Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Who's better looking?: Heath Ledger or Leonardo Di Caprio and why?

Heath Ledger, hands-down. Much more manly and expressive.

by Anonymousreply 2802/09/2013

.....

by Anonymousreply 102/08/2013

Unfortunately it's a bit of a redundant question isn't it?

HL was a wonderful actor. I wish he'd lived to maybe take some of LDC's roles away from him.

by Anonymousreply 202/08/2013

neither is particularly good looking.

by Anonymousreply 302/08/2013

Leo di Caprio, because he is not a rotting corpse.

by Anonymousreply 402/08/2013

I was waiting for the nasty obvious reply, but I guess R4 is really just stating the bleeding obvious.

HL was losing his hair before he died, but he was quite beautiful in his late teens/early twenties.

Regardless of his looks which disappear for everyone if you live long enough, he would have continued to be a great actor had he lived.

by Anonymousreply 502/08/2013

Step away from the computer, obsessive-compulsive Heath Ledger Troll, and take your Paxil.

by Anonymousreply 602/08/2013

I think Heath Ledger was a better actor but Leo is better looking. If I had to look like one of them, I'd go with Leo.

by Anonymousreply 702/08/2013

I don't know, OP, I haven't seen Ledger's corpse lately.

by Anonymousreply 802/08/2013

Leo's faced looks smushed in and flat.

by Anonymousreply 902/08/2013

To be fair they should be compared only up to the age of 27. LCD looked about 12 until he hit 30. He looked like Kate Winslet's little brother in Titanic.

From age 18 HL had an air of manliness about him. He was beautiful in Two hands and Ten things I hate about you at age 18/9. Just checked IMDB. He was damned fine to look at in everything except Dogtown (where they uglified him on purpose) and as the Joker.

I've seen them all OP, like you have presumably. What a loss.

by Anonymousreply 1002/08/2013

OP, what stroke have you had where that seemed to be a logical question to ask?

by Anonymousreply 1102/08/2013

The REAL question is: Who looks better now?

Bloated, middle-aged Leo, or a rotting corpse?

by Anonymousreply 1202/08/2013

Definitely Heath. Besides, I read that some girl said Leo had a skinny little dick that bent to the right and he had nearly no head at all. Echh!

by Anonymousreply 1302/08/2013

God, now we have a Heath Ledger troll.

by Anonymousreply 1402/09/2013

Neither one is/was goodlooking.

by Anonymousreply 1502/09/2013

How is it any worse than any other troll, R14?

by Anonymousreply 1602/09/2013

I can't tell the difference between Heath Ledger and this dead crab!

by Anonymousreply 1702/09/2013

This is the second Heath Ledger post tonight. Seriously, what is wrong with you, OP?

by Anonymousreply 1802/09/2013

R18, if people want to post then let them - he's paid his $18. You don't have to respond if you don't want to.

by Anonymousreply 1902/09/2013

I did not like Heath Ledger in his role as "Joker".

by Anonymousreply 2002/09/2013

I’m sure if Heath Ledger was ugly, we would still be getting these endless threads about how wonderful he was.

Right.

by Anonymousreply 2102/09/2013

Heath Ledger had a mullet. Grossy Josie.

by Anonymousreply 2202/09/2013

Mullets are never sexy.

by Anonymousreply 2302/09/2013

T

by Anonymousreply 2402/09/2013

You know who isn't sexy. Tiffani Fat Face Thiessen. Fat facer.

by Anonymousreply 2502/09/2013

Even John Travolta is better looking that Leo.

I have scooped up things dogs have left that are more attractive.

by Anonymousreply 2602/09/2013

Leonardo is not aging well, so Heath wins.

by Anonymousreply 2702/09/2013

R26, that's called overplaying your hand.

by Anonymousreply 2802/09/2013
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.