Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Nick Gr1mshaw & co. PART 6

New thread

by Anonymousreply 59502/19/2013

Tell us again who this is, OP, before you post another 600 masturbatory posts.

by Anonymousreply 102/15/2013

Thanks for the new thread!

by Anonymousreply 202/15/2013

So is he out? Outed?

This is the biggest development of the story yet.

The first fully out teenage pop sensation. Sounds good to me.

by Anonymousreply 302/15/2013

Article is still up...they also just posted one with a headline about harry pining for taylor by getting wasted on valentines day. Not sure what they're doing to be honest.

by Anonymousreply 402/15/2013

So Alexa C is back in london and by the looks of instagram and she's with Gellz, Pixie, Aimee, Jack G etc. No sign of Grimmy yet, he may be MIA?

by Anonymousreply 502/15/2013

Thanks for the new thread!

Just seen the Metro article, they are seriously not joking are they, oddly the only mention of Rita's lover was in a sentence without a mention of James Arthur, so could actually refer to someone else, as all of the references to him included variations on "rumoured" unlike the ones of Nick and Harry.

I had a quick read of the previous article about choosing Taylor's tract and it just says "could be hinting" so she is not normally so direct.

It doesn't seem to have had much impact on twitter or tumblr from the quick look I have had. Apparently 1D are having a meeting at the end of their rehearsal, one wonders if this will be mentioned.

by Anonymousreply 602/15/2013

And yet these same deranged fanbois will turn around and trash the deranged Twilight twats.

by Anonymousreply 702/15/2013

He did say he had a dinner tonight, didn't sound like just a get together with friends so I imagine he's elsewhere. Still curious about his vague tomorrow night plans too. What is going on

by Anonymousreply 802/15/2013

Oh primetime was kind to us today...

Yeah, a lot of people seem to be taking it as a joke...which is odd to me. I mean it might be but it really isn't written that way...and surely people must consider the possibility at least of it being serious.

I'd love to know that about the meeting too, C.

by Anonymousreply 902/15/2013

R4 - Do you mean the attached; I am losing track a little, they seem to have published so many about Harry in the last couple of days. The article itself just says that he didn't let Taylor ruin his Valentine's Day. Of course it is written by someone else. They really do need to co-ordinate themselves a little better.

by Anonymousreply 1002/15/2013

Well H is allegedly at a birthday party in Manchester tonight.

by Anonymousreply 1102/15/2013

Re R6 - Track not tract!!

by Anonymousreply 1202/15/2013

R11 how do you know this? Is someone tweeting it? Wonder if it's someone in Nick's family...

by Anonymousreply 1302/15/2013

[quote] Radio 1 DJ comfort too as he spent the most romantic day of the year without his lover Harry Styles.

[quote] Grimshaw, meanwhile, was likely to be nursing a broken heart last night as he gets ready for his One Direction lover embarking on the band’s eight-month world tour. The 28-year-old breakfast host recently spoke of his dread at being without the 19-year-old.

Pretty direct if you ask me.

by Anonymousreply 1402/15/2013

Found it: from Nick's niece Liv's twitter @olivegrimmo

by Anonymousreply 1502/15/2013

R11 Someone tweeted a picture of him. I don't think it's Nick's family, more's the pity.

by Anonymousreply 1602/15/2013

Just seen a pic of H with suit jacket on on twitter with an actress called shannon flynn who had just met him. Dont know where only he was at a posh hotel today.

by Anonymousreply 1702/15/2013

It definitely is, R14.

I forgot to say thanks for thread, OP.

by Anonymousreply 1802/15/2013

So, does that mean that Nick is at home? If that is the case and Harry is in Manchester, maybe they'll meet up around there?

by Anonymousreply 1902/15/2013

Not relevant to anything tonight by interesting convo

by Anonymousreply 2002/15/2013

His niece posted the pic 15 hours ago though and it seems like it's from a different night? No clue when nick would have been in Manc? Unless she was in London?

by Anonymousreply 2102/15/2013

R15 - She posted that photograph 15 hours ago, so not today.

There are several photographs of Harry at the party on @1Dneews, including one with a man who was with him at the studio earlier.

by Anonymousreply 2202/15/2013

What does "hen macking" mean, r20?

by Anonymousreply 2302/15/2013

R20 - I don't know; I think the fact that Caroline's assistant has a photograph of Harry and Nick kissing is rather telling! (It seriously took too long for me to translate "hen macking" back into normal typing!).

by Anonymousreply 2402/15/2013

R23 - I rather think it is a quickly, and badly, typed version of "them macking" (macking meaning kissing).

by Anonymousreply 2502/15/2013

I think she meant *them, and macking = snogging

by Anonymousreply 2602/15/2013

Can you link to that photo, C? I've seen a few from tonight but not with a man.

Thanks, R20, that's really interesting, and yeah, what it is "hen macking?"

by Anonymousreply 2702/15/2013

R23 I just googled hen macking and I'm still giggling yet. Still have no idea what it could possibly mean.

by Anonymousreply 2802/15/2013

Oh, hahahaha...there is too much going on for me to focus I guess. Thanks, C and R26.

by Anonymousreply 2902/15/2013

R27 - See attached.

by Anonymousreply 3002/15/2013

Oh, I did see that one, C. Thanks though. I may need some coffee or something to focus.

by Anonymousreply 3102/15/2013

I think Harry was smoking outside with that msn wasn't he in a pic in yorks earlier? I didn't know he did smoke.

by Anonymousreply 3202/15/2013

There is no mention of that on twitter, are you sure, R32?

by Anonymousreply 3302/15/2013

wow just caught up on that Metro article!!

by Anonymousreply 3402/15/2013

N16 what do make of all of this?

by Anonymousreply 3502/15/2013

R32 The attached is the only photograph I have seen of the two of them at the studio and I think it is the other man who is; oddly it is very difficult to tell those arm it is in the middle of the photograph.

N16 - My feelings too.

by Anonymousreply 3602/15/2013

Hi, N16 :)!!!!

by Anonymousreply 3702/15/2013

The article doesn't seem to be causing to much of a stir?! Strange?

by Anonymousreply 3802/15/2013

Thanks again, C. I don't actually see a just looks like Harry is waving and it is a bit of a blur. I think the person who took it would probably have mentioned if he was smoking right then. I only wonder because of that video of him with an inhaler, which makes me doubt he'd smoke? Who knows though.

by Anonymousreply 3902/15/2013

The girl's father arranged for H to appear at the party tonight so probably a paid gig.

by Anonymousreply 4002/15/2013

LG - Not really; Friday afternoon is known to be the classic time to drop a story that you don't want to be especially talked about and the writer tagged it with James Arthur's, Rita Ora's and Nick's names but noticeable not Harry's, so it is not going to show up on anyone's google alerts.

One wonders if it was preplanned to test the waters. It seems to have come out of nowhere given their normal stories about Harry.

by Anonymousreply 4102/15/2013

Sorry maybe i was assuming he was smoking. I saw pic on FB could be a blur or cigarette and you might be right in it could be either persons hand. Just thought with him not smiling and stood in doorway.Nick has an inhaler has asthma and he smokes.

by Anonymousreply 4202/15/2013

No problem, R42. I was just curious.

by Anonymousreply 4302/15/2013

I can definitely see it as being a test, C. That is interesting about it not being tagged with Harry's name and published at this low-key time of week.

by Anonymousreply 4402/15/2013

R42 if it's the picture of him standing by the door earlier today, I saw a clearer picture, it just shows him waving, his other hand is in his pocket.

by Anonymousreply 4502/15/2013

C, the article is very odd. Repeatedly mentioning the term 'lover' and in neither a properly serious nor jokey tone?

It only went up a few hours ago. I assumed it was published at 2.59pm as written at the top of the piece but apparently not.

It does suggest they is no injunction though?

by Anonymousreply 4602/15/2013

Just noticed someone has posted a link to metro article on an old H and N thread on DS in Showbiz. Which hasn't been active since November.

by Anonymousreply 4702/15/2013

Thanks, R45.

How is it possible to tell when the article was put up?

by Anonymousreply 4802/15/2013

The pictures in the article do come up in a search of both their names at about the time mentioned

by Anonymousreply 4902/15/2013

LG - Not sure about the injunction; someone posted a link to an article about them at the near the end of the previous thread, and made the following comment:

"There is some interesting information here on "interim non-disclosure orders" : By definition they are time-restricted and it seems that for the Internet contempt proceedings are rare, as online publication is apparently not considered as serious or something because it does not have the same permanency and credibility as a newspaper publication and will not be on a database"

So I think a website, even attached to a newspaper, could get away with it.

by Anonymousreply 5002/15/2013

I'm not sure what to think of it! I don't work in showbiz or journalism/pr so I don't know how it works but it seems major to me?! Like, the metro is the free paper everyone reads on the tube in the morning - I can't understand why more people aren't mentioning it? I suppose they are assuming it to be so blatant it's a joke.

The main thing I find strange though is the word 'lover' being used so many times. I can't think of a time I've ever referred to a partner, however casual, in that way. Why not use 'partner'? or 'boyfriend'?

by Anonymousreply 5102/15/2013

Someone has now posted the Metro article on tumblr.

by Anonymousreply 5202/15/2013

I don't know what to make of it. It seems very deliberate though.

by Anonymousreply 5302/15/2013

Maybe just because of Valentine's Day, N16? It is odd though. The whole thing is, as is the lack of if everyone is waiting for someone else to react first.

by Anonymousreply 5402/15/2013

It already was on tumblr actually, R52. That is where I saw it first a few hours ago.

by Anonymousreply 5502/15/2013

N16 - It was posted too late to make any of today's print editions and there won't be another actual print copy of the Metro until Monday and I would be very surprised if it's in that. So really it is just those who look at the website on a Friday evening, which can't be very many.

by Anonymousreply 5602/15/2013

I did a twitter search on the actual URL of the article to see how many people were talking about it and there actually aren't that many results. The oldest tweet is from 10 hours ago so the article has been up a while.

by Anonymousreply 5702/15/2013

The use of the word lover must be intentional, it's the only way they describe Harry in the whole article, whereas James Arthur is called "rumoured new man" and that they "fueled rumours that they are more than just friends". I think it is to leave absolutely no dispute in what she is saying.

by Anonymousreply 5802/15/2013

Haha, that was me, r47.

by Anonymousreply 5902/15/2013

That's possible, C. It really is so oddly deliberate.

by Anonymousreply 6002/15/2013

Haha, nice one R59 to stir it up on that thread, i'm always interested in what DS posters think actually!

by Anonymousreply 6102/15/2013

It's the most popular article on the gossip section and the third overall though, Pringle. Many people must have read it.

by Anonymousreply 6202/15/2013

It's unusual to use the same term repeatedly? You would normally vary it for interest.

by Anonymousreply 6302/15/2013

I find it more weird that the article was preceded (not directly) by articles about Harry/Taylor and followed by the same.

by Anonymousreply 6402/15/2013

ahhh thanks c - well it really has been buried then - in 5 years of reading the hard copy almost every day I've never been on the metro website. I can't see it getting much traffic at all (comparative to other news outlets) The apparent lack of reaction is very interesting. I wonder if any other site will run with it now. Doubtful, as there are no direct quotes.

by Anonymousreply 6502/15/2013

It would be hard for any other news outlet to build on this as the story is not what The Metro reported on (Ora & N consoling one another etc..) but rather the way in which they reported it?

The Metro piece itself is now the 'news'

by Anonymousreply 6602/15/2013

N16 - Yes, that's what makes me wonder if it was pre-planned, not to mention you would have to be pretty mean to out him on the day that their Comic Relief single was released otherwise.

(It also might possibly explain Nick's very strange mood this morning on his show, which even he kept commenting on; he was very hyper).

by Anonymousreply 6702/15/2013

Can someone explain to me why they would pre-plan it?

by Anonymousreply 6802/15/2013

Sorry, I mean debuted rather than released.

by Anonymousreply 6902/15/2013

R68 - Just to see the reaction on a small scale.

by Anonymousreply 7002/15/2013

I'm officially lost and have no idea what the media are doing.

by Anonymousreply 7102/15/2013

I have a hard time beleiving it could have been planned, because I can't really see 1D's PR even considering a coming out for Harry right now. That said, I think the fact that this appeared so soon after Harry's birthday supports this theory a bit (as in, waiting till he's 19 so it sounds less "scandalous").

by Anonymousreply 7202/15/2013

R71 I agree with c. I think they are trying to gage the reaction.

by Anonymousreply 7302/15/2013

Yeah, I agree, R73.

Yeah, R72, it could well be that they felt 19 sounded better than 18. Bizarre yet plausible.

by Anonymousreply 7402/15/2013

This whole thing is just so weird.

by Anonymousreply 7502/15/2013

Now the article is at the top of trending list on the main metro website/homepage.

by Anonymousreply 7602/15/2013


by Anonymousreply 7702/15/2013

How do you guys think the term 'lover' is being used?

FWB? Or as in a relationship?

by Anonymousreply 7802/15/2013

The whole thing seems so inconsequential...which is really amazingly great! I think that if this was testing the waters, it couldn't have gone any better. This is what they wanted.

by Anonymousreply 7902/15/2013

I can't help but think it was meant to be taken as a joke, though; simply because "lover" is such an odd choice of word, not one you read very often in the press ...

Also the complete lack of reaction doesn't suggest to me that this is a "test gone well", more that no one else has read anything into it. I highly doubt this is testing the waters for a "coming out" at the BRITs ...

by Anonymousreply 8002/16/2013

R80 - I agree it is very odd, especially if it is preplanned; why go with the Metro? I can't imagine there will be any PDA at the Brit's either!

The strange thing is that it's written as a straight showbiz gossip piece, the quote from Nick is given as if it was serious (she cut the bit at the end about candles etc which made it obvious he was joking) and she had no need to mention Harry at all given that it's mainly about Rita Ora. I am not particularly puzzled by the use of the word "lover" I think it was the quickest way for her to make her point, but I am surprised that both the Metro and Syco etc have let the article stand. I don't suppose we will ever really understand her motivation. It's certainly not being picked up on though.

by Anonymousreply 8102/16/2013

So, is it true?

by Anonymousreply 8202/16/2013

[quote]It's certainly not being picked up on though.

It's like "The Purloined Letter".

by Anonymousreply 8302/16/2013

R83 - Indeed, it is the letter itself.

by Anonymousreply 8402/16/2013

It's really odd that there has been NO REACTION at all. Bizarre.

by Anonymousreply 8502/16/2013

Probably because Harry's name isn't in the headline

by Anonymousreply 8602/16/2013

Yeah exactly there are two names in the headline and neither are Harry OR Nick, no one would think it has anything to do with them. I did raise an eyebrow at them not tagging Harry too. The article comes up fairly low on the list after some other not-as-recent ones if you do a news search for harry styles nick grimshaw, but I doubt anyone would stumble on it if they were just interested in Harry. I'm really surprised there hadn't been more fuss on tumblr or twitter or stuff like that, but it just seems like the people who care are talking amongst themselves and the people who would freak out mostly haven't seen it.

by Anonymousreply 8702/16/2013

Yeah, probably. I'm curious if any new tweets from people in the know will turn up.

by Anonymousreply 8802/16/2013

I'm just praying ontd don't find it and provide another 200 comments about what an awful person Nick is :/

by Anonymousreply 8902/16/2013

Ugh, yes, ontd is mostly so unpleasant.

by Anonymousreply 9002/16/2013

Henry Holland's show is being livestreamed at 7pm which is exciting! Likelyhood of H/N attending?

by Anonymousreply 9102/16/2013


Didn't Nick say he had something he had to be in London for at 7 on Saturday??

by Anonymousreply 9202/16/2013

Oooh, that would be great, R91!

by Anonymousreply 9302/16/2013

1D were still in Yorkshire earlier though, have they left?

by Anonymousreply 9402/16/2013


I feel sure he said 7 because he was talking about Example's Sheffield show and I remember thinking that he could probably have gone and made it back in plenty of time if he wasn't busy til the evening.

by Anonymousreply 9502/16/2013

Yeah, R95, I think it makes sense for Nick to be would be great if Harry could join him, if they're back in London in time.

by Anonymousreply 9602/16/2013


I have to admit, I get so used to my 3.5 hours of Nick every weekday morning that I feel a bit bereft at weekends!

by Anonymousreply 9702/16/2013

Awwwww, R97, I can imagine. He is great fun to listen to, immediately giving the day a positive start.

by Anonymousreply 9802/16/2013


Where is the show being livestreamed?? Thanks!

by Anonymousreply 9902/16/2013

Henry holland website

by Anonymousreply 10002/16/2013

R99, here is Henry's tweet about the links:

by Anonymousreply 10102/16/2013

Nick did say his Sat plans were a fashion thing his friend was doing so it's almost 100% that he'll be at Henry's show.

by Anonymousreply 10202/16/2013

People on Twitter are saying the lads are still at studio in Yorkshire so its unlikely H will be back for 7pm

by Anonymousreply 10302/16/2013

Wonder if we'll get any interaction between Nick and Harry at the Brits? That would be nice!

(and thanks for the Henry Holland links btw, much appreciated)

by Anonymousreply 10402/16/2013

That's a pity, R103 :(.

by Anonymousreply 10502/16/2013

Also - Nick and Sara Cox were talking on the show when they thought the mics were still off about Nick booking a table for 12 so he likely was at Alexa's dinner thing on Friday.

by Anonymousreply 10602/16/2013

It's official, I love Aimee and Ian together!!

by Anonymousreply 10702/16/2013

N will 100% be at Henry's show - they are best buds from way back! I think it's highly doubtful H will go too though, I'm more interested in whether they will both go to the Burberry show on Monday. That's the one show I would expect to see H at, last time (amid all the CD hype) he took Tom Atkin along

by Anonymousreply 10802/16/2013

Yes R107. Called it! Lovely pair :)

by Anonymousreply 10902/16/2013

Also, forgive the overposting but I'm pretty sure this is the playlist N mentioned he was working on for his friend on Valentine's night. Ashley Williams shares an office with the Teasdales and Eve Lee, she's good friends with Alice Dellal and Pixie too.

Bit of 1D in there!

by Anonymousreply 11002/16/2013


And of all 1D songs, it's THAT one.

Altogether now, "I've been playing it cooooooool"

by Anonymousreply 11102/16/2013

Haha, N16 and R111.

by Anonymousreply 11202/16/2013

R107 Cute! I asked back in one of the other threads if those two were together and no one was really sure. So you have Ian and Aimee, then possibly the loveliest couple ever in Cara and Rita and of course a chance of Nick and Harry. Are there any other of Nick's pals who can pair up?

by Anonymousreply 11302/16/2013

Doesn't it say Ashley herself made the playlist in the blurb?

by Anonymousreply 11402/16/2013

R114 it does, but I think Grim made it :) If the music she uses for her show is smilar I'll be convinced!

by Anonymousreply 11502/16/2013

I thought Ian was gay because of some comments the whole breakfast crew was making a couple of months ago after a date of his. They were teasing him about being sore/limping/exhausted and being up all night. They made a gay sex innuendo that I've totally forgot now. I remember being really surprised how blatant they were being but no one ever really commented on it. This was before people started speculating about Ian/Aimee. Maybe I just read their convo wrong, or he could be bisexual.

by Anonymousreply 11602/16/2013


I thought that too, but they've also joked a lot about girls he fancies so I have no idea anymore!

by Anonymousreply 11702/16/2013

Tweet from the Henry Holland show - I have no idea who the guy is though.

by Anonymousreply 11802/16/2013

House Of Holland website seems to have crashed so there is a youtube link, doesn't seem to be any sound at the moment though.

by Anonymousreply 11902/16/2013

you can see nick and pixie sitting in the far right of this link for the henry holland show (no sound though)

by Anonymousreply 12002/16/2013

R118, if he is N's types, H clearly isn't.

by Anonymousreply 12102/16/2013

Haha this girl who is a senior fashion assistant just tweeted that nick is at the house of holland show but no harry with him, sadface. Just thought it was cute that people expect to see h in tow!

by Anonymousreply 12202/16/2013

they appear to have moved the camera up slightly, you can only see their feet now. Nick is wearing dark shoes with what looks like pink spots? might be his socks. You can see them at the edge of the frame.

by Anonymousreply 12302/16/2013

Thanks for the links, R119 and R120.

That is cute, R122!

LG there are exceptions to everyone's type I think.

by Anonymousreply 12402/16/2013

Not that I am saying there is anything there but in general.

by Anonymousreply 12502/16/2013


I was going to say the same thing! I have a type, but that's not ALL I ever look at in a man. Good looking is good looking after all ;)

by Anonymousreply 12602/16/2013

R118 I did a quick google of the Derek Blasberg and he's a fashion editor.

His facebook is pretty public and it says he's in an open relationship with a woman.

by Anonymousreply 12702/16/2013

Yes, exactly and same here, R126, and sometimes I like someone pretty much the opposite of my usual type of guy.

by Anonymousreply 12802/16/2013


Apparently he went on holiday with Nick and Alexa and their crowd??

by Anonymousreply 12902/16/2013

Thanks for clearing that up then, R127, haha.

by Anonymousreply 13002/16/2013

R129, Perhaps that's who N snogged on holiday then?

by Anonymousreply 13102/16/2013

No idea why L Girl is always so insistant that Harry isn't Nick's type.

Whether they're together or not - Nick likes young twinky models (which Harry classifies as) and has admitted in the past that he finds Harry attractive (pre being friends with him even)

Him and Derek are friends and if there was anything more with Derek (who I think is straight?) he would be the exception to Nick's type.

by Anonymousreply 13202/16/2013

And Nick snogged Aimee on holiday - there's a picture - so I'm guessing that's what he was referring to.

by Anonymousreply 13302/16/2013


Yeah, whether he and Harry are together or not, I don't think there's any question that Nick finds him attractive and has done for a while.

by Anonymousreply 13402/16/2013

R132, some guy commented that masculine is his type (based on his last bf) and that matches HH who I read he saw for a bit (might be rubbish) and Nicolo IMO.

It's irrelevant anyway. If 1D's camp are seemingly fine with The Metro publishing articles referring to H as N's lover, that suggests to me there is no injunction and no secret relationship in need of hiding.

Unpopular opinion I know, but that's how I see it.

by Anonymousreply 13502/16/2013

Nicolo masculine? Yeah right.

And as stated, Nick has said he finds Harry attractive so it doesn't matter what Nick's type is.

1D wouldn't want articles with Harry being referred to as Nick's lover whether or not they're true. There's enough rumors already that this article should cause concern. That's what makes it so odd.

Does this mean you're actually leaving for good LG? Farewell!

by Anonymousreply 13602/16/2013

LG - It's not so much it's an unpopular opinion, it's just a slightly odd one.

One imagines the 1D camp are not "fine" with the article but do you really honestly think they are in a position to sue for libel.

I am seriously being to wonder if instead of your self-professed dislike of Caroline Flack, you do indeed want Harry to be in a relationship with her. For someone who apparently liked the idea of Nick/Harry until recently your last comment does sound rather bitter.

by Anonymousreply 13702/16/2013

R136, nope.

by Anonymousreply 13802/16/2013

LG - nothing wring with an unpopular opinion. If no one took that position we wouldn't have a thread worth debating.

For what it's worth, for the first time I am comfortable they are sleeping together without any real doubt.

Lover is a classic word used in UK media when a publication is sure of a physical relationship.(but possibly unsure of emotional tie (eg boyfriend)

They know something. Whether its a PR test or a leak I don't know

by Anonymousreply 13902/16/2013

That is an interesting differentiation, JJ. You could be onto least in terms of what is known to the media. They may have to wait for either Harry or Nick to comment (that may take a while, haha) before being able to say there is an emotional relationship as well.

by Anonymousreply 14002/16/2013

Derek Balasberg is gay, he had a longterm boyfriend though I've no idea if they're still together. FB thing is likely a joke - she's probably just his hag.

Oh and the pic of Nick kissing Aimee is from 2011 if it's the one I'm thinking of.

And yes Nick made it clear he fancied H numerous times before they even became friends so I'm not sure why people are still debating that!? The argument over what Nick's type is has been done to death anyway. LG when you say stuff like you think Nicolo is masculine I really do wonder if you are on the wind up.

by Anonymousreply 14102/16/2013

are there any other forums commenting about it than Datalounge?

by Anonymousreply 14202/16/2013

Digital Spy has something

by Anonymousreply 14302/16/2013

C, sorry, I didn't mean to sound bitter. I just can't help but wonder if we are all being played? (H once said that the key to privacy was to put out lots of conflicting rumours to confuse everyone)

As for CF & H. I'm her age and have a nephew H's age. Consequently, was appalled by their 'thing'. Perhaps that's why I appear preoccupied with that angle.

JJ, you were always a bit of a sceptic if I recall? Your change of heart does sway me slightly.

by Anonymousreply 14402/16/2013

It won't let me post the link but I don't think Derek B was on their holiday this year, there's a Harpar's Bazarre article that talks about his holiday with Alexa being before that, then Alexa going away with a different group for New Year (including Nick).

by Anonymousreply 14502/16/2013

Pringle, I meant masculine in relation to H (who looks considerably younger and feminine IMO)

by Anonymousreply 14602/16/2013


I don't think it's anything as cynical as being played (at least not by Nick and Harry). I think they're just getting on with their lives as they want to and mostly ignoring how it's interpreted. Neither of them strike me as people who let the media and public perception dictate how they behave, unless forced to do so by their respective jobs of course. Nick rarely comments directly on media stories about himself and Harry certainly doesn't.

by Anonymousreply 14702/16/2013

Hey LG

Never a sceptic but always have believed that in all relationships there can be layers, confusion, one way feelings and friendships with odd boundaries.

Add to this a massive media interest, a 19 year old and a group of people with conflicting interests it's hard to tell. (2 PR companies, agents, a major record label and the differing moralities of US, worldwide and UK)

In addition there's the female married DJ before CF and I was unsure.

Now though, I am sure the use of word is not accidental and I am absolutely sure there is no managerial benefit to a N/H relationship sexually (though a BFF ha huge benefits for all)

by Anonymousreply 14802/16/2013

LG - To be completely honest, I really don't think there was a thing between Harry and Caroline at all. But regardless of my opinion if you look at the similarities between the timings, and the media reporting with his relationship with Taylor with that of Caroline it really looks suspicious regardless of whether you think he is gay or not.

I don't think we are being played; N16 and I have personal accounts, there are so many random tweets of sightings etc, and many which just seem to refer to them as a couple - such as the earlier one from a fashion girl lamenting that Harry wasn't with Nick, without even mentioning yesterday's article (and lets face it, she is not going to want to lose her job over something like that, and if she is publishing lies the Metro are not going to be happy as they are not really a tabloid). And finally, why would it help for anyone to think erroneously that Nick and Harry were romantically involved; from a marketing point of view it's seriously not good for either of them.

by Anonymousreply 14902/16/2013

JJ, sorry, 'open minded' is probably more appropriate than 'sceptical'!

C, don't get me wrong, what you say sounds reasonable. There are just a few things that make it less clear cut for me.

by Anonymousreply 15002/16/2013

LG - no worries an for what it's worth I have a controversial view too.

Whilst it is hugely unlikely to me that CF an NG could both have some reality I do not discount altogether.

Stranger things have happened with my friends when we were younger.

My overriding feeling though is that were this non-famous people and instead people who were friends of friends, I wouldn't doubt they were sleeping together.

by Anonymousreply 15102/16/2013

There's now also a thread about it on Famousmales forums, r142.

by Anonymousreply 15202/16/2013

D Blasberg is gay and a horrid social climber who pimps out male models who have no recourse. He also has the professional skills of a senior newspaper editor (if we are talking about a senior in high school).

Nick is so far above that, it's not even funny.

by Anonymousreply 15302/16/2013

LG, I appreciate that the H/C was odd for you because of how you personally related to the age difference but that doesn't mean there was anything wrong with it for them, people get on differently, and I'm not really comfortable with age difference bashing. Nick is only a few years younger than C, to be fair. Your dislike of the H/C situation and of her particularly because of it being so-called inappropriate has always rubbed me the wrong way more so than your bringing her up and questioning things. It's one thing to speculate etc but let's not casually assume there was anything inappropriate about H and C having a relationship if they did.

by Anonymousreply 15402/16/2013

C, I agree about the reporter not wanting to lose her job over something like that. It might just be a tabloid but you still have to be able to back it up or at least claim it was from "sources" if you're printing outright lies, which is usually the strategy used, but this article didn't mention any sources and didn't even couch it with "alleged". Absolutely no way do I think they would sue for libel, because that would just draw more attention and let's face it more lies have been printed about H before and he's hardly commented. I'm surprised I haven't seen anything interesting between tweeted at the journalist who wrote the article, comments from others and so on.

by Anonymousreply 15502/16/2013

Thanks, R152. I'm curious whether other places will slowly start picking up on this story...

by Anonymousreply 15602/16/2013

R154 I agree. To go with the comparison anyway, Nick has a niece only a year younger than H, so. Relationships with people of the same age can obviously be different depending on the person. H surrounds himself with people older than him and seems to have a lot of genuine/equal friendships with older people, he definitely seems mature for his age, or an "old soul"

by Anonymousreply 15702/16/2013

LG - maybe its was H he snogged on holiday. I have always suspected they met up. We will never know.

by Anonymousreply 15802/16/2013

R154, you're right. It's just an opinion. But one I'm sticking to vehemently based on personal values.

by Anonymousreply 15902/16/2013

R158 I always suspected that too, especially because I noticed Nick was particularly quiet about his vacation before he left and then the first couple of days there (social media-wise). I think it's plausible to think Harry might have gone to PR for a couple days before heading to the Virgin Islands to sell "Haylor". Harry was MIA before the vacation and everyone just assumed he was with Cal, but I remember there being rumours about him in PR (and they were based on airport spottings I believe, not just speculation). Again, I could be wrong and like you said, we'll never know.

by Anonymousreply 16002/16/2013

LG - No one is against you having, and expressing, a personal opinion, what is perhaps a little tiring at times is that as soon as you see a tweet that links Nick in anyway to another person, be it someone he has known for years as a friend, someone who is straight, or in a long term relationship, or someone he apparently has just had a brief conversation with, you appear to comment that plainly he can't be involved with Harry because of his interest in this other person. It is quite normal to talk to friends, colleagues, strangers etc and even flirt with them without it in anyway being relevant to your relationship with a significant other.

For example he (according to a tweet) is going to Henry Holland's after show party, there will be a lot of models there and no doubt he will talk to a lot of them and probably be photographed with them too but this does not really mean anything more than that he, like many people in media, is sociable.

Anyway, I don't want you to feel I am getting at you, because I am not trying to, and if this sounds as if I am, my apologies, I am just not expressing myself very well, which is my problem, not yours.

by Anonymousreply 16102/16/2013

add me to the list of people who suspect Harry and Nick were together at some point during the "haylor" vacation.

by Anonymousreply 16202/16/2013

C, You're right I do sometimes do that. I guess I'm just feeling a bit disillusioned by it all and therefore a bit negative.

However, I do get slightly irritated by the people who conversely, dismiss everything that doesn't fit with the theory N&H are a couple. There needs to be a happy medium!

(But don't worry. I don't think you're getting at me)

by Anonymousreply 16302/16/2013

There is a thing called an open relationship... I could see Harry and Nick being in one... IMO

by Anonymousreply 16402/16/2013

In response to the the thing about Harry being spotted in PR - him, Cal, and Jen were spotted flying OUT of PR at the end of their trip. Which suggests the possibility that they flew into the area via PR. And since they had obviously chartered a yacht at some point they could have been anywhere before stopping in Virgin Gorda.

by Anonymousreply 16502/16/2013

Does anyone one know if 1D are done with rehearsals in Yorkshire and heading back to London?

by Anonymousreply 16602/16/2013

What was the general conclusion on this thread re the possibility of Harry being in PR before the Virgin Islands?

by Anonymousreply 16702/16/2013

I saw a tweet that 3 of 1d had come outside to meet fans about 2hrs ago inc H but not sure if that was it for today or anything further

by Anonymousreply 16802/16/2013

R165 sorry saw your post after I made my reply. Thanks for the info!

R164 An open relationship makes the most sense to me too, especially considering their schedules.

by Anonymousreply 16902/16/2013

LG - Good.

R165 - Don't think he arrived with them though, as seem I remember Cal tweeting something about their first morning there and that was after Harry was already there with Taylor.

R164 - I agree it's a possibility but given that he appears to be staying with Nick a lot, and both N16 and I were told they were a couple, along with quite a few of the tweets mentioning this it looks as if it may be something more exclusive at the moment. There have also been nothing to suggest they are actually seeing anyone else either.

by Anonymousreply 17002/16/2013

R166 I saw pictures of Niall and Louis meeting fans after rehearsals (it was quite dark) and the same girl who tweeted this also tweeted a card with all the boys signatures. She could have gotten them earlier though, all the boys took fan pics this morning/afternoon.

Also saw a rumour that the boys were staying in Yorkshire until right before the Brits (Tuesday) proof was provided though and newspaper articles from today said the boys have a Brit rehearsal on Monday.

by Anonymousreply 17102/16/2013

I agree that H definitely could have been in PR or seen N at some point. Considering how much he is normally tracked, there was definitely a LOT of ambiguity about his location for a few days there

by Anonymousreply 17202/16/2013

Thanks, R168. Yeah, I saw the photos but was not sure whether that meant they were done there completely.

by Anonymousreply 17302/16/2013

Thanks, R171. I read that about the Monday rehearsal too.

I agree, R172.

by Anonymousreply 17402/16/2013

C- I know people who are married and in a open relationships but they are in love with each other.. they just have an open relationship because of their jobs.. Im not saying Nick and Harry aren't a couple but an open relationship makes the most sense to me right now with both of their careers and the amount of time Harry is away.

by Anonymousreply 17502/16/2013

Open relationships are not as rare among gay couples as they are among straight couples.

by Anonymousreply 17602/16/2013

Harry was definitely outside the studio in Yorkshire taking pictures tonight

by Anonymousreply 17702/16/2013

R175 / R176 - Yes, it's impossible to tell it was just that the word "couple" is being used a lot; if their relationship was open I am not too sure how obvious it would be to as many people that they were together. I also think we would be seeing some tweets at least if they were hooking up with anyone else at the moment.

by Anonymousreply 17802/16/2013

It looks like 1D were still in Yorkshire earlier tonight. Have no idea if they are coming back to London tonight or tomorrow. They had been rumoured to be coming back yesterday but that obviously wasn't the case.

Not sure when the Brits rehearsal is for 1D, read something about that today but the article mentioned TS and H being kept apart therefore I didn't bother reading it.

On another note. I agree with whoever thought H and N possibly met up in PR. I'm of the opinion that it could have been possible.

by Anonymousreply 17902/16/2013

Looked it up a bit, Harry wasn't spotted until dinnertime on January 3 when he showed up on the Virgin Islands (That's when the first pic of him and Taylor got put up on twitter). So he was missing from the evening of NYE after the public Times Square kiss until then. Same with Taylor I believe.

by Anonymousreply 18002/16/2013

I'm glad I wasn't on my own thinking they could have met up.

by Anonymousreply 18102/16/2013

Haha. No.

Harry is one jealous kid. He is not the I-share-my-boyfriend-type.

If you haven't even found out that yet...

by Anonymousreply 18202/16/2013

Or did we think that they met up BEFORE NYE? That actually might make more sense. I'm all muddled now. Maybe both?

by Anonymousreply 18302/16/2013

Add me to the list of those who believe Harry spent soem time in PR with NG over NY. I always thought he brought the American football shirts they were all pictured in one day. Wasn't Harry spotted at a game with Cal a day or so before?

Tinhatting here...

by Anonymousreply 18402/16/2013

Anyone any idea of who was playing or location and any connection with the team the shirts are for, the group were wearing?

by Anonymousreply 18502/16/2013

No idea who the shirts were for but the photo was probably aimee or nicks instagram.

by Anonymousreply 18602/16/2013

R183 - Yes, the before was also possible; just going from memory, Harry arrived in Boston early on the Saturday (he missed the earlier flight I seem to remember) and wasn't seen again until the late afternoon of the Monday (at a friend of a friend's who lived directly between Boston and New York). So he might have just got a connecting flight then.

by Anonymousreply 18702/16/2013

According to a post on instagram the shirts are st louis is that misdouri? But I wondered if they have a connection with the game H went to?

by Anonymousreply 18802/16/2013

Try to link the picture attempt number 1:

by Anonymousreply 18902/16/2013

Thanks isis. I had never thought about the shirts before.

by Anonymousreply 19002/16/2013

R182 I actually agree with you but that just makes me worry about the tour. H is going to be away for months and N can only really come visit shows so often without it looking suspicious? I mean I imagine he'll go to some UK dates and they've been hinting around the European leg enough it might happen but whereas the other boys can fly their girlfriends out when they're in NA, I doubt that's going to happen with Nick, also cause he's so damn busy too! Maybe a weekend but who knows. Either way it's a long time to go not seeing each other that's a pretty serious commitment

by Anonymousreply 19102/16/2013

The football jerseys were not from Harry. He supports the Packers and would not have purchased an opposing team's jerseys.

If he stopped by in PR it was likely after NYE not before (he seems to have been in Boston with Cal)

by Anonymousreply 19202/16/2013

oh well it was a thought...

by Anonymousreply 19302/16/2013

Tweet from someone working for Talksport radio:

by Anonymousreply 19402/16/2013

Nick, Harry, Cara and Rita are rumoured to be at Dominic Jones after party tonight. Evidence of Rita and Harry being there, don't know about Cara and Nick though. Let's hope they are all together that would be nice to see.

by Anonymousreply 19502/17/2013

R194 Above tweet was deleted sometime overnight.

It said: "Just been told by a very reliable source Harry Styles is doing Nick Grimshaw ha" in case anyone was curious.

by Anonymousreply 19602/17/2013

Nick wasn't at the party... Harry did DJ!!!

by Anonymousreply 19702/17/2013

Thanks, R196.

by Anonymousreply 19802/17/2013

I wonder if that's who N was making the playlist for, earlier this week.

by Anonymousreply 19902/17/2013

Harry apparently already left...just did his "job" and that was it :).

by Anonymousreply 20002/17/2013

Went back to see if there was any follow up to the tweet below but it got deleted:

Emma de Smith‏@emmadesmith Just been told by a very reliable source Harry Styles is doing Nick Grimshaw ha 8:34 PM - 16 Feb 13

I copied and pasted it into a google doc, not sure how to post that (it looks more legit in the document though).

by Anonymousreply 20102/17/2013

I don't know if anyone follows @jrcbitch (works in TV) but she is obsessed with Harry Styles. She is forever posting cryptic tweets implying he is sleeping around, involved in some sort of scandal, is hiding some huge secret. She even seems to be implying some sort of 'thing' involving herself.

Seems a bit of an attention seeker but does come across as someone in the know.

She posted a tweet this evening claiming the biggest celeb scandal in a decade will be revealed this week. It will be interesting to see if she turns out to be right? (& whether or not it involves Styles)

by Anonymousreply 20202/17/2013

ignore previous message, thought my other message didn't go through. I was R196.

by Anonymousreply 20302/17/2013

tweet, seems more like speculation:

by Anonymousreply 20402/17/2013

tweet from what appears to be a uni student in London. The reply is just spam.

by Anonymousreply 20502/17/2013

R202 LG, did you see her previous tweets from her account (which she later deleted) about him and nick? They were a while ago I believe.

by Anonymousreply 20602/17/2013

LG... I just read her tweets... a couple weeks ago she said Harry and Nick were together and she also said Haylor was real and now she is saying Harry tried to hook up with her...?

by Anonymousreply 20702/17/2013

R202 LG: I've come across her before. She posted a lot of stuff just before Christmas about some sort of scandal if my memory serves me correctly. Which didn't really come to anything. To me she's just an attention seeker.

Thanks for explaining what the tweet said. Funny how it looks to have been deleted.

by Anonymousreply 20802/17/2013

R206, yes. Her tweets suggest she believes H has been involved with CF, NG, TS and that he is also harbouring some huge secret. Her tweets tonight are particularly interesting.

by Anonymousreply 20902/17/2013

R208, yes, she's promised scandal before and not delivered.

That's why it will be interesting to see if a big story breaks this week.

by Anonymousreply 21002/17/2013

R209 I've looked through her tweets and she seems kind of insane...not sure I would trust what she says. Her site is also really sketchy.

by Anonymousreply 21102/17/2013

Didn't someone find out that she co-runs one of those One Direction update blogs? She might have a few contacts but I think she just sources most of her information from the internet (her info that 1D was in Africa already could have easily been sourced from Ben Winston who tweeted earlier than her). And is obviously trying to start rumors about her "relationship" with Harry.

So far she's just verified every rumor - it's easy to say everything is true because then if something gets proved true then she's right. It's harder to prove something isn't true.

Haylor was obviously false and she was wrong about that but she can easily back track and say that she just meant they hooked up once or twice during the PR thing.

by Anonymousreply 21202/17/2013

I dont think u can take what she says as being serious.. she was tweeting Harry like he hooked up with her..

by Anonymousreply 21302/17/2013

Maybe he did hook up with her? He was papped following a 'mystery blond' out the back door.

It is actually possible that this thread is wrong, H is into women and not with NG.

by Anonymousreply 21402/18/2013

There's no mystery blonde in any of the photos I've seen except one who is walking with another man.

I don't understand why you're so easy to believe that a random gossip twitter that verifies every single rumor (and apparently makes up some - she's said she's hooked up with Harry before) and may run a 1D update account and has no proof they were at the party but you completely ignore tweets from verified London media accounts.

LG you're fast becoming a troll.

by Anonymousreply 21502/18/2013

215, nope. Just irritated at the immediate dismissal of anything and everything opposing the H&N theory.

Just pointing out that you 'might' actually be wrong.

by Anonymousreply 21602/18/2013

I'm not dismissing this because it's opposes the Harry/Nick theory. I'm dismissing it because of all of the reasons I listed. The reasons you seem to ignore.

by Anonymousreply 21702/18/2013

LG- Everyone is kind of getting annoyed with u because u are willing to believe everything unless it confirms that Nick and Harry are a thing... I want to know what happened to u because u were the biggest H/N supported during Haylor and now u are becoming a troll.

by Anonymousreply 21802/18/2013

LG- you're not a secret 'Larry' shipper are you? Your theories are just as out there as theirs are regarding anything N/H. You're just looking ridiculous.

Of course there's a possibility we're wrong, but it's not looking likely at this point.

by Anonymousreply 21902/18/2013

R217, I wasn't referring to you or this info specifically. It was a general observation.

R218, my colleagues don't seem to think anything is going on. They might turn out to be wrong but as some of them have worked with NG in the past, I'm prepared to believe them.

by Anonymousreply 22002/18/2013

What exactly is people's obsession with the love life of a 19 year old teenager? At this point in his life he doesn't know who is.Do people actually think he is going to spend the rest of his life with this creepy Grimshaw fellow? People are taking this little boy's personal life way to seriously. Perhaps this boy is just having casual relationships with boy's and girls and just having a good time.

by Anonymousreply 22102/18/2013

I must admit, LG's posts keep me entertained. I'm fairly certain she's lost the plot of late.

by Anonymousreply 22202/18/2013

R221, he might be having casual relationships with boys and girls, but at least ONE of those is that "creepy" Nick Grimshaw, to whom this thread is dedicated. You won't find many who share your "creepy" view here.

by Anonymousreply 22302/18/2013

LG, what do your colleagues think is going on? I am inclined to believe you.

by Anonymousreply 22402/18/2013

R222, I've simply changed my mind based on info from people I actually know rather than continuing to believe random tweets and online anons. Shocking.

R224, they have just said they haven't heard that anything is going on.

by Anonymousreply 22502/18/2013

Fair enough, LG. It is, let's be honest, the most likely thing.

by Anonymousreply 22602/18/2013

R221 I wouldn't exactly say Nick Grimshaw is "Creepy" like someone else said. I doubt you'll find anyone on here who will share your view.

And as for that 19 year old is concerned. Perhaps he is just having fun with both male and female. But one of those he seems to be having fun with seems to be Nick. Don't think he finds him creepy at all.

by Anonymousreply 22702/18/2013

I for once believe Harry's having fun with both Louis (on tour, because let's be honest, these two are having the most intense sexual tenssion I've ever saw) and with Nick (off tour). One thing is clear: Harry doesn't like girls. He was outed (by Nick and other friends) more times I can count.

by Anonymousreply 22802/18/2013

228,I don't believe in Larry as relationship, but I'm convinced Harry and Louis are having fun together. There is a air of intimacy between them who make me think they are bonning each other whenever they can. But off tour I think Harry and Grimmy are definitely fucking (but nothing about them reveals they are a couple).

by Anonymousreply 22902/18/2013

[R228] Totally agree with you. I wouldn't be surprised if he is having fun with Louis on and off tour.

I think that Louis and Harry are both gay, but not in a relationship.

Harry is just having fun with both of them. It would explain why Louis and Nick don't really seem to like each other.

by Anonymousreply 23002/18/2013

R226, my view is H is either in a hidden relationship with a women or.. Bi, casually sleeping around with both sexes, one of which could be N.

I don't believe they're in a monogamous relationship or that there is an injunction/cover up. (I do think Haylor was nothing more than PR though)

I doubt we'll ever really know.

by Anonymousreply 23102/18/2013

Loved the weekend pics of Nick at and sfyer Henry's show.

Also, for those interested thete and interesting piece about Harry Styles and philosophy in the Independent written by Janet Street-Porte

by Anonymousreply 23202/18/2013

The reality is neither of the One Direction boys can be in a real relationship with a partner of their choice. Zayn, Louis and Harry can only publicly date women set up by their mangement. Those boy's don't look happy anymore because they can't live their on lives. Everything from how they dress to what they say is dictated by the tyrant Simon Cowell.And yes the Nick Grimshaw fellow is creepy. Just take another look at those pictures of him outside Harry's birthday party. Harry is clearly drunk and you see Grimshaw holding him up in front of the cameras while Grimshaw looks dead into the cameras knowing pictures are being taken of Harry drunk.I know you guy's are fans of his but there is something about him that is not quite right.

by Anonymousreply 23302/18/2013

I don't think Harry was drunk (yet), but even if he was the photos were sweet and there is nothing creepy about Nick.

by Anonymousreply 23402/18/2013

lg- why do you think h must be in a secret relationship with a woman or at least sleeping with women? (we of course know your thoughts on that one particular woman)... why are you convinced it couldn't be a relationship with a man? (rather than nick).

the shear number of tweets (i have a screencap folder of 100+ now) from unconnected individuals in positions to know who have no reason to lie and don't think their tweets are going to be searched for leaves me pretty convinced something has at least happened. do you really think that these ongoing rumours are being spread to protect a relationship with a woman?

i'm personally not sure of what exactly n/h's relationship is. i'm pretty convinced they are at least sleeping with/have slept with each other though.

by Anonymousreply 23502/18/2013

I need to know the truth! I am about to have a nervous breakdown worrying about Nick and Harry. Why can't they just let the cat out of the bag. Don't they realize how we, the fans, feel? One Direction is the most important band of the last 50 years and has the most loyal following of any act EVER! They need to be honest with us and not keep us in a state of panic worrying over this. I can't even concentrate on school or my job because I am worrying myself sick about what's really going on. They need to just come clean.

by Anonymousreply 23602/18/2013

Cute article about H at the Dominic Jones after party. Apparently N was supposed to make an appearance and have a DJ battle with H but had to have an early night. H also talks about their friendship.

by Anonymousreply 23702/18/2013

Very cute, R237.

by Anonymousreply 23802/18/2013

Awww that is a nice article about Harry. The press seem to have lightened up on him lately, or is it just me mellowing?!

by Anonymousreply 23902/18/2013

R236, I'm with you. No sleep in days. I cried myself to sleep Thursday night. I am a wreck. Harry and Nick need to shit or get off the pot. Let us know. I, for one, am frantic with worry.

by Anonymousreply 24002/18/2013

Metro has an amusing slant on yesterday's party. I don't know why they're saying he left at 3:30 am when those there said he left before one...

by Anonymousreply 24102/18/2013

I'm sorry but N and H don't need to tell anyone anything. It's their business.

by Anonymousreply 24202/18/2013

And what is Harry supposed to say? "Ladyes and gentlemen, I announce you that i'm fucking Louis Tomlinson on tour and Nick Grimmy Grimshaw off tour"? Good luck expecting that from him!

by Anonymousreply 24302/18/2013

My parents told me I need to get counseling over my 1D obsession. LOL. I can't help it. They are the hottest most gorgeous men who ever stalked the planet. They are so nice, sweet and loveable. My every waking thought is on them. I dream about them at night. My mom says it's not normal to be obsessed about celebs. I think it is normal. I am going through exactly the same thing, no sleep, worry, fatigue, anxiety. I'm a wreck over the personal lives of total strangers (even though I feel closer to them than family). My ex dropped me because he said I cared more about people Ii would never meet than I did about him. He was right. Harry and Grimmy are my life.

by Anonymousreply 24402/18/2013

R239 there have been more positive stories about him but I suspect that might be due to an increased focus on Taylor and the antics of Zayn?

I agree that I don't think N or H will ever say anything about it. Both are notoriously tight lipped about things they want to keep hidden. I don't think it's fair on either of them to expect such statements.

by Anonymousreply 24502/18/2013

244, your parents are totally right, if you are so invested in Harry/Grimmy as a couple I'm afraid you will be disapointed. They don't look like a couple, maybe fwb type of friends. Harry seems also interested in his bandmate Louis and these two look like they were/are intimate (all the signs are there).

by Anonymousreply 24602/18/2013

I would eat the corn and peanuts out of Harry and Louis' shite. Then I would eat the shite itself. There have never been sexier men on this world. I just know all five of them have huge penises. I want to bend them over after a great concert show and tongue out their poop holes all night long. I worship these men.

by Anonymousreply 24702/18/2013

I actually am considering counseling. I think about Harry and Louis constantly. I can't sleep due to worry about whether they are happy or wondering if their relationship will work out in the long run. I think I need help. I can't function at school and my parents are about to ban everything related to One Direction from the house. I am 19, I think they are going overbored.

by Anonymousreply 24802/18/2013

I'm 99% sold on Harry and Nick being together, but I really don't think Harry and Louis have anything going on. At most, I believe they might have fooled around in the past, but the "sexual tension" between them is the same between all the boys in the band. If you look at the "larry" tag on tumblr with a bunch of slowed down gifs and cleverly edited footage, you might think there's something there. In fact, if you go to every pairing's tag on tumblr you might end up thinking they're all real. I did believe for while there was something more between H and L, but then I went and look at the actual footage and pictures of them interacting with each other and with the other boys and the only thing that's clear to me, is that 1D is just five boys who are distinctly close and who are not shy about showing physical affection to each other.

by Anonymousreply 24902/18/2013

R233 If Nick was so creepy I don't think Harry's mother and sister would be so friendly with him, do you? He is well liked by his colleagues and indeed by most people who meet him. Either you are a Moyles fan, a Larry shipper or are homophobic and don't like the fact that Harry Styles has gay mates.

by Anonymousreply 25002/18/2013

Well this thread has taken a very weird detour. Can we please get back on topic?

by Anonymousreply 25102/18/2013

There has never been a sexier, more manly stud than Harry Styles. He is THE SUPREME BEING of all times. The greatest body on any man on this planet or any other. I want to suck his 10" cock.

by Anonymousreply 25202/18/2013

Lovely and amusing trolls R251. I quite like trolls most times but only if they are witty.

by Anonymousreply 25302/18/2013

0.5/10 on the troll-o-meter. God, I miss the subtle trolls of yesteryear.

by Anonymousreply 25402/18/2013

Actually lovely trolls. Why do you feel annoyed by a thread which has a short title and is very easily passed by? Wlso if you read some of the thread there are a few on here who are only really interested in NG who is openly gay and is known for having lot of celeb pals including Harry Styles. He is interesting for who he hangs out with and as a person in his own right.

by Anonymousreply 25502/18/2013

I am 23, so I am quite a bit older than One Directions demographic, but, for the life of me, I cannot see why people are so obsessed with them. There is not one member of that band that I would call attractive. Not one of them looks more than 11 years old.

by Anonymousreply 25602/18/2013

I for one don't see any sexual tension between Harry and Nick. Please, if someone have pictures or videos who show they are in love and cannot wait to jump one another, please post them. But there must be something with them, otherwise I don't think they will spend so much time with each oter, so they must be in a FWB type of relationship.

by Anonymousreply 25702/18/2013

The Burberry Prorsum fashion show starts in half an hour. I wonder if N & H will be there like last year? It seems that H's sister is going to be there as she mentioned it on her twitter.

by Anonymousreply 25802/18/2013

None of you ipocrite people didn't give a fuck about Nick Grimshaw apart of his relationship with Harry. Nobody was interested in who he was, who he dates and so on. He is interesting only because he may be fucking Harry. I asure you, he will disapear the second Harry will find some younger and hotter man to tumble.

by Anonymousreply 25902/18/2013

R259 Nick has been on the scene way longer than Harry Styles and will still be around long after HS has gone by the by. I think it is you who needs to find out the truth of the situation.

by Anonymousreply 26002/18/2013

It's hilarious today, love the trolls and angry 1D fans calling us 'ipocrites'.

Nick is probably one of the trolls.

by Anonymousreply 26102/18/2013

Doesn't look like he's at Burberry this year - I wondered whether he might attend Tom Ford tonight, instead? Would be a shame if he didn't go to one show. There's still tomorrow though (I think tomorrow's the last day, is that correct?).

People need to not take the trolls so seriously! If you're going to have nearly 20 threads on two people, you have to take the ribbing that comes with it.

by Anonymousreply 26202/18/2013

Harry's sister Gemma is at burberry but it doesn't look like he is there. Nick was at the Happy Ashley show (the friend he did the playlist for) with Pixie.

by Anonymousreply 26302/18/2013

Nick was a nobody before outside UK. Now he is known and "famous" because of Harry, this is the truth.

by Anonymousreply 26402/18/2013

I don't think Nick cares either way if he is famous outside the UK

by Anonymousreply 26502/18/2013

Famous amongst a small sector of 1D fans outside of the UK is different to actually being famous outside of the UK - he'd never get reported on singularly or for the sake of himself, and barely does because of Harry anyway. He gets reported on in the UK because he's a household name.

He does nothing in the US, having his name known over there (or most other countries) doesn't really have any impact, positive or negative. Listeners elsewhere don't get counted because they're not license payers.

by Anonymousreply 26602/18/2013

Nick's not even famous outside of the UK except for a horde of fangirls who keep tabs on him because he's a ~threat to their precious LARRY or want to see him boning Harry Styles.

Most casual American 1D fans (and don't get it twisted, MOST 1D fans are casual fans, contrary to tumblr and twitter's crap) don't even know who he is.

by Anonymousreply 26702/18/2013

Grimmy is a fucking ugly piece of shite. I don't believe for one second that Harry is letting Nick up his shithole. No fucking way!

by Anonymousreply 26802/18/2013

oh gosh, how did you idiots even get here?

by Anonymousreply 26902/18/2013

if your losing sleep and totally obsessed with 1D then you maybe should get some help. Someone also said 1D are the most important band in the last 50 years which is either a joke or the words of an insane person, i hope the former.

as for Nick seems like a fun and nice guy and is seemimgly fucking Harry

by Anonymousreply 27002/18/2013

On the night of Harry's birthday. The photographer who took pics described the photos as great photos of Nick hugging Harry and didn't make a claim it was because he was drunk. He wasnt drunk when they were taken.

by Anonymousreply 27102/18/2013

R270 they're just trolling. Badly.

by Anonymousreply 27202/18/2013

the girl harry followed out was billie jd porter apparently and was all over him that night. she is a well known teenage journo. maybe jrcbitch is her alias as she is also journo and seems immature? If so, maybe they did hook up or at least that's what the jrcbitch person wants people to believe?!?

by Anonymousreply 27302/18/2013

R273 did you get that info about her "all over him" from that comment on the daily mail article?

by Anonymousreply 27402/18/2013

I only saw photos of someone following Harry out and he took a taxi alone as the metro article I posted article amusingly described.

by Anonymousreply 27502/18/2013

Oh god Billie JD Porter is the most irritating, pretentious stuck up "I'm too indie for you" person, I hope harry has better rate than THAT!

by Anonymousreply 27602/18/2013

I would love to see video of harry, louis and grimmy taking greasy farty shits. are the any videos online like that? I want to see their poo-holes and kiss their arses. i want to smell their smelly feces.

by Anonymousreply 27702/18/2013

Oh, oops, I just noticed the photo in the metro article and another "blonde" not that he actually left with either.

by Anonymousreply 27802/18/2013

I leave you all alone for 5 minutes .... honestly!

can someone let me know when its past their bedtimes as I am quite interested that the talksport tweet was deleted. Strikes me as amateur panicking journo.

Metro article re:lover dropped then suddenly they get to talk to Harry direct. Maybe a coincidence.

I am becoming more suspicious rather than less and imagine there is every possibility that IF they are seeing each other they are deliberately staying out of the way and regrouping whilst working out how to handle everything.

Alternatively, of course, they could have fallen out or broken up, these things do happen........

by Anonymousreply 27902/18/2013

What do you mean by "Metro article re:lover dropped then suddenly they get to talk to Harry direct," JJ?

by Anonymousreply 28002/18/2013

R279 Doubt they fell out/ broke up (if they are indeed together) judging from Nick's giggly attitude when One Direction and Harry were mentioned on the show today.

They were a question on showquizness today- question being "what have 1D been told to tone down by their management" with the answer being "womanizing". There was lots of dead air and stifled laughter when they were mentioned, especially when a caller made a comment on how you "only really think about Harry when you think of 1D". Matt Fincham cut in to say something along the lines of "Nick, after you" and then there was more dead air and Nick giggling and changing the subject.

Another caller brought up Nick going on tour with One Direction, which was also met with giggles.

by Anonymousreply 28102/18/2013

Oh dear, seems that there are a lot of people with their knickers in a knot today. Angry 1D fans and trolls. Oh the joy. I especially like my new Favourite word of the day. 'ipocrites'.

JJ I agree they may be staying out of each others way, regrouping. Going to ground for a while.

I hope they haven't fallen out.

by Anonymousreply 28202/18/2013

[r280] My mistake, got a bit over excited but I think Grazia is the one with direct quotes not Metro so nothing suspicious

by Anonymousreply 28302/18/2013

The Metro article's still there, JJ. Can't you see it anymore?

by Anonymousreply 28402/18/2013

No problem, JJ, thanks for explaining.

by Anonymousreply 28502/18/2013

I think it is highly likely that after the Metro outing it has been suggested that they don't go out of their way to be seen together in public. They probably will be at the Brits, but then it would be odd if they weren't.

lots / R281 - The third question on Showquizness this morning was highly amusing (I am still amazed that they have not had any real problems with callers mentioning Harry and Nick on air) and certainly did nothing to dispell from the fact that they are a couple.

The Grazia interview which was linked to earlier was only from last night and given that Harry was saying that he wanted Nick to help him with his DJ'ing (I love the fact that he chose the one hobby Nick could openly be seen helping him with; what better excuse to be together publicly) so I don't any there has been any chance of a falling out, just perhaps a little prudence.

by Anonymousreply 28602/18/2013

I'm wondering why Harry didn't go to the Burberry show today, he always attend their show. I undestand the 1D boys had a free day today. Niall just twitted they play playstation and eat chicken cooked by Liam. Of course I don't know if Harry is with the other 4 boys right now, he may be with Nick who knows.

by Anonymousreply 28702/18/2013

I agree, C.

R287, someone suggested he might go to the Tom Ford show...that would be nice and maybe Nick could join him...that's all wishful thinking at this point though.

by Anonymousreply 28802/18/2013

Just had a listen of the show this morning. Nick was on great form. Yes agreed I think we discount a break up for the moment, judgin by the amount of hilarity (IF they are together)

Seems like normal service is resumed.

by Anonymousreply 28902/18/2013

R287 I'm not surprised he didn't go the Burbery show, the boys had at least some time off yesterday (as Louis was at the Topshop show with his gf, Liam was apparently at the zoo and Niall was hanging out with his hairdresser-though was later song writing with a member of the vaccines)and with the Brits and their tour right around the corner I assume they are extremely busy rehearsing.

I think they just had a break to eat and play playstation, but I am very skeptical that they had the day off (or enough time for Harry to go to the fashion show).

Nick was at his friend Ashley's fashion show, though I have yet to see any pics.

by Anonymousreply 29002/18/2013

I don't see any fall out between Harry and Nick. When they are together we normaly see them (Harry's two days very public birthday anyone?) or hear about them (usually Nick, his friends and fans who spott them inform us on twitter). When they are together we know. But Harry was in Yorkshire for more than a week, is normal we didn't hear about them. What caution, what hiding, Harry and Nick are a very open talking from what I saw. And imo they are not in an exclusive relationship, they seems more like FWB.

by Anonymousreply 29102/18/2013

I appreciate it was a big weekend for Nick but its unlike him to cancel on someone, in my view. The supposed DJ battle last night became a one man affair and I could imagine a deliberate attempt to calm things with the printed press.

From what limited amount I have heard from this am's breakfast show, Nick was attempting, at least a little to slow the H and 1d references but Showbot struck.

FYI I imagine showbot to be at least somewhat prepped the working day before.

by Anonymousreply 29202/18/2013

R291 - Not too sure how you would know if they were spending time at their own or friend's houses, but regardless of that, given that one presumes they don't generally go out of their way to be seen getting off in public one wonders how people know that they are in private unless they do obviously appear to be a couple.

For me, it's tweets like the attached which really don't go along with FWB idea.

by Anonymousreply 29302/18/2013

I heard Billie JD Porter was fucking a guy from the band Peace - think he's in some of those pics with her, both behind H? I thought it was odd H was at the Dom Jones party without any of his 'scenester' pals but makes sense he was supposed to DJ alongside N. How cute would that have been?

by Anonymousreply 29402/18/2013

JJ - Yes, Matt Fincham was away this weekend, so it would have been Friday (and before the Metro article). To be fair though, there wouldn't have really been too much of a mention of Harry had it not been for the caller insisting it was "all about Harry" and I'm guessing they seriously weren't expecting him to say that!

by Anonymousreply 29502/18/2013

Thanks for always clearing up those rumours for us, N16 and yeah it would have been adorable...a pity it didn't happen :(.

by Anonymousreply 29602/18/2013

C, Iwouldn't put so much faith in a word of some friend of a stranger. I like to make my own opinion based on what I see. And I'm sorry, Harry and Nick don't look like a couple, like two people in love. They remind me of Harry and Ed Sheeran, two very good friends who like to have a laugh and to spend time together. Maybe H/N had/have sex, but definitely they are not a couple.

by Anonymousreply 29702/18/2013

R297 - In my case I also have the word of my close friend's work colleague/friend who works at times with Nick, so I have a little more to go on.

by Anonymousreply 29802/18/2013

Apoloigies for the semi related nature of this:

This is an interesting one. Elsewhere on datalounge is a thread about sleeping with famous people. A guy from the UK just posted that his male friend slept with James Corden a couple of times when they were younger.

Puts such a great new spin on his whole One Direction and NG adoration eh?

by Anonymousreply 29902/18/2013

I would pay good money to see Grimmy fist-fucking Harry, all the way up to the shoulder. Whilst pulling on Harry nubby willy.

by Anonymousreply 30002/18/2013

Nick said on the show today that there was a celebrity in the studio with him. He said that's why they were worried when Tina said the cameras flashed on for a minute.

He then went on to say that it was a duo but had just mentioned it being one person a few times before he said it was a duo.

Any idea who it could have been? Harry? If they were supposed to DJ together and Nick dropped because of the article and Harry left soon after the DJ set was done then it would make sense for him to go to Nick's after. Plus he said his friend said it was alright if he wore the same shirt from the night before.

by Anonymousreply 30102/18/2013

@JJ I must admit I was beginning to think something along the same lines about JC. Haven't any evidence just a gut feeling. Probably totally wrong.

by Anonymousreply 30202/18/2013

Not sure if it's true but 1D were supposed to have rehearsals for the Brits today. Perhaps that's why H didn't show up at the Burberry show.

I missed Nick's show this morning. Have to listen to it back.

by Anonymousreply 30302/18/2013

1D have cancelled all public performances for the rest of the week. All five of them and Nick Grimmy have been stricken with explosive diarrhea and will not be leaving the loo until the plot thickens, so to speak. If you are truly a fan, please send tissue and moistened wipes so they can wipe their arses.

by Anonymousreply 30402/18/2013

MyDaily accounts Harry being very pally with Dominic Jones ('playfighting' she calls it); I think he's friends with a few more fashion people and not through Nick. Isn't he sort of friends with the head of the fashion council? I'm sure he's close to people other than the band, Ed and Nick's friends, without needing them as a connection.

I've never got a vibe off of JC ... And he's obviously happily married now. Suppose it might well be true though.

Also think if Nick really didn't want Matt/Showbot talking about something, then it wouldn't come up.

by Anonymousreply 30502/18/2013

R302 He pings like crazy for me and has a history of David Walliams-esque gay-baiting.

I just always assumed it was a wanting to be like the popular/cool kids with him. (Not a massive fan of his personality, just personal taste from the way he presents himself but I think he is a fabulous actor and writer)

Now though.......

by Anonymousreply 30602/18/2013

Well, Nick has said that he had asked Matt not to ask Haylor question three times, but they still came up.

Here are a couple of photos of Harry with Dominic Jones:

by Anonymousreply 30702/18/2013

Showbot brought up 1D, but it was the caller who mentioned Harry and literally said they should talk abut him and how it was "all about Harry". To me, it sounded like he was clearly doing it on purpose just to mess with Nick.

by Anonymousreply 30802/18/2013

Harry is a great singer and all that, but I feel he suits the fashion world/scene so well!

by Anonymousreply 30902/18/2013

R308 I didn't really get the impression the caller brought it up to mess with Nick, more commenting on the fact that Harry is indeed the most popular of the band and is in the press far more frequently. If I remember correctly he said something along the lines of "well it's all about Harry isn't it".

by Anonymousreply 31002/18/2013

Agreed lots. To the rest of the world (ie redtop readers) I think the media appears obsessed with him and it's a bemusement.

by Anonymousreply 31102/18/2013

That's what I mean - I don't think Matt would have done the questions if Nick had quite seriously told him he was uncomfortable with it, to the point where it would upset or annoy him. It wouldn't make for good radio. Nick always seems a good sport about it. I know that people have gone off him a bit recently, but he is Nick's friend and I doubt he'd ever push anything that far - no further than Nick pushes things with everyone else.

I had hoped Harry might be at Tom Ford, but it seems not. Is there anyone he's likely to take time out to see tomorrow? I suppose if they're rehearsing it's not possible.

by Anonymousreply 31202/18/2013

1D mangement clearly wants to sell Harry and all this womanizing circus began with the fake story of Caroline Flack. And didn't really stopped for more than a year. Everything is a big mediatic circus. Come on, Harry slept with 410 women in a year? He date everything that moves: Rita, Cara, Emily, his childhood friends, the stripper etc. It is such a big lie.

by Anonymousreply 31302/18/2013

I definitely agree R313. It's ridiculous, and yet people believe it all. The management/PR people really did a good job selling this one. People go in a frenzy if H is even in a room with another girl. I had never really heard of 1D until the Flack story hit and the subsequent womaniser stories. It has people young and older paying attention to the band.

I'm not sure if 1D would have ever really hit the fame that they did without selling that sort of media image. I really think that 1D is much more about the image and the relationships than the music.

by Anonymousreply 31402/18/2013

Their music is shit. They can't play instruments, write songs or even sing very well.

It's all about image but that's how it is now, they are in the papers every day.

by Anonymousreply 31502/18/2013

I've been following this thread for a while without posting, and I've seen posts about Nick and Harry meeting each other respective families for dinner/tea (not Christmas) and was wondering if anyone actually had evidence for this? Never seen any and am curious.

by Anonymousreply 31602/18/2013

Harry was with Nick and his mum at dinner and a fashion show last year. There are lots of photos of that. Harry was also at Nick's for Christmas and Nick himself mentioned Harry meeting his dad (indirectly) before the Christmas before last.

There is a photo of Nick with Harry's mum and I'm sure he's met Gemma...someone was saying she was in the background of some of Harry's birthday photos.

by Anonymousreply 31702/18/2013

Oh, I missed part of your post there, I'm sorry...I'm not sure what the evidence of the tea part is.

by Anonymousreply 31802/18/2013

Hey lots - mostly by following instagram and twitter accounts of Nick and his friends. For example Nicks mate Aimee posted a pic at his parents house on Christmas day of them preparing sandwiches and h's tattoos are clearly identifiable.

There are some tumblr accounts that document all the history. Some of it is indisputable, some is pretty obvious and some of it is wild speculation.

by Anonymousreply 31902/18/2013

R317 R318 Yeah I've seen the pics of him at the fashion show with Nick's mum last year but was wondering if there were any pics/tweets of them in a restaurant.

I assume the photo of Nick and Anne you're talking about is the one from Huw's stag-I've only really seen that one.

That's fine, thanks for answering anyway:)

by Anonymousreply 32002/18/2013

So the girl Harry left with, via a back entrance, was the same girl seen all over him all night and people are convinced it was nothing? They even look shifty in the pap shots and no doubt took separate cabs as they were spotted.

Call me a 'troll' all you want but it looks pretty obvious to me.

by Anonymousreply 32102/18/2013

You're welcome, R320 :).

by Anonymousreply 32202/18/2013

Sorry, R20 was me.

R319 Yeah, seen some of those tumblr accounts but never a detailed documentation of their history; mostly just tinhatting. Will have a look though, thanks.

I did see that photo from Christmas that Aimee posted, was surprised she did if I'm honest. I assumed she thought that the small bit of hand we could see wouldn't be able to be linked to Harry.

by Anonymousreply 32302/18/2013

LG - Well at least you know he's not with Caroline Flack. You should be ecstatic.

by Anonymousreply 32402/18/2013

LG - N16 named the girl, and commented that you can see her boyfriend with her in some of the photographs as well, a couple of pages back, so maybe not quite what you think...

lots - I remember tweets about Nick and Harry being in a restaurant with his brother/sister in law in the late spring as well, as well a separate ones about the pair of them with Nick's parents (all in London). I don't remember any photographs but quite a few random tweets rather than just update accounts.

From what has been tweeted today Harry's mother is in London at the moment along with his sister.

by Anonymousreply 32502/18/2013

R324, would rather H was with N but yep, happy to see anything that quashes my CF theory.

by Anonymousreply 32602/18/2013

Oh, she is, C? Maybe they're there for the Brits and the start of the tour or is it too early you think?

by Anonymousreply 32702/18/2013

R321 Are you talking about the DJ? Or Billie JD Porter? What evidence have we seen that she was "all over him" besides comment in a daily mail online article? Not really good enough if that's the only proof there is.

I thought you were set on him secretly seeing CF?

Might be of interest, but Billie JD Porter is friends with Sam Teasdale, and she posted a picture of her on instagram today. I feel like you'll take that as "confirmation" LG but I'm skeptical.

by Anonymousreply 32802/18/2013

LG: Well I have seen pictures of H leaving the venue last night. Seen the picture where some girl is holding the door open for him. Another where a girl is behind him and you can just see another guy walking beside her. Another where some drunk man jumped into the papped pics, (which looked quite funny actually) another where another man was walking behind H and the last one I saw was the one where H was in the taxi alone.

But hey, I'm not saying he didn't hook up with some random girl. I just never seen any evidence of it.

by Anonymousreply 32902/18/2013

LG - Why wouldn't Nick and Harry quash your CF theory? After all the fact that Harry is gay (or at least dating a man) pretty well negates any chance of him dating Caroline doesn't it?

by Anonymousreply 33002/18/2013

R325 Thanks c, I assumed there must have been tweets somewhere along the line but never saw any links to them. I don't doubt they did, from tweets it is clear they are all close.

R327 I saw a lot of speculation that they are in town for the Brits and opening show on Saturday. Liam Crowe, Gemma's boyfriend, tweeted about being in London for the week for her and was arranging a meetup with Harry's cousins/family friends that he got linked to in the press (the one that sells cars and has been pictured hanging out with Nick as well).

by Anonymousreply 33102/18/2013

Thanks, lots. I would expect them all to be there for both the Brits and opening show(s)!

by Anonymousreply 33202/18/2013

Lots: not set on anything so willing to change my mind on CF if there is reason to. H seemingly hooking up with other girls is good reason IMO.

I saw N16's post but someone saw this girl 'all over' H (not going to ignore them just because they read a DM article) Also she appeared to leave without a bf and through a back entrance. She is no celeb so why the need other than to avoid being seen leaving with H.

Yes, it's possible they are just friends through ST but it looked like a classic hook up to me.

by Anonymousreply 33302/18/2013

R33 In the pics I saw, which I'll try to find links to, she can be seen walking with another guy behind H. How do we have any proof it was a back entrance? There are pictures of Harry leaving directly from the building so paps were clearly waiting, wasn't exactly a secret back exit. Why would she want to avoid being seen with H? Many reasons, not sure why you're asking this.

I don't mean to poke holes in everything you're saying, and of course he could have been hooking up with her, but it's all very weak evidence.

by Anonymousreply 33402/18/2013

LG.. U are willing to believe some source that said they saw the girl all over Harry but ur not willing to believe people who put their names to it saying they have seen Harry and Nick all over each other.. I dont know what going on in ur mind but it makes no sense.

by Anonymousreply 33502/18/2013

I think it is a little strange that N didn't DJ with H after all there were several tweets before the event saying they would both be attending. I didn't know about the joint DJing till the article by Grazia. Obviously H's explanation of getting up early would have always been the case. So it appears something made N not do the DJing last night.

by Anonymousreply 33602/18/2013

Eve certainly seems to still be in a relationship. Simmer down, LG.

by Anonymousreply 33702/18/2013

LG is trolling again...

Why take tiny, isolated snippets about a possible hook-up and spin them into a new conflicting theory unless you get a kick out of it?

We may take tiny snippets, but the vast amount of them is how we build our picture.

by Anonymousreply 33802/18/2013

To be fair, LG I think you may be trolling with that comment, I have just read the article and comments and this is the full line :

"Mystery woman is Billie JD Porter. She was all over Harry last night but he just seemed a bit embarrassed to be honest."

So perhaps not someone he was going home with.

In addition the Daily Mail describe Nick as "the main man in his life" which for DM is really quite a statement (I still have no idea where there dislike of him comes from), and four of the comments reference this (with added LOLS).

I've attached it in case anyone actually wants to read it.

by Anonymousreply 33902/18/2013

Re R339 - "their" not "there" (pedantic, I'm sorry).

by Anonymousreply 34002/18/2013

Thank you, C, for giving us the full story.

by Anonymousreply 34102/18/2013

C, I just don't share your level of certainty unfortuantly.

R329, if she was papped leaving with her bf or another male, then obviously i'd look at it differently.

R335, simply trying to remain open-minded. I posted earlier that I think H might be bi & sleeping around with both women and men (one of which could be N) The gossipy tweets and comments like the one you mention about H&N are why I think that. It doesn't mean I can't believe that there are other possibilities too.

by Anonymousreply 34202/18/2013

I find this funny, Its George Barnett (Pixies boyfriend) in to days Burberry Show!! The birthday shirt!

by Anonymousreply 34302/18/2013

The fact that he was embarrassed also fits with the article saying he had to switch tables a few times because he was being "chased" by women, C.

by Anonymousreply 34402/18/2013

L Girl, I would take your opinions more seriously if you didn't completely believe everything printed in the daily mail. or the comments below the daily mail. You flat out refuse to believe tweets or anything linking Harry to Nick at this point, yet you'll happily believe the shit posted in the mail/sun/mirror and even worse, believe the comments of those posting below. Complete double standards. You cannot take those any more seriously than a tweet. Its frankly annoying. You also, for example, took the view that as far as you were concerned the fact Caroline went to Harry's bday party as proof they were still together. Yet you dismiss every single time Harry and Nick are together as any kind of proof. Again, double standards. This is what annoys people. Bring in your differing views, but you cannot double standard the 'evidence' people bring to the Harry and Nick table. and thats what you are doing. I'm willing to bet if Harry and Nick left by the back door and in separate cabs a la yesterday, you would says its cos they are 'just mates', they happened to leave at the same time and were going to separate houses.

by Anonymousreply 34502/18/2013

Ha, I was just about to post about the birthday shirt! I saw a women in the female show in a brown heart shirt and thought, wait, that looks familiar! And then I had a peek at the mens and there it was :) I thought I read that it was his mums shirt!? People make up such crap!

by Anonymousreply 34602/18/2013

LG - It's not to do with sharing my level of certainty; I would not expect you, or anyone else, to (apart from N16 who is in a similar position). It is about jumping on every photograph of Harry with a woman/girl who is not obviously a fan and immediately posting that he is plainly involved with them. (And in a thread about Nick rather than Harry).

There have been no tweets or comments or anything else that links him to anyone but Nick (we will discount Louis for the sake of this conversation as that is different) for months. Given how "tweet-happy" everyone is how would this possibly be the case given that girls even tweet when Harry has kissed their friends on the cheek or met him in a Starbucks.

by Anonymousreply 34702/18/2013

That Billie JD Porter is known for getting around with all the famous 'hipsters' if you will, i'm not surprised if she was trying to 'woo' Harry, glad to hear that he apparently wasn't interested.

by Anonymousreply 34802/18/2013

LG, snooped the awful 1DSuperhumans for you...linked are the photos of Billie JD Porter being papped in the back of the Harry pics with another guy.

by Anonymousreply 34902/18/2013

and another:

by Anonymousreply 35002/18/2013

Isis: Please leave me alone. I'm not interested in any more of your unpleasantness.

R337, we weren't talking about Eve.

C, if 'trolling' means to upset? Then that's not my intention. I'm just interested in working it out and if posting 'controversial' views as part of that is going to result in constant 'troll' insult, then so be it. I think I'll survive.

I just don't think it's as straight forward as others do.

by Anonymousreply 35102/18/2013

R351 - Not everything is a convoluted conspiracy theory! It is straightforward in my opinion.


1. Harry is with Nick 2. Both are single and playing the field (with whatever sex(s) they're interested in.

Or both.

If you want to discuss alternate theories about who Harry might be hooking up with then there's plenty of threads for that. I for one don't come here for that. I come for a bit of gossip about Harry and Nick together - what the truth is, or whether we're all succumbing to confirmation bias, doesn't matter to me as it doesn't exactly affect my life at all.

by Anonymousreply 35202/18/2013

3. Harry is with Louis

by Anonymousreply 35302/18/2013

I wasn't talking to you LG, just a general comment to the thread.

Not interested in you or your made up stories.

by Anonymousreply 35402/18/2013

Lots: thanks. That pic does change my view.

R345, by all means, have your say but please read my posts first. I've never said CF' attendance at H's bd meant they were together? In fact, I'm pretty sure i didn't mention it all as I was trying to avoid discussing her?! As for the H&N tweets, please read R342. You'll see I mention them as reason I agree H might be sleeping with N. Thanks.

by Anonymousreply 35502/18/2013

Isis: I've offered to prove I'm being truthful. You're just not prepared to be proven wrong.

by Anonymousreply 35602/18/2013

LG - I think the problem was that you reported the comment as that the girl was

"seen all over him all night"

whereas the actual full comment was

"She was all over Harry last night but he just seemed a bit embarrassed to be honest"

which rather has the opposite meaning, and you did this just to make your point. In this case it's not putting out a "controversial" view, it's putting out a willfully incorrect one.

To be fair, I am not truly sure of your motives, so trolling might not be quite the correct word; I just don't really know what is.

by Anonymousreply 35702/18/2013

People have memories LG, you might not have mentioned CF today, but you certainly have mentioned her before and one of your previous theories was that CF&HS were in a secret relationship and that all the NG/HS speculation was to cover it up.

All based on your opinion and with no supporting evidence.

by Anonymousreply 35802/18/2013

Feel free to prove your truth LG, but I don't think you can or will, you never have before.

As I have said before you are making everything up.

If I wasn't bored I wouldn't be replying now!

by Anonymousreply 35902/18/2013

C, fair point re my lack I accuracy in that instance.

I have no agenda. I'm just questioning by nature and want to work it out. However, I do get frustrated when everything apposing H&N is ignored when maybe it shouldn't be and that may come out in my posts.

by Anonymousreply 36002/18/2013

Isis, tell me how to and I will.

by Anonymousreply 36102/18/2013

LG - Well I suppose "lacking accuracy" is one way of putting it!!

I don't think anyone minds your questioning, a lot of other people are as well, but I am unsure of what the "everything opposing" (rather than apposing? as in against rather than next to?) Nick and Harry is. I am not aware of anything which as been seen to actually show that they are not together; apart of course from PR stories in the press, and even then, when they could, they slipped in comments about Nick.

Your only comments so far about your colleagues are that they hadn't heard anything, which just tells us that they are either unwilling to comment or just don't know, not that they have proof that it's untrue.

by Anonymousreply 36202/18/2013

C, and this is not just because I agree with you, you write really logical and articulate posts. I enjoy reading them.

by Anonymousreply 36302/18/2013

LG, you often refer to newspaper comments as reasoning. and dismiss all the tweets. If I had time, I'd go back and find them. I'm also fairly certain at some point you mentioned 'case closed' about Flack and Harry due to her attendance at something with Harry recently, and that it had convinced you. You say you have reasons but you'll never explain them other than 'things in the press' which none of us have ever seen or your colleagues. I understand people want to keep fairly secretive about their work on here, but N16, C and others have given as much 'proof' as they can or at least stories from their colleagues. You have said none, other than you believe them. What theories do they have that you are so insistent on?

by Anonymousreply 36402/18/2013

Agreed 363 - you're post are very logical C, you explain what I can't write down so well..!

by Anonymousreply 36502/18/2013

R363 - (thank you).

by Anonymousreply 36602/18/2013

I find it very odd that L Girl, who once so staunchly defended the Nick and Harry theory with the many tweets from "media insiders" and "people who would know", now takes her lead from Daily Mail commenters. If this was just about what you'd heard from your colleagues re: Flack then I would understand; however, it seems like you have suddenly turned to believe about every woman Harry is linked to by the press. Stories which, in the past, you readily dismissed. You also fail to hear or see the full story before you jump in the deep end saying it's most likely a hook up.

Each to their own, but your turn around is fairly astounding.

Personally I'll wait until there is clear proof Harry is with anyone, before saying it's "case closed" or whatever. Male or female. Right now evidence points most clearly to Nick. I thought his comment to Grazia about it not being "weird" was actually very defensive; but that could be defensive of any form of relationship which is being questioned quite like theirs.

And quite frankly I don't think there is any clear or overwhelming proof that he is seeing any woman at all right now. Billie, Caroline, Eve ... There is no woman, other than the very clearly platonic Lou (or Sam), his old school friends or his mother and sister who he has been spotted with. And he is spotted almost anywhere he goes - especially when it's with a girl/woman. I find it hard to believe he could be successfully hiding a relationship.

As many have said, he may also simply be single. And possibly not even playing the field.

by Anonymousreply 36702/18/2013

LG actually knows for a FACT that Nick and Harry are dating, but she's been coming into the DL threads to misdirect.

Because LG is actually Nick Grimshaw.

by Anonymousreply 36802/18/2013

Found a "masterpost" of a sort from tumblr, quite interesting actually. Recommend people have a look, it looks like their friendship escalated quickly and they met each other's families early on.

by Anonymousreply 36902/18/2013

R368 Haha wouldn't that be great!

To add to my previous comment, it's no wonder he's defensive - just seen a tweet saying Nick is a "pa*do" for hanging out with Harry. Ridiculous and inaccurate; offensive; libelous really. It's shameful that people can make this accusations on such a public forum, when they are clearly so uneducated and being almost wilfully ignorant. I also think it's very disrespectful to actual victims of sexual abuse, but that's another discussion, really.

When people have these reactions, in the current social climate (read: the BBC's current social situation), is it any wonder that a couple with an age difference where one is younger would feel the need to hide? The implications on Harry's career aside, I imagine that IF something is happening, it would be incredibly precarious for Nick to be open about it.

A real shame, when for many straight couples with the same or larger age gap; or for any couple where theage gap is the same (or greater), but the younger is just that bit older; you don't get this kind of prejudice or name calling.

I think even just one year for Harry would make a difference, but he's in a situation where many people still see him as the baby-faced little boy who auditioned for X Factor, or the young looking seventeen year old who alledgedly slept with Flack. (And I have never felt that their age difference is really an issue, more that I don't like the woman and don't see how they are compatible; they seem like very different people, different interests, different social set.)

by Anonymousreply 37002/18/2013

Because I knew nothing about N or H before I stumbled on the early October threads in Datalounge - I spent a few evenings watching YouTube vids of the progression of 1D as a group on The X Factor from 2010-11(?). There was a silly filler scenario of young Harry and a bevy of women (contestants?) on the show who ALL thought they were 'dating' Harry. Boy, was he in trouble.

I am so sure that he is tired of being papped and written about with whoever he is standing by or exiting a building in camera viewfinder range. If there was, in fact, a request by their management to all 1D members to tone down the womanizing, I think he is more than willing to follow that and is probably relieved after the last couple of years of media gossip of him and women.

If he was changing tables to escape attention of admirers and being 'embarrassed' by anyone 'hanging all over him' then he is trying to limit this media attention.

by Anonymousreply 37102/18/2013

C, yes I meant 'apposing'

To be clear, I have no 'proof' of anything and have never claimed to. If I had, I wouldn't still be discussing the subject. All I have is personal interpretation of info available to all and a chat with colleagues who claim to have heard nothing (That's all I mean when I refer to 'evidence' it's not something I can prove)

Clearly, the above is not enough to conclude anything. Even if I think I'm sure of something (CF) something else will come along and change my mind. My general uncertainty on this subject means it takes very little to sway me so i react quickly (maybe too quickly)

That said, since xmas, I've noticed a number of things (all mentioned before) that have lead me to question H&N in terms of a relationship. Consequently, I most likely pick up on things that confirm that view (albeit subconsciously) as that's where my head is on the subject.

I'm not asking anyone else to agree with me. It's just my view, take it of leave it.

by Anonymousreply 37202/18/2013

R372 LG, I'm interested in what specific things you've noticed since Christmas. If they are in regards to doubting H/N then it is perfectly relevant to this thread.

by Anonymousreply 37302/18/2013

looks like Harry is at the pre-Brits Muse party tonight with Rita Ora and if Nick's there

not sure if this link to the image will work:

by Anonymousreply 37402/18/2013

Lots - just go back through thread Part 5 and you'll find her posts. Nobody wants to have to sit through them again.

by Anonymousreply 37502/18/2013

R375 will do ahaha

by Anonymousreply 37602/18/2013

Lots: I was about to suggest the same thing. I'm as bored of writing repetitive, defensive posts as R375 & co are of reading them.

by Anonymousreply 37702/18/2013

Harry. Rita and Cara tonight!

by Anonymousreply 37802/18/2013

Just to be 100% clear, that guy in the pics is defs Harry (a different one!) from Peace, and he's dating Billie.

by Anonymousreply 37902/18/2013

what does everyone think of these pics? does anyone know the guys in them? I swear I saw the blonde one somewhere before...

by Anonymousreply 38002/18/2013

well the Sun is already doing what LG is...Gordon Smart is also the one that gets exclusives from One Direction's management team (for ghana, the tour etc.) and has been photographed with the boys on a few occasions.

by Anonymousreply 38102/18/2013

Gordon Smart knows where the money is. He's always writing articles about Harry/various girl and then squeezing in articles that hint at Harry/Nick. Seemed like he was too busy insinuating Cara/Rita in this article to bother with Harry/Nick though.

by Anonymousreply 38202/18/2013

R380 Thats David Gardner he is friends with Nick! I think he is a sports agent! Its the David Nick always talks about on his show.

by Anonymousreply 38302/18/2013

Thanks R383 ! Still don't know who the blonde guy is but I found where I recognized him from...this picture on Rita Ora's Instagram from yesterday:

by Anonymousreply 38402/18/2013

Ok, I need a moment to fangirl over how adorable Cara and Rita are. I hope it's true they're together because they make a gorgeous couple.

by Anonymousreply 38502/18/2013

"Well, if Cara's taken! Harry Styles moves on from Delevingne... by flirting with her best pal and 'wifey' Rita Ora at War Child Brit Awards concert"


by Anonymousreply 38602/18/2013

Lots: that's because rightly not wrongly, it's an obvious assumption to make if your believe H is into girls which I do.

by Anonymousreply 38702/18/2013

N and H get a mention and there is an old photo in this Daily Mail article. Earlier N mentioned the article in a paper but did not mention himself.

by Anonymousreply 38802/19/2013

It's one thing to believe H is into girls, but that still doesn't make it reasonable to assume that he can't leave the house without hooking up with someone, even if they're leaving an event with another guy behind him and all pictures show him leaving alone. Personally that's what I have the biggest problem with, how big this whole "womanizer" thing has blown up despite numerous people saying it's not really like that. I mean the article about Rita for gods sake, they've been friends for months. Like Cara herself pointed out its unfortunate that H really can't seem to have any female friends or even breathe in the presence of a girl without tabloids running stories on how she's his latest "conquest". And that's gross.

by Anonymousreply 38902/19/2013

R367, I don't believe everything the rags report in relation to H and girls. I was one of the few on this thread that maintained, throughout Haylor, that it was tabloid rubbish and have never wavered from that. Also, I have used DM comments, tabloid articles etc.. as 'evidence' for H&N as well as for other theories. I've never changed the way I've looked at all this, just my conclusions.

At the end of the day this is just a gossip forum about whether 2 celebs are shagging. Who cares if I've changed my mind. It's hardly important.

by Anonymousreply 39002/19/2013

That's it: I don't believe for one second in a superinjunction concerning Harry and Nick, and those jurnalists or media people who insist with this shit are obviously lying shameleslly. Everybody in the media is talking about H/N, who have ton of articles about them, are papped every time they step outside together and we must believe they are under some kind of superinjunction?

by Anonymousreply 39102/19/2013

R388 - Yes, it is slightly odd; given that the second highest comment at the moment is "I dont think Harry and Nick is a bromance" and the newspaper's comment yesterday that Nick was Harry's "main man" one wonders if they are trying to make some kind of point....!

by Anonymousreply 39202/19/2013

R391 - If there is an injunction it will be to stop the press outing them as a couple, not to stop them photographing them in a social setting, and with the exception of the online Metro (and online publications appear to be currently safe from legal ramifications) no one has actually has said anything definite.

by Anonymousreply 39302/19/2013

Thank you, c.

by Anonymousreply 39402/19/2013

C/R392, I bet you don't get 'told off' for taking notice of DM comments..

by Anonymousreply 39502/19/2013

LG, maybe it's because we're sick of your boring, repetitive, endless crap, your Caroline Flack obsession, and your constant need to link Harry to ANYONE he's ever papped with (instead of the person we KNOW he's been spending time with public and privately for well over a year) or even rumored to have been in the same room with for more than a few seconds.

That might go a long way to why we don't take you, your mysterious coworkers, the "evidence" you have but never produce, or your comments seriously on this thread for even a second.

by Anonymousreply 39602/19/2013

LG - To be fair my comment was obviously jokey whilst yours was purposely misquoting in order to make your point; not the same.

by Anonymousreply 39702/19/2013


by Anonymousreply 39802/19/2013

C, I would have to look into UK law more to be sure but generally online publications can definitely be subject to the same legal ramifications as print publications. They could be charged with libel over anything printed and I would imagine they're definitely subject to injunctions as well. The bit from that article about injunctions that said it was harder to hold online stuff accountable was referring more to stuff like Twitter, or online users spreading information (possibly anonymously) but an actual news source would still be expected to follow injunctions rules, as far as I know. Although that just surprises me more because I definitely would have thought there was an injunction around them from the way papers were behaving and the numerous references to it. I suppose it's possible the metro broke the injunction but they could definitely be held liable if that's the case. What's interesting in this case is that the parties involved may not want to charge or say anything because it would draw attention they don't want. Alternatively the Metro might have thought that the as revenue they'd get from hits (it was their top viewed story that day after all) would be worth whatever fallout they might incur, but I don't know enough to compare that.

by Anonymousreply 39902/19/2013

Yeah, I agree, R399. I don't think websites that are part of well-known mainstream media can get away with breaking a n injunction. So either there isn't/wasn't one or it has lapsed. As for libel, they must be really sure of themselves and as you said "management" making a fuss about it would draw attention to it, particularly if it is in fact true and they can't actually sue.

by Anonymousreply 40002/19/2013

C, I did not misquote on purpose.

R396, get your facts straight. I've ignored many 'womanising' stories. I was one of the ONLY ones who dismissed Hayor from the start and never bought into Cara.. That doesn't fit with your critisism though so I guess you're ignoring that. As for your other criticisms, I've answered them all a million times before. I'm not bothering from now on.

Half the posts on here supporing H&N are illogical, steeped in confirmation bias and tin-hatting and in some cases, are just plain crazy. However, I respect their poster's right to an opinion and ignore them. I certainly don't care enough to respond with hostile posts demanding they justify their views. Bizarre.

Still by all means, continue if that's your 'thing'

by Anonymousreply 40102/19/2013

LG - Really this is the last I am going to say anything about this, although plainly you are welcome to comment as much as you like, but your quote was

" the same girl seen all over him all night"

which was taking from your reading of the newspaper comments.

The actual quote was

" She was all over Harry last night but he just seemed a bit embarrassed to be honest"

Now either you stopped reading when you had the information you wanted to make your point; a touch lazy perhaps, or you cut the quote to suit your purposes.

This has nothing to do with your, or my, opinions on the matter, it is just making misleading comments to fuel your own agenda.

by Anonymousreply 40202/19/2013

LG - I am going to make one further comment, because having reread what I have posted above it does seem somewhat harsh. Whilst I do feel what I am saying stands, I could have phrased it more kindly, and I don't want to bully you, or anyone else, with my comments, so my apologies for that.

by Anonymousreply 40302/19/2013

c your comments are not bully, merely pointing out LG's manipulation of the text to suit her opinion.

We are all free to express our opinions and question there basis.

by Anonymousreply 40402/19/2013

C, as I said in R372, I most likely pick up on what reflects my current view. But this is a subconscious thing. Not a deliberate attempt to mislead. I'm as as susceptible to 'confirmation basis' as the next person. I've been pretty honest about that (although as I'd like H&N to be together, this is perhaps confirmation bias in reverse if such a thing exists)

You've never come across as a bully.

by Anonymousreply 40502/19/2013

Sugarscape are saying Harry gets linked to anyone and anything.

"Harry Styles has only just stopped being papped out with Taylor Swift, so it was only a matter of time before he was linked with a new girl, boy, or inanimate object (seriously, we're going for a lamp in around.... June?)."

I though it was funny they say a lamp.

by Anonymousreply 40602/19/2013

Haha, that is funny, R406. It's nice of the media to have some self-awareness every now and then!

by Anonymousreply 40702/19/2013

Also interesting that they even refer to him being "linked" with boys

by Anonymousreply 40802/19/2013

Definitely interesting, R408.

by Anonymousreply 40902/19/2013

My minimal legal knowledge:

Injunctions have to be vey specific about what they can and cannot include. For example they may be restricted from publishing pics within 100m of their homes or using language that implies a physical relationship. It will be for a fixed period and could be applied for a renewal with different restrictions.

All media could be prosecuted but ultimately it's the fear of litigation that restricts printed press. Most websites have no money so aren't as worried and the PR of sueing a member of general public (eg twitter outing) would be disastrous.

Super injunctions restrict people from reporting on the existance of any injunction.

This tends to only restrict professional media as people oh find out about a super-j when they infringe it. So the person with injunction can decide if it's worth telling a publication or not.

Every paper has a legal department and is likely if there were a injunction in place - articles will have to be Pre-checked for infringement.

Can any journos let me know if this is correct?

Despite all this I doubt one is in place. Too messy and even withiut one press will still be fearful of implying something that can't be proven. Being a couple or in a relationship can't be proven. They need a snogging pic or similar (see portia de Rossi outing)

by Anonymousreply 41002/19/2013

So if is not any superinjunction in place, can we say those tweets claiming it is one are bulshitt, and in fact maybe all this Harry and Grimmy are a couple OMG!!!" may be a big lie? I don't think Harry wants to come out right not, he is under contract to looks straight. I think Grimmy is trolling us, like the morning he instagrammed a photo of him with a unknown male in bed, very well knowing the fans will think of Harry. Even if we later find out that Harry was in Ghana in that particular day. Or the instagramed photo of Grimmy with his legs on someone knees, who supposed was Harry (even if the unknown legs were too thick or short to be H and we know that evening he spent his time with Teasdales).

by Anonymousreply 41102/19/2013

R411, I don't know about super injunctions at all to say anything on that.

But I don't think that N or H are going to make up rumours about something like that when it's so clear what the majority of the public think. There are so many p*edo comments, etc. and making up a relationship like this is certainly not going to help anyones career.

N probably doesn't care that much about what people think about what he instagrams.

by Anonymousreply 41202/19/2013

I think it is possible that there was an injunction at some point or people were told there was one to try and prevent them from saying anything. The idea that someone from Nick or Harry's circle, including them, is spreading this for fun is just not logical. Not everyone who has said they know that Harry and Nick are together has said anything about an fact very few have. I mean even C said the person saying there was an injunction was not that certain of it. I think the media would be reluctant to out Harry/them as a couple regardless and metro really is an exception for whatever reason.

by Anonymousreply 41302/19/2013

O,I don't believe for a second Nick didn't know what people will think when he took those pictures. He is too smart, I don't think we should suspect him of naivete. He is a very good friend of Harry, I don't think he will encourage such speculation of a relationship if it is real. He will keep his mouth shut (because he is known to be a very private guy about his romantic life) and be discret about them. I think Nick use this as publicity, this ambiguity is good for him and his show (they share the same PR team after all).

by Anonymousreply 41402/19/2013

R414, 411, I don't think N posted those pics to deliberately 'troll' but I would agree with the rest of your posts. It was those pics that started the doubt in my mind re H&N.

by Anonymousreply 41502/19/2013

And don't forget the instagramed picture on Christmas day at Nick's house whith just some arms who conveniently displayed "Things I can't" tattoo of Harry. It was Aimee who took the photo but I bet with Nick's approval.

by Anonymousreply 41602/19/2013

I don't think at this point Nick is at all playing that card, maye sometimes on the radio but I am doubtful he is being purposely ambiguous with his Instagram photos. I don't think he is that obsessed with what we're all speculating on and is just doing what he wants (within reason).

by Anonymousreply 41702/19/2013

LOLLLLLLL, Nick is a very practical person, he wants his show to succeed, of course he wants to be in papers, to be talked, so his frienship with Harry is a big help. Bonus the ambiguity of a romantic involvement.

by Anonymousreply 41802/19/2013

Given that R411/R414/R416 used the line

"I don't think Harry wants to come out right not, he is under contract to looks straight."

I think it is entirely possible that they are a Larry shipper, and not perhaps someone who has an interest in Nick at all.....

by Anonymousreply 41902/19/2013

The rumors of an injunction could have just been an easy way to explain "nothing big will make it to the press" without going into detail about the relationship between tabloids and PR teams or the fincial incentive of posting continuous Harry/Girl articles versus one BIG time story of Harry/Nick or the tricky legal/moral issue of outing someone in the press (you'd need facts and pics)

The instagram pics in bed could easily have just been friends (even if it was Harry they could still just be friendly) and as stated before: the legs aren't actually too thick or short and Harry easily could have met up with Sam after. I'm not saying that it is Harry just that it's possible.

by Anonymousreply 42002/19/2013

Could it be possible that Harry's pr team have asked/persuaded the media not to run any big 'shock horror Harry's gay' stories but not said anything about quietly mentioning/suggesting things, so as to slowly let more people catch on so he can come out of the closet without too much fuss?

Meanwhile they can continue to run all their womaniser stories and cash in on that, win win situation really

by Anonymousreply 42102/19/2013

I think that is possible, R421.

by Anonymousreply 42202/19/2013

So if I point some strange things in the whole ""Harry /Nick are lovers" picture I'm a Larry shipper. Good one, C. This is what you preach in your blog also?

by Anonymousreply 42302/19/2013

C, I am talking about your blog, harrick tumblr.

by Anonymousreply 42402/19/2013

R424, Is this a wind up?

by Anonymousreply 42502/19/2013

Of course.

by Anonymousreply 42602/19/2013

R426 - I'm glad you are aware your comments are a "wind-up", and no, I am not Harrick (in fact I don't have a twitter or a tumblr account).

My comment that it was "entirely possible" that you were "Larry shipper" was based on the fact that you apparently, from your comments, believe that Harry is gay but are seemingly rather against him having a relationship with Nick. Now, obviously, since you have put me right, I can tell you don't believe in Louis and Harry's' mutual adoration, but you can see it was an easy mistake to make.

by Anonymousreply 42702/19/2013

Well I suppose make of these pictures what you will. However, I would say that for someone with a boyfriend she's very forward. Then again, in a loud club setting, you're going to lean close into someone to talk. I wonder if they've just met, for how she's touching him? Perhaps not, if, as someone says, she's friends with Sam T. People seemed very adamant she's taken though.

by Anonymousreply 42802/19/2013

anyone BUT billie JD porter jesus christ, would prefer t swift

by Anonymousreply 42902/19/2013

Yeah, she does seem forward, if we go by those photos and by the comment about her being all over him. It may all be quite innocent though, maybe it was loud here as you say and she's tactile. Anyway, yeah, both N16 and the media are reporting she has a boyfriend, so a big fuss over nothing.

by Anonymousreply 43002/19/2013

Haha, she that annoying?

by Anonymousreply 43102/19/2013

So according to tumblr, Audrey Kitching tweeted this then deleted it. For those who don't know her she used to be MySpace queen, used to date Brendon Urie from Panic! at the disco.. Takes me back...

by Anonymousreply 43202/19/2013

R431 I don't know what it is about her but i've had a strong dislike towards her since she was on that "joys of teen sex" programme, acts superior to everyone around her. Anyway!

by Anonymousreply 43302/19/2013

In all but one of those pictures it merely looks like Harry is leaning in to talk to her/listen to what she has to say. The first one is more 'suspect' as he has his hands on her waist.

by Anonymousreply 43402/19/2013

R433 I feel the same way and I know we're not alone. I tend to find a lot of young, pretentious and "avant garde" or "quirky" journos very irritating though. It's probably jealousy.

by Anonymousreply 43502/19/2013

I think that is just because she is leaning in, R434.

R432, that is interesting, thank you! Why are people deleting their tweets now, I'm curious.

R431, haha, okay. I know nothing about her, but anyway, as you said.

by Anonymousreply 43602/19/2013

That should have been R433, not R431 of course.

by Anonymousreply 43702/19/2013

C, you know, till Christmas I believed Harry and Nick were having sex (as fwb or a couple). But the obvious publicity of their relationship, the misleading instagramed photos, the very public display of their friendship on those two days of birthday party, the innuendos and the countinuously mention of Harry by Nick in his show, and many other things, make me to reconsider my thinking. What really shocked me is H/N very suspiciuos behaviour on bday party; when drunk you don't have many inhibitions,they didn't show any kind of intimacy normal for two people fucking (and there are about 1 thousand photos from that day).

by Anonymousreply 43802/19/2013

What is up with the DM and their friendly articles about Harry and interesting focus: I like it, though I don't trust them to keep it up.

by Anonymousreply 43902/19/2013

Oh R438 you reminded me of all my sensible doubts. :)

My concen was the risk that they may do something while pissed.

Others on here reassured me it was probably that they had a couple of friends briefed to keep an eye but that seems far fetched?

by Anonymousreply 44002/19/2013

Hmm, see I think if you were Harry Styles, you would still be careful when drunk in a public place. Or he at least was surrounded by slightly less drunk people who were watching out for him. Nick being one of them. I think the hug pics we have from them are as close as we'll ever see them, friends or more, and was fuelled by alcohol, I doubt they'd have hugged otherwise in view of paps or certainly hidden paps as the photos are from a distance. I can quite imagine Harry being pulled back from Nick by friends Being reminded. If they are indeed together.

by Anonymousreply 44102/19/2013

Haven't seen this posted yet - some speculation about H/N:

by Anonymousreply 44202/19/2013

Actually the headline was not very friendly...oh well, can't expect too much.

JJ, I don't think it's far-fetched. I actually don't think Nick was drunk though to be honest. I think it was only Harry, so Nick would have made sure to be careful, even if Harry didn't.

by Anonymousreply 44302/19/2013

Nick is having a Pre-Brit party tonight, Rita, Jessie Ware etc are attending...

by Anonymousreply 44402/19/2013

Am I the only person who thinks the girl in the hand on waist pic isn't Porter? Could be a random hookup, or a friend or whatever. I still think he's primarily with N!

These tweets are from Billie's bf - think that pretty much clears that up. I try not to bad mouth people, but I really can't stand her, I bet she'll do nothing but encourage these rumours!

by Anonymousreply 44502/19/2013

R438, that's my view (better articulated) Add to that the Lycett comment left in a prerecorded BBC show (usually edited) and it starts to look sus IMO.

by Anonymousreply 44602/19/2013

Just out of curiosity N16, have you ever bumped into Billie around London?

by Anonymousreply 44702/19/2013

R438 - Fair enough. I don't really agree with you over the instagram photos. The one with the ring was posted when Nick knew it was obvious Harry was in Africa, the one with the "legs" really could be any of his friends as there is nothing really identifiable about the other person and the one taken at Christmas was posted by Aimee and not him.

As to the birthday photographs, the early ones show them hugging when they are sober, but there is nothing to really indicate that Nick was actually drunk that evening. By the time Harry was, he was being "wrangled" by Theo and being kept away from Nick; although apparently according to an eye-witness at the time he was making a rush for the car which Nick was in when the minder grabbed him.

I don't think Nick has increased his actual mentions of Harry; all of those recently have been made initially by someone else, and he certainly is not making any innuendo about him; that's all down to the papers, and neither of them have any control over them.

I think the difference is that they have both largely been in London for the last month or so which was not the case for the last couple of months of 2012, especially when Harry was tied up with Haylor, and have just been seeing each other more often. After the week in the summer when they were together constantly, this has been positively restrained; particularly during the last couple of days when Nick has cancelled his planned appearences at events Harry has attended.

by Anonymousreply 44802/19/2013

I think it is her, N16, just with different hair, so maybe the photos are not from the last few days? I'm not sure though. Thanks for the boyfriend tweets link.

Thanks for the link, R442. That was quite interesting!

Harry needs to turn up then, R444!

by Anonymousreply 44902/19/2013

R447 yeah I've met her here and there, never really spoken though, she's a fair bit younger than me and in with all those Vice idiots. Not my cuppa tea!

by Anonymousreply 45002/19/2013

LG - ITV2 might be a touch hurt to be called BBC!

by Anonymousreply 45102/19/2013

C, my mistake. I thought it was from Never Mind The Buzzcocks?

by Anonymousreply 45202/19/2013

LG - No! It was Celebrity Juice.

by Anonymousreply 45302/19/2013

Actually it was Celeb Juice, if i recall. I don't know why it wasn't edited out though. N is friends with both F Cotton and the host.

by Anonymousreply 45402/19/2013

Celeb Juice is fuelled by jokes, innuendoes and banter. Nobody takes anything said on that programme seriously.

by Anonymousreply 45502/19/2013

LG - Don't think Fearn Cotton would have any editorial control over that, but it was noticeable that although Joe was sat next to her we didn't see her reaction on camera; which was unusual. And as to Keith Lemmon; given that he started a conversation with Nick about Harry when he was on the breakfast show, I think he would just find it funny.

by Anonymousreply 45602/19/2013

Well Porter just denied the girl was her:

by Anonymousreply 45702/19/2013

Haha, well good for her then, R457!

I guess it was just a random girl or a friend who looked similar enough and it went well with the story from the day before.

Ugh at the media sometimes.

by Anonymousreply 45802/19/2013

C, I know Cotton would have no influence but thought she might have given N a heads so he could try and get it removed. I guess that might have looked suspicious in itself though.

by Anonymousreply 45902/19/2013

*heads up

by Anonymousreply 46002/19/2013

What did Lycett say?

by Anonymousreply 46102/19/2013

I think we're talking about when he replied in response to the question along the lines of "who "is the the latest conquest/woman of harry styles" with "nick grimshaw" ?

by Anonymousreply 46202/19/2013

R442 Thanks for that. Rather less "close to the bone" and "subtle" and more "oi-we reckon theres something going on. Tell us please"

Of course if we really want an answer (I mean really) it would require a twitter campaign to get the article noticed and into the public awareness and force either a response or a removal.

I have a deep suspicion that HS will never state an outright lie.

by Anonymousreply 46302/19/2013

I agree on both counts, JJ.

by Anonymousreply 46402/19/2013

Thank you, r462.

by Anonymousreply 46502/19/2013

Looking at the pictures again properly, I don't even think he was wearing that jumper that night? Strange also that there was that DM comment made about her and then suddenly they linked her to him with some random photos. Hope they're not using their comments as their sources, that would be a new low ...

by Anonymousreply 46602/19/2013

What pics are u talking about? I looked at the article and I only saw on picture..

by Anonymousreply 46702/19/2013

Yeah, he wasn't, R466, they seem to be from some other random night. The girl also seems to be wearing a jacket/coat in some of them, so it looks like she is actually leaving and telling Harry goodbye or something, because he doesn't look like he is leaving.

by Anonymousreply 46802/19/2013

Any more info on this supposed pre-Brits party that Nick is hosting?

by Anonymousreply 46902/19/2013

I'd love to know more, too, lots!

by Anonymousreply 47002/19/2013

I knew it wasn't her! And now Heat have changed the article and removed the pics of the other girl. I think (whoever she is) they are talking over the noise in the bar and possibly kissing/hugging goodbye.

The article speculating over H and N is interesting but tbh I think there'll always be rumblings about them and they'll never admit it until 1D is over, or they break up, or if they stay together for years and decide to get married etc. Think the last option is completely unlikely but I'm not one for doom and gloom :)

by Anonymousreply 47102/19/2013

Yup, you were right, N16, I was wrong, haha.

I agree that the photos were harmless but suited Heat's purposes quite well.

The N/H speculation was's progress for sure that gossip sites are actually saying things like that.

Awwww, I'm all for your non-doom and non-gloom attitude.

by Anonymousreply 47202/19/2013

Maybe not a full on injunction, but it is noteworthy that the only articles speculating on h/n have been on American websites. Unless the British rags have more respect for not outing celebs? Like I've said before I signed off, I think at the very least there is a "gentleman's agreement" with the British press to not report on it. (This even covers that metro article, which was definitely taken as a joke by most people and h/n weren't the focus or headline of the piece anyway)

by Anonymousreply 47302/19/2013

It's also worth noting that while the government are debating the Leveson Report the press are very unlikely to do anything which could be seen as unethical.

by Anonymousreply 47402/19/2013

The celeb Juice question was Who is the latest woman to fall for Harry Styles' charms? Nick was listening and tweeted Joe Lycett immediately after the question.

by Anonymousreply 47502/19/2013

Yeah I remember, he called him a "bitch". Quite funny.

by Anonymousreply 47602/19/2013

Also nothing that dodgy about the Celeb Juice comment. Absolutely in the mood of the show and NG has been vocal on his 1D crush.

Far more weird for me was Russell Howards well-documented speculation on the oddity of the relationship and the way the press covered his comments

The Sun and Gordon Smart was the originator I think with the Mail and Now covering his comments (as did many others and the online world too)

by Anonymousreply 47702/19/2013

I think Harry's comment the other day about how there was nothing "weird" about his relationship with Nick and how they were both "equally stupid" or something had a lot to do with that Russel Howard article. To me it sounded like he was referring to the criticism over the age gap, like he was trying to say they were both equals.

by Anonymousreply 47802/19/2013

JJ - Oh yes, although to be fair to Russell Howard, the comments were made on Richard Herring's Leicester Square Theatre podcast which doesn't exactly have a huge number of listeners, so I don't think he himself was expecting his comments to be picked up upon.

Gordon Smart on the other hand would have had to have taken notes from the audio as there is no published script, so he was seriously seeking out specific material.

R478 - Yes, I agree, it did sound as if he was emphasizing that they were equals; which is understandable however one views their "friendship".

by Anonymousreply 47902/19/2013

Sorry, R479, was me.

by Anonymousreply 48002/19/2013

Anyone else getting the feeling that NG is a real life troll?

by Anonymousreply 48102/19/2013


by Anonymousreply 48202/19/2013

Ok, whatever, Nick.

by Anonymousreply 48302/19/2013

Right-I quit. The British gossip press are not even interested in what the actual story is.

They are in a symbiotic relationship with all the celebs to put as many famous names in headlines as possible, in order to get more web hits.

IT seems the truth is utterly irrelevant as long as someone wants to read the story.

Im not saying this below isnt true. Im saying that ALL the articles cannot be true as they all contriadict each other. And noone cares.

Just like the Leveson enquiry wont actually do anything (everyone stopped caring there too)

Truth is, the public want to believe a glam exciting lifestyle and would rather that the truth and the press are happy to oblige.

FFS GB sort your crap out.

Sorry. Rant Over.

by Anonymousreply 48402/19/2013

Haha, JJ, I've been waiting for this for a while and kept wondering why the press never went there! Soooooo ridiculous. Don't let it get to you though.

by Anonymousreply 48502/19/2013

I was thinking the exact same thing this morning, JJ. Plain circus. I kind of feel bad for Harry, sure it gets him press but everything around him is just ridiculous. I think, ironically, sugarscape got it right when they said Harry's being linked to girls, boys and objects at the moment. To me, the only story with actual substance is a possible relationship with Nick Grimshaw. Other than that, it's all just pseudo journalism turned trolling.

by Anonymousreply 48602/19/2013

I agree, R486.

by Anonymousreply 48702/19/2013

Whilst Im a fan of these two (I am I promise-even get up early on occasion to listen to R1), I have no sympathy and I cannot stand how the press is effectively allowing these games as it makes for webhits. (This is true of all the celeb fodder)

They are both actively (and quite within their rights) courting this fame, the Instagram, twitter, radio mentions, the fashion week, the Public birthday parties. All of it.

Both have reputations for being really good guys but that doesnt mean they aren't ferociously ambitious.

I doubt its that calculated but it absolutely is intentional to court this much press. NOw they just have to work out how close they can sail to the edge before backing off.

The reason I am interested is that unlike most media staged relationships this has an element of real and an element of smarter than the average celeb about it.

My frustration is that the press dont seem to be interested in finding out the real story. (on any of these people)

by Anonymousreply 48802/19/2013

I'm starting to believe Harry and Nick are very good friends, because nothing about their behaviour towards each other reveal any kind of intimacy. Is a very good friendship, but not different than Harry and Ed Sheraan, or Harry and Louis. Grimmy knows about speculation and like to feed them, no harm and more publicity. Look how often he is in papers now, and all because of Harry.

by Anonymousreply 48902/19/2013

R489, N's profile has risen because he has the top radio broadcasting job in the UK.

You cannot attribute it all to his association with a boyband member.

by Anonymousreply 49002/19/2013

Sorry R489 I dont agree at all.

Nick is providing credible access to Londons fashion and Primorse Hill set.

He may not have been massively famous pre-breakfast show but he is incredibly well connected.

HIs closest friends include some incredibly big hitters in the London social scene.

Just to reiterate, I do like these two and don't think there is anything wrong with ambition at all, but there are benefits for both.

by Anonymousreply 49102/19/2013

JJ please tell me what is the diference between Harry/Ed or Harry/Louis friendship and Harry/Nick to consider the last one a romantic relationship. Harry lived with both Ed and Louis, are often seen with them (with Louis is practically every day). The diference should be something special, and air of intimacy between them, and I cannot find this in Harry and Nick right now, even if all the media in London tweet about them.

by Anonymousreply 49202/19/2013

Harry and Louis have been seen together practically every day~?

No. Not when 1D's not in rehearsals or doing shows or promo.

When Harry's at work, he's seen with his coworkers. When Harry's at home? He's with Nick Grimshaw or the Teasdales.

We see Harry and Louis together at 1D sponsored media events- and that's IT and has been for nearly a year, soz.

by Anonymousreply 49302/19/2013

493, are you joking or trolling? Harry and Louis lived together for more than a year, their mothers considers themselves mutualmommies(read their tweets from yesterday), all Harry's family was to Louis's very private birthday party, I asure you they are very good friends, not only coworkers.

by Anonymousreply 49402/19/2013

They lived together for over a year- over a year ago.

There's been silence outside of 1D events since that time.


by Anonymousreply 49502/19/2013

This thread isn't about Harry and Louis, oh god, this is going to go on for ages. Harry spends a lot of his time with Nick, including staying over at Nick's, and Louis is spending a lot of time with his girlfriend. I'm sure they're still very close friends, but they've definitely made the decision to not be as public with their friendship after the rumors got out of control, so it's impossible to know how much time they spend together when they aren't with Nick/Eleanor, so this discussion can really only go in circles.

But yeah, it's pretty clear that Harry spends a lot more of his time time with Nick than Louis or Ed/anyone else that was mentioned, and they've definitely settled into various domestic behaviour which is why some people do think they might be more than FWB and an actual relationship. IMO, Nick's involvement in Harry's bday, and even their tactile behaviour there, did seem a lot more couple-y than friends.

by Anonymousreply 49602/19/2013

R492 "air of intimacy" really? We are watching their relationship, whatever it may be, play out mostly from photographs and tweets. Not sure what you exactly expect, it's not like they are on a television programme and we can analyze every word and stare.

by Anonymousreply 49702/19/2013

The short article from earlier has been extended. Of interest to those of you who believe Nick and Harry are in a relationship.

by Anonymousreply 49802/19/2013

"When Harry's at home he is with Nick", sorry but you made me laugh. How many times was Harry with Nick in the last two months? Where was Harry yesterday, and the day before? You know for sure he was with Nick? Please don't troll. And for your information, Harry lived with Louis till September 2012, so more than a year.

by Anonymousreply 49902/19/2013

I hate to bring up "larry" shippers, but that is exactly why I'm tired of them. They keep vehemently throwing all this "evidence" like it's completely irrefutable. And yeah, I agree, Harry and Louis seemed very close, they lived together, their mothers are friends. But that was a year ago. They're never seen socializing outside of work. They don't live together, and they don't seem to have similar interests at the moment. And well, when it comes to families Harry's and Nick's know each other very well, Harry's mom and sister seem to love Nick, and Harry spent christmas with Nick at Nick's parents' house. Their families are clearly involved in their friendship/relationship/whatever.

by Anonymousreply 50002/19/2013

HI R492

FIrstly, I have no interest at all in other relationships of Harry so its very difficult for me to say the differences. This is not meant disrespectfully , I just have minimal info.

What I am certain of is that for me, (and I cant talk for anyone else) I hvae no interest in looking for an "air" of romance/intimacy as I think that tends to be the realms of tumblr gifs and classic McFly gaybaiting and also sometimes unconsummated relationships (see most great screen couplings and the tension that goes once they were known to be physical together)

I will concede though that nothing particularly in their conversations on radio seems to convey a sense of intimacy and that were they together in May, Call or Delete is a very odd thing to do to a friend"

However, I have the word of two friends of friends working in press now that the press believe they are sleeping together (though one does not speculate whether he is gay particularly and think its more a "try everything" phase)

I think they're abnormally close to each others families, family and lives to be friends for adults (BUT concede Nick is like that with lots of people and Harry is young and in a big city and clearly "collects" friends all over)

But mostly, I studied history for 15 years and like to think I know a little about source evaluation and research. Some of the tweets are relevant. Some of the newspapers use of words is deliberately tasting the water.

I realise I sound like a twat, but my interest is as much about the media obssession with celebs and their relationships, the utter homophobia of hollywood and the press; and the idea that gay and bisexual people choose to stay in the closet for purely business decisions meaning young people have less role models to follow and older people like my parents think that noone they like is gay on TV!

I am still in two minds about whether its a flirty friendship with business benefits that got out of a hand or a relationship with business benefits that is carefully managed just on the boil.

And now reflecting what I've written in the last 3 hours I am going to put my head in the oven as I have been sucked in once again to the madness. Apologies for cloggin up the thread with my ramblings

by Anonymousreply 50102/19/2013

Lots, by your logic everything that are played in front of papps are real. So Harry was fucking Taylor when he was seen doing the "walks of shame" from her hotel in NY then. Good one. And I simply asked what is the difference between H/Ed or H/Louis and the H/N saga (must be something special who prove two people are having sex with each other) , not to speak about Louis. But I don't like when people bring their lies and hates to try to make me shut my mouth.

by Anonymousreply 50202/19/2013

In the last two months, seriously? He was out to lunch with Nick the day he arrived back in the UK in mid-January, he stayed over later that same week, he was over the night they were baking together and presumably stayed over, if you can take some of Nick's comments about a male friend staying over than that adds even more nights (even if Harry is only some of those mentions), there have been multiple days when he's been wearing Nick's clothes, Nick was up for pretty much 48 hours over the span of Harry's birthday partying, which included Harry staying over at his the first night and the two of them presumably staying at Nick's the second night (he mentioned the after party being there), and then since then Harry was out of town for 8 or 9 days in Yorkshire and only got back on Sunday. Since then they haven't been out in public, presumably since attention is ramping up around them so much, but Nick has again referenced a male friend being at his place which may or may not be Harry, judging on past mentions. I'm not saying that every mention is automatically Harry, but considering that that is the way he references Harry time and time again, and it has been proven to be Harry time and time again, I do think it's worth noting, especially when he specifies that the friend is male, since the vast vast majority of his close friends that frequently stay over are female.

Also, not true about Harry living with Louis til September 2012. I know there are various arguments about the exact dates, but Harry bought his own place in the summer and definitely was staying over at Nick's even more frequently then (no, I'm not going to go back and figure out dates for you, but it was definitely frequent, plus they were spending multiple days at a time together constantly, Harry was driving Nick to work, etc.) Nick has also been making references to "a friend" staying over, or staying with "a friend" that was proven to be Harry since as far back as that too.

by Anonymousreply 50302/19/2013

Sorry, I'm one of the most vehement "this is not a Louis" thread people here, but I cannot STAND when this crap happens.

Harry and Louis haven't been seen together outside of work events in months. Not so much as a casual lunch or a fan picture has been unearthed.

Your ship has sunk, and if you're not interested in NICK GRIMSHAW or his varied friends (which includes Harry to a LARGE degree), you need to leave this goddamn thread.

by Anonymousreply 50402/19/2013

JJ I rarely post here but I have found your posts interesting. I get totally bored by the thread sometimes as I am mostly interested in Nick and his entourage of celeb friends and am also hugely cynical about any press coverage and how news is is manipulated. I don't believe anything unless it comes directly from the mouths of he people involved and then realise that editing can twist things enormously.

by Anonymousreply 50502/19/2013

Exactly, R503

by Anonymousreply 50602/19/2013

Love this bit JJ: 'I am still in two minds about whether its a flirty friendship with business benefits that got out of a hand or a relationship with business benefits that is carefully managed just on the boil.'

Sums up my opinion entirely!

It is certainly interesting and entertaining to watch!

by Anonymousreply 50702/19/2013

R502 Well you clearly missed my point but I don't think anyone is interested in this thread becoming some big argument so I'll leave it there. I assure you I didn't intend to "bring lies or hate" to the table.

RE the dinner tonight, seen some rumours on twitter about Harry attending. It's at a hotel, I'll try to find the links again.

by Anonymousreply 50802/19/2013

I'm starting to think a lot of people here are strange to say the least. Now I'm a Larry shipper. Please, I'm far from one, I want to know what make Harry/Nick relationship special, different from other type of relationship Harry is having (and I will let Louis outside, because everybody here will try to tell me they are no longer friends, they are enemies, they never are papped together OMG, their mothers was forced by management to tweett each other sweet things yesterday, somebody put a pistol to all Harrys family's temple to came to Louis select party etc), so I will use the Harry/Tom Atkin one (or maybe you will consider me a Hatkin sipper now!!!!)

by Anonymousreply 50902/19/2013

JJ, I agree with pretty much everything you've said.

by Anonymousreply 51002/19/2013

I can't really imagine him not attending...that would be suspicious in itself. Thanks, lots.

by Anonymousreply 51102/19/2013

Thanks R505

Two final points. Please learn to use google:

1) Harry lived with Louis in a aprtment in the same block as the others till Feb 2012. When he turned 18. It is unlikley he would be able to get a lease on his own. He bought a place in East London near Lou Teasdale. Autumn 2012 he bought a much bigger place nearish Nick in the borders of Golders Green/Hampstead I believe

2) Harry and Louis were spotted playing football with some friends a couple of weeks back. Yes they were filmed for documentary but they appeared to be the only 1D boys there.

Life is rarely about certainties or absolutes. I imagine the trueth lies somewhere in betweeen. And I understand the mainstream media play the games. But for people like Holy Moly, Perez Hilton etc to sell out too just pi**** me off.

by Anonymousreply 51202/19/2013

JJ, I'm not the Larry shipper (I wrote R503 about Harry and Louis not living together long before September 2012) BUT I follow One Direction and I know that there's room for confusion about exactly when Harry moved out, it's not as simple as the news stories. The flat was put up for sale in February but the boys did an interview in Australia in April 2012 where Harry discussed living with Louis and it was definitely still the current situation. I imagine they moved out when they got back from that tour (so more like April/May 2012). Which isn't really important, but it does show why there's rightfully some confusion.

by Anonymousreply 51302/19/2013

Well, Perez sold out a while back, I think and didn't Holy Moly have the whole beard joke with Union J? I don't know much about them, so I have no idea what else they say/write the rest of the time about Harry.

I do wish it was possible to avoid all this crap, but I can't blame Harry and Nick for this at the moment. I really don't know how free Harry is to be openly with Nick, if there is a relationship to be open about and I think there is. Nick by extension would not be able to do anything about this...yet.

by Anonymousreply 51402/19/2013

R514, Yeah Jamie East from Holy Moly made the joke with Union J about Harry having a beard. Larry shippers went crazy but I definitely think that was a reference to Harry and Nick.

by Anonymousreply 51502/19/2013

I agree, R515!

Lots, any idea when the dinner is taking place?

by Anonymousreply 51602/19/2013

I find East some thing of a prat and will say anything to be controversial. I don't believe he knows anything one way or another but will use current gossip to stir things up.

by Anonymousreply 51702/19/2013

Yeah, R517? As I said I don't know anything about them except that interview.

by Anonymousreply 51802/19/2013

Doubt this is really relevant, don't know anything about the guy, but he's tweeted about H/N before, although idk if he ever labelled them "boyfriend"

by Anonymousreply 51902/19/2013

Scope here for an interesting discussion about press reporting and manipulation. Not really fodder for a gossip thread though.

by Anonymousreply 52002/19/2013

Well, that's two people talking about a boyfriend today. Thanks, R519.

by Anonymousreply 52102/19/2013

R509 I agree that it worthwhile to look at what makes Nick and Harry's friendship different than the ones Harry has with his other friends like Cal, Gabe, Tom, Louis, Ed etc. It seems like Harry spends a lot of his spare time with Nick, but of course that would be more publicized than the others for different reasons (some are not famous, others more low-key, like Ed, and Louis because of the rumours).

One example of what sets them apart is the tweets with info from industry insiders that are clearly not meant for public viewing (they seem unaware that people would use twitter search and think their conversations are just between them and their 100 or so followers).

by Anonymousreply 52202/19/2013

Fair point re: housing situation, thanks for correction :)

As to "freedom"Im so easily sucked in but need to respond lol! Of course he is free. He can pick up a phone or laptop anytime he wants and say - this is the reality.

He is lucky not to live in a country where people have freedom of speech and sexuality enshrined by law.

If he signed a contract then that was his choice. Contrary to popular belief it is in the record labels interests to be straight about the deal. He wanted this. Add to that that he subscribes to the Moss, Jagger world of Never Complain, Never Explain PR philosophy.

But I will say, if he is gay and he is staying quiet for his career but is out to all friends and family and aquaintances then that is sad for the millions of kids out there who's lives he could influence by raising the profile of successful gay/bi teens.

If he isn't, then bless him- he is just a very smart very gay friendly boy with an eclectic group of mates.

Now back to Grimshaw- anyone have any idea of who the slew of models he bedded were)

by Anonymousreply 52302/19/2013

First tweet about the dinner. No idea if Harry is there.

by Anonymousreply 52402/19/2013

You can fuck almost any model you want if you have the connections that Nick has. People will have sex for nothing, so why wouldn't they lower their standards for a little gain.

by Anonymousreply 52502/19/2013

R516 Sorry, no idea when it starts, am still searching twitter. It's probably already started, maybe even finished, as it's already 9:30 pm in London.

Regarding that tweet someone posted, if you look at his twitter page it seems very sketchy. He is posting mostly gossip but is tagging lots of things as #gay when it doesn't seem relevant, has awkward spelling and punctuation errors etc.

by Anonymousreply 52602/19/2013

Fair enough, JJ. He is free, haha! He may have signed a contract before he ever thought he'd be in this mess and getting out of it might be a daunting prospect, if he even wants to. So you're right of course, it is a choice, but I would not dare put myself in his shoes. I have NO IDEA what kind of pressure that would be...assuming of course there is something he would like to share, and again, I do believe that.

I agree that it would be great if he were able to be a role model, but again, it is not my place to judge.

by Anonymousreply 52702/19/2013

new tweet, appears to be a uni student maybe? His friend seems skeptical lol

by Anonymousreply 52802/19/2013

Jesus R519 - great find. He writes the blind items and Green Room for Metro newspaper ( in my experience he is pretty inaccurate) but still!!!!

by Anonymousreply 52902/19/2013

Thanks, R524. I really hope he is!

by Anonymousreply 53002/19/2013

Thanks, lots. The tweet R524 posted is already from almost an hour ago, so no idea if it's still going on or not.

by Anonymousreply 53102/19/2013

Ooooh, he does, JJ? It all keeps coming back to Metro at the moment, haha.

by Anonymousreply 53202/19/2013

JJ, whoah really?? I didn't even know that. He's definitely tweeted about them multiple times before, I had no idea who he was though. I don't have links right now to the old tweets (though I'm pretty sure most were discussed here), but I took screen shots of some of them, and they included:

"Nick Grimshaw spotted with Harry 1D .. he must be so happy over split #gays #onedirection #radio1 #bbcradio #gossip #onedirection" on January 10th

"Harry 1D ditches Ms Swift .. free now to finally come out & live whgile your young #id #onedirection #gays #harrystyles"

and "Nick Grimshaw of R1 is planning to keep a low profile on his 1D Harry obsession" wise given the climate #id #gays #radio1 #radio"

(both the latter tweets were a few days before I think)

The "boyfriend" thing is definitely new in his tweets then, if he went along with the Swift stuff.

by Anonymousreply 53302/19/2013

Oh, btw, JJ, I did not mean to imply you were judging, or shouldn't, just that I'd rather not.

by Anonymousreply 53402/19/2013

R527 I assume you are referring to H? If so, then I assume he signed that contract when he was sixteen and even may have had to have someone sign it for him. Not sure of the legalities of contracts where sixteen year old's are concerned.

I could of course be totally wrong, it was just a thought.

by Anonymousreply 53502/19/2013

So the dinner definitely seems like more of a private thing then an event, if it's just Nick's annual thing he does with friends (which is also the impression I got when he brought it up on the radio).

by Anonymousreply 53602/19/2013

I had not considered that, R535. Thanks for pointing it out.

by Anonymousreply 53702/19/2013

Seems like the official pre-Brits dinner party is at Buddha Bar in Knightsbridge (NOT the club funky Buddha). I think it is just starting as they are RTing people saying they are on their way. No mention of Harry or Nick that I can see yet.

Their twitter is here:

by Anonymousreply 53802/19/2013

Yeah, R536. That could potentially mean Harry being there without us finding out.

by Anonymousreply 53902/19/2013

Oh, so there is an official and a Nick-held dinner? Thanks, lots.

by Anonymousreply 54002/19/2013

R538, thanks! So the party is from 7pm-1am, it says. Interesting that it does seem like an official pre-BRITS party, although the other girl was referencing it as Nick's annual dinner - maybe he just normally has the same-ish group at a table? I spy Pixie, her bf, and Alexa in the picture (and is that Example at the end?)

by Anonymousreply 54102/19/2013

Maquita Oliver posted pics on her twitter about 3 hours ago

by Anonymousreply 54202/19/2013

Maybe he books a room/section and then they move out into the main party (which is sponsered, so must be official)? If they go to the main party I imagine there'll be pap pics or ones taken by the restaurant itself.

by Anonymousreply 54302/19/2013

Maybe and I hope so, R543!

by Anonymousreply 54402/19/2013

Didn't nick say it was for nominies this morning on the radio? I wasn't listening properly as other things werd going on so not 100% sure.

by Anonymousreply 54502/19/2013

R527 - took no offence at all!

Think it's likely his parents would have co-signed. But either we think H is mature enough to be in a relationshio with a 28 year old or he isn't. And Also, they all re-signed (rather than resigned! Lol)- before Christmas.

Finally, I urge you all to follow that twitter account. The guy used to write blinds and gossip bullet points for the metro. Not sure if he still does. Reads like an aged desperado losing his looks and spouting vitriol at everyone younger and better looking. He is/was infamously inaccurate at the metro, or even better, weeks past the in saying stuff.

But he appears to be having a meltdown with his online bank and life in general.. Kids this is what happens when your media career goes wrong.

by Anonymousreply 54602/19/2013

Pic from the dinner!!!!

by Anonymousreply 54702/19/2013

Rita, Nick and Harry. Now give me Cara. Pleeeaaaseee!

by Anonymousreply 54802/19/2013

Are these pics of Harry and Nick from tonight?! Not seen them before ... they both look SO good :)

by Anonymousreply 54902/19/2013

By the way Nick is looking absolutely delicious in those pics.

by Anonymousreply 55002/19/2013

Love this pic! They look so happy!

by Anonymousreply 55102/19/2013

Oh god, I was not prepared for these pictures. Hello boys!

by Anonymousreply 55202/19/2013

I'm glad, JJ. Of course, I think he is mature enough. I just have no clue about contract legalities, haha. It makes sense that he would have resigned at 18 though, you're right, so that argument can probably be ignored.

I thought you'd said he was accurate...oh well seems he's accurate enough this time given that he's only saying what so many others are, haha.

by Anonymousreply 55302/19/2013

Not in the best format (watermarked etc) but the Getty Images page from this evening so far.

by Anonymousreply 55402/19/2013

Yay!!!!!!!!! I love the photos!!!! (Forgive my excitement, haha)

by Anonymousreply 55502/19/2013

@H Neither was I.

They look like they are having a ball. Really nice to see them together.

by Anonymousreply 55602/19/2013

They look so happy!

by Anonymousreply 55702/19/2013

I apologise for my moment of fan girl-ing - I promise I am a grown up ;)

I so often think they are just friends but when I see pictures, I wish them to be a couple cos they'd make a great one.

by Anonymousreply 55802/19/2013

Maybe it's because I like them both as people, but I do think they compliment each other!

by Anonymousreply 55902/19/2013

Great pics. Thanks all posters. They do make a lovely couple! Looks like Nicks party is this place to be!

by Anonymousreply 56002/19/2013

I'm sure I'll be shot down for saying something 'pro' N&H now but I have noticed (and seen commented) that when they are out together, they really seem to stick by each other's sides. That does seem slightly couple like.

by Anonymousreply 56102/19/2013

Welcome back LG.

by Anonymousreply 56202/19/2013

So many pictures - I love how every speculates and then bang, so many! Not that it means everything but they are together in nearly every pic :) albeit with every combination of guest!

by Anonymousreply 56302/19/2013

They seem to be taking ALL their photos together pretty much.

LG, we all just want to enjoy so I'm glad you're enjoying with us!

by Anonymousreply 56402/19/2013

They look closer to the same age in these pics. Nick really looks good.

by Anonymousreply 56502/19/2013

C, haha, still on the fence but happy to jump off it if I continue to see pictures like these...

by Anonymousreply 56602/19/2013

I really like the group pics with Henry, Pixie et al in too. They are all such a close and seemingly warm bunch of friends.

by Anonymousreply 56702/19/2013

I wonder where Aimee is? But these pics are adorable, very nice to see!

by Anonymousreply 56802/19/2013


by Anonymousreply 56902/19/2013

LG - It was meant that way!

It appears they are at Hix rather than the Buddha Bar (which doesn't surprise me terribly as the ceiling was all wrong for the Buddha Bar - their's are barely more than pipes oddly).

by Anonymousreply 57002/19/2013

R565 I agree Nick looks so happy, in fact they both do, it's like they are just happy and relaxed. It's really good to see.

@LG Glad you are enjoying these pictures with us.

by Anonymousreply 57102/19/2013

Good on Nick. Blurb says its his first annual awards season dinner and is at Hix. Cracking restaurant. The guest list is crazy good. sponsored by Phillips Sound.

Good for him! (Shows he can keep things on the down low hen he wants too - didn't hear any major mentions on the radio this am)

Looks a cracking party.

by Anonymousreply 57202/19/2013

I may have slipped off the fence a little with those pics but will be firmly back up again tomorrow. First time for everything I suppose. It was the pic of the two of them laughing together that did it.

by Anonymousreply 57302/19/2013

I have jumped off the fence for tonight too!

They look happy and are wearing complimenting suits a la Ant n Dec!

by Anonymousreply 57402/19/2013

They've got tons of pics with loads of other people but are constantly together in all of them! If you check gettyimages tag for just Harry, there are two pictures of him by himself and every other picture he is with Nick.

by Anonymousreply 57502/19/2013

Oh God, don't start on Ant and Dec. I snorted laughing when you wrote that.

by Anonymousreply 57602/19/2013

I love it, R575! It just convinces me even more.

by Anonymousreply 57702/19/2013

I think it's the fact that Harry is sitting right next to Nick at the table. They are not as far away from each other like they usually are. That's really nice to see.

by Anonymousreply 57802/19/2013

I get the impression that they're hosting it together, I know that's not the case but bloody hell

by Anonymousreply 57902/19/2013

Yeah, it really is, R578.

by Anonymousreply 58002/19/2013

I snorted when I wrote it, but that's what struck me!

by Anonymousreply 58102/19/2013

I went "awww!" out loud. They look so good together! And they're right next to each other in pretty much all the pictures. Very cute.

by Anonymousreply 58202/19/2013

R573, the picture of the two of them leaning against the table was all it took for me..

They look great and far closer in age than they did this time last year.

by Anonymousreply 58302/19/2013

I thought it looked like they were hosting the thing together but I suspect that is just my over-active imagination!

by Anonymousreply 58402/19/2013

Just picked myself up off the floor after looking at all those photos. They are brilliant.

by Anonymousreply 58502/19/2013

I just noticed Nick's suit matches Harry's shirt. Seriously. AW!

by Anonymousreply 58602/19/2013

I know, R586...awwwww indeed.

by Anonymousreply 58702/19/2013

We need a new thread ASAP!

by Anonymousreply 58802/19/2013

where did the last 5 comments go

by Anonymousreply 58902/19/2013

You know. I'll be so sad if they're not a couple. They look so good together.

by Anonymousreply 59002/19/2013

Here's part 7

by Anonymousreply 59102/19/2013

Super cute pics! Of all involved, but particularly N and H. Slight tangent but how gorgeous is Jessie Ware? Stunning!

H looks very happy and smiley when with N - just have to compare these to the pics of him from the War Child gig last night, where it's all polite and professional!

by Anonymousreply 59202/19/2013

R590 Indeed. It would be a real shame. They look amazing together.

by Anonymousreply 59302/19/2013

I agree, N16...he glows and giggles around Nick and what could be better!

by Anonymousreply 59402/19/2013

I just realized I've been sitting here with a big dopey grin ever since I looked at the pics. I can't help it! They look so happy. Very sweet, whatever their situation.

by Anonymousreply 59502/19/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!