Has anyone ever noticed that? Anything else doesn't matter, the mate (woman or man) would have to be good-looking. It doesn't matter if they are rich or poor just so long as their mate is a looker.
Men: looks is everything for them in love
|by Anonymous||reply 46||03/15/2013|
How are you supposed to get it up for someone you're not attracted to?
|by Anonymous||reply 1||03/14/2013|
Looks are everything for men in attraction. Love only starts with attraction.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||03/14/2013|
The penis does the picking!
|by Anonymous||reply 3||03/14/2013|
There are exceptions.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||03/14/2013|
I'll bet you give him a boner, R4.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||03/14/2013|
And yet so many gay men wonder why they end up alone when all they care about is trying to chase after the hottest guy they can get.
Yes you have to be attracted to the person you have sex with, but looks aren't the most important thing.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||03/14/2013|
I agree with you up to a point. Certainly the first way we experience people is through the senses, and, for many, primarily the visual.
But a great many very attractive - at first glance - people can be huge turn offs on second glance and especially when one gets to know them. And by that I mean within 30 seconds when one realizes that even fucking this person with someone else's dick would be an ordeal. Other beautiful people can be extremely annoying and impossible to consider as partners, even if you would fuck them with your own dick in a heartbeat.
The flip side is that a great many people who are not necessarily our idea of hot - or what we think is our idea of hot - can be both fascinating and sexy as well as highly appealing as lovers and or spouses.
As the Marquise de Merteuil said, happiness and vanity are incompatible.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||03/14/2013|
Most men will get it on with anything. I know there is a conceit now of twenty-somethings that they will only trade up, but that is brand new. Before about ten years ago any gay men would do anyone who would let them, regardless of how they looked. Straight men, it must be said, are the same. They would sleep with any woman at all, even one they ridiculed for her appearance, if she'd let them. And that makes sense because the range of human beauty is not so large that the penis can actually distinguish that much. Good enough is 90% of the people who aren't visibly sick.
So when you change the coversation to love, then you introduce the next level where men would rather only be seen with people who are attractive. That's an additional wrinkle, and it accounts for most male relationships, but I don't think you've actually crossed the "love" bar yet. And, as is often pointed out on DL, closet cases will take ugly women for partners just to get that hetero social status, which muddies the result a bit. And straight guys will take ugly women if they are rich; or if their parents are rich, which also muddies the pool.
But to get beyond partnership to actual love, I don't think looks has much role to play. Anybody will seem beautiful or ugly, depending on your mood. Anybody will seem entrancing or boring, depending on the situation. When you get to actual love, what really matters is 1) what the person thinks love is; and 2) whether the beloved satisfies the deep values inculcated in childhood, which are pre-sexual.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||03/14/2013|
Tons of military men with Heifers for wives, not in the least attractive and some of the guys are hot. Explain that one OP.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||03/14/2013|
'm with r9. How do you explain all the very unattractive women who are married and/or in a relationship? Page through the wedding announcements of a local newspaper (not the elitist publications) and you'll see plenty of homely brides. And I'm glad for them. they too deserve happiness.
Why? Because women target marriage; men target sex. But the clever women already know all the tricks to get their men, and they don't necessarily have to be gorgeous to do so.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||03/14/2013|
[quote]Before about ten years ago any gay men would do anyone who would let them, regardless of how they looked.
Is there anyone who actually believes this?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||03/14/2013|
No wonder you're alone, r3.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||03/14/2013|
That's what ugly people say when they can't get a date/
|by Anonymous||reply 13||03/14/2013|
As gay man I have always been somewhat in awe of handsome or cute men. As I age I realize that these people are just as capable of being f**ked up as anybody else. I was cute when young and had sex with a lot of attractive guys. It got me exactly nowhere until I started focusing more on the personality. I do admit that a guy still has to be pretty attractive for me to want to have sex with him. Looks still have a power over me, and it can be a struggle, but it's worth the effort to get past them if you can.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||03/14/2013|
OP, that's a WISH for most men -- not a reality.
In fact, you will hear the most repulsive fat assed slobs talk about what they want like they can get it. It's a fantasy for 97% of them.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||03/14/2013|
[quote]How do you explain all the very unattractive women who are married and/or in a relationship?
There is a lot of societal pressure for straight men (especially military men) to get married.
Doesn't mean they are going to be faithful if some more attractive girl was an option.
Gay men have much less pressure to settle down prematurely.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||03/14/2013|
Most people are ugly. That's how you explain very unattractive men & women who are married and/or in a relationship, ditz.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||03/14/2013|
I personally don't believe ugly people should be allowed to reproduce, but that's just me.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||03/14/2013|
Most heteros are butt-fugly and therefore hold bigoted opinions about gays and lesbians (jealousy). If you notice, it's always the ugly people that are anti-abortion as well.
Ugly straights that are anti-abortion are so because they want to make life miserable for attractive women who can get laid. They are jealous that good-looking people can have sex purely for enjoyment.
This is the very same jealousy against gays and lesbians who have sex for enjoyment, not nation-building. People need to understand this. Jealousy is such a powerful emotion that politics will not change the fugly mind. That's why there will always ne a bias against gays and lesbians.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||03/14/2013|
No, OP, no one has noticed that men's arousal is largely driven by visuals. This is why pornography is so unpopular that it's almost on the brink of extinction. There are only about three nude photos left on the Internet. No one thought men would ever want to look at photos of attractive sexual partners.
Until now. You're quite the trailblazer.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||03/14/2013|
Most heteros become beasts by forty. But they still "make love" *barf* so we have to have that fucking image in our brains.
When two hetero-beasts get together, they remove their wide-load underpants and jiggle their fat-fuck bellies together like wildebeasts. You can smell their shit a mile away.
The male beast has titties as big as his girl-beast. Often times the famale of this species must sit atop the male due to belly fat and boy-tits. Then they consummate by jiggling their sweaty, stinky, rolls of fat together, mating with the disturbing sounds of female screeching and male moaning (watch out, could be heart failure as well) which culminates in a pile of beast-fat and fluids. The smell can be stifling.
Said female beast will now be ready to carry a child, which cannot grow up to be a gay or lesbian under the penalty of social exclusion or death.
And this is how it is done.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||03/14/2013|
I wish the OP was wrong, but he is right...at least 80% of the time. It's different among straights, I've seen the hottest guy (or girl) in love with a very average partner. Many gays seem to marry someone that looks like their twin.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||03/14/2013|
R22, that's because gay people are narcissists.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||03/14/2013|
[quote]Tons of military men with Heifers for wives, not in the least attractive and some of the guys are hot. Explain that one OP.
This is true, because I work at a Hotel and see many good looking military guys with below average wives. I suspect these guys are looking for a partner to have a family with, and don't want to deal with the jealousies of having a beautiful spouse. They know their partner would never go out on them.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||03/14/2013|
Handsome gays tend to be jealous of other hot gays...too much competition. That's why you see a lot of single gay men who are devastating good looking with no gay partner.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||03/14/2013|
Female hetero-beasts talk incessantly of their children because they resent said children. They are trying to convince themselves that they love them, that they were worth stretching out their vaginas, and that they are worth all of the trouble.
These beast-ettes will gloat about being mothers in front of gays and lesbians as a territorial ritual. It is a form of one-up manship and is used to gain access to more filling foods, bigger homes, and better job positions. Beast-ettes excuse their fat, misshapen bodies on childbirth, and will not do anything to improve their figures due to "gluten-sensitivities," "chronic fatique syndrome" and "peanut allergies."
But more commonly, beast-ettes will quote scripture in casual conversation to strangers in order to relieve their feeling of inferiority.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||03/14/2013|
Men look for a big, healthy, hard-working heifer to bear his young. Then they cheat with sexy sluts on the side.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||03/14/2013|
Not for me!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 28||03/14/2013|
[quote]In fact, you will hear the most repulsive fat assed slobs talk about what they want like they can get it. It's a fantasy for 97% of them.
You're talking about yourself, we take it.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||03/14/2013|
I do believe that on average male-male couples have the highest ratio of HOT:HOT than MF or FF couples, so there is something to this "looks is everything" thing.
However, being attracted to a physically appealing partner doesn't make it impossible to find love with that person, too.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||03/14/2013|
I think it really varies....I'm no great bargain in the looks department myself, so I've always tended to be attracted to (or to feel I had a chance with) men in my own (self-determined) attractiveness bracket (and often men older than myself)--also, as a college teacher, I've never found the appeal of youth (for a partner) compelling--I experience 20-somethings at their most whiny (and, to be fair, as they are still developing intellectually--and it can be pretty wonderful to see their growth--no pun intended--but not particularly erotic--lucky for me). So, brains, wit, personality, and character are always what make me interested in pursuing someone. Probably a combination of my hard wiring, experiences when I was younger, and a certain degree of self-protection. What I never understand are older men who are only attracted to those much younger than themselves (just in practical terms, talk about narrowing your field) or men of any age who, as they move into middle age, don't get beyond the superficiality of looks. I mean, yeah, I understand how visual stimuli play a role in initial attractions (especially from a Darwinian perspective), but I would think compatibility would just simply become a higher priority as one matures. Not for the NSA hookup, I guess, but for anything beyond that.
And I agree, I suspect that's why there may more older lonely and/or single gay men than lesbians. I hardly want to become the attraction police--people should feel free to go whichever way they want--but I have been grateful to have had two life partners, one with severe physical-motor disabilities that would have made many men ignore him (he was brilliant, but turned out to be a prick--which helped disabuse me at a young age of stereotyping people with disabilities as saintly) and my current partner (almost 18 years), 19 years older than I and he looks like your Uncle Morrie from a Sendak illustration. Couldn't love him more if he looked like (fill in the blank) and my heart still melts when I see him at the end of the day.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||03/14/2013|
That's cute, R31.
Also, R21 made me laugh.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||03/14/2013|
Looks aren't the only thing that matter to the average man, looks are just a starting point.
It's like an algoritm: Is s/he hot? If yes, hit on. If no, forget they exist. And the next level of the algorithm is something like: Is there some dealbreaker immediately obvious, like psychosis or children? If yes, proceed with seduction. If no, look for another hottie. Etc.
Looks only start things, they don't sustain a relationship. But it's very hard to start things with a man, unless he's attracted to how you look.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||03/14/2013|
It's a cliche for straight men to "fall in love" with women based strictly on their looks, without giving any thought to the woman's character. Then he's shocked when it turns out she doesn't have the personality he wants.
I understand wanting to be attracted to your partner, but at least be mature about your choices. If you value the wrong things in a partner and things don't go the way you want, you have no one but yourself to blame.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||03/14/2013|
Can this whole 'men are visually stimulated women are not' myth just die a slow painful death already? I'd rather have my clit gnawed off by a rabid woodchuck than fuck a guy I'm not attracted to. I don't care how much money he has....
|by Anonymous||reply 35||03/14/2013|
R35 is very young.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||03/14/2013|
Money seems most important to certain Canadians.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||03/14/2013|
I know where R35 is coming from. I've never even considered a rich man I'm not attracted to, and that includes the days of my youth when I was inundated by older men, often friends/acquaintances/business associates of my mom's wealthy parents. In fact, they seem to have given me an aversion to rich men.
Much better a beautiful poor man. I don't care about money, as long as I have the basics and a clear conscience.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||03/14/2013|
In the world I live in people tend to pair off with people who fall on a similar level on the looks scale. I keep hearing about ugly old men who have gorgeous young things crawling all over them, and that may well happen in the upper echelons where money and power are everything, but I don't really see it among the lower and middle income crowd.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||03/14/2013|
No OP. It's fun to look at good looking guys but that is not essential when picking a mate.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||03/14/2013|
I also agree with r35. I make my own money and don't need a man's "power" or "status." In the modern age, women can be self-sufficient and free to focus on men's looks and personality rather than what's in their wallet.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||03/15/2013|
Canadians are goldiggers? I never knew that.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||03/15/2013|
We would pleasantly beg to disagree.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||03/15/2013|
Isn't it more common to fall in love with some and then see the good looks that wasn't so obvious at first sight like how they have beautiful eyes or a great crooked smile? Love makes you see your partner as better looking.
Also it's how you hook up. If you're meeting from online or elsewhere you'll probably naturally pick the person with the best combo of good looks & personality. But sometimes you fall in love with a friend or someone you got to know slowly. In those cases you're not basing love on just looks.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||03/15/2013|
R19, R21, R23, R26 (same poster) is a fucking nut job.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||03/15/2013|
Westboro Baptist Church Founder Fred Phelps May Be Gay, Suggests Former Member Lauren Drain
|by Anonymous||reply 46||03/15/2013|