Heath Ledger, hands-down. Much more manly and expressive.
Who's better looking?: Heath Ledger or Leonardo Di Caprio and why?
|by Anonymous||reply 28||02/09/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 1||02/08/2013|
Unfortunately it's a bit of a redundant question isn't it?
HL was a wonderful actor. I wish he'd lived to maybe take some of LDC's roles away from him.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||02/08/2013|
neither is particularly good looking.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||02/08/2013|
Leo di Caprio, because he is not a rotting corpse.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||02/08/2013|
I was waiting for the nasty obvious reply, but I guess R4 is really just stating the bleeding obvious.
HL was losing his hair before he died, but he was quite beautiful in his late teens/early twenties.
Regardless of his looks which disappear for everyone if you live long enough, he would have continued to be a great actor had he lived.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||02/08/2013|
Step away from the computer, obsessive-compulsive Heath Ledger Troll, and take your Paxil.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||02/08/2013|
I think Heath Ledger was a better actor but Leo is better looking. If I had to look like one of them, I'd go with Leo.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||02/08/2013|
I don't know, OP, I haven't seen Ledger's corpse lately.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||02/08/2013|
Leo's faced looks smushed in and flat.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||02/08/2013|
To be fair they should be compared only up to the age of 27. LCD looked about 12 until he hit 30. He looked like Kate Winslet's little brother in Titanic.
From age 18 HL had an air of manliness about him. He was beautiful in Two hands and Ten things I hate about you at age 18/9. Just checked IMDB. He was damned fine to look at in everything except Dogtown (where they uglified him on purpose) and as the Joker.
I've seen them all OP, like you have presumably. What a loss.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||02/08/2013|
OP, what stroke have you had where that seemed to be a logical question to ask?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||02/08/2013|
The REAL question is: Who looks better now?
Bloated, middle-aged Leo, or a rotting corpse?
|by Anonymous||reply 12||02/08/2013|
Definitely Heath. Besides, I read that some girl said Leo had a skinny little dick that bent to the right and he had nearly no head at all. Echh!
|by Anonymous||reply 13||02/08/2013|
God, now we have a Heath Ledger troll.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||02/09/2013|
Neither one is/was goodlooking.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||02/09/2013|
How is it any worse than any other troll, R14?
|by Anonymous||reply 16||02/09/2013|
I can't tell the difference between Heath Ledger and this dead crab!
|by Anonymous||reply 17||02/09/2013|
This is the second Heath Ledger post tonight. Seriously, what is wrong with you, OP?
|by Anonymous||reply 18||02/09/2013|
R18, if people want to post then let them - he's paid his $18. You don't have to respond if you don't want to.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||02/09/2013|
I did not like Heath Ledger in his role as "Joker".
|by Anonymous||reply 20||02/09/2013|
I’m sure if Heath Ledger was ugly, we would still be getting these endless threads about how wonderful he was.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||02/09/2013|
Heath Ledger had a mullet. Grossy Josie.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||02/09/2013|
Mullets are never sexy.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||02/09/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 24||02/09/2013|
You know who isn't sexy. Tiffani Fat Face Thiessen. Fat facer.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||02/09/2013|
Even John Travolta is better looking that Leo.
I have scooped up things dogs have left that are more attractive.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||02/09/2013|
Leonardo is not aging well, so Heath wins.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||02/09/2013|
R26, that's called overplaying your hand.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||02/09/2013|