Opinions on her. I find her incredibly articulate and talented. Man, she's good.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||02/03/2013|
That movie she made where she just sits and talks with Martin Scorsese is surprisingly entertaining.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||01/29/2013|
did she ever get out of bankruptcy? she went a little nuts buying real estate during the boom!
|by Anonymous||reply 2||01/29/2013|
What kinda name is Franz for a lady?
|by Anonymous||reply 3||01/29/2013|
I prefer Ludwig van Beethovenberg.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||01/29/2013|
For a woman who really does absolutely nothing but talk at people, she is incredibly captivating. No one can describe the death of old New York to suburbanite gentrification quite like she can.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||01/29/2013|
OP, you scored 100% by getting both her first and last names wrong. Good work!
|by Anonymous||reply 6||01/29/2013|
She's the bomb, OP. But then you knew that already.
Fran went nuts with the real estate, r2? I thought she only had an apartment and a co-op.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||01/29/2013|
Love her! So witty!
|by Anonymous||reply 8||01/29/2013|
Typical for our age -- one of our best writers has writer's block...
|by Anonymous||reply 9||01/30/2013|
I love her too. And I agree that the Scorsese documentary was captivating. I hung on every word she said. She is one of those people about whom I could almost say that every word she speaks is the truth. (And I have to also comment: If she were better looking, I probably wouldn't take her quite as seriously as I do...her whole persona rocks.)
|by Anonymous||reply 10||01/30/2013|
wrong Leibowitz r2, your thinking of Annie.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||01/30/2013|
I recall having loved her books years ago, but when I went to re-read them, they seemed stale and dated.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||01/30/2013|
she licks the corners of her mouth when she speaks and its GROSS
|by Anonymous||reply 13||02/02/2013|
op = easily impressed lezling
|by Anonymous||reply 14||02/02/2013|
Who are her contemporaries? Who's got a better wit today? David Sedaris?
|by Anonymous||reply 15||02/02/2013|
She really managed to coast pretty far on a few essays she wrote in 1982.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||02/02/2013|
Rules for News:
1. Is it attractive?
2. Is it amusing?
3. What do you expect me to do about it?
|by Anonymous||reply 17||02/02/2013|
Not everything can be dealt with by epigram. She tries to make being shallow amusing.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||02/02/2013|
[quote]and its GROSS
|by Anonymous||reply 19||02/02/2013|
I enjoyed her 2 books (now over 30 years old) but she reminds me of Capote's description of another female author: "Her reputation for genius was based largely on her notoriously slim output."
|by Anonymous||reply 20||02/02/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 21||02/03/2013|
She's lazy, not just for her slim output but for her tendency to go for the easy joke.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||02/03/2013|
[quote]No one can describe the death of old New York to suburbanite gentrification
This sort of makes it sound like she's describing it to suburbanite gentrifiers, (which is probably true btw).
Wonderful talker, sure. I enjoyed the Scorsese documentary so much I checked out one of her books from the library. "Dated" isn't even the word. It was hard to believe they were ever a thing. Moderately amusing baubles for suburbanite gentrifiers, and no matter the subject, the essays always seemed to point back to the author in a really obvious, self-serving way.
And imho her "witty" statements about marriage and DADT were unforgivable. I'm sure it was a scream to the in-crowd millionaires she hangs with, as limousines took them cackling into the Manhattan night, but many gay people have boots on the ground and are fighting discriminatory laws in the real world in a very real way because such laws do enormous harm to real people.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||02/03/2013|