Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Plus-sized male model James Richard Aiken

More cushion for the pushin'?

Or "Get thee to a gym ASAP!"?

by Anonymousreply 3002/11/2013

Looks like today's version of "slim and trim" among the DLers under 40 here.

by Anonymousreply 102/10/2013

Ewww, he looks 'squishy'!

by Anonymousreply 202/10/2013

Nice, I prefer my men a bit hefty and want something to grab onto. A bit of chunk on my hunk is perfect, like this guy

by Anonymousreply 302/10/2013

It's [R3] and ME, hand him over now.

by Anonymousreply 402/10/2013

I want a shirtless pic of him.

by Anonymousreply 502/10/2013

The problem with this one is that he's waaay too manicured. Also he's trying to hard to hide his heft. Let your fat flag fly fatty!

by Anonymousreply 602/10/2013

He's not my type, but compared to most American men, he looks downright anorexic.

by Anonymousreply 702/10/2013

I actually agree with R6, he can let it go a bit, I find it rugged and handsome.

by Anonymousreply 802/10/2013

He looks a little "precious" for my tastes. There are masculine big guys that would serve as much better examples of Handsome Heft.

by Anonymousreply 902/10/2013

He's cuter than many of the hardbodied twigs I see in magazines.

by Anonymousreply 1002/10/2013

He's cute. Love a bit of chunk as well.

by Anonymousreply 1102/10/2013

A bit of presence is great, but this guy is excessively groomed. Fat renders people androgynous as it is....

by Anonymousreply 1202/10/2013

Needs a less femme face.

by Anonymousreply 1302/10/2013

Wow..standards must be really high these days. He looks pretty normal to me. Not to fat or slim. Nicely groomed. Is this over-groomed? how?

by Anonymousreply 1502/10/2013

For me, it's the eyebrows.

by Anonymousreply 1602/10/2013


by Anonymousreply 1702/10/2013

I just threw up in my mouth looking at him. Give me Lucky Vanous any day.

by Anonymousreply 1802/10/2013

He's allright. Itdon't find him unattractive. He's better than those food challengend models.

by Anonymousreply 1902/10/2013

He's grotesque and needs to lose at least 75 pounds.

by Anonymousreply 2002/10/2013

[quote]He's better than those food challengend models


by Anonymousreply 2102/10/2013

Hmmmm...same lavender typeface as Petfinder.

by Anonymousreply 2202/10/2013

Vile fuckwits on here that apparently are only attracted to men who have the freshly-released-from-Auschwitz look...

by Anonymousreply 2302/10/2013

It's incredibly heard to stay at your desired "thin" weight. Even I gained a few pounds in the last few months.

by Anonymousreply 2402/10/2013

I too like a bit of "beef" on a guy. So, yes, he's hot enough, but I agree that he is just a tad too manicured.

by Anonymousreply 2502/11/2013

He's 24, Australian and from Melbourne.

by Anonymousreply 2602/11/2013

He's not my type at all.

by Anonymousreply 2702/11/2013

He doesn't look beefy he just looks like a prissy queen who's put on a few pounds. I don't see any model material here.

by Anonymousreply 2802/11/2013

Where the fuck is the "plus" on this guy?

Admittedly, the long jackets hide a lot of his middle, but judging by his overall outline, there's no way he could reasonably be called chubby or even "plus-sized" in the real world. In fact, his BMI is probably below-average for an adult male in a developed country (certainly for the US).

The absurdity of it all!

And he does need to lay off the brow waxing.

by Anonymousreply 2902/11/2013

Could someone review the stats posted that I questioned last night? He doesn't seem to measure up to what is in the article. Makes no sense to me.

by Anonymousreply 3002/11/2013
Need more help? Click Here.