Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

The Da Vinci Code: Do you believe any of it is true?

Do you think Dan Brown has a very active imagination or is what he's saying true?

by Anonymousreply 1602/03/2013

I think it's no more or less true than any other story involving the Bible.

by Anonymousreply 102/03/2013

You understand it's a novel, right?

by Anonymousreply 202/03/2013

Ask people in southern France. Many will tell you that Jesus escaped from the cross and ended his life in France.

They pour wine over the penis of ithyphallic saints there, too... and drink it.

by Anonymousreply 302/03/2013

He doesn't have a vivid imagination. It's pretty obvious he based his novel on Holy Blood, Holy Grail. There was even a lawsuit actually.

by Anonymousreply 402/03/2013

R4, Brown won the lawsuit. Authors borrow ideas and have overlapping concepts all the time. The litigants in that case failed to meet their burden of proof.

R2, while it may be a novel and many of the concepts are fictional, there are aspects of truth to it and many of the historical incidents it discusses are real (eg. the Church wiping out the Knights Templar, the selective choice of which Biblical writings to include in the official Bible, etc.)

by Anonymousreply 502/03/2013

R5 I know that he won. But it's still doesn't prove that he has vivid imagination. The main plot (the most interesting and the most controversial one) was borrowed from Holy Blood, Holy Grail. He didn't imagine it himself. I'm not saying it was plagiarism, since he created different story around it, but still, it wasn't his original idea, that nobody thought about before him.

by Anonymousreply 602/03/2013

Dan Brown practically lifted Holy Blood Holy Grail wholesale for his book. Anyone who read Holy Blood Holy Grail knew the answers to the mysteries posed in Brown's book. If that isn't plagiarism I don't know what is, despite the court's ruling. If it wasn't illegal, what he did was unethical.

But in answer to your question, who knows if any of it is true. I do know that the Father Sauniere got rich by selling masses. So his sudden wealth did not come from discovering any explosive secrets hidden away in his church or in any tomb.

by Anonymousreply 702/03/2013

The basic thesis of the book is simple, and is stated by the grandfather/curator to his granddaughter when she is young: people should have the right to choose in what to believe, not to be told what to believe by the Church.

by Anonymousreply 802/03/2013

IMO it wasn't plagiarism because authors of Holy Blood Holy Grail never presented their book as a work of fiction, but as a result of historical research. Whether they were right doesn't matter here. So anybody who creates a fictional work, e.g. a novel based on so called historical events can't be considered plagiarist IMO. It's like some historician has written a book about Lincoln and now was suing Spielberg for making a movie about Lincoln.

And even if authors of Holy Blood Holy Grail promoted their book as a complete fiction, it still wouldn't make The DaVinci Code a plagiat, because Brown didn't re-write the book, he used it as a basis for another story. And that happens a lot of time.

by Anonymousreply 902/03/2013

I remember early press for the book. Dan Brown said he was writing about an ancient mystery from art historian circles passed through the ages through hidden messages in paintings etc. I was an art history major and I had never heard the story he was talking about. He even said that he was an art historian which he was not. He was a musician/songwriter. His wife had a heavy hand in the book too.

I was talking to a guy wh was a former physicist who swore up and down that the Da Vinci Code was commissioned by the government. In a way it would explain why it was heavily promoted and astonishingly popular. Everywhere you went someone was clutching a copy.

by Anonymousreply 1002/03/2013

There is no such thing as a Professor of "Symbology" at Harvard.

by Anonymousreply 1102/03/2013

Why on earth would the government commission a novel that would piss off the Vatican?

If only!

by Anonymousreply 1202/03/2013

Dan Brown didn't come up with that, OP.

by Anonymousreply 1302/03/2013

The government is run by satanists, try to keep up.

by Anonymousreply 1402/03/2013

And yet, R12, the novel made The Vatican very, very angry. They even appointed their own spokesperson to go after him in the press.

by Anonymousreply 1502/03/2013

It would be interesting to get ex-Senatory Santorum's take on this book. As a member of Opus Dei, he's sure to have a unique viewpoint.

by Anonymousreply 1602/03/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!