Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Israel Lurches To Far Right

Israel is heading towards its most predicable generation election in a generation, but one that promises to bring profound change.

It's an odds-on certainty that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will return to power after the ballots are counted on January 22 at the head of a similar Right-wing coalition with a similar majority to the one he current holds.

The outward appearance of the government will be almost the same, but behind the familiar cabinet line-up, the third term Mr Netanyahu is likely to be radically different from the Israeli leader known until now. The certain victory means an uncertain future for the Middle East.

David Horovitz, editor of The Times of Israel, said: "The elections will almost certainly yield a leadership that firmly rejects Palestinian statehood and adamantly champions settlement expansion.

"Not so much because the electorate is swigging heavily to the Right, but because the Right already swung to the far Right."

Mr Netanyahu's new government is likely to be the most Right-wing,pro-=settler, Israeli administration to date.

The shift is the result of the Rightward radicalization of Mr Netanyahu's Likud Party, the re-emergence of religious nationalist Zionism under a dynamic new leader, and the fragmentation of Israel's centrist and Left-wing opposition.

Israeli settlements will greatly expand, increasing the Israeli population in the occupied West Banks.

That will make it almost impossible for future Israeli government to up up the territory, even if it wants to.

by Sunday Expressreply 1701/17/2013

"Israel election: country prepares for next act in the great moving right show"

Secular liberalism once dominated politics in Israel, but polls next week are set to confirm a long-term shift to the right – driven by disillusionment at the failed peace process. So is this a permanent shift in the country's political landscape?

Dalya Steinberger's journey across Israel's political landscape began more than 20 years ago when she cast a vote for Labour, one of almost a million people who helped propel Yitzhak Rabin to the leadership of the Jewish state. A year later, in 1993, Rabin signed the historic Oslo Accords, shaking hands with Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat on the lawns of the White House. A little more than two years later, the prime minister died at the hands of a rightwing assassin who objected to the prospect of Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank.

In the two decades since that vote, Steinberger's optimism and belief in an attainable and lasting peace with the Palestinians have evaporated. Her disillusion has led her steadily rightwards: in 2006 she voted for the centrist Kadima party; in 2009 for the rightwing Likud; and in a little over a week, she expects to vote for the ultra-nationalist Jewish Home, a party that flatly opposes a Palestinian state and advocates the annexation of large swaths of the West Bank.

"To vote for the left now would feel like committing suicide," says Steinberger, a civil servant who lives on the outskirts of Jerusalem. "We have to protect ourselves and our future and we have to be strong."

Steinberger's rightwards trajectory has not been performed in isolation. Many of her friends and associates have made similar shifts in their political views. As the general election of 22 January approaches, polls predict a clear majority for the Israeli right. According to pollster Rafi Smith, 41% of Israeli voters now define themselves on the right, up from 34% three years ago. The country, he says, "has become more hawkish over the past five to 10 years".

Naftali Bennett, leader of Jewish Home, whose momentum in opinion polls has shaken up the campaign, likens this to a rightwing nationalist uprising. With a nod to regional revolutions, he told a foreign policy debate at Jerusalem's Hebrew University: "A Jewish spring is sweeping Israel these days. What you are seeing with Habayit Hayehudi [Jewish Home] is a dormant desire to restore Jewish values to Israel being uncovered, exploding."

Danny Danon, another extreme rightwinger rising in the political firmament, in his case within the ruling Likud party, describes it is an "awakening". His elevation from 24th place on Likud's list of candidates to fifth "reflects the will of the people", he says.

It is not only politicians and analysts who say Israel's political centre of gravity is shifting to the right. "Something revolutionary is happening," says Nerya Avitan, a 21-year-old campaign volunteer for Jewish Home at an election rally in Rishon Lezion. "People are not ashamed to say the whole of Israel [including the West Bank] belongs to the Jews. The two-state solution is a beautiful idea, but in reality there's no way to get there. Bennett is telling us the truth, and bringing Jewish heritage back to politics. He's telling us to stop living in a movie."

The early scenes of that "movie" told an epic tale of early socialist-Zionists building a new democratic Jewish state. Its stars were the backbone of the kibbutz movement – secular and leftwing European Jews, many of whom gave up professional careers for manual and agricultural labour. These pioneers were committed to equality, inclusiveness and tolerance – at least, among fellow Jews – and some also believed it would be possible to coexist with the Arab population.

A strong nationalist strain was always present, says veteran peace activist and former MP Uri Avnery, who will be 90 this year. "But at the start, most Israelis were sincere in wanting a democratic state. The Zionist movement was idealistic, and it was unbearable to think that we were displacing another people. So it was simply denied."

"Israel was established on a foundation of communal solidarity, a socialist and secular paradigm," says Avraham Burg, a former speaker of the Israeli parliament and chairman of Molad, a leftwing thinktank. "Now, in 2013, Israel is capitalist and religious. The change has been over a long period, and it's not just the paradigm that's changed but also the population. In 1948 Israel's Jewish population was 650,000. Each and every decade of Israel's history has added a different demographic layer, which has shifted Israel to a different place."

The "watershed" moment, says Burg, was the 1967 war, when Israel swiftly defeated its Arab neighbours. The resulting occupation and colonisation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza changed the course of Israeli politics. "The old socialist movement ended its historic rule and redemptive messianic religious Zionism took its place."

Avnery agrees on the significance of 1967. "It was a revolution as well as a military victory. The Labour movement was over in practice and a new elite of settlers, who would never dream of giving back the West Bank, took over.

"Now, if you ask an Israeli taxi driver, he will say, 'I want peace, but there's no chance of it in this or the next generation.' That is now the opinion of 90% of the public. And when people feel there's no chance of peace, the rightwing is more creditable than the left. Today the competition is between the right wing, the extreme right wing and the fascist right wing. They have a solid majority."

The twin factors of demographic change and the failure of the "peace process" aimed at establishing an independent Palestinian state alongside a democratic Israel over the last 20 years underlie the rightward shift, say analysts.

Among Israel's 7.9 million people, only 14-15% now describe themselves as secular Jews, whereas about 50% identify themselves as traditional, religious or ultra-Orthodox, according to Smith's polling figures. As a proportion of the population, the ultra-Orthodox are growing rapidly as a result of their large families. Jerusalem has become a bastion for those communities.

The vast majority of such traditional and religious Israeli Jews are on the political right – 79% of the ultra-Orthodox, compared with only 17% of secular Israelis. "The religious are clearly to the right – that's how they define themselves," says Smith. "The demography does not look good for the centre-left. Secular people are becoming a small minority."

The second significant demographic factor is the influx of immigrants from the former Soviet Union, who now make up nearly 15% of the electorate. In the last election, around half voted for former foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman's ultra-nationalist Yisrael Beiteinu, now in a rightwing electoral alliance with Likud, the party led by prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

Many are instinctively on the political right after enduring years of repression in the former Soviet bloc. Their politics combined with their numbers have helped tip Israel's political balance, leading former US president Bill Clinton to describe Israel's Russian-speaking community in 2010 as "an obstacle to peace with the Palestinians".

On the political front, the moribund peace process is the main factor behind changes in public opinion, say many analysts. The Oslo Accords created a surge of optimism dashed by a wave of violence during the second Palestinian intifada, or uprising. The withdrawal of Israeli settlers from Gaza in 2005 was followed by Hamas rule, rocket fire and two conflicts. Regional upheavals in the last two years have added to Israel's sense of insecurity.

There is a siege mentality, says Smith. "People believe the missiles are coming. So, as a whole, society is becoming very hawkish."

Carlo Strenger, a psychologist and commentator, says: "The bottom line is that Israelis have become so mistrustful of the prospects of peace that they are moving to the right because quite simply they are scared. And they prefer parties that they feel will safeguard their security. Most have not moved to the right in a deep ideological sense. The truth is that, for most Israelis, security is the primordial and primary issue."

Some analysts dispute the premise that Israeli public opinion has moved to the right, pointing to polls predicting that more than a third of parliamentary seats will go to centrist or left-of-centre parties. Reuven Hazan, a political scientist at Jerusalem's Hebrew University, says the notion of a fundamental rightwards shift is "completely wrong". "In the current election campaign, we see a small shift to the right, but this is minor compared to the convergence on the centre."

But with the Israeli political spectrum moving rightwards, the centre is much further to the right than in most western democracies. "The right has become the far right," wrote commentator David Horovitz on the Times of Israel website last week. "On the Israeli right in 2013, Binyamin Netanyahu, rhetorically at least, is a discordant relative moderate."

There is little doubt that Netanyahu will still be prime minister after the election. A series of opinion polls on Friday predicted that the Likud-Beiteinu alliance would win between 33 and 38 seats in the 120-seat parliament, way ahead of Labour, the next biggest party, which is forecast to get between 16 and 18 seats. Bennett's Jewish Home is expected to come third, with 13 or 14.

But Netanyahu's parliamentary group will be markedly more rightwing after 22 January. Several relatively moderate voices in Likud will not be members of the next parliament, replaced with hardliners such as Danon – whose top priority is "loyalty to the land of Israel" and who says "it is a fatal mistake to try to appease Europe or America" – and Moshe Feiglin, a radical national-religious settler.

Among Jewish Home's MPs are likely to be two hardline settlers from Hebron, a Palestinian city fraught with tension because of the extremist Jewish settlement at its heart. And, while the settler presence in the parliament grows, the next Knesset is likely to be the first without a single member from a kibbutz.

Meanwhile, Labour, led by former journalist Shelly Yachimovich, has abandoned its traditional platform of seeking a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing almost exclusively on socioeconomic issues. The "alternative voice" is silent, wrote Horovitz. "The party of… Yitzhak Rabin, the one-time party of government, has offered no leadership in these elections on shaping our relations with the Palestinians."

That ground appears to have been ceded to the right. The compromises necessary for peace seem even less likely in the next government than the present one. Many liberal Israelis and foreign diplomats fear that the chances of a two- state solution will finally be snuffed out.

Amos Oz, a celebrated author and a supporter of the leftist Meretz party, expected to win about five seats, warned last week that without a two-state solution Israel was heading towards apartheid. The right wing, he told a meeting, "believes that Jews can rule over an Arab majority for a long time". The inevitable collapse of an apartheid state would mean the end of the Jewish state.

But for Dalya Steinberger, the opposite is true: the move to the right is essential for Israel's survival, she says. "This is our country. We are here to stay. We can't afford to be soft or generous, or do what the world wants us to do. There is only one Jewish homeland and we cannot risk losing it."

by Sunday Expressreply 101/17/2013

How is this "right wing"? The USSR was militarily uncompromising and it was "left wing."

by Sunday Expressreply 201/17/2013

No doubt that Obama's reelection got this chump back into office. Israelis hate Obama overwhelmingly. This is why I support Chuck Hagel. Netanyahu is going to continue to try and bully Obama. The Left in Israel is gone. I still can't believe Netanyahu supported Mittens. Dumbfuck. He must know that the Right will go to war with the Middle East over anything. The Iraq war showed how gullible Americans can be. I guess he didn't count on the US going broke. At least his country still gets its massive welfare check.

Do you think Obama would do a preemptive strike against Iran (which is what Israel and the Right in America wants). He's a hawk, but I don't think he's that stupid.

by Sunday Expressreply 301/17/2013

r3, only a nutcase would think Obama is a "hawk."

by Sunday Expressreply 401/17/2013

Netanyahu is just a ganster. He has done nothing but hurt the country. Sad.

by Sunday Expressreply 501/17/2013

The GOP worships the ground that Bibi walks on.

by Sunday Expressreply 601/17/2013

[all posts by right wing shit-stain # a removed.]

by Sunday Expressreply 701/17/2013

They made peace with Egypt R7. They could make peace with Palestine. They refuse to.

by Sunday Expressreply 801/17/2013

As for the argument that Palestine won't give up its desire to annihilate Israel, that has been offered any number of times, and Israel pretends it hasn't.

by Sunday Expressreply 901/17/2013

[all posts by right wing shit-stain # a removed.]

by Sunday Expressreply 1001/17/2013

[quote]They made peace with Egypt [R7]. They could make peace with Palestine. They refuse to.

Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip unilaterally in 2005, even though the Gaza Palestinians had been launching rockets into southern Israel since 2001. The Palestinians were so interested in peace with Israel that they increased the rate of rocket attack.

In 2008 Olmert offered a deal to Abbas that included sharing Jerusalem, land swaps and a limited right of return. Abbas was so interested in peace that he didn't bother to respond.

by Sunday Expressreply 1101/17/2013

Israel want to repeat what Germany did - they want to become the aggressors because they haven't gotten over the trauma.

by Sunday Expressreply 1201/17/2013

Pull their funding.

by Sunday Expressreply 1301/17/2013

[quote]I can never side with a religion as violently, bloodthirstily, institutionalized homophobic as Islam.

No one is asking anyone to side with a certain religion. You are part of the dipshit crowd, that just doesn't get it. Religion has nothing to do with this in terms of a humanitarian response.

by Sunday Expressreply 1401/17/2013

Exactly. This is humans doing this to humans. You should care because this represents our collective failure.

by Sunday Expressreply 1501/17/2013

[quote]Pull their funding.

I agree. The U.S. should not give another cent to the Palestinians until they resume negotiations toward a final settlement. I'd also like to see them resume elections and stop incitement, but I won't demand everything at once.

by Sunday Expressreply 1601/17/2013

Israel is now the Fourth Reich.

by Sunday Expressreply 1701/17/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!