Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

The white South’s last defeat

[quote]Hysteria, aggression and gerrymandering are a fading demographic's last hope to maintain political control

TUESDAY, FEB 5, 2013

In understanding the polarization and paralysis that afflict national politics in the United States, it is a mistake to think in terms of left and right. The appropriate directions are North and South. To be specific, the long, drawn-out, agonizing identity crisis of white Southerners is having effects that reverberate throughout our federal union. The transmission mechanism is the Republican Party, an originally Northern party that has now replaced the Southern wing of the Democratic Party as the vehicle for the dwindling white Southern tribe.

As someone whose white Southern ancestors go back to the 17th century in the Chesapeake Bay region, I have some insight into the psychology of the tribe. The salient fact to bear in mind is that the historical experience of the white South in many ways is the opposite of the experience of the rest of the country.

Mainstream American history, from the point of view of the white majority in the Northeast, Midwest and West Coast, is a story of military successes. The British are defeated, ensuring national independence. The Confederates are defeated, ensuring national unity. And in the 20th century the Axis and Soviet empires are defeated, ensuring (it is hoped) a free world.

The white Southern narrative — at least in the dominant Southern conservative version — is one of defeat after defeat. First the attempt of white Southerners to create a new nation in which they can be the majority was defeated by the U.S. Army during the Civil War. Doomed to be a perpetual minority in a continental American nation-state, white Southerners managed for a century to create their own state-within-a-state, in which they could collectively lord it over the other major group in the region, African-Americans. But Southern apartheid was shattered by the second defeat, the Civil Rights revolution, which like the Civil War and Reconstruction was symbolized by the dispatching of federal troops to the South. The American patriotism of the white Southerner is therefore deeply problematic. Some opt for jingoistic hyper-Americanism (the lady protesteth too much, methinks) while a shrinking but significant minority prefer the Stars and Bars to the Stars and Stripes.

The other great national narrative holds that the U.S. is a nation of immigration, a “new nation,” a melting pot made up of immigrants from many lands. While the melting pot story involves a good deal of idealization, it is based on demographic fact in the large areas of the North where old-stock Anglo-Americans are commingled with German-Americans, Polish-Americans and Irish-Americans, along with more recent immigrant diasporas from Latin America, Asia, the Middle East and Africa.

But even before the recent wave of immigration from sources other than Europe, the melting pot never included most of the white South. From the early 19th century until the late 20th, the South attracted relatively few immigrants. Who wanted to move to a backward, rural, apartheid society dominated by an oligarchy of a few rich families? Apart from several encapsulated minorities — Cajuns in Louisiana, Germans in central Texas — most white Southerners remained descendants of colonial-era immigrants from the British Isles, chiefly English and Scots-Irish. And while Irish and German Catholics and Jews diversified the religious landscape of the North, the South was dominated by British-derived Protestant sects like the Episcopalians, Baptists and Methodists from Virginia to Oklahoma and Texas.

Two maps illustrate the demographic distinctiveness of the white South. The first shows the close correlation of evangelical Protestantism with the states of the former Confederacy. The second map is even more revealing. It shows the concentration of individuals who identified themselves to census takers as non-hyphenated “Americans.”

by Anonymousreply 3202/08/2013

It is clear from the map that most self-described unhyphenated “Americans” are, in fact, whites of British descent — many if not most of them descendants of the Scots-Irish diaspora that emigrated from Ulster to the British colonies in the 1700s. The point is that many white Southerners do not think of themselves as having any “ethnicity” at all. Others — German-Americans, Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans, Jewish-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Chinese-Americans — are hyphenated Americans. White Southerners tend to see themselves as “pure” Americans, “real” Americans, “normal” Americans. Long after Mayflower descendants were submerged by waves of European migration in New England, large regions of the white South remain the last places in the country where local majorities can trace their family ancestry back to before 1776 in British America.

As difficult as it may be, outsiders should try to imagine the world as viewed by conservative white Southerners, who think they are the real Americans — that is, old-stock British-Americans — and the adherents of the true religion, evangelical Protestantism. In this perspective, the rest of the country was taken over by invading hordes of Germans, Irish and other European tribes in the first half of the 19th century, leaving the South, largely unaffected by European immigration, as the last besieged pocket of old-stock British-Americans, sharing parts of their territory with subjugated and segregated African-Americans.

This local British-American ethno-racial hegemony in the South was eroded somewhat by the migration of Northeasterners and Midwesterners to the Sun Belt following World War II and the advent of air-conditioning. And now, predominantly nonwhite immigration from Latin America and Asia threatens to make white Southerners of British Protestant descent a minority in their own region. Texas and Florida are already majority-minority states. It is only a matter of time before the same is true of every state in the South. Southern whites will go from being a minority in the nation as a whole to a minority in the South itself.

If Southern culture had a tradition of assimilating immigrants, then cultural “Southernness” could be detached from any particular ethnicity or race. One could be an assimilated Chinese-American good old boy or a Mexican-American redneck. To some degree, that is happening. And Southern whites and Southern blacks have always shared many elements of a common regional culture.

But it is difficult, if not impossible, for many white Southerners to disentangle regional culture (Southern) from race (white) and ethnicity (British Protestant). The historical memory of white Southerners is not of ethnic coexistence and melting-pot pluralism but of ethnic homogeneity and racial privilege. Small wonder that going from the status of local Herrenvolk to local minority in only a generation or two is causing much of the white South to freak out.

The demographic demise of the white South is going to be traumatic for the nation as a whole. A century ago, when European immigration made old-stock Yankee Protestants a minority in much of the Northeast and Midwest, one response was hysterical Anglo-American nativism. In a 1921 essay in Good Housekeeping titled “Whose Country Is This?,” then Vice President Calvin Coolidge, an old-stock Yankee from Vermont, explained: “Biological laws tell us that certain divergent people will not mix or blend. The Nordics propagate themselves successfully. With other races, the outcome shows deterioration on both sides.” Patrician Yankees promoted immigration restriction to prevent “inferior” European races from further contaminating America. Some eminent Americans of New England descent, including Henry James, T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound, all of them nasty anti-Semites, took the extreme step of expatriating themselves. James and Eliot became British subjects and Pound made anti-American broadcasts for Mussolini during World War II.

by Anonymousreply 102/05/2013

Just as white Southerners today are gerrymandering congressional districts and contemplating gerrymandering the Electoral College to compensate for their dwindling numbers, so the outnumbered Yankees of the North sought to dilute the political influence of European “ethnics” in the early 1900s. When the 1920 census revealed that largely European urbanites outnumbered mostly old-stock Anglo-American rural voters, Congress failed to reapportion itself for a decade, because of the determination of small-town Anglo-Americans to minimize the power of “white ethnics.”

By the 1970s, the social divisions among old-stock Anglo-Americans and the “white ethnics” had faded to the point that most white Americans in the North had ancestors from several Western European nationalities. Similarly, the trans-racial melting pot in the U.S. will probably blur or erase many of today’s racial differences by the middle of the 21st century.

But the old-stock Yankees in the Northeast and Midwest did not accept their diminished status in their own regions without decades of hysteria and aggression and political gerrymandering. The third and final defeat of the white South, its demographic defeat, is likely to be equally prolonged and turbulent. Fasten your seat belts.

by Anonymousreply 202/05/2013


by Anonymousreply 302/06/2013

I live in the South, and the author of this article pretty much has it nailed.

by Anonymousreply 402/06/2013

On the contrary. It's over and they know it's over. If he had written this in 1970, we would congratulate him on his prescience. What is most interesting about it is that his maps don't match up. No evangelicals in West Virginia? And he can't explain Missouri, Kentucky, and West Virginia, the most backwards areas of the nation today but in 1860 they stayed in the union and gave more than their fair share of blood to putting down the South, in Kentucky it was something like 3 to 1 of Unionites over Confederates. If you can't explain this huge anomaly - why today' white racist South is domiciled in the border states, not the Confederacy, then you have no business writing a column like this.

by Anonymousreply 502/06/2013

I might add that the white south has shown very little hostility to Asians and Mexicans in the last two decades.

by Anonymousreply 602/06/2013

Unfortunately, they just rigged the entire system so that there is no way we won't have another Republican president in 2017.

by Anonymousreply 702/06/2013

Where did they do this, r7?

by Anonymousreply 802/06/2013

If only the South were a different nation -- think of how great the U.S. would be without Alabama, Texas, Georgia, Arkansas etc. It's just such a shame Southerners get to vote in the same elections as intelligent people.

by Anonymousreply 902/06/2013

I think what R7 is referring to is Redmapping. The strategy is to award Electoral College votes by district rather than winner takes all. In that way a rural area with a few thousand people would have the same weight as an urban community with several million people. In most of the swing states it was the urban areas that determined the Electoral College votes. So now, instead of giving 3 votes to the winner, there could be two votes for R and one vote for D, even though the majority of voters voted for the D. It would make it very hard for a D to win.

by Anonymousreply 1002/06/2013

damn damn damn

by Anonymousreply 1102/06/2013

Two of our interns from TX were very adamant about being Texan and equally adamant about being ethnic. One was Polish and one was Egyptian. They had an arrogance about their TX/ethnic heritage, thinking they were superior to us NYers who were ethnic, but whose state didn't have much of an identity compared to the Republic of TX.

by Anonymousreply 1202/06/2013


by Anonymousreply 1302/06/2013

Let them secede. Good riddance. (We keep New Orleans and southern Florida).

by Anonymousreply 1402/06/2013

Everyone I ever met from TX was very arrogant about being from TX.

by Anonymousreply 1502/06/2013

Texas is not really The South, though.

by Anonymousreply 1602/06/2013

Theyre part of the plot, though.

by Anonymousreply 1702/06/2013

Isn't TX one of our southern-most states? Only FL seems further south in the continental US

by Anonymousreply 1802/06/2013

Was told that in TX the state flag is always more prominent than the Stars&Stripes.

by Anonymousreply 1902/06/2013

R18--The South is not defined geographically. It is defined by history and current attitudes.

by Anonymousreply 2002/06/2013

Texas vote with the south.

by Anonymousreply 2102/06/2013

[quote]Texas vote with the south.

So do Idaho, Utah, and Alaska. What the hell is your point?

by Anonymousreply 2202/06/2013

[quote]No evangelicals in West Virginia? And he can't explain Missouri, Kentucky, and West Virginia, the most backwards areas of the nation today but in 1860 they stayed in the union and gave more than their fair share of blood to putting down the South, in Kentucky it was something like 3 to 1 of Unionites over Confederates.

It's apples and oranges. The Civil War is the border states was about politics, not slavery - as it wasn't as much a part of the industrial engine in those states. In WV, the higher up in the hills you were the more likely you were to be ignorant and a Rebel. The closer to the rivers, the more likely Union. The split in soliders was not the split in sentiment. It was much closer.

Where WV is today is not about religion. It's that insularity described in the article. Most WVians don't really go to church, but they view themselves as God-fearing and truly American. Jews in the cities of Huntington converted to Baptist to be successful in business and "society." Catholic eastern Europeans who came 125 years ago to work the mines, assimilated and changed their names to ridiculous and poorly spelled Amerikun versions and are Church of God or 7th Day Adventists if anything.

by Anonymousreply 2302/06/2013

Take a look at the maps in OP's article (use link). The first shows the concentration of evangelical protestants.

The second shows the self-defined majority ethnic group in each county. Note that the white south tends to identify its ethnicity as "American" "Real American" "Regular American" etc. In fact, they are mostly of Scots-Irish and British ancestry. With no history of later immigration, they think of others as some kind of foreigner.

The religion, ethnicity and self-identity define the South.

by Anonymousreply 2402/06/2013

"The demographic demise of the white South is going to be traumatic for the nation as a whole."

No, it will be cause for rejoicing! Seriously, I've always wished we let those backwards fuckers secede, the nation is better off without them.

by Anonymousreply 2502/06/2013

The problem, r25, is that they aren't leaving; they're just getting frightened and angry. This is what the Tea Party is really all about. The rise of the TP has hurt us all.

by Anonymousreply 2602/06/2013

I so glad the white race is in its death throwes. Hallelujah. The world will be a better more peacefull place when they are gone. Hopefully it is gonna be during my lifetime so I can dance on their graves

by Anonymousreply 2702/07/2013

My Aunt lives in a small town outside of Atlanta. Most of the white people are outright racist. They EXTREMELY resent black and hispanic people moving into their small crazy backward town. During the last 15 yrs a lot of black residents have gotten involved in local politics. In the last election every white candidate (except one) was defeated by a black candidate. Some of these people have been in office 20 yrs. Some asshole wrote a letter to the paper and the paper actually published it. It said something like, "Rockdale County should change it's name to Blackdale County"

The town also records and airs meetings on the local cable access channel. I watched it once and was shocked. They let citizens get up and talk about anything for a few minutes. The county CEO got up and had to make an announcement that he wouldn't tolerate anymore comments about his wife, children or the rest of his family.

by Anonymousreply 2802/07/2013

This is very interesting. According to this, I must be some idiotic southerner. I'm Scot-Irish and English decent and my family was in the US prior to 1776.

But I find the southern ignornce and bigotry disgusting and offensive.

What to do?

by Anonymousreply 2902/07/2013


Not in the death "throwes", dummy. Far from it.

Haven't you figured out that in the future, numbers don't matter? It's who controls the information.

Welcome to Machine.

by Anonymousreply 3002/07/2013

Very very few people are all white or all black; through the centuries we've become mixed race. And that's a GOOD thing.

by Anonymousreply 3102/08/2013

[quote] According to this, I must be some idiotic southerner. I'm Scot-Irish and English decent and my family was in the US prior to 1776.

Since that is an illogical inference, we know you're not Harvard material.

by Anonymousreply 3202/08/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!