Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Ann Coulter implies "Guns don't kill people, minorities do"

"If you compare (the) white populations, we (would) have the same murder rate as Belgium"

"So perhaps it's not a gun problem, it's a demographic problem, which liberals are the ones pushing, pushing, pushing."

by Anonymousreply 6001/17/2013

Liberals aren't the ones who invited 15 million illegals here during the Bush years.

by Anonymousreply 101/16/2013

I wish someone would use her to test out that charming little slogan.

by Anonymousreply 201/16/2013

Has she read a paper lately?

by Anonymousreply 301/16/2013

Good God she's an attention whore.

by Anonymousreply 401/16/2013

Can someone dump her in a minority community after dark please

by Anonymousreply 501/16/2013

Is that even a statistic someone has worked out? I suppose so since she says the murder rate among whites is the same as Belgium. Where are these numbers? Or, as I suspect, did she just pull this out of her skinny ass?

And aren't all the recent mass-shooters white?

by Anonymousreply 601/16/2013

[quote]Can someone dump her in a minority community after dark please

LOL ... she'd freak out like Mrs. Pingleton in [italic]Hairspray.[/italic]

by Anonymousreply 701/16/2013

You have to admit, she's funny.

by Anonymousreply 801/16/2013

She is a drag queen, didn't you guys know that?

by Anonymousreply 901/16/2013

[quote]Can someone dump her in a minority community after dark please

Why would that be a bad thing for her? How would being dumped in a minority community at night be any worse than being dumped in a place where she would encounter other people who she has disrespected in the past?

by Anonymousreply 1001/16/2013

[R10] Seriously? She claims that is minorities that are killing not white people. A white drag queen in the ghetto after dark might be dicey.

by Anonymousreply 1101/16/2013

She's absolutely right

by Anonymousreply 1201/16/2013

Oh no she din't!

by Anonymousreply 1301/16/2013

I think she probably means the white murder rate would be the same as Belgium if Belgians were armed to the teeth.

by Anonymousreply 1401/16/2013

You knows she just says this shit and goes home to her black lesbian lover and just laughs over all the people who eat her shit up.

by Anonymousreply 1501/16/2013

R11 That really doesn't answer the questions. In fact, I'm not even sure what you are saying there. Can you repost it using syntax that is not so muddled?

by Anonymousreply 1601/16/2013

Ann and Jimmie Walker were hot and heavy years ago. They had a passionate torrid affair!

by Anonymousreply 1701/16/2013

"If you compare (the) white populations, we (would) have the same murder rate as Belgium"

I doubt that the murder rate would be as low as Belgium's, but if she is saying that blacks are disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders... well, she is right about that:

by Anonymousreply 1801/16/2013

We already had another thread about this.

by Anonymousreply 1901/16/2013

Well R18, it's a pretty well known fact that low-income folks of all colors involved in drug trade or other crime generally kill each other or their neighbors. Crimes motivated by poverty.

White people are generally the ones who go out and kill masses of innocent people, their wives, or their parents, motivated by who knows what.

But the cunt knows that, and so do you.

by Anonymousreply 2001/16/2013

[quote] We already had another thread about this.

Link R19 ?

by Anonymousreply 2101/16/2013

Did Columbine & those schools get that memo.

How about the NRA.

by Anonymousreply 2201/16/2013

Yes, we've heard

by Anonymousreply 2301/16/2013

R20 Of course whites have overwhelmingly been the perpetrators of mass shootings. And I doubt that anyone (even someone as idiotic as Ann Coulter) would deny that. Statistics are statistics.

And speaking of statistics, the fact remains, overall: blacks are disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders.

The "whys" of this, are I'm sure, many.

The NYTimes recently (jan 2, 2013) ran article about this very subject: "In a Soaring Homicide Rate, a Divide in Chicago"

by Anonymousreply 2401/16/2013

But this thread is getting more response.

by Anonymousreply 2501/16/2013

Ann Coulter, words don't kill words, but you kill words by using them.

by Anonymousreply 2601/16/2013

There's some truth in what she says, but what she fails so miserably to include in her statement is why that might be, i.e. the effects of poverty and racism.

by Anonymousreply 2701/16/2013

Well do you really think Cunter is concerned about poverty in America, R24?

Are you? Why are you defending her? Please. Who the hell are you trying to kid?

by Anonymousreply 2801/16/2013

Exactly, R27--Because she's only concerned with furthering her racist agenda, which is possible only by omitting other pertinent "facts."

by Anonymousreply 2901/16/2013

Just because your poor or something happen 100 years ago that your still using for a excuse, doesnt give you the right to kill inecent people for crack money or that you have a chip on your shoulder.

by Anonymousreply 3001/16/2013

R24. Please show us where I am in anyway defending Ann Coulter. Can you read?

And why are you asking me if I think Ann Coulter is concerned about poverty in America?

If I must answer you question: I think the only thing Ann Coulter cares about is Ann Coulter.

However: let me repeat "if she is saying that blacks are disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders... well, she is right about that"

by Anonymousreply 3101/16/2013

Context is everything, R31.

You know that and I know that.

by Anonymousreply 3201/16/2013

[quote]Just because your poor or something happen 100 years ago that your still using for a excuse, doesnt give you the right to kill inecent people for crack money or that you have a chip on your shoulder.

It's a little more complex than that, although given your apparent level of education, you may have trouble comprehending such things as sociology, criminology, economics.

Oh, and darling, nobody said anything about having "the right to kill innecent (sic) people.

by Anonymousreply 3301/16/2013

R24 While we are sorting out the proper context. The statistics, as cold and harsh as they are, remain.

by Anonymousreply 3401/16/2013

I'm not sorting out a thing, R34. No need.

Your trolling remains, but that's nothing new.

by Anonymousreply 3501/16/2013

Oh and one more thing, R34: You lost.

by Anonymousreply 3601/16/2013

R33 Agreed. I too frown upon people who speak English incorrectly. And I agree that people with a lack of education often do have have trouble comprehending such things sociology, criminology, economics....

by Anonymousreply 3701/16/2013

Some are so ignorant that they start sentences with 'and'...

by Anonymousreply 3801/16/2013


by Anonymousreply 3901/16/2013

R38 Some people speak English as a second (well actually third) language. That's how ignorant they are.

by Anonymousreply 4001/16/2013

*Now* he wants context. LOL.

by Anonymousreply 4101/16/2013

I don't care if English is your 30th language. If you can't speak it correctly, you are ignorant. It's not a sin, because we are all ignorant of something. But it's getting a little tiresome for people who can't speak English to come here posting ironically bigoted statements about other marginalized groups--and then get indignant about the "prejudice" they encounter. This suggests not only poor English skills (for which there may be an excuse,) but also poor thinking skills, for which there is no excuse.

by Anonymousreply 4201/16/2013

And that, my friends, is what you call a "slap-down."

by Anonymousreply 4301/16/2013

R42 First of all, I'm actually glad if someone points out a spelling or grammar error. In fact, in my come-back (a rather soft one) , I made no comments about you. And if you think my post shows me " indignant about the "prejudice" they encounter." LOL. Well...golly. ---

And reading your posts, in my opinion, the one showing the "poor thinking skills" is you.

by Anonymousreply 4401/16/2013

R42 (In case there might be some confusion here, I want to point out that I am not poster 33.)

by Anonymousreply 4501/16/2013

We know who you are R45, but you seem a little confused about who R42 is (and a few other things).

by Anonymousreply 4601/16/2013

R46... in one of your posts to me, you inexplicably said "you lost".

You know, I just assumed you meant to say "You are lost".

by Anonymousreply 4701/16/2013

But I'm not R42, R47.

Still confused?

by Anonymousreply 4801/16/2013

I meant what I typed, R48: "You lost," not "You are lost."

But I am not the same poster who criticized your grammar.

Why don't you lie down, put a washcloth on your forehead, and turn on Fox News?

by Anonymousreply 4901/16/2013

Correction; R47.

by Anonymousreply 5001/16/2013

She's right. A gun, left alone, will not kill a person. And, minorities have a disproportionate role in violent crime. She's not interested in getting these points across, however, unless she can simultaneously create outrage and draw attention to herself.

by Anonymousreply 5101/16/2013

R49. I don't live in the US. Do not have Fox News. And the last US election I voted in was for Bill Clinton.

R51. Agreed.

by Anonymousreply 5201/16/2013

"If you compare (the) white populations, we (would) have the same murder rate as Belgium"

No doubt a drunken Ann Coulter made up that "clever" comment while applying all that pancake batter intended for her waffle maker to her face.

by Anonymousreply 5301/16/2013

Minorities do not have a "disproportional role in violent crime" unless you don't consider domestic violence a crime.

by Anonymousreply 5401/16/2013


by Anonymousreply 5501/17/2013

Can't someone [bold]PLEASE[/bold] assassinate the cunt?

by Anonymousreply 5601/17/2013

R54 could you site some statistics on this?

Also: the quote from Coulter in the opening post is about the murder rate (not general violent crime). And that is backed up by statistics.

The context of those statistics would be an interesting discussion.


For those interested: conjunctions at the start of a sentence:

by Anonymousreply 5701/17/2013

I really wish people would stop creating threads about this stupid woman. I know I don't have to read them, but it would be nice if they didn't exist at all. She does this to get attention and we give it to her.

by Anonymousreply 5801/17/2013

Let's see if this link works:

by Anonymousreply 5901/17/2013

Eventually the bitch is going to get hers. I just wish it weren't taking so long.

by Anonymousreply 6001/17/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!