Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Anti-gay group: Chief Justice Roberts' decision to adopt "second-best"

John Eastman, chairman of NOM, told AP:

[quote]"You're looking at what is the best course societywide to get you the optimal result in the widest variety of cases. That often is not open to people in individual cases. [bold]Certainly adoption in families headed, like Chief Roberts' family is, by a heterosexual couple, is by far the second-best option,[/bold]" said John Eastman, chairman of the National Organization for Marriage. Eastman also teaches law at Chapman University law school in Orange, Calif. [emphasis added]

by Anonymousreply 3703/19/2013

Second-best dad, John Roberts.

by Anonymousreply 103/14/2013

Second-best CLOSETED dad, John Roberts.

by Anonymousreply 203/14/2013

He's okay, isn't he? Even if he was appointed by you know who.

by Anonymousreply 303/14/2013

They should totally put that on the record for Roberts to see. Great idea.

by Anonymousreply 403/14/2013

How shitty. Does that mean adopted kids in general are "second best." How nice to have a caste system among different types of families.

by Anonymousreply 503/14/2013

What's the first-best option? I don't feel like clicking that link?

by Anonymousreply 703/14/2013

[quote]What's the first-best option? I don't feel like clicking that link?

Renting temporary illegal immigrant children from Mexico, Rose.

by Anonymousreply 803/14/2013

Blah! Homosexuals make the best parents and pet owners. They usually carry a higher degree of humanity.

by Anonymousreply 903/14/2013

The reason for the adoption.

by Anonymousreply 1003/14/2013

This must be the most ill-timed pronouncement EVAH.

by Anonymousreply 1103/14/2013

R10 I love that photo!

by Anonymousreply 1203/14/2013

R7 don't be afraid, Americablog is a gay rights site

by Anonymousreply 1303/14/2013

The study used to supposedly demonstrate the superiority of raising children with one father and one mother compared hetero couples as parents vs. single parents. Comparison with same sex couples was not studied. But it is consistently misused.

by Anonymousreply 1403/14/2013

I must be missing something. I don't get this.

by Anonymousreply 1503/14/2013

[quote]Comparison with same sex couples was not studied.

As I recall, there were quite a few entered in the Prop 8 case. They showed no difference between mixed-sex and same-sex.

by Anonymousreply 1603/14/2013

Is it possible that NOM and the like believe that Roberts may actually be in favor of the upcoming gay rights cases and are firing off this crap as some kind of warning to him?

by Anonymousreply 1703/15/2013

Gay Chief Justice John Roberts and his gay friends get together for dinner:

by Anonymousreply 1803/15/2013

I should be embarrassed and deeply ashamed that I find John Roberts very fuckable, shouldn't I?

by Anonymousreply 1903/15/2013

[quote]The study used to supposedly demonstrate the superiority of raising children with one father and one mother compared hetero couples as parents vs. single parents. Comparison with same sex couples was not studied. But it is consistently misused.

What "study?" I haven't seen references upthread, in the Ameriblog article, or the AP article it references.

by Anonymousreply 2003/15/2013

R18, see 10.

I don't know whether or not Roberts is gay but what is the big problem with adoption? And we're not even talking about same-sex couples. Seems like NOM is just going out of their way to be ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 2103/15/2013

[quote]Is it possible that NOM and the like believe that Roberts may actually be in favor of the upcoming gay rights cases and are firing off this crap as some kind of warning to him?

Yep.

by Anonymousreply 2203/15/2013

Let's not forget that morbidly obsese Maggie Gallagher procreated without the benefit of marriage. Years later, when she finally got some guy to marry her, it didn't last. He left her two years ago.

In all the years of her gaybashing fight against marriage equality, no member of the media has asked why the founder of NOM is a total failure when it comes to marriage.

Her obsession with gaybashing screams self-hating closet case. Her photo should be in the DL dictionary next to caneface.

by Anonymousreply 2303/15/2013

Maggie Gallagher [bold]IS[/bold] Nan Michiganwomyn!

by Anonymousreply 2403/15/2013

It pains me to say it, but Roberts has nice eyes.

by Anonymousreply 2503/15/2013

I actually think Roberts is a decent human being.

Unlike those other two creeps, CT&AS

by Anonymousreply 2603/15/2013

We should force orphans to self-deport.

by Anonymousreply 2703/16/2013

I would rather be adopted by Chief Justice Roberts than have John Eastman's genes.

by Anonymousreply 2803/16/2013

We shall see very soon about Justice Roberts.

by Anonymousreply 2903/16/2013

This NOM shit will only reinforce the blatant bigotry towards gays.

by Anonymousreply 3003/16/2013

r17, but what kind of "warning" would that be? Supreme Court justices are appointed for life. It's not an elected position. And I doubt they try to impeach him (you'd think they would've tried after the Obamacare ruling); now, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, I do think there are justifiable grounds for impeaching them.

by Anonymousreply 3103/16/2013

The only thing I get out of this is that the NOM are out of touch, delusional bullies.

by Anonymousreply 3203/16/2013

I think the warning is they know he's gay and they intend to out him if he doesn't rule their way.

by Anonymousreply 3303/16/2013

Reading that actually made me feel sorry for Roberts' family, especially his kids.

by Anonymousreply 3403/16/2013

It's going to backfire, just like Romney's negative campaign ads.

by Anonymousreply 3503/16/2013

ha

by Anonymousreply 3603/17/2013

I wish I had gone for the best option (a termination) rather than the second-best option (squirting out the turd)

by Anonymousreply 3703/19/2013
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.