Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

The Kristen Stewart Problem

Last night on the Oscars she looked gaunt, angry and unkempt. When the camera panned the audience, you could almost hear the bigwigs thinking, "Punch... delete".

If she cut her foot open somehow, why didn't she just cancel? She made a spectacle of herself- and not in a good way.

She's going to throw it all away. What's wrong with her?

by Anonymousreply 26404/21/2014

Hopefully her career is over.

by Anonymousreply 102/25/2013

i love that she didnt even bother to run a brush through her hair. she tries so hard to look like she doesn't try at all.

by Anonymousreply 202/25/2013

Poor thing is not going to age well at all. She already has the beginnings of haggard, and she's what? 22?

by Anonymousreply 302/25/2013

I think it's pretty obvious that Kristen Stewart couldn't give a fuck about Hollywood one way or another. She was basically pushed into the business by her parents, who are both in the Industry. There's not a chance in hell she ever would have been successful in Hollywood if her parents weren't connected, which is pretty much the story of about 75% of Industry people. Now that she's made a fortune and never has to work again, she might just go away. One hopes.

by Anonymousreply 402/25/2013

What's wrong with her? She's a closet case, that's what's wrong with her.

by Anonymousreply 502/25/2013

Two questions. Why didn't she stay home? It wouldn't have been that hard to find a presenter to fill in. And why didn't she wear sleeves to cover the weird bruising or have a makeup artist cover the bruises?

My theory: she's been on a bender since Wed. or Thurs. during which she cut her foot open and sustained assorted contusions. Quick stop to stitch up the foot and she continued to party without giving a thought to her appearance. She was aroused around 3:00 p.m. Sunday by a frantic publicist who realized there wasn't time for formal hair and makeup. Publicist did the best she could and poured her into a limo.

by Anonymousreply 602/25/2013

Now that Twilight's over she needs to get a TV show soon or else she's going to be doing second rate indie flicks forever, with maybe one or two last attempts at blockbusters. And even at that, Snow White and the Huntsman was a complete fluke.

by Anonymousreply 702/25/2013

She looked like a heroin addict. Probably not a bad guess.

by Anonymousreply 802/25/2013

Mia Farrow did tweet "You can tell who's using coke"

by Anonymousreply 902/25/2013

I think her career as an A-list starlet is over.

by Anonymousreply 1002/25/2013

She did not look gaunt,

by Anonymousreply 1102/25/2013

R2, do people honestly think she goes to these things without having her hair professionally done? Especially in this case you can see the style they were going for. She just fucks it up by playing with her hair.

by Anonymousreply 1202/26/2013

You people exaggerate!

by Anonymousreply 1302/26/2013

That little filly always has a puss on her face (yet, somehow, she remains miserable.)

Seriously, every picture I have ever seen of her she looks like she is barely tolerating being photographed. Was this a surprise to her? Did no one tell her that it was part of the deal?

The only acting I've seen of her was a YouTube compilation clip. "Twilight" scenes highlighting her single facial expression and the way she runs her hands through her hair to express emotion.

Gifted, I tell ya. Surely worth every penny.

by Anonymousreply 1402/26/2013

She looked like she was on a crack binge.

by Anonymousreply 1502/26/2013

She looked like she'd just rolled out of bed - hung over. Doesn't she own a brush?

by Anonymousreply 1602/26/2013

seriously, any experts out there, can you tell who was on drugs last night? i've never done drugs so i don't know the signs...

by Anonymousreply 1702/26/2013

[quote][R2], do people honestly think she goes to these things without having her hair professionally done? Especially in this case you can see the style they were going for. She just fucks it up by playing with her hair.

Jesus Christ on a cracker. Clutch your ass, boy.

by Anonymousreply 1802/26/2013

I know almost nothing about her but she was awful presenting. Unpleasant. Her tone and smirk was actually rather disrespectful to nominees in that category. I mean, really. To act like a flippant cunt at basically the awards dinner for people in the industry, with them ALL watching you, is absurd.

She also had that "don't gawk at me just cos I'm famous" vibe .... At the fucking Oscars!

I do think she's very beautiful, but the whole greasy hair cunty shtick is loathsome.

Has there ever been a long term successful actress whose public persona was purposely that of such a humorless cunt before? I mean Angelina and Liz Taylor are homewreckers, but they do/did shitloads of charity AND meticulously preened their "exciting glamorous sexpot" persona. Julia Roberts is kind of a cunt, but has the laugh and the pretty woman vulnerability about her.

by Anonymousreply 1902/26/2013

There seems to be an age, around 19, and if you get extremely famous before that age, you never acquire basic social skills and seem to get frozen in pathological cunt zone.

Lindsay llohan, Shia leboeuf, Chris brown, her.

by Anonymousreply 2002/26/2013

Her hair is the least of her problems, that hair is now even hers!

She wears a ton of extensions, have you ever seen how flat, thin and see through her real hair is?

I am so sick of seeing this smug spot faced bitch all over the place, like Lindsey Loathsome, she needs to fade away very soon.

by Anonymousreply 2102/26/2013

I assumed she thought she would get sympathy points for being injured and still going on the show. As though it shows she's a trooper who's unashamed about the affair and won't hide.

Poor thing.

by Anonymousreply 2202/26/2013


by Anonymousreply 2302/26/2013

[quote]She did not look gaunt,

She looked like she had put on weight.

by Anonymousreply 2402/26/2013

You might have a point, R20 but it doesn't happen to all of them.

Did anybody see her posing on the red carpet? She was literally shaking her leg as her photo was being taken! I've never seen anything like it. She's been in the game a long time, she's walked tons of red carpets, so what exactly is her problem?

Then to come out and present the award next to Daniel Radcliffe, another child actor from a huge franchise, act so professionally and lovely, and she's this smirking little cunt, all twitching, scratching her head, grunting out her lines.

I can't imagine any directors, producers, or major industry people saw that performance and was at all impressed.

She's like what Lindsay Lohan would have became if she starred in Twilight.

I know she has a team of managers, publicists, agents, makeup and hair people, so what exactly is the problem? Don't they realize their client is fucking up her career for good? Can they control her? What is going on with this strange woman-child?

by Anonymousreply 2502/26/2013

She is not at all beautiful. Pale, thin pointy rat-like features. She is one of the luckiest lesbians on the planet.

by Anonymousreply 2602/26/2013

I forgot she was with Daniel Radcliffe r25 - you are so right!

He seemed so lovely and well mannered and pleasant next to her. Like the young man you'd want your niece or nephew to bring home to grandma. He actually looked like he was having a nice time - it was pleasant to watch.

The thing about being a presenter is that it is a very stylized western theatrical performance. Whether it is on stage at the oscars or giving a wedding toast, there is an expected demeanor as you speak to people. You have to be either hilariously funny like Jennifer Aniston or Ben stiller, or genuine and warm. Shy and demure yet sweet works too. Even angelina Jolie and Nicole Kidman, who are kind of icy or vampirey in some roles, are always elegant and gracious and charming on stage. .

Because it is NOT all about you and it insults your audience to be a cunt. you are visually walking out into their home. Also it's called having acting talent.

Remember when Katherine heigl presented an award a couple years ago and sad "my apologies - I am just extremely extremely nervous" and it was super uncomfortable? The woman is a prifessional actress! That didn't help her cunty rep. Again it is not all about you.

by Anonymousreply 2702/26/2013

I didn't see Jodie at golden globes, but over the decades she's ALWAYS been gracious and lovely at oscars. She smiled demurely, her blond hair was always on point, she laughed on red carpet, she wore stunning Armani suits or gowns - truly a standout.

And I know for a fact she's a huge cunt when random people gawk at her.

So it is a performance. And if you can't manage that, you insult your other performers who clap and smile at this huge marketing event for your industry every year.

by Anonymousreply 2802/26/2013

Her face is beautifully symmetrical though I think. I've seen some lovely photos.

by Anonymousreply 2902/26/2013

Americans don't seem to train their young actors to be on the stage. All you have to do is look right on camera. The Brits manage to educate their actors, at least the ones we see here.

Kristen Stewart's Moment of Surliness is over. God, she's a tired little tramp.

Go away, learn something about life, invest your funds, quit the drugs and lead a good life elsewhere, dear.

by Anonymousreply 3002/26/2013

Where was Dakota Fanning while all this was going on? Chain-smoking Marlboro Reds as she reclined in a pool lounger, hollering for Elle to fix another Red Bull and vodka?

by Anonymousreply 3102/26/2013

Maybe she has Aspergers.

by Anonymousreply 3202/26/2013

My mother called me up yesterday to chat about the Oscars. I didn't watch them but saw pictures and got info here but she called me and asked "who the hell was that sullen, stoned looking girl on crutches and why was she there since she looked so pissed about it?"

by Anonymousreply 3302/26/2013

I think she is an angry young lesbian who wants to come out of the closet and her people say, no. She is being forced to wear frilly dresses when she would rather be in her jeans and hoodie.

by Anonymousreply 3402/26/2013

When you talk about my piece of pussy, say it to my face, chaps!

by Anonymousreply 3502/26/2013

I thought she looked OK but I imagine she was using coke...don't most?

I thought her dress was pretty.

by Anonymousreply 3602/26/2013

Mia Farrow tweeted you could tell who's on coke right after she presented.

[quote]My mother called me up yesterday to chat about the Oscars. I didn't watch them but saw pictures and got info here but she called me and asked "who the hell was that sullen, stoned looking girl on crutches and why was she there since she looked so pissed about it?"

My mother doesn't know who Kristen Stewart is from a hole in the wall but she also remarked on who the angry, disheveled looking girl was.

by Anonymousreply 3702/26/2013

I think she showed up because she knew it is probably the last time she's invited to the dance. She is completely unlikeable, not just by the general public but her professional peers.

by Anonymousreply 3802/26/2013

She's the female Shia LeBoeuf.

by Anonymousreply 3902/26/2013

"Has there ever been a long term successful actress whose public persona was purposely that of such a humorless cunt before?"

Was there ever a time when Faye Dunaway was thought of as anything else?

But Faye had talent, at least when she was young and comparatively sane.

by Anonymousreply 4002/26/2013

It had to kill K-Screw to see her peer Jennifer Lawrence win an Oscar (and Jen's four months younger than Kristen). She was already losing roles to her and Emma Stone, and now it will be even harder.

by Anonymousreply 4102/26/2013

Hollywood is all about image. It is downright an insult to every actor and actress that this sour puss has any career at all and acts like she has to suffer so much for it (that may be true, but damn Kristen, you are supposed to be an actress, PRETEND like you are greatful and happy!).

by Anonymousreply 4302/26/2013

Blah blah blah. Nobody will call her on it - she'll continue to get jobs and other opportunities.

by Anonymousreply 4402/26/2013

no, I think she is finished

by Anonymousreply 4502/26/2013

We'll see.

by Anonymousreply 4602/26/2013

She always looks like shit and has a shitty personality but the bruises on her arm?!? She might as well have hoovered a rail off the podium. Girl is an epic wreck.

by Anonymousreply 4702/26/2013

[quote]Blah blah blah. Nobody will call her on it - she'll continue to get jobs and other opportunities.

Her IMDB page doesn't look so great right now. Not very many opportunities or roles are going her way it would seem. If you are going to act like an asshole, you better at least have the talent to back it up. She doesn't.

by Anonymousreply 4802/26/2013

My problemth KStew is not her always looking like a shitty mess with uncombed hair, heck she could grow dreads, more power to her.

My problem is her lack of enthusaism at award shows/interviews/red carpet, she always pretends to be so bored and over it all. YES pretend, because judging by some of these paparazzi photos of her, she IS able to act joyous and happy.

However, we the viewing publi who pay to see her movies or tune in to see her, she puts on a bored "SHY" or whatever attitude, and this fucking irks me.

I want her to go away, someone please take her out

by Anonymousreply 4902/26/2013

[quote] I think she is an angry young lesbian who wants to come out of the closet and her people say, no. She is being forced to wear frilly dresses when she would rather be in her jeans and hoodie

well sure fine, she should have worn a men's tuxedo suit then.

by Anonymousreply 5002/26/2013

What was up with the grunt/sigh when she first walked out?

She has the manners of a truck driver.

by Anonymousreply 5102/26/2013

Have you seen pictures of her mother? She looks like a truck driver.

by Anonymousreply 5202/26/2013

I'm guessing she thinks she is "cool" acting that way. Hey if you were cool, you would not be in those corny Twilight movies and pretending you are in a romance with your costar.

by Anonymousreply 5302/26/2013

Dear Kristen Stewart, here's the amazing thing about living in Hollywood. They have these places called Hair Salons. Should you be asked to present at the Academy Awards and happen to slice your heel in half two days before the big day, thus rendering it impossible to find a friend to help you get in a shower, they will cut, wash and color or highlight your hair! They also employ make-up artists who will hide those dark circles and bags under your eyes and add some color to your pale, lifeless coutenance. My don't you look pretty! A stylist will help you find a dress, hopefully something with sleeves, suitable for the occasion, and will also round up some lovely baubles for your ears and wrists. A medical professional can place a temporary soft cast on your affected foot, a licensed Dr. can give you a script for some fast acting pain meds that won't get you high, cause you to go blind, or make you appear to be under the influence, and a fancy shoe designer will be happy to find you a kitten heel that would look FABULOUS with that cast. A wheelchair can be rented for the day and if you show up early for the Red Carpet, you can have photos taken that don't make you look like you are auditioning for the role of Tiny Tim. Allow your fellow presenter, Mr. Radcliffe, to escort you on his arm to the podium, and for fuck's sake, please control the urge to GRUNT when he is reading the name of the unfortunate winner you got picked to announce. Muster up all the talent you have and try and look like you enjoy that fucking cushy job you have and all the perks that go with it. Or better yet, just be Jennifer Lawrence.

by Anonymousreply 5402/26/2013

There were a number of actresses there who looked unkempt (I agree Stewart was the worst of the leading names.) Greasy skin, moptop hair, shlumpy walk, bad attitude. Can't their management do anything with them?

by Anonymousreply 5502/26/2013

Does she get forced to go to these events? Maybe it's the dress that's uncomfortable. Why not just let her wear a stylish pantsuit. So many questions.

by Anonymousreply 5602/26/2013

According to an article I read a few weeks ago she has a team of 6 that gets her ready for events.

And apparently there WAS a hair stylist since he was the one who broke the story about her stepping on a piece of glass. I also read that her main make up artist was already being employed by Jennifer Lawrence (ha!) so she had to use a back up.

by Anonymousreply 5702/26/2013

She is a miserable cunt.

by Anonymousreply 5802/26/2013

I think her hair is messy because she has lice, so she has to scratch her head a lot.

by Anonymousreply 5902/26/2013

It's really too bad that charm schools don't exist anymore. Someone needs to coach her in elocution, posture and poise. She's always slouched over which makes everything else look sloppy.

Maybe not lice but she could tweaking. Don't meth heads scratch a lot?

by Anonymousreply 6002/26/2013

We don't know. She might have lice. Head lice, body lice, or pubic lice.

by Anonymousreply 6102/26/2013

Dlisted has some of the worst pictures. The blonde woman in lace in the third and fourth pictures is her publicist. How could she let her client out of the house looking like this? Acting like this?

I just don't understand how she can have a team managing her and letting her go on like this. I mean, I understand with Lohan. She's pretty much on her own. But you'd think Stewart's agency or somebody with any stake in keeping the gravy train rolling, would stage an intervention.

by Anonymousreply 6202/26/2013

I don't know about meth, but codeine makes me itch like crazy. When I get colds, codeine based cough syrup is the only thing that gets rid of my cough. So I have to take Benadryl for the itching.

by Anonymousreply 6302/26/2013

When she's pissed, Stewart has those dead fish eyes. She had that look on her face most of the time the other night.

Look, she's nothing more than a spoiled Hollywood brat who still believes she's Queen of the Hill because of her Twilight fame.

by Anonymousreply 6502/26/2013

[quote]Has there ever been a long term successful actress whose public persona was purposely that of such a humorless cunt before?


by Anonymousreply 6602/26/2013

She is indeed an insolent brat when she's having all these stylist people around her and still looks like a coke whore dragged out of a dirty and smelly back alley.

by Anonymousreply 6702/26/2013

Why do people always point out that an actor or actress should act all grateful and charming all of the time and that it's part of their job? Because it's not. The job is to show up on the set and do what the director wants. That's it. She does it. Whether she does it well or not you can argue about but who the fuck cares if she doesn't comb her hair or put make up on her bruises?

by Anonymousreply 6802/26/2013

She makes millions so no, I don't feel sorry for her. If she doesn't like doing the publicity she should take less money and tell the studio, no to publicity.

by Anonymousreply 6902/26/2013

Because an actor or actress has to build a public reputation, since in fact, work is based on not just talent, but getting people to see your movies and make people $$$$.

quote]The job is to show up on the set and do what the director wants. That's it. She does it. Whether she does it well or not you can argue about but who the fuck cares if she doesn't comb her hair or put make up on her bruises?

Well, yes and no. Actors also need to show up and promote their movies, especially when they're on the level of Kristen Stewart. She can't get through an interview, she can't pose for pictures and she can't seem to be arsed to look presentable for awards shows and major industry events. And that's all part of the job.

It's not like she's getting criticized for looking like crap walking down the street on her off hours. The Oscars, just like any company event, IS work.

by Anonymousreply 7002/26/2013

"I think she is an angry young lesbian who wants to come out of the closet and her people say, no. She is being forced to wear frilly dresses when she would rather be in her jeans and hoodie "

I think it's true that her publicists would want her to project a feminine image while the "Twilight" franchise is on. But now it's over, everyone remotely sane has left the fandom, and she really does need a new image if she wants to keep working.

The Oscars actually would have been a good time to show up with a new look for a new image, but she was given a frilly femmy white thing instead of a sexy dress or a tux. But no matter how much she hated the look, it was damn stupid to make a spectacle of herself in front of the whole Industry. An audience full of people who might give her jobs, and this is how she behaves.

by Anonymousreply 7102/26/2013

I thought she was a closeted lesbian for a long time and that was why she was so miserable. But than the director affair thing happened and now I don't know what to think. She's still as butch as ever, if not more so. Maybe my gaydar is broken.

by Anonymousreply 7202/26/2013

[quote]I do think she's very beautiful

I don't -- the word that comes to my mind is "plain".

R66, the difference between Bette Davis & this poor creature is talent.

by Anonymousreply 7302/26/2013

The thing is, IMHO coming out as bi might help her career, it'd certainly shed her awful virginal "Twilight" image.

by Anonymousreply 7402/26/2013

I don't necessarily think she has a 'virginal' image but, yes, I agree coming out as bi or gay would at least make her somewhat interesting.

And she should really just ditch the dresses and wear a suit, since she obviously hates anything femme.

by Anonymousreply 7502/26/2013

She always has that dirty, just got fucked and rolled out of bed can't be bothered look. I can't imagine how she has any career at all.

by Anonymousreply 7702/26/2013


by Anonymousreply 7802/26/2013

Lots of drugs.

by Anonymousreply 7902/26/2013

K-Stew has rat face

by Anonymousreply 8002/26/2013

Jesus. She looks god awful in thise pics.

by Anonymousreply 8102/26/2013

[quote]Why do people always point out that an actor or actress should act all grateful and charming all of the time and that it's part of their job? Because it's not.

Perhaps not the job of an actor, but definitely the job of a movie star!

by Anonymousreply 8202/26/2013

She doesn't look very happy. Maybe she shouldn't be an actress if it makes her so unhappy and if she can't BE who she wants to be and blah blah blah.

by Anonymousreply 8402/26/2013

Wow, R79! I saved that pic for my collection, renamed it Twilight of a Starlet.

by Anonymousreply 8502/27/2013

She's always come across as a sullen, stoned teenager. She also generally looks unkempt to one degree or another. Is she talented as an actress at all?

That "Harry Potter" girl usually looks well-groomed on the red carpet.

by Anonymousreply 8602/27/2013

Next year she will be relegated to doing Dancing With the Stars.

by Anonymousreply 8702/27/2013

She resembles Eddie Furlong.

by Anonymousreply 8802/27/2013

Wow. She really does look like Eddie Furlong. I couldn't put my finger on it until now.

by Anonymousreply 8902/27/2013

Now I'll never unsee it. Although I've always felt like her weirdly pale, slouched over body reminds me of Gollum.

by Anonymousreply 9002/27/2013

"KStew looked like a visual dry heave"

Michael K has a way with words.

by Anonymousreply 9102/27/2013

Was the Publicist her date? If not- why doesn't a pretty young thing have a beau on her arm?

by Anonymousreply 9202/27/2013

Because her supposed boyfriend is as gay as she is. Are there going to be more Twighlight films?

by Anonymousreply 9302/27/2013

There are no more Twilight movies. It's finished.

by Anonymousreply 9402/27/2013

Unless the Mormon women decides to write more additions to the series.

by Anonymousreply 9502/27/2013

Stephenie Meyer hasn't written a Twilight book in 5 years, so god willing, she's done.

I'm wondering when we can conclude that Kristen Stewart's "collapse is complete."

by Anonymousreply 9602/28/2013

I think what Kristen Stewart is doing is displaying alternative behavior. She wanted to appear different from her peers on Oscar night so she put on more of a "punk"/alternative type of Academy Award behavior. She has always been into punk music and I'm sure working with Joan Jett on The Runaways has influenced her. Kristen doesn't run with the pack and her Oscar night behavior was nothing more than cynicism over the whole Academy Award Show charade. I probably would have acted the same way, especially following some of the tap and dance ridiculousness that when on that night.

by Anonymousreply 9702/28/2013

R97 is fucking insane.

by Anonymousreply 9902/28/2013

I honestly think that Kirsten Stewart should have been nominated for her portrayal of Joan Jett in The Runaways. Certainly more Oscar-worthy than some of this year's nominees.

by Anonymousreply 10002/28/2013

The first film i saw her in was Panic Room. She played Jodie Foster's daughter and I thought the two of them had great chemistry. I hope one day they will work together again.

by Anonymousreply 10102/28/2013

Some fangurl has obviously found this thread.

by Anonymousreply 10203/01/2013

[quote]Last night on the Oscars she looked gaunt, angry and unkempt.

So a day that ends in y?

by Anonymousreply 10303/01/2013

She's very shy and misunderstood.

by Anonymousreply 10403/01/2013

Who cares if she is shy? R104 She wasn't nominated and never will be, she had nothing to promote. Oh and she injured herself there was no reason for her to torture herself or the public with her presence.

by Anonymousreply 10503/01/2013

On the Fashion Police (I know) they said that it was ridiculous for her to walk the red carpet on those stupid crutches, when she could have easily just gone in through the back door. Not all stars have to walk the carpet and she was only presenting, she wasn't nominated for anything and did no interviews anyway.

They were very harsh on her on Fashion Police and it was hilarious.

by Anonymousreply 10603/01/2013

[quote]her Oscar night behavior was nothing more than cynicism over the whole Academy Award Show charade.

Then why go? I doubt that she would have been missed.

by Anonymousreply 10703/01/2013

She was probably required to go by her publicist. I don't think she could have gotten out of it. Besides, she looked beautiful.

by Anonymousreply 10803/01/2013

She absolutely did not look beautiful, R108. Take off your fangurl goggles.

She looked like she had just come off a 3 day bender and had some rough sex off stage.

by Anonymousreply 10903/01/2013

If you're referring to her hair it's called 'second day hair' and was styled that way on purpose. Her eyes were probably a bit puffy from being nervous about the awards show.

by Anonymousreply 11003/01/2013

She looks worse than La Lohan.

by Anonymousreply 11103/01/2013

[quote]If you're referring to her hair it's called 'second day hair' and was styled that way on purpose. Her eyes were probably a bit puffy from being nervous about the awards show.

No it wasn't. She was scratching and pawing at her hair like a meth addict and she fucked it up. This ain't 'second day hair' it was a disaster.

by Anonymousreply 11203/01/2013

Check out the link below and you can see how Kristen Stewart's Academy Award style was created.

by Anonymousreply 11303/01/2013

If you are going to post a picture of her supposed 'beauty,' R113, you should at least find one where she looks good.

by Anonymousreply 11403/01/2013

She has a weird psychology of "don't look at me, who cares," but then she sort of cares since she show up.

I think psychologists call it approach avoidance.

by Anonymousreply 11503/01/2013

She's a whore. But you couldn't prove it by me.

by Anonymousreply 11603/01/2013

I would feel bad for her if it wasn't for her horrid attitude. As soon as Twilight ended she lost her status. She's too overexposed her chance to get out from the shadow of Twilight has past. She will of course continue to work but her career peaked with Twilight. She will now join the ranks of Scarlett Johansson except she doesn't have Scarlett's looks or sex appeal.

by Anonymousreply 11703/02/2013

She's got permanent bitch-face. And that "stepped on a piece of glass" excuse is probably a cover up for an embolism caused by a needle. Many addicts shoot themselves up in weird places to try to hide the track marks--Elvis used to get shot up between the toes.

by Anonymousreply 11803/02/2013

She'd be lucky to even have Scarlett's career.

by Anonymousreply 11903/02/2013

Because she's one of those people who will perpetually look like an angry teenager--even when she's 40, acting gigs will be few and far between for her. Especially after about five years or so.

by Anonymousreply 12003/02/2013

She looks like she's going grey in that photo, R112. And those dark circles under her eyes make her look ten years older.

by Anonymousreply 12103/02/2013

The Kristen Stewart School of Acting

by Anonymousreply 12203/02/2013

R117 - She's not going to have ScarJo's career.

by Anonymousreply 12303/02/2013

She always looks miserably unhappy and I mean ALWAYS. River Phoenix was like that; in every picture of him he looked very depressed. I don't know what her problem is exactly. Drugs? The strain of being in the closet? The strain of being stalked by photographers all the time? If it's the latter, then tough shit. You want to be a movie star in a popular but godawful franchise, what's what you're going to get.

She's not even a good actress? Maybe she should retire. She's rich enought to do that. I think she'd be happier if she did. And I'd be happier too! I'm sick of her.

by Anonymousreply 12403/02/2013

I agree with all of this, except I believe she does care. Her PR team works very, very hard to keep her in the public eye. Someone who didn't give a damn would not have done 32 magazine covers in a year. She's gotten away with years of ungrateful, rude, unwashed, half-stoned behaviour on the back of rabid Twilight fans who would have adored anyone remotely physically suitable who was cast as Bella. She only had to show up to get fawning attention, but those days are over and she has no idea how to be a grown-up.

I think she's going to have a hard time as she watches her career disappear right from under her. Or really, be taken away by Jennifer Lawrence...

by Anonymousreply 12503/02/2013

She's wealthy, maybe she doesn't care...besides that, she has made quite a few films. I hate her attitude but it's nothing new.

by Anonymousreply 12603/02/2013

I feel sorry for the guy who had to accept his Oscar from this asshole. And then pose for pictures.

by Anonymousreply 12703/02/2013

She looked like she'd either been fighting or fucking right before she came onstage at the Oscars. Does anyone know what the hell she'd been up to?

by Anonymousreply 12803/02/2013

R[112] was that photoshopped? Could she look that bad?

by Anonymousreply 12903/02/2013

Why didn't they put make-up on her bruised arms? Must have been rough sex or maybe she's been using?

by Anonymousreply 13003/02/2013

Do all men wear stubble now...whether it looks good on them or not?

by Anonymousreply 13103/02/2013

Kristen Stewart is the Sid Vicious of the flock of current actresses today. She stands on her own.

by Anonymousreply 13203/02/2013

How do you solve a problem like Kristen Stewart?

by Anonymousreply 13303/02/2013

[quote] Because she's one of those people who will perpetually look like an angry teenager--even when she's 40, acting gigs will be few and far between for her. Especially after about five years or so.

yeah an Ally Sheedy type

by Anonymousreply 13403/03/2013

Ally Sheedy looked a lot better at 22. Ally Sheedy looked a lot better at 32.

by Anonymousreply 13503/03/2013

[quote]I thought she was a closeted lesbian for a long time and that was why she was so miserable. But than the director affair thing happened and now I don't know what to think. She's still as butch as ever, if not more so. Maybe my gaydar is broken.

No, your gaydar is fine.

There are whole families in Hollywood - Mommy, Daddy and 2.5 kids - that were created solely for the purpose of making one or both of the parents appear to be straight. Why then is it so hard for people to believe that an affair could be created for reasons of image management as well? It's been done before, to the same effect - the tongues that had been wagging for years stopped.

Trust your instincts.

by Anonymousreply 13603/03/2013

She looks so fucked up in those photos. Judging by her tiny pupils I say heroin. She also has bruises on both arms.

by Anonymousreply 13703/03/2013

While I agree with you R136, I would have to think there was a better way to 'prove' Stewart was straight than concocting an affair with her much older, married director. Especially when Stewart was already supposed to have a 'boyfriend' and was in a much celebrated relationship with her co-star.

There are supposedly dozens of closeted actors in bearding relationships and none of them are pulling stunts like this.

And that stunt has effectively ruined Stewart's reputation. What kind of publicist would have their client sign up for that?

by Anonymousreply 13803/03/2013

ITA @ R138, that stupid theory @ R136 is the reason no one believes 'most' blind items about closeted celebs. The majority of them require you to suspend disbelief and logical thinking.

Let's imagine how this might have happened. Kristen Stewart's handlers are in a meeting, sitting around a conference table, and someone pipes in with this brilliant idea: "I know, let's have her get caught getting fucked in a car by a famous, married director twice her age. Who cares if it jeopardizes a multi-million dollar movie franchise, her career and the director's marriage? At least everyone will stop calling her a lap lapper."

Everyone murmurs their approval, shaking heads in approval. "Yeah, let's do it!"---high fives all around.

by Anonymousreply 13903/03/2013

[quote]Ally Sheedy looked a lot better at 22. Ally Sheedy looked a lot better at 32.

Hell, even *I* looked better at 22.

by Anonymousreply 14003/03/2013

[quote]Kristen Stewart is the Sid Vicious of the flock of current actresses today. She stands on her own.

I'd say she's more Nancy Spungen.

by Anonymousreply 14103/03/2013

Wow, R138 and R139, did the two of you ever get that right.

Spot on. Perfect.

by Anonymousreply 14203/03/2013

I think it's time for Jodie Foster to stage and intervention.

by Anonymousreply 14303/03/2013

I don't think Jodie gives a shit. Even that essay that was supposed to 'defend' KStew was All About Jodie, and said very little about Stewart.

by Anonymousreply 14403/03/2013

Oh, you got that right, R144.

by Anonymousreply 14503/03/2013

I just like the name of the thread.

by Anonymousreply 14603/04/2013

So sweet...

by Anonymousreply 14703/05/2013

They look like a couple to me. "Pal" indeed.

by Anonymousreply 14803/05/2013

She's awful. I used to have a shred of sympathy for her because, as popular as the Twilight books were, she couldn't have known they'd become the phenomenon that they became as movies. But the fact that she hemmed and hammed about the attention and then, when Twilight came to an end, signed onto another 100 million dollar budget franchise, it proved that she didn't want to become a well-respected, hardworking actress but continue as a well-known movie star living under a microscope.

Being an aloof bitch is one thing. Being an aloof bitch who's also a hypocrite is unforgivable.

by Anonymousreply 14903/05/2013

Yeah, I have a hard time believing she's straight.

by Anonymousreply 15003/05/2013

Anyone with a working brain would realize she's a lesbian. I knew it the first time I saw her

by Anonymousreply 15103/05/2013

She's bi and experimenting. The thing with Sanders was real. The thing with Pattinson is mostly fake. The thing with girlfriends is real.

by Anonymousreply 15203/05/2013

Bisexual now but lesbian in denial

by Anonymousreply 15303/05/2013

[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]

by Anonymousreply 15403/05/2013

[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]

by Anonymousreply 15503/05/2013

I think I read that Tamra is an out lesbian. I don't remember seeing her in pictures of Katy Perry but she sure spends a lot of time with Kristen! 'Boyfriend' Pattinson hasn't seen his his girlfriend in 2 months, since he's filming in Australia.

by Anonymousreply 15603/05/2013

I don't quite buy the "lesbian" angle. It makes no sense for studios to struggle with a sour lesbian, when there are a million perky straight actresses that could easily fill her role. She is expendable.

by Anonymousreply 15703/05/2013

I don't buy her as straight at all

by Anonymousreply 15803/05/2013

lol, R154!

by Anonymousreply 15903/05/2013

"I don't quite buy the "lesbian" angle. It makes no sense for studios to struggle with a sour lesbian, when there are a million perky straight actresses that could easily fill her role. "

She's actually well cast as Bella, who is supposed to be plain, useless, virginal, and totally lacking in sex appeal. She was also supposed to be in her mid-teens, and when casting teenagers, you don't always know what kind of adult sexuality will come along by the time you finish shooting a series of films.

But her closeted vibe worked well for a those sex-phobic films, at least at first.

by Anonymousreply 16003/05/2013

Chicks lived vicariously through her in the TWILIGHT movies. They wouldn't have liked it if she was too hot or too appealing, because most hardcore TWILIGHT fans are neither.

Bella is a cipher with no personality and boring looks. I guess Kristen Stewart was perfectly cast. And the role certainly didn't require any acting ability.

I've also noticed that she was a little more femme and girly in her teens. She's gotten more sullen and butch as she's aged.

by Anonymousreply 16103/05/2013

Some friends and I watched the first Twilight film...we all commented about how plain she was but then we decided the character was SUPPOSE to be plain!

by Anonymousreply 16203/06/2013

There's just no way she's straight. NO WAY.

by Anonymousreply 16303/06/2013

No way.

by Anonymousreply 16403/06/2013

simmer down

by Anonymousreply 16503/06/2013

She is coming out soon...

by Anonymousreply 16703/06/2013

Awesome news.

Maybe there's a chance for Kristen to get an Oscar nomination after all. You people have got her all wrong. Twilight is only the beginning of a long film career, and with Jodie on her side she will do just fine.

by Anonymousreply 16803/07/2013

I really hope you're joking, R168. Since the film already came out in 2012 it has no chance of being recognized for 2013/2014. It's done. And she's done.

by Anonymousreply 16903/07/2013

I feel like she's going to come out as bisexual sometime over the next few years.

by Anonymousreply 17003/07/2013

R169 It will give her more recognition and a better chance to be cast for Oscar-worthy roles in 2013.

by Anonymousreply 17103/07/2013

Kristenbot, no it will not. The movie is a flop. It had a thousand award screenings and a platform release in December. It did nothing. That's the end of it.

I could see her coming out as bi in a few years to drum up press. Her career is definitely on the skids.

by Anonymousreply 17203/07/2013

Oh god, first a Janbot now a Kristenbot? How do they find this place?

I don't know anyone who wasn't totally disgusted by her Oscar appearance. Surly, grunting and no poise at all.

by Anonymousreply 17303/07/2013

As far as I know, On The Road got NO PUBLICITY and no distribution. Seriously, what went wrong with that film? Coppola owned the rights for years and blew it off...what a jerk.

by Anonymousreply 17403/07/2013

R173 She stepped on a piece of glass and had to walk on crutches so I'm sure it wasn't easy for her to walk out onto the stage without them to present an award. And way too many people are mistaking her shyness for rudeness.

by Anonymousreply 17503/07/2013

[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]

by Anonymousreply 17603/07/2013

God. Who is this person who has landed here to defend Stewart?

"She's not rude, she's just shy." That one is as old as the hills, my friend.

by Anonymousreply 17703/07/2013

She's a poor man's Evan Rachel Wood. And no where near as talented.

by Anonymousreply 17803/07/2013

Now, this is sweet, you jaded fucks:

by Anonymousreply 17903/07/2013

What's so sweet about it?

by Anonymousreply 18003/07/2013

This thread is going in circles.

by Anonymousreply 18103/07/2013

Isn't that standard promo for the release of the DVD? Got to keep those fans gushing and all that good stuff.

by Anonymousreply 18203/07/2013

Why does Rob Patterson wear that really gross beard?

When a guy can't grow a beard, he should just accept it.

by Anonymousreply 18303/07/2013

Cry Baby! K-Stew Pouring Her Heart Out To Taylor Lautner While Fishing For Info On R-Patz!

by Anonymousreply 18403/08/2013

I thought she did a decent job on The Runaways as Joan Jett but she ruined Snow White and the Huntsman.

by Anonymousreply 18503/08/2013

I can barely even remember her in The Runaways. Dakota really stole the movie (and I didn't think she was that good, just better than Kristen). Stewart is like a black hole of suck.

by Anonymousreply 18603/08/2013

Will charlize be back?

by Anonymousreply 18803/08/2013

Oh look, Kristen Stewart's PR has arrived.

by Anonymousreply 18903/08/2013

Snow White and the Huntsman was a forgettable bore. Couple that with the whole scandal, and I don't know why they're forging ahead with a sequel. Money is the answer of course, but the first one only did well because it was up against zero competiton the week it was released.

I don't see how this will help Stewart's "relationship" with Pattinson either. Won't it just be a constant reminder of her affair even if Sanders isn't directly involved with this one?

by Anonymousreply 19003/08/2013

I'm assuming Stewart is happy to go along with a sequel simply because she has nothing better on deck. Her IMDB shows she only has 2 other movies lined up and neither has a start date.

What I don't understand about a Snow White sequel is that there is absolutely no demand for one. Is anybody clamoring to see anymore of Snow White's story? Did anybody even like the first movie? It's a miracle it made any money at all.

It's the same thing that happened with Clash of the Titans. Nobody really liked the first one but they rushed ahead with a sequel anyway, and of course, it flopped.

by Anonymousreply 19103/08/2013

Oh yeah, that Kristen Stewart's really unattractive.


She may be annoying as fuck but she's stunning WHEN she cleans up.

by Anonymousreply 19203/08/2013

You absolutely have to know, R192, that that picture has been photoshopped to death.

by Anonymousreply 19303/08/2013

So, is R 192 Kristen, Kristen's butch mommy, or Kristen's PR maven, Ruth?

by Anonymousreply 19403/08/2013

Not to mention that her makeup had to be applied with a trowel...

by Anonymousreply 19503/08/2013

I can't believe everyone here has their knickers in a bunch just because Kristen wore crutches to the Academy Awards. She is GORGEOUS!

by Anonymousreply 19603/08/2013

Oh, honey. Get better taste.

by Anonymousreply 19703/08/2013

There have been times when I thought she was pretty, it's just that in the first Twilight...they must of wanted her plain.

by Anonymousreply 19803/08/2013

Oh, yeah, that's what people were disgusted about, R196....her crutches {eyeroll}.

She looked like she rolled out of bed and didn't even shower. Her hair was a greasy mess, she had bruises on her arms and raccoon eyes. She looked like a strung out junkie hooker.

by Anonymousreply 19903/08/2013

Her personality shines through in her appearance. Dawn Davenport described Taffy as having "the face of a retarded brat". Taffy looks good compared with dead-inside Kristen.

by Anonymousreply 20103/08/2013

I think she has a pretty face and a nice body, but to compare her with Charlize is insane.

by Anonymousreply 20203/08/2013

Needs to get past trying to appeal to teens with body/ image issues.

by Anonymousreply 20303/08/2013

She's a mouth breather who never closes her lips. Gross to look at.

by Anonymousreply 20403/08/2013

She looks particularly awful in that photo with Charlize. And R200 is the ONLY person I've ever heard of who thought she could hold a candle to Theron's beauty.

Half the problem with Snow White was how gorgeous Charlize looked, while Kristen looked like a drowned rat with bunny teeth (and she couldn't close her damn mouth).

Kristen is like an uglier Amber Heard, but a prettier Rumer Willis. Which frankly means, she's average. And isn't that the appeal to ugly teens every where? She's just enough that with good hair and makeup she can look OK. Kind of like Aniston, they are the patron saints of mediocrity.

by Anonymousreply 20503/08/2013

Too much make-up doesn't suit Kirsten. To me she has a natural beauty, which is why she may have appeared so awkward at the Oscars to so many.

by Anonymousreply 20603/08/2013

I agree R206

by Anonymousreply 20703/08/2013

Is her PR agent here, plugging's a waste of time. Maybe she thinks she is Sid Vicious but she acts like every other 16 year old spoiled brat.

by Anonymousreply 20803/08/2013

[quote]Too much make-up doesn't suit Kirsten. To me she has a natural beauty, which is why she may have appeared so awkward at the Oscars to so many.

What? No. She looked awful at the Oscars because her hair was a mess, her makeup was bedraggled and she looked like she was either fighting or fucking backstage, as another DLer said. All of those bruises were gross. Then she limps out to present with Harry Potter and she grunts, grimaces and starts playing with her fucking hair again while speaking her lines in the most monotone voice I've ever heard.

And the PR line that she's just shy and awkward? Yeah, sorry, lady, nobody's buying that here. Or anywhere, really.

Except maybe the fat wackos over at LChat. I have a feeling a few of her most ardent fans wandered over here from that mess.

by Anonymousreply 20903/08/2013

Right about the "Oh, she's just shy" bullshit, R209. Shy as in the way she flipped the paps off in Cannes. Or shy as in the way every single one of her interviews turns into a celebration of Miserable Me, Kristen the Misunderstood Artist.

She's not shy. She's spoiled.

by Anonymousreply 21003/08/2013

That wench is an ugly troll. And she can't. Her day in the sun is just about over. Good thing she made a lot of money from the stupid Twilight movies; she'll need it all to get through the rest of her life because film work won't be forthcoming in the next couple of years. She's an unprofessional douchebag who pissed off a lot of people with her arrogance.

by Anonymousreply 21103/08/2013

Her attitude has a lot to do with the way the media and paparazzi has been treating her. They just won't give her a break and the only way for her to deal with it is being punk rock. I hope she is able to recover from all this and get her career back on track.

by Anonymousreply 21203/08/2013

Why should anybody give her a break when she acts like a cunt?

There a lot of beautiful, talented actresses in this world. Nobody needs this plain, untalented, ungrateful, surly little creature stinking up movies. Maybe that's what she doesn't realize. She's utterly replacable.

And she's about as punk as Justin Bieber.

by Anonymousreply 21303/09/2013

The role of Bella is both a career-maker and a career-killer. Of course it's made her rich and famous, but as the role calls for someone with zero sex appeal, all the straight male powers-that-be in Hollywood will have no interest in giving "Bella" major roles. Seriously, most roles for young actresses are cast according to what a producer finds "fuckable", and she isn't it.

I suspect her managers have spent the last few years trying to fight this by glamming her up for public appearances, but apparently she's had enough of that. Her only hope now, is to butch it up and hope that they find a bit of girl-on-girl appealing.

by Anonymousreply 21403/09/2013

Awesome! I think this will be a stepping stone for bigger, better roles. She doesn't have to be "fuckable" to be a leading lady.

by Anonymousreply 21503/10/2013

R215 is a lost, little soul.

No, "Bella" being voted "Best Mum" in some British survey voted on by tweens won't lead to better roles. Or any roles for that matter. If that were the case, the Teen Choice Awards would be the stepping stone for an A-list career!

Thanks for playing, but maybe a Twilight fanboard is more your speed.

by Anonymousreply 21603/10/2013

R216 I don't know why everyone here is so Hellbent on seeing Kristen's career fail. Is in because you hated the Twilight movies? Please explain.

by Anonymousreply 21703/10/2013

I speak for myself when I say that I couldn't sit through more than, oh, about 20 minutes of one of the Twilights when it was on FX recently.

I didn't hate it. No. I just didn't care one way or the other. Lame special effects. Juvenile script. Flat, monotonous acting.

As for Kristen's career--if she gets some talent, and if she could stop with the arrogant teeny-bopper attitude, then more power to her. But, honestly, I don't think either will happen any time soon.

by Anonymousreply 21803/10/2013

Exclusive video of KStew securing her next role:

by Anonymousreply 21903/11/2013

[quote] She's average. And isn't that the appeal to ugly teens every where?

That's exactly her appeal. Teen girls love the idea that a girl as plain and homely as Bella (aka KStew) could have every male in the Pacific NW chasing after her.

by Anonymousreply 22003/11/2013

She isn't beautiful but she isn't homely either. Doing the hissing queen thing about every young actress just gets old and stereotypical after awhile.

by Anonymousreply 22103/11/2013

Here are some topless photos of her from On the Road.

by Anonymousreply 22203/11/2013

Oh, R222, you can find unedited pics and gifs from the film online if you look hard enough and want to rub one out, err, gaze upon those perky, juicy, mouth-watering little tits!

by Anonymousreply 22303/12/2013

SO perky!

by Anonymousreply 22403/12/2013

you're welome

by Anonymousreply 22503/12/2013

Actually the first time I saw the pics of her naked breasts, all I could think about was Rupert's mouth sucking on them like a baby, can't blame me, there are pics of him doing that to her in her car.

by Anonymousreply 22603/12/2013

The only people who thinks she's sexy are lesbians.

by Anonymousreply 22703/12/2013

Kristen has beautiful rosey pink nipples that are just the right size for sucking. God, I'd love to flick her clit with my tongue all nigiht long while watching her come over and over again...

by Anonymousreply 22803/13/2013


by Anonymousreply 22903/13/2013

Kristen Stewart fans are creepy.

by Anonymousreply 23103/13/2013

I don't quite get what people have against her. Is it because of the Twilight films? I think people mistake her shyness/reservedness for bitchiness. And she's not bad looking at all, I find her attractive, there's something interesting about her.

by Anonymousreply 23203/13/2013

If she was an ordinary girl I knew in real life I'd probably fancy her (I'm a straight male btw)

by Anonymousreply 23303/13/2013

It's because she a cunt.

by Anonymousreply 23403/13/2013

Really, have you met her?

by Anonymousreply 23503/13/2013

R19 What are you on about? OK, her presenting wasn't that "polished" and she seemed a bit nervous but she still smiled. How on Earth was she being disrespectful?

by Anonymousreply 23603/13/2013

Maybe her "smirk" was because she was in pain with her foot and she was thinking something like "Oh God, I can't believe I'm up here with this foot injury" or "Come on, hurry up, Daniel!"

by Anonymousreply 23703/13/2013

[quote]Seriously, most roles for young actresses are cast according to what a producer finds "fuckable", and she isn't it.

If you're gay how do you really know what's fuckable to straight guys? I wouldn't kick her out of bed.

I've read the whole read and it's just so ridiculously catty. Is this site basically a gay self-parody humour site?

by Anonymousreply 23803/13/2013

Some of these posts sound like they're either being written by Twihards or Kristen Stewart's PR. Strange.

by Anonymousreply 23903/13/2013

Do PR people for big stars really bother to defend them on informal Internet sites?

by Anonymousreply 24003/13/2013

I think Kristen Stewart is a very pretty girl, JMHO.

by Anonymousreply 24103/13/2013

[quote]Really, have you met her?

No, so whatever.

by Anonymousreply 24203/13/2013

R238 = Twihard.

by Anonymousreply 24303/14/2013

For those of you Kristen fans here who think this thread is 'catty' (not my word) the headlined theme of Data lounge is Pointless Bitchery--so by that standard, this thread is perfectly normal.

If it bothers you, please go back to your Twilight boards. You'll be happier there.

by Anonymousreply 24403/14/2013

Her IMDB page shows she has almost nothing going on career wise.

by Anonymousreply 24503/22/2013

Doesn't she have the movie about shoes and the cuntsman sequel lining up? I guess the filming date is not decided yet. And the Focus movie is it still a go?? or being swapped under the rug?

by Anonymousreply 24603/23/2013

Over the holiday weekend I decided to try to watch Snow White and the Huntsman. My mother walked into the room and asked who was in the movie. Since my mother has no idea who Kristen Stewart is, I told her that it was the girl who hobbled out on stage at the Oscars last month.

My mother has no strong feelings on pop culture or Hollywood in general, but she said, "that girl is a PIG!"

by Anonymousreply 24704/04/2013

Oh please - that girl hasn't said anything unique and fresh since she smoked her first blunt.

Happily, she's disappearing even as I type.

by Anonymousreply 25007/09/2013

It's sad really what drugs do to a person. I typed before I saw this Oscar nightmare. Damn what is wrong with her.

by Anonymousreply 25107/09/2013

Filming Camp X-ray on set.

by Anonymousreply 25307/20/2013

She really fucked up any chance she ever had at a credible career. This Camp X-Ray garbage looks like a direct to Lifetime TV movie of the week.

by Anonymousreply 25407/20/2013

How did she fuck up a chance for a credible career? By fucking a director? Twilight? I bet she ends up marrying a director even though she is clearly a lesbian. She is attracted to power and opportunistic, the exact opposite of what she says in interviews. She plays the Hollywood game hard and her publicist works overtime to set up pap shots etc to keep her relevant. I think she'll be around a lot longer than we all think (and want).

by Anonymousreply 25507/20/2013

R255 - Yes, she'll be around for awhile.

by Anonymousreply 25607/20/2013

She's already faded. She's a tabloid joke.

Her acting career is essentially dead.

by Anonymousreply 25707/20/2013

R257 - She's faded a little. She's not going to remain A list, but she will be a working actress.

by Anonymousreply 25807/20/2013

I feel like she is overtly sexual and thrives on shocking people. I had a coworker that was like that, she would sit on the male collegues laps, be inappropriate test their boundries etc. She was defintly the driving force in the affair with the director and probably pushed and hinted alot before their first hook-up.

I get the feeling that after being caught with the director she wan't to push further and I wouldn't be surprised if we see pictures in the near future "revealing" a lesbian affair.

by Anonymousreply 25907/20/2013

She looks healthier than she did a year ago.

by Anonymousreply 26007/20/2013

How many people who have posted in this thread recently are guys?

by Anonymousreply 26107/20/2013


by Anonymousreply 26207/26/2013

She always looks like she is in the middle of a big poop.

by Anonymousreply 26312/14/2013

Re: The Kristen Stewart Problem

by Anonymousreply 26404/21/2014
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!