Anyone with half a brain can see that USA has embraced fascism. Our government is fascist by any legitimate definition.
The word fascism is rooted in the Latin word fasces, a Roman object made of wooden rods tightly bound by red, overlapping straps. At the top, or occasionally in the middle, of the fasces was an axe head. The bound wooden rods represented strength through unity and the axe represented the means by which authority was exerted by the unified entity. In addition to being used as a weapon by Roman authorities, the fasces was a key symbol on government buildings of the Roman empire. The symbolism of the fasces is significant. The wooden rod represents the weak individual whose sole contribution is to provide strength to the unified object, in this case the State. The axe head, unsurprisingly, represents the force with which the State will ensure its survival.
Fascism is referred to as an ideology with numerous characteristics, the most common being fervent nationalism, virtually unlimited central authority, militarism, and state control of production. While those traits are almost universally present in fascist run societies, we take the position that fascism in, in fact, not an ideology at all. Merriam-Webster defines ideology as the “visionary theorizing of a systematic body of concepts especially about human life or culture.”
We contend that the objective of fascism is to ensure the survival and further the influence of the State. As Benito Mussolini famously stated, “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” Fascism holds self-preservation of the State as the supreme objective, regardless of method. It is therefore difficult to envision fascism as an ideology any more than a pride of lions being governed by an ideology. Fascism is an observed organizational structure in which the State exerts unlimited and arbitrary power over all its subjects merely for its own survival.
|by Anonymous||reply 119||05/31/2015|
Here at TDV fascism is frequently referred to as the increasingly prevalent form of government in the West. We recognize that this conjures strong emotions and we often get a few angry emails voicing displeasure with our characterization of their homeland. We understand that the word fascism is an emotionally charged word and we do not use it lightly.
We recognize, however, that we have never taken the time to define it completely nor place it within the context of our communications (although Jeff did compare the USA to the dictionary definition of "fascism" in "The Fasco-Communist Police State of America"). As such, we have fallen victim to one of our own cardinal sins; letting somebody else control the thoughts by controlling the definition of the words used to define those thoughts. To make matters worse, by default, we have relegated the responsibility of defining those words to two of the most criminally complicit estates in our society, namely the educational system and mass media. It is time to address this oversight.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||01/25/2013|
It's all because of Deanna Durbin.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||01/25/2013|
[quote]Anyone with half a brain can see that USA has embraced fascism. Our government is fascist by any legitimate definition.
Anyone with half a brain can see that the USA has not embraced fascism. Our government is not fascist by any legitimate definition of that word. Gosh, isn't argument by assertion fun? I could just as easily replace "fascism" with "pink bunnies" in that diatribe of yours and it would be just as accurate and make just as much sense.
Note, by the way, that the original author of that drivel was very careful to a) not cite an actual definition of "fascism," and b) very careful to not actually tie any current U.S. actions or legislation to any historical fascist examples.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||01/25/2013|
OP is the libertarian troll and author of the idiotic "Gun Control" creative writing 101 posts.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||01/25/2013|
"Anyone with half a brain can see that USA has embraced fascism."
That indeed sounds like a good description of you, OP.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||01/25/2013|
I love it when social critics try to redefine socio-political terminology to fit their agendas.
Lew Rockwell is a crackpot.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||01/25/2013|
We didn't "embrace" fascism, it was imposed on us by a military and Wall Street conspiracy, aided and abetted by so-called "libertarians." Get your facts straight OP.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||01/25/2013|
OP claims to be opposed to fascism, yet we saw in a previous thread a few weeks ago that he is a proponent of eugenics. Now, individuals of which political philosophy put eugenics into practice in the past?
|by Anonymous||reply 12||01/25/2013|
Thanks for a good laugh, OP.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||01/25/2013|
OP, the real root of the word fascism is the Latin word "fax" which means "torch". The torch used to be the symbol of imperial Rome, so when the followers of Mussolini took Italy over they also used the torch symbol as harkening back to that mythic powerful time, thus they became "fascisti" from the Latin word "fax"
|by Anonymous||reply 14||01/25/2013|
You just know OP forwards a million emails a day to everyone in his contacts list.
They probably all have his messages rerouted to Spam.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||01/25/2013|
And an uninformed imbecile.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||01/25/2013|
[quote]America is Facist
face time comes as importances among the Americans
|by Anonymous||reply 18||01/25/2013|
R4, I just reread this post replacing "fascism" w/ "pink bunnies" and it was a hell of a lot more fun to read, I'll tell you that.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||01/25/2013|
Fascism is coming and both parties of US imperialism will bring it about!
|by Anonymous||reply 20||01/25/2013|
Fascism (or nationalism) is right, Communism (or communitarianism) is left. What this author describes is totalitarianism, which means total control by the central authority and can be reached by extremes of either. The opposite of totalitarianism is anarchy and not in the sense of chaos, but in the sense of no central authority.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||01/25/2013|
Fascism is when you "solve" the problem of 43 million uninsured citizens by telling them that they have to buy health insurance out-of-pocket from a privately-owned, for-profit company or else pay the federal government a fine.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||01/25/2013|
I think we all need to go back to high school and remind ourselves what fascism actually is.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||01/25/2013|
Fascism - Philosophy of government that stresses the primacy and glory of the state, unquestioning obedience to its leader, subordination of the individual will to the state's authority, and harsh suppression of dissent. Martial virtues are celebrated, while liberal and democratic values are disparaged.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||01/25/2013|
1921, from Italian partito nazionale fascista, the anti-communist political movement organized 1919 under Benito Mussolini (1883-1945); from Italian fascio "group, association," lit. "bundle" (see fasces).
With fascism, originally used in English in its Italian form, as an Italian word. [Fowler: "Whether this full anglicization of the words is worth while cannot be decided till we know whether the things are to be temporary or permanent in England" -- probably an addition to the 1930 reprint, retained in 1944 U.S. edition.] Fasci "groups of men organized for political purposes" had been a feature of Sicily since c.1895, and the 20c. totalitatrian sense probably came directly from this, but influenced by the Roman fasces, which became the party symbol. Related: Fascistic.
1590s, from Latin fasces "bundle of rods containing an axe with the blade projecting" (plural of fascis "bundle" of wood, etc.), perhaps from PIE *bhasko- "band, bundle" (cf. Middle Irish basc "neckband," Welsh baich "load, burden," Old English bæst "inner bark of the linden tree"). Carried before a lictor, a superior Roman magistrate, as a symbol of power over life and limb: the sticks symbolized punishment by whipping, the axe head execution by beheading
R14 is a retard.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||01/26/2013|
Please google "Lew Rockwell" and fascism and your absolutely correct understanding of fascism will make sense.
Corporations get their power from the government. The banks get their charter from the government.
Please be warned- once you understand it, and see "through the matrix" it will make you angry, and upset, and you will hate every politician in DC and soon find yourself in love with Ron Paul.
You will understand why the drug war, the bank bailouts, the invasions of Iraq/Afghanistan /Syria/Iran, the destruction of civil liberties, the drone murders of innocent people, the hatred of the Federal Reserve, the corruption of the government at every level, the way the cops have become thugs with badges, the subsidies of big corporations, etc., are all just a single manifestation of government corruption.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||01/26/2013|
"Fascism (or nationalism) is right, Communism (or communitarianism) is left. What this author describes is totalitarianism, which means total control by the central authority and can be reached by extremes of either."
Define "left" and "right".
Until you can define those terms, you are just spouting bullshit.
"The opposite of totalitarianism is anarchy and not in the sense of chaos, but in the sense of no central authority"
Uhhhh, exactly. Anarchy, a term The Elite have slandered for 2 centuries, is a far better way of "organizing" society than democracy.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||01/26/2013|
"Fascism is when you "solve" the problem of 43 million uninsured citizens by telling them that they have to buy health insurance out-of-pocket from a privately-owned, for-profit company or else pay the federal government a fine."
The morons that deny that the USA is fascist will not face this simple fact.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||01/26/2013|
"Fascism - Philosophy of government that stresses the primacy and glory of the state, unquestioning obedience to its leader, subordination of the individual will to the state's authority, and harsh suppression of dissent. Martial virtues are celebrated, while liberal and democratic values are disparaged."
So, MW has defined fascism properly. Anyone who doesn't see that this describes the USA to a T is delusional.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||01/26/2013|
r29 with your threads on gun control, Schwarz and fascism, it's clear you're mentally ill. Paranoid delusional.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||01/26/2013|
We have also seen the rise of corporatocracy in the last 50 years to the extent that I would consider the U.S. to be closer to that particular ideology than it is to representative democracy.
Not that most of the denizens of Datalounge would give a fuck...they're some of the most consumptive, zombie like corporate citizens around.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||01/26/2013|
R31 you need a history lesson. This isn't the last 50 years. It has been this way for much of American history, if not all of it.
Representative democracy is the great American myth - despite surges in the participatory elements of democracy achieved by women's suffrage and the civil rights era, the poli-sci notion of representative democracy has always been questionable in the US as redistricting, voter suppression and -- worst of all, federalism -- distort it.
And corporate money has been running the show forever. Banks, railroad magnates, oil barrons, plantation owners have all dominated at one point or another -- they've just spawned millions of corporations of varied degrees of power in the post World War II era.
Progress has only been achieved in the US with generational shifts tipping the majority toward progress just enough to give strong leaders the clout to drag America forward. The electorate barely tunes in to elections, turnout is low, and political accountability has always been a joke.
Why do you think Mr. Smith Goes to Washington was made when it was, and even serious thinkers and satirists thought it was too idealistic and mythical to ever represent anything real?
|by Anonymous||reply 32||01/26/2013|
The role of cousin Oliver clearly destroyed the brilliant career of Robbie Rist.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||01/26/2013|
[quote]Please be warned- once you understand it, and see "through the matrix" it will make you angry, and upset, and you will hate every politician in DC and soon find yourself in love with Ron Paul.
It took till R26 to get to Ron Paul?
You dipshits are slipping.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||01/26/2013|
He's the only modern politician who sees the destruction of civil liberties, sacrificed for the aggrandizement of Wall St and DC.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||01/26/2013|
The people who cannot see that Bush, and Obama, are just neo-fascists draped in patriotic colors are blind.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||01/29/2013|
The conspiracy nuts who pretend that Bush and Obama are just alike and that they are "neo-fascists draped in patriotic colors" [a redundance if ever there was] are morons.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||01/29/2013|
THIS, AMERICA, is the FACE OF FASCISM!
|by Anonymous||reply 38||01/29/2013|
The fundamentalists and gun nuts sure sound like fascists. The corporate rulers and their govt puppets are just nihilistic globalism profiteers.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||01/29/2013|
This discussion could be had in many places on the Internet. I like DL because we get to gossip about celebs and actors and such. Not that there isn't a time to discuss politics. But DL is an alternative to that.
Here on DL, I'd rather read Hollywood gossip.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||01/29/2013|
"He's the only modern politician who sees the destruction of civil liberties, sacrificed for the aggrandizement of Wall St and DC."
Ron Paul is a race-baiting old fart with a redneck accent who wears a suit two sizes too big and interprets civil liberties very selectively -- he tends to like the ones that benefit white pro-life men best. He's also the father of poultry-faced Pee Tardy nuckfugget Rand Paul. Thrilled that this howdy-doody who looks like he has bad breath will never get near the presidency.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||01/29/2013|
Why click on the thread!,
|by Anonymous||reply 42||01/29/2013|
This is the first intelligent thread I've seen in a while. Right on target OP. Thank you.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||01/29/2013|
Six million dead Jews are reading this idiotic thread and spinning in their graves.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||01/30/2013|
Sorry OP these idiots don't get it. Nice try though. Maybe one day one of their puny brains will fire a synapse and remember what you were trying to say.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||01/30/2013|
R43 and R45-
Thanks. The people that can't see the fact that our country is now fully fascist, and that socialism, fascism and communism are just different names for government control of the society makes me sad. I'm glad at least some gay men and women area finally recognizing that libertarians are the only ones who understand why our country is dying.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||01/30/2013|
R43, I'm not here for intelligence. I am here for entertainment and GOSSIP. Please. If I want meaningful political discussion, I'll go elsewhere.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||01/30/2013|
I propose we use this thread to talk about soap operas. That way it will swiftly be deleted.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||01/30/2013|
R46 is a moron. Libertarians are at the forefront of the anti-gay movement in this country. Libertarianism is, by its very nature, anti-gay, anti-women, and anti-minority. A gay libertarian is a person who acts against his own self interests - also known as a tool or a pawn. Wake up.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||01/30/2013|
[quote]Thanks. The people that can't see the fact that our country is now fully fascist, and that socialism, fascism and communism are just different names for government control of the society makes me sad.
ROFL.... And this is why we love you, OP - the total disconnection from reality, the redefinition of standard terms, demonstrating that you don't have the foggiest idea what they actually mean, the total ignorance of history, and the fact that you're "sad" that nobody shares your delusions.
|by Anonymous||reply 51||01/30/2013|
Honestly, the freeper OP sounds a lot more like a fascist than the people he accuses of fascism.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||01/30/2013|
He's not a Freeper; he's a libertarian/anarchist/Ron Paul disciple/gold nut/conspiracy nut/anti-Fed nut.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||01/30/2013|
Virtually every libertarian I ever met was anti-gay. And they are FOR a huge military intended to make the rest of the world slaves to US corporations.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||01/30/2013|
My guess is that anyone who has lived under a Fascist regime (as I have) can tell the difference between it and our government. It's only as such regimes have died out that folks like OP have been able to come up with this Fascism=Socialism nonsense.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||01/30/2013|
Really R57? What fascist regime did you live under?
|by Anonymous||reply 58||01/30/2013|
[quote]I'm not here for intelligence
Yes, we've noticed.
|by Anonymous||reply 59||01/30/2013|
[quote] Anyone with half a brain can see that USA has embraced fascism. Our government is fascist by any legitimate definition.
1. Pick pejorative term.
2. Assemble "research" based on word etymology and cherry-picked emotionally driven misreadings and misstatements.
3. Claim equality of America with the HIDEOUS CONCEPT.
4. Badger and badger and badger.
Another ignorant crank who tries to babble her way into exhausting her enforced audience into submissive silence.
Listen, cunt, the whack-job Rockwell is a Ron Paul-licking nouveau-Know-Nothing "libertarian" (insulting the concept), and you're a tool's tool of a lunatic. Nothing good has ever come from your tired tactics, and plenty of damage has.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||01/30/2013|
Libertarians love gay people.
The fascists that want to keep people ignorant are sad.
Fascism=socialism, and communism=fascism. People too stupid to see this are sad products of gubmint edumakashun.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||01/31/2013|
[quote]Fascism=socialism, and communism=fascism. People too stupid to see this are sad products of gubmint edumakashun.
ROFL.... Dear heart, mindlessly repeating a *really* stupid statement does not make it any less stupid. All you're demonstrating is that you're an ignorant nutcase.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||01/31/2013|
Spain, Portugal, and Greece.
That good enough for you, R58?
|by Anonymous||reply 64||01/31/2013|
The proof that OP is wrong is that no one is stopping him from posting his insane rants. If this country were truly fascist, he wouldn't be able to.
There is no proof that he is completely crazy, however. That's just an educated guess.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||01/31/2013|
Corpocracy ...yes....Fascism, no.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||01/31/2013|
R66 But aren't fascism and corporatocracy the same thing? I think that's OPs point.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||01/31/2013|
He is posting on DL a lot right now, constantly clearing cookies as he goes. I am guessing he is the OP of the "King Obama" thread among many others.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||01/31/2013|
I guess that I am as worried as anyone about the influence that large corporations (especially large banks) exercise on government today. But the point is that they can exercise that influence perfectly easily within the structures of democracy, by manipulating its institutions, its politicians, and the electorate.
In fascist states, the State controlled corporations and used them for its own purposes. That is, in practice, a very large difference.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||01/31/2013|
It's Neo-Corpocracy... Derived in part from Corporatism, but is in no way related to Fascism.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||01/31/2013|
You know R26, I have no problem hating the DC politicians AND Ron Paul at the same time!
No problem whatsoever.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||01/31/2013|
Fascism and neo corporatcy are the same. That's why Ron Paul libertarians scare them.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||02/02/2013|
Hardly R72. Dimwitted pretend libertarians run most American corporations and pretty much all of Wall Street, which is why New York will never be financial capital of the world: its elites are too stupid.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||02/02/2013|
Ron Paul is not a god, doofus. And NO ONE is scared of him!
|by Anonymous||reply 74||02/02/2013|
Obviously OP has half a brain.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||02/02/2013|
OP,fascism comes from the Latin word, "FAX" which means literally "torch"
Fascists for whatever reasons took that as their symbol.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||05/16/2015|
OP is the Catastrophizing Queen. Seek help.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||05/16/2015|
The Tea Party is a Fascist party.
|by Anonymous||reply 81||05/16/2015|
"Muscle" also has the same latin root
|by Anonymous||reply 82||05/16/2015|
If we lived in a Fascist society, would you know it?
Do you think the average Aryan German in 1936 or 1940 thought that Fascism was bad? Or would they have thought that Fascism was a good thing for Germany?:
It put an end to street brawls, and labor unrest.
It put an end to Czech and Polish oppression of fellow Germans.
It put an end to the humiliation of Versallies, and made Germans proud of themselves again.
It put an end to unemployment and hyperinflation
It put those uppity minorities in their place.
It kept them safe!
I wonder what they believed, and how that differs from the beliefs of Whites in America today.
|by Anonymous||reply 83||05/16/2015|
Why single out "Whites"?
We all live under the same fascist state.
|by Anonymous||reply 84||05/16/2015|
Not true R83. Labor unrest, yes. Street brawls, NO. It did not put an end to hyperinflation, that was gone 9 years before Nazism arrived.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||05/16/2015|
We are not fascist by any meaning of the word, much to my dispair because i consider myself to be fascist. Facism would be the savioir of our country from the corporate rule and rule by the black mob.
|by Anonymous||reply 86||05/16/2015|
Fascist means government plus corporations equals rule over society.
You are genuinely stupid.
I "dispair" for you.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||05/16/2015|
[quote] R83: I wonder what they believed, and how that differs from the beliefs of Whites in America today.
[quote] R84: Why single out "Whites"?
I singled out Whites to compare with Aryan Germans because both have a privileged position in our respective societies, and are not generally the target of organized discrimination by Government.
Blacks have a different experience. Disrespect of Blacks is routine. "Stop & Frisk" by the blue shirts reminds me of the Nazi brown shirts and the demand "Paper's please". "Driving while Black" isn't something Whites experience. And it seems anybody can shoot any Blacks they choose, including in the back, or after in custody, as long as the perp isn't black themselves.
As a result, I think black people are already living in a fascist society. I don't know how they can tolerate it, frankly. That being clear, the only question is when the blue shirts start treating the remaining privileged Whites with the hostility and violence they currently direct at Blacks. As Martin Niemuller wrote: "...by the time they came for me, there was no one left to protest".
|by Anonymous||reply 88||05/16/2015|
I agree with everything you say. Blacks have seen (or refused to see) the front lines of the jackboot fascistic Amerika for decades via the drug war.
Are you a Ron Paul supporter too?
|by Anonymous||reply 89||05/16/2015|
It is not Fascism if the Victim Cultures implement it.
|by Anonymous||reply 90||05/16/2015|
[quote] R89: Are you a Ron Paul supporter too?
No, I'm a guy who describes Libertarianism as Fascism, American style. I'm a Liberal Democrat.
|by Anonymous||reply 91||05/16/2015|
How can you be anything BUT a Ron Paul guy?
You named the same sins he names, decried the same power structures he decries, and recognized the same crimes he exposes time and again, but you find no common ground?
|by Anonymous||reply 93||05/16/2015|
R92, I don't believe that people should be owned like property.
And you're being repetitious and boring again. Do the world a favor and drop this idiocy from your vocabulary.
|by Anonymous||reply 94||05/16/2015|
Ron Paul is a crazy old man. If we share any common ground, and I am not taking your word on it, but if we did, it would be a coincidence.
|by Anonymous||reply 95||05/16/2015|
Don't be so closed minded.
|by Anonymous||reply 96||05/16/2015|
Thank you, R96. That is at least something new from you.
|by Anonymous||reply 97||05/16/2015|
Was I responding to your shit?
|by Anonymous||reply 98||05/16/2015|
For all those struggling to understand...
Fascism = right wing economics + authoritarianism Socialism = left wing economics + authoritarianism
Left and right are best understood in terms of economic policy.
Authoritarianism and libertarianism are best understood in terms of social policy (equalities, civil liberties).
Once you understand that you are looking at two axes, it's easy to see how different politicians/theorists fit in. For example:
Hitler: authoritarian right Stalin: authoritarian left Gandhi: libertarian left Ron Paul: libertarian right
|by Anonymous||reply 99||05/17/2015|
R99, the problem with your otherwise correct analysis is the fact that a proper understanding of economics always leads to libertarianism.
I was a democrat, mostly due to social issues, until I started learning about economics and how government distorts the market. Not just commerce, but personal interactions, distortions of consumption, planning for the future- the list is endless.
|by Anonymous||reply 100||05/17/2015|
Ha! Libertarianism is a con.
|by Anonymous||reply 101||05/17/2015|
Well, that's more of a "right vs wrong" than a "right vs left" argument, isn't it?
I was really responding to the strange person (people?) earlier in the thread who believe(s) any authoritarian regime is the same and therefore fascism = communism.
I'm just saying that if you see things as a two axis graph or a Venn diagram rather than a single line continuum, it makes better sense.
People from the libertarian left and the libertarian right can find common cause on civil liberties, for example. But people on the authoritarian right and libertarian right cannot.
|by Anonymous||reply 102||05/17/2015|
If I weren't gay, I'd probably be a fascist. Being gay has made me somewhat human and has tempered my manner of thinking.
|by Anonymous||reply 103||05/17/2015|
The main obstacle between cooperation between the left libertarians like Chomsky and Cockburn and economic libertarians like Raimondo and Rockwell is a lack of intellectual consistency and economic comprehension on the left.
Like libertarians, they are against war, but they can provide no concrete rationale for why it is wrong. They hate the banks and megacorporations, but can't see the policies of the Federal Reserve as the primary enabler. They know Washington DC is corrupt to the core, and that both parties are beholden to Wall Street and the Military/Industrial Complex, but still think a little more government intervention will fix it. Maybe another decade of Democrats waging war and propping up the banks during Hillary's reign will disabuse them of those illusions.
Until one can affirmatively answer the question of who owns their body with a resounding "I DO!" then they do not understand economics, or politics, or history, or biology, or psychology...
|by Anonymous||reply 104||05/17/2015|
Hi Libtard troll.
Glad you're back. There's a huge shout out to you in the thread below.
|by Anonymous||reply 106||05/17/2015|
Thank you for exposing your stupidity for the world.
|by Anonymous||reply 107||05/17/2015|
Every day, I get on my knees and thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster that Libertarians don't run things.
|by Anonymous||reply 108||05/17/2015|
How do wash that innocent blood off!
|by Anonymous||reply 109||05/17/2015|
R109 Lady Macbeth is still trying to figure that out!
|by Anonymous||reply 110||05/18/2015|
It is the blood of peasants and brown people, so it wahes right out.
The NeoCons have taken over datalounge. Their lust for government power is sick.
|by Anonymous||reply 111||05/18/2015|
The end is near...for Datalounge!
|by Anonymous||reply 112||05/30/2015|
Mussolini, the originator of fascism, was a socialist in his younger days.
It's been some weird historical revisionism that somehow imputed fascism to right-wing nomenclature.
And all of that is further confused by the fact that in Europe, "right wing" implies royalist sympathies which have no American analogue.
|by Anonymous||reply 113||05/30/2015|
OP why do you hate the HOMELAND?
|by Anonymous||reply 114||05/31/2015|
[quote]It's been some weird historical revisionism that somehow imputed fascism to right-wing nomenclature.
It isn't weird at all.
Government schools control the textbooks.
Government employees are generally in favor of more government power and money.
Portraying fascist economics in an honest manner would mean children asking why the USA didn't meet that same definition.
Government teachers cannot answer that question honestly, since they are government underlings.
|by Anonymous||reply 115||05/31/2015|
America is highly decentralized. States finance and regulate themselves differently.That alone makes the US non-fascist. Fascism features a strong central state -- also heavy militarism. Fewer and fewer people in the US serve in the military.
|by Anonymous||reply 116||05/31/2015|
Au contraire, more and more of us do serve in the ranks of the domestic military.
|by Anonymous||reply 118||05/31/2015|
Police have been cut around the country. The police's role is being debated right now in a way that it could not be in a fascist nation.
A core component of fascism is compulsory military service, which we do not have.
The US has authoritarian tendencies and injustice -- not he same as fascism.
|by Anonymous||reply 119||05/31/2015|