This isn't good!
QE2 Rushed to the Hospital
|by Anonymous||reply 83||03/03/2013|
[quote]This isn't good!
|by Anonymous||reply 1||03/03/2013|
Ol' Lizzie has got the shits!
|by Anonymous||reply 2||03/03/2013|
Is this about Ben Bernanke?
|by Anonymous||reply 3||03/03/2013|
Everything at that table was from my organic farms!
|by Anonymous||reply 4||03/03/2013|
In the UK, do you have to be "in hospital" to receive an IV, or can you be hooked up at home?
(She might just need an IV.)
|by Anonymous||reply 5||03/03/2013|
Who cares about some old rich bitch who calls herself a queen. They are a dime a dozen.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||03/03/2013|
Why do the Brits say "in hospital" rather than "in the hospital"?
|by Anonymous||reply 7||03/03/2013|
Come to the light, Elizabeth, come to the light!
|by Anonymous||reply 8||03/03/2013|
She wasn't rushed anywhere. She was driven there in her private car. Probably needs IV fluids or something.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||03/03/2013|
Oh, R9, people - public and private - are ALWAYS "rushed" to the hospital. The drama, you know.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||03/03/2013|
[quote]She wasn't rushed anywhere. She was driven there in her private car. Probably needs IV fluids or something.
Oh bloody hell.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||03/03/2013|
Die bitch die!
I mean, God Save My Mum!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 12||03/03/2013|
Strangely enough I had a dream about Princess Diana last night. She was independent and happy and using a smartphone.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||03/03/2013|
I think she's just gone off her nut. This is the royal equivalent of seeking treatment for "exhaustion."
|by Anonymous||reply 14||03/03/2013|
Please have cameras rolling at all times to capture THE SCREAM when QE2 bites the dust.
"Queen Elizabeth has the shits, SERIOUSLY. They've added SERIOUSLY."
|by Anonymous||reply 15||03/03/2013|
Wait, didn't we already know this? Did she get out and was rushed back in again?
|by Anonymous||reply 16||03/03/2013|
[quote]Why do the Brits say "in hospital" rather than "in the hospital"?
|by Anonymous||reply 17||03/03/2013|
How come people are always rushed to the hospital. How come no one ever takes a leisurely stroll to the hospitable or a brisk walk to the hospital.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||03/03/2013|
I screamed when Princess Diana died, and would scream louder for the Queen Mother.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||03/03/2013|
Queen Mother's already dead, dear.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||03/03/2013|
I told you in the other thread -- my elderly, independent aunt who was in pretty great health died after getting gastroenteritis earlier this winter. It was a norovirus and it began a cascade that ended in respiratory failure in a pretty short period of time.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||03/03/2013|
Camilla probably poisoned her so her husband has a chance at being King and she can become Queen. If Elizabeth lives as long as her mother, the chances Charles will be living go way down.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||03/03/2013|
People receive IV therapy at home all the time.
They must be doing tests. Scans, MRi, what have you. Probably worried about dead gut.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||03/03/2013|
I'm sorry, r21.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||03/03/2013|
"I screamed when Princess Diana died, and would scream louder for the Queen Mother."
What did you do when Queen !MARY! died?
|by Anonymous||reply 25||03/03/2013|
The castle doesn't have its own hospital? How middle class!
|by Anonymous||reply 26||03/03/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 27||03/03/2013|
I told her those IKEA meatballs would give her the trots.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||03/03/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 29||03/03/2013|
Agreed. Let's move on to why they pronounce schedule as "shed-ual," but school isn't "shool."
|by Anonymous||reply 30||03/03/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 31||03/03/2013|
If she just needed an IV they would have done it themselves. No, this is something big.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||03/03/2013|
I hope it's nothing trivial.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||03/03/2013|
I told you she would never beat my record.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||03/03/2013|
The rotweiller Camilla is chewing madly on her bone.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||03/03/2013|
She's stealing my bloody thunder, dammit.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||03/03/2013|
She actually has severe vaginosis.
The butler said something about a jar of peanut butter and one of the corgis.
Sad. Very sad.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||03/03/2013|
Camilla will be known straight out as the Queen, won't she?
|by Anonymous||reply 38||03/03/2013|
Awww. If her number is up, so be it, but I adore QE II.
She didn't ask to be Queen. She, nevertheless, took a role that is inherently ridiculous and performed it flawlessly, including when Diana died.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||03/03/2013|
Dibs on all her Royal Stuff!
|by Anonymous||reply 40||03/03/2013|
I imagine the Queen has someone vomit for her.
Also, who cleans up the mess when she has the squirts and doesn't make it in time to the loo?
|by Anonymous||reply 41||03/03/2013|
Della, the entire Royal Family including the Queen did such a scandalously poor job responding to the death of Diana that there was national outrage over their public absence. They only stepped up when it became clear that they were seriously jeopardizing the future of the monarchy with their stony silence.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||03/03/2013|
I don't adore her or anything, but I don't dislike her. It's not like she's the Pope, covering up awful crimes and dooming people to poverty with a ridiculous birth control policy.
I'm sure she's a snob and her husband is a twit. But still... she's been queen since before I was born. I hate losing celebrities, authors, cultural figures and the last of the politicians who worked for the common good (I don't fool myself by thinking the pols weren't corrupt. They were. But they did get positive policies in place for the common good).
I can see why the UK would be sick of her and her family. The popular press dogs their every move and for what? They might just be Kardashians with a thin veneer of civilized behavior.
But I don't like losing so many of the Old Guard. It makes me feel old and frightened about what's coming next. It's always something worse (except for the 2008 election which dislodged Bush &Cheney. That was better).
|by Anonymous||reply 43||03/03/2013|
[quote] Also, who cleans up the mess when she has the squirts and doesn't make it in time to the loo?
|by Anonymous||reply 44||03/03/2013|
I would imagine the Royal Under Footman-Shitewiper.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||03/03/2013|
OK, r42, even granting your point, still, I suspect that a lot of that overwrought response to Diana's daeth has, by now, devolved into cryers remorse.
If given the chance to react again to Diana's death, knowing how over the top it all was, I think the Queen's restraint has been vindicated.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||03/03/2013|
Della, don't worry about the insane R42.
The notion that the Royal Family, which was doing everything properly and in the appropriately conventional, decent, sensitive manner and style, to which they are committed BECAUSE THAT'S HOW IT'S DONE AMONG GROWNUPS, were somehow defaming the memory of the mother of an heir to the throne and his brother is an indication of the low thinking permeating Dianaland.
Nothing the Royals did showed disrespect or disregard. Their actions showed sorrow and kindness for the people who mattered most. That they were caught off guard by what amounted to mob rule and mass hysteria is not a sign of their awfulness. It is a sign that they were among the only sane people in Britain at the time. Bowing to the cries for the standard to be changed and for a public display and for a tasteless funeral were survival instincts taking charge.
But the notion that the divorced wife of the Prince of Wales somehow was a martyr when she died in a drunken car crash with her Egyptian fuckbuddy is just the depravity of the uneducated raising an ignorant fist to their betters.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||03/03/2013|
R47, you are ill-informed indeed if you think there was not public furor in the UK aimed at the Royals immediately after after Diana died. Read some news stories from that week. There was a huge uproar, not by any means quiet or secret.
"One of the Queen's most trusted former advisers has disclosed that she feared that republican MPs would call for an end to the monarchy because of public anger at the Royal Family's initial reaction to the death of Diana, Princess of Wales....."
|by Anonymous||reply 48||03/03/2013|
Oh, I'm not worried, r47. Thanks and you wrote in your post a point that I was thinking but couldn't express in the great way you did.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||03/03/2013|
[quote]the entire Royal Family including the Queen did such a scandalously poor job responding to the death of Diana that there was national outrage over their public absence. They only stepped up when it became clear that they were seriously jeopardizing the future of the monarchy with their stony silence.
R42. You are absolutely correct. The queen along with Prince Philip were abyssmal in their actions following Diana's death. Queen Elizabeth should have been particularly ashamed of her horribly unkind and unfeeling behavior. She completly misread the public's love for Diana.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||03/03/2013|
You could hear the crowd outside the cathedral at Diana's funeral cheering in approval when her brother the Earl Spencer made pointed references knocking the Royal Family.
|by Anonymous||reply 51||03/03/2013|
[quote]Camilla will be known straight out as The Queen, won't she?
Good luck with that. When The Queen is 'gathered' the outpouring will be momentous, as I said in the other thread. It'll be an intense blend of history, respect, affection and more, and all our yesterdays. The end of an era is no small thing.
All that, plus the very separate but equally potent Diana factor, will put Camilla in a cold thin light. How can she begin to compare? Her position is wholly unenviable: whatever PR campaigns are mounted at Charles's insistence, she'll be accorded grudging respect at best for years.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||03/03/2013|
She's in a comma.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||03/03/2013|
In a comma
|by Anonymous||reply 54||03/03/2013|
She has a comma?
|by Anonymous||reply 55||03/03/2013|
[quote]She's in a comma.
Well we absolutely know she's not in a bloody Period.
|by Anonymous||reply 56||03/03/2013|
The Queen is not in a coma. She will be fine, she ahs at least 5, 10 more good years in her.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||03/03/2013|
She was the People's Queen!
|by Anonymous||reply 58||03/03/2013|
And how many bad years, dear?
|by Anonymous||reply 59||03/03/2013|
Will Camilla have a Sally Field in "Steel Magnolias" style meltdown if Charles kicks the bucket before he becomes King?
|by Anonymous||reply 60||03/03/2013|
R47 can't conceal the ghetto with that last statement.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||03/03/2013|
If the Queen were properly dehydrated she would keep for a lot longer.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||03/03/2013|
She's in a comma
Is she stuck in a compound sentence?
|by Anonymous||reply 63||03/03/2013|
She's wearing commaflage on the commode!
|by Anonymous||reply 64||03/03/2013|
I agree with 47 though. Later on there were documentaries that exposed Diana's spiteful jabs at the Queen. She ruined Elizabeth's anniversary by airing her dirty laundry on the exact day. It was childish. She didn't get what being a monarch entails. Fergie and Diana enjoyed watching Lizbet sweat. The Queen was merely following protocol and ancient traditions. I feel for the Queen having to suffer through Diana's mental illness and tantrums. After her death previously hidden secrets were leaked and sane people realised she was disturbed. Most people then came to empathise with Elizabeth and understand her bitter reaction. Diana fucked with her for years, tormenting her. That shit is aging and tiring. We all have known someone like this at our making a living or in our families. It's a sense of relief when these people pass but they brought about their own legacy. Can't fault us for not being crushed.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||03/03/2013|
[quote]She's in a comma.
So pause and reflect.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||03/03/2013|
Camilla's getting her mane washed and curled in anticipation.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||03/03/2013|
They Royals should have allowed Diana a royally sanctioned lover. Charles had one in Camilla. It was unfair of him to retire his wife to a lifetime of presumed celibacy starting in her early 20s. You'd be neurotic too.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||03/03/2013|
C. difficil is a killer.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||03/03/2013|
Elizabeth needed to be told to do the right thing when Diana died. Elizabth and Philip's behavior was atrocious and hightly disrespectful.
While Liz and Phil were in Scotland, all they had to do was turn on the television and see the reaction of the British public to know that their rude and dismissive behavior was way out of line with the outpouring of love by the people for Diana.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||03/03/2013|
Due to the queen's gastroenteritis, the hospital is now dealing with a rather unpleasant royal flush.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||03/03/2013|
Doctors say she'll remain on the throne for days.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||03/03/2013|
Is it true that Prince Charles has asked Parliament to make him Regent and he has thrown his father out of Buckingham Palace?
|by Anonymous||reply 73||03/03/2013|
lol. r72. Fwiw, you've earned a rare WW from me.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||03/03/2013|
The QE2 is a ship, not a person you dumb Americans.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||03/03/2013|
Charles hates mummy's favorite Andrew. York will be the first head to roll...
|by Anonymous||reply 76||03/03/2013|
Any Australians call the hospital yet?
|by Anonymous||reply 77||03/03/2013|
Does the Queen wipe herself, or does someone do that for her, baby style?
|by Anonymous||reply 78||03/03/2013|
Phillip takes care of that, R78.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||03/03/2013|
I suppose this frees us from any confidentiality agreement we may have signed?
|by Anonymous||reply 80||03/03/2013|
They take her out on the back patio at the palace and squirt the hose at her bum.
No muss, no fuss!
|by Anonymous||reply 81||03/03/2013|
[quote]While Liz and Phil were in Scotland, all they had to do was turn on the television and see the reaction of the British public to know that their rude and dismissive behavior was way out of line with the outpouring of love by the people for Diana.
Not to excuse their behavior, but at some point Phil ordered all of the TVs removed from Balmoral. Apparently, William had watched some report, became distraught, and took off without his royal protection officers. They didn't know his whereabouts on the estate for a while and had to send out search parties. He was eventually found and kept away from media. Perhaps the Queen stayed away from it, too, or the courtiers fed her selective information.
BTW, this is from Tina Brown's book about Diana.
|by Anonymous||reply 82||03/03/2013|
N-virus is hitting world wide.
Another gift of the developing nations
|by Anonymous||reply 83||03/03/2013|