Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

French Assembly Passes Gay Marriage, Adoption Bill

The measure, approved in the National Assembly in a 329-to-229 vote, puts France on track to join about a dozen mostly European nations that allow gay marriage and comes despite a string of recent demonstrations by opponents of the so-called "marriage for all" bill.

by Anonymousreply 902/23/2013

How many more fucking hoops does this have to go through for crying out loud?

by Anonymousreply 102/13/2013

They're not "hoops", it's the normal process for all legislation. Unless you want to get rid of democratic processes and have rule by decree.

by Anonymousreply 202/14/2013

[quote] Unless you want to get rid of democratic processes and have rule by decree.

Personally, I believe that same-sex marriage and gar rights in general are human rights, and should not - like civil rights, equal rights for women etc. - be left to the voting masses, but rather an enlightened judiciary. That is why we have three centers of legislative power in the United States - I don't trust the "people" to be equal and fair. See Proposition 8 in California.

by Anonymousreply 302/14/2013

The religious right is now holding out hope that this will be struck down by the constitutional courts. French president Hollande has recently lost one battle (over taxes) there so it’s not clear if the court will uphold same-sex marriage as constitutional.

by Anonymousreply 402/14/2013

Maggie Gallagher is threatening to overdose on powdered sugar if this passes.

by Anonymousreply 502/14/2013

R3, we're talking about France, which has a particular democratic legislative process. In the US, the central government and congress can't even propose or pass same-sex marriage.

R4 that's the first I've heard of efforts to involve the constitutional court. In fact, in 2011 the French constitutional court rejected a challenge against the current ban on same-sex marriage because, it stated, it was not up to the court to decide this but it was the job of parliament, effectively inviting parliament to make the decision on this issue. The tax law was simple ideological crap rushed through by the French government. It was so shabbily put together that its unconstitutionality (taxing individuals as opposed to households) would have been glaringly obvious to them if they bothered to spend five minutes thinking about it.

by Anonymousreply 602/14/2013

r6, I forgot about that court ruling. But yep, they are so vehement about this that they are willing to take it to the French constitutional court. They definitely will do whatever it takes to stop it.

by Anonymousreply 702/15/2013

Then the court will pass the same judgement as it did in 2011 - that it's for parliament to decide.

by Anonymousreply 802/15/2013

r8, only if they are consistent and not cravenly political.

by Anonymousreply 902/23/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!