I think having an incumbent president inaugurated a second time is ridiculous.
I think all presidents should only have one formal inauguration. One who wins a second term should be given a second stripe or other to indicate he is rightfully serving his second term.
All this commotion and expense is totally stupid. Now his third term might include a dance, but this parade shit is murder on city traffic patterns and costs money that could be better spent on those in need.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||01/21/2013|
And, of course, the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution limits a President to being elected only two times. So, that third-term dance would be a rarity.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||01/20/2013|
Democrat here too! Yeah, the first time was history in the making. This one should have been more simple! Then again, Washington D.C. is good at wasting tax payer money!
|by Anonymous||reply 5||01/21/2013|
[quote] Then again, Washington D.C. is good at wasting tax payer money!
Please don't let the fact that inaugurations are funded by private donations get in the way of your rant.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||01/21/2013|
On the one hand, I agree with OP. On the other, it's a very important occasion to mark. I'm not at all very patriotic but I was proud watching that. It draws a line, compels us to reflect going forward.
Of course, it should be noted OP's opinion has been a freeper talking point for the last week. I don't think they EVER said that about GWB.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||01/21/2013|
Inaugurations are largely paid for by raising private money.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||01/21/2013|
Why the hell is King Obama getting a 2nd inaguration? He's a facist dictator! No other President got a 2nd inauguration!
And why do his little black kids get special protections from the sEcret service? Why does HE get prtoection from the Secret Service if he's trying to ban guns!?!!!!!1
|by Anonymous||reply 9||01/21/2013|
The gov't only pays for the security which is usually slightly more than the "fun" stuff. But it's a drop in the bucket, really.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||01/21/2013|
I don't mind the inauguration. I don't like all the state dinners and foreign junkets they get. Statesmanship is not wining and dining, people!
|by Anonymous||reply 11||01/21/2013|
Yes, r11 it IS LARGELY "wining and dining"! Diplomacy is just like everything else, it revolves around people sharing food and wine and managing to get past the small talk to the big issues. You must be quite sheltered.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||01/21/2013|
It is an important occasion but the money spent on a second inaugural seems crazy.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||01/21/2013|
GWB's second inauguration actually cost more than Obama's first.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||01/21/2013|
[quote]Now his third term might include a dance
Yes. It's a tradition FDR started upon being the first president to be inaugurated for a third time. Unbeknownst to most historians, he sprang up from his wheelchair and did a lively jig. All third term presidents since have held up the tradition.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||01/21/2013|
No that was the fourth term R15, and it probably killed him.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||01/21/2013|
Whether privately funded or not, I agree it's a waste of money and resources.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||01/21/2013|
I agree, OP. And not for any partisan reasons (I voted for Obama). I wanted to see this b/c of our remaining financial issues, and also because it's a big ole waste.
And I know much of it is a thank you to the people that helped.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||01/21/2013|
[quote] Statesmanship is not wining and dining, people!
If only I had Datalounge back in my time for such wisdom. I'd have never needed to take that unnecessary journey to Paris in 1776.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||01/21/2013|
Like you accomplished anything besides taking credit for what Silas Deane did!
|by Anonymous||reply 20||01/21/2013|