Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Theater Critics Gossip

Theater Critics: What's their damage?

by George Jean Nathanreply 2905/12/2013

Ben Brantley has long outstayed his welcome - if there was ever a "welcome" at all. His reviews aren't very enlightening, especially his dreaded "love letter" reviews.

by George Jean Nathanreply 102/18/2013

I can't believe MIchael Reidel is straight

by George Jean Nathanreply 202/18/2013

A lack of writing talent and a jealousy of people who are so gifted.

by George Jean Nathanreply 302/18/2013

Is John Simon still alive? He did a lot of damage in his day.

by George Jean Nathanreply 402/18/2013

He's not, R2.

by George Jean Nathanreply 502/18/2013

Reidel is straight. I pulled up next to his urinal one time and pulled my 11 inches and wacked it around the urinal. He didn't even look over at it. When he left, he turned AWAY from me and left the urinal.

by George Jean Nathanreply 602/18/2013

As William Goldman once famously said, looking for the world's greatest theatre critic is as futile as looking for the world's greatest ditchdigger. He doesn't exist because the job doesn't call forth the man. The job is SHIT. Which is why theatre critics suck, always have, and always will.

Read THE SEASON. Nothing's changed.

by George Jean Nathanreply 702/18/2013

Riedel and his bf have the seats in front of me at Encores, every Friday night. They sit there and hold hands while the ballads play, and whisper like little girls. The bf often kisses Riedel's ear. No straight man does that.

by George Jean Nathanreply 802/18/2013

R8, where is Encores and what is it?

by George Jean Nathanreply 902/18/2013

Charles Isherwood has VICIOUS halitosis.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1002/18/2013

A friend who sublet Riedel's Village apartment got kicked out ten years later when the landlord found out.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1102/18/2013

R9 = too dumb to live

by George Jean Nathanreply 1202/18/2013

Unlike plays and people, Ben Brantley has never come across a buffet he didn't like. That boy is a P.I.G., pig.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1302/18/2013

I'll never forget watching Stephen Holden picking his nose during a Karen Akers cabaret act at the Oak Room of the Algonquin. His index finger was all the way up his nose probably massaging his brain for le mot juste. He was there then with a boyfriend; I also saw him at the Oak Room another time reviewing some other cabaret performer and he was with a dame who was all over him.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1402/18/2013

Ben Brantley looks dirty in person, like he doesn't wash his clothes often enough.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1502/18/2013

Critics may be marginal people, but even by that low standard I'm still surprised Riedel's name is brought up in this thread.

What's most amazing is that, judging from his appearance in the docu "Show Business", Riedel himself has no idea what a complete bottom-feeder he is.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1602/18/2013

Riedel may be a self-important bitch, R16, and he's basically a gossip columnist. But EVERYONE in NYC with any connection (or interest in) theatre reads his column. Cause it's fun.

And that's just not true of his classier "legit critic" colleagues. People will glance at the Times to see if it's thumbs up or thumbs down, but no one pores over the reviews. Frank RIch was, in the 80s, one of the most loathed people in NY theatre, but everyone read his reviews. Every word.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1702/18/2013

Even though I had very little respect for Rich's opinions -- he was the quintessence of middlebrow -- I never doubted the seriousness of his intent or his ability to see a larger artistic purpose. (That sounds way more high falutin' than I mean.)

But Riedel's like a hairdresser who, because he services the wife of a publisher of a local newspaper, gets the job reviewing community theater ... and terrorizes the few people who give a shit. In a way, Riedel is the perfect "critic" for the industry that Broadway has become.

And, btw, if Riedel is straight then I will personally eat out Marian Seldes vagina.

by George Jean Nathanreply 1802/18/2013

Riedel IS straight. Didn't you hear him say so when they interviewed him?

by George Jean Nathanreply 1902/18/2013

You realize of course that most of these posts are by the same embittered person?

So tiresome. Go home dear. Please.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2002/18/2013

Don't drag me into this.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2102/18/2013

OH dear, R20 is tired and calls strangers Dear. Must be an elder, living alone in the nursing home.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2202/18/2013

This thread pretty clearly is basically a conversation between two, possibly three, extremely elderly assholes.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2302/18/2013

It is odd how everyone hated Frank Rich when he was a critic BUT loved him when he became a op-ed writer.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2402/18/2013

The critics didn't help me, the bitches.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2502/18/2013

I thought people feared Frank Rich because he was so influential. And he campaigned for shows, in his perspectives column. I didn't know he was hated. I think he was too good of a writer to be hated.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2602/18/2013

I think he was hated by his foes. I bought his collected reviews at a used bookstore recently. He added some present day comments after the reviews. Trevor Nunn and David Hare and a lot of the British mega-musical people really hated him. He feels his opinions have been validated with time.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2702/19/2013

There is no way that Riedel would have looked at r6's dick, even if he wanted to - because he knows it would make its way into the gossip circuit if he did. His whole column depends on the kindness of strange r6s, who feed him quick tips about celeb naughtiness.

So, he's very, very careful - particularly since he was shamed by his own drunken antics a few years back.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2802/19/2013

The Village Voice's Michael Feingold is worried about being fired.

For my money, which ain't much, he's he smartest critic in NYC.

by George Jean Nathanreply 2905/12/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!