is why this was not a sealed proceeding. It seems they were tried as juveniles and as such it was a bench trial (no jury - just a judge as trier of law and fact). The entire purpose of the juvenile justice system is to ascertain "involvement" aka guilt and rehabilitate/punish the respondents (juvenile term for defendants) in a way that allows them to return to society without the stigma of a crime on their public records and name.
In this case the case was as public as it could get thereby defeating the entire purpose of the juvenile system.
So if they are denied the benefits of the system then they should have been afforded a jury trial where they might have stood a better chance at a more favorable verdict - no way that judge was a better choice than a jury. There must be more than it appears - perhaps they had the option of a jury trial and opted for a bench trial. Maybe someone else knows about this.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||03/22/2013|