Why are threads critical of the government closed and deleted?
I've noticed that many threads that are critical of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the use of drones to spy on US citizens, the prosecution of government whistleblowers, or the revolving door between government appointees and Wall Street usually get deleted.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||01/24/2013|
In other words; you need a new hobby, Drone Troll.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||01/15/2013|
[quote]Many websites silently censor intelligent conservatives, then use the remaining ones as straw man to perpetuate the myth that only liberal Democrats are intelligent.
Whereas others let them remove all doubt.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||01/15/2013|
More delusional-thinking from yet another typical conservative.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||01/15/2013|
I hadn't noticed those threads disappearing OP but on my local newspaper blog the ones who whine the most about threads or comments being deleted/censored are rightwing freepers who moan about their freedom of speech being infringed upon by a "liberal" media all the while reporting the "libtards" who refute their paranoid claims until said "libtards" get banned and then they gleefully boast about it.
Maybe they just know you are trolling?
|by Anonymous||reply 6||01/15/2013|
[quote]Many websites silently censor intelligent conservatives,
And your proof of this is...?
|by Anonymous||reply 7||01/15/2013|
It's because the New World Order is actually behind the DataLounge. They also keep a record of what everyone posts, the IP address it was posted on, and they link that IP address with a name. If someone gets too out of line, and starts asking questions, they inform the NSA/FBI/CIA of the poster's possible connections to terrorism. Eventually, if the posting continues, they may get sent to Guantanamo Bay, or if the posts are especially incriminating of the government, they send drones to the poster's home. I know this because Alex Jones and Ron Paul told me.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||01/15/2013|
[quote]Many websites silently censor intelligent conservatives...
Uh-huh, right.... It doesn't matter, in any case, since that doesn't apply to the OP, since he hasn't been "censored," is manifestly not "intelligent," and is not "conservative."
|by Anonymous||reply 9||01/15/2013|
[quote]I hadn't noticed those threads disappearing OP
He had a couple of Paul Krugman threads deleted. They had remained active for a few months until he decided to repeatedly spam them with some inane "challenge" from a fellow loon.
[quote]Maybe they just know you are trolling?
Bingo. The webmaster is very tolerant of this particular loon but even he has limits. Mostly, he just locks the threads when the OP goes nuts but occasionally he'll delete them.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||01/15/2013|
Because you have the morals of a Ukrainian spam operation and are dumber than a box of hair?
Just my guess.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||01/15/2013|
If sticky messes are not cleaned up right away, they will attract ants and flies.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||01/15/2013|
[quote]If it makes you uncomfortable, or goes against your beliefs that Democrats are pure and Republicans are evil, it gets deleted.
ROFL.... Wow... you really don't get it, do you? And you're wholly incapable of dealing with reality, or learning anything that contradicts with your lunatic worldview.
Has it really escaped your notice that your threads remain around for months and, in some cases, years, dear? That they don't get deleted or closed unless you spam them? And that as long as you're not spamming, the webmaster just really doesn't give a rats ass?
You posted the same drivel to twenty old threads, dear, reactivating threads that hadn't had anything posted to them for months. And then you spammed a couple of other threads repeatedly, posting and reposting the same lame "challenge" from a fellow loon, a dozen times or more in a single two-hour stretch.
Of course the webmaster responded to this rude, spamming, and trolling behavior, dear. Why are you surprised? You don't want your threads deleted? Don't spam them.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||01/16/2013|
According to troll-dar, OP attacked Hillary Clinton as a "cunt" on the Benghazi thread.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||01/23/2013|
Talk about an oxymoron.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||01/24/2013|
R19 = the queen of false equivalencies and exaggerations
|by Anonymous||reply 20||01/24/2013|
OP, I agree you about the duopoly, and that most DL'ers are overly trusting of the Dems, but obviously the WM isn't on board with you about it, so why fight it? I ignore most of the political threads here, there are better places for those discussions. DL is better as an entertainment/gossip board.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||01/24/2013|
Because the groupthink and mindless worship of government by my fellow gays makes me sick.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||01/24/2013|
R22, you're beyond an idiot. You can tell just by your vocabulary.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||01/24/2013|
Your inability to articulate any argument shows how stupid you are.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||01/24/2013|
Not bothering to engage a libertarian moron/troll is not "incapable". It's "I don't want to waste my time having a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent".
Your post at R22 is, however, a perfect example of garbage-in, garbage-out. Or maybe a strawman argument.
Regardless, you're a brainwashed idiot, and not worth my time.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||01/24/2013|
If you are denying that you worship the government then you are the one not worth debate.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||01/24/2013|
r22, I am quite certain you are a bigger practitioner of "groupthink" than almost anyone else on DL; your group just happens to consist of nothing but loons.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||01/24/2013|
I neither engage in "groupthink" (nor do I associate much with idiots who use such words), nor do I "worship government".
But neither do I have an irrational paranoia about "Government", and I guess that's the part that bothers you. Regardless, your generalizations start "way off", and I can tell your argument veers off into insanity from there, so don't even bother.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||01/24/2013|
From your ignorant rant on the gun control thread, I can tell you have no education.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||01/24/2013|
R29, more strawmen. I never said or implied any of those things. You put words into my mouth and then denounce those words. Fascinating.
You need to see a shrink, dear.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||01/24/2013|
Then tell, in detail, how Obama has been better than Bush in those areas. Or shut up.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||01/24/2013|
R30, awesome, you're psychic! Though, like most psychics, you're also completely wrong. Not only am I well educated, I'm well versed in the facts regarding the things you're ranting about.
But whatever. Your opinion doesn't matter to me in the slightest. And your repeated assertions of untrue things doesn't make those things true. Reality is stubborn that way. Perhaps that's why you reject it.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||01/24/2013|
Groupthink was invented for idiots like you.
Unless you denounce the wars, the corporate bailouts, the loss of civil liberty- well, then you are just a brainwashed cunt.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||01/24/2013|
If you are so smart, then tell us why
We are still in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and Syria, and...
Why we are giving the banks $85B a month.
Why we subsidize the biggest military contractors to the tune of $1T a year.
Why Obama has authorized the murder of US citizens without trial.
Why the man who wrote the ACA left to join a private law firm that specializes in insurance law, making millions.
Please, tell us.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||01/24/2013|
Ooh, groupthink, OP learnded a word! A durrrrrr.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||01/24/2013|
Here's one advantage to having the Democrats in power. More people learn that both parties rule for the rich.
More examples -- He and the officials he has appointed have put thousands of protestors in jail but not one banker. Let Wall Street off the hook for stealing billions from regular people. He let those same crooks write the new regulation. He let dozens escape war crime prosecutions.
He authorized drone strikes killing women and children to protect the profits of energy conglomerates. He permits second drone strikes as followups so rescuers are killed, a war crime. He authorized regular army troops to enforce the law in the U.S.
If a Republican had done any one these things, outrage on the left would have been enormous. There would have been petitions and street marches. Now? Silence.
The Democratic Party drifts to the right when the Republicans are in power. It is full steam ahead when it is in power. The Democratic Party can accomplish more in protecting the rich and eliminating civil rights than the Republicans because its presence silences left activism.
And no, I do not suggest voting Republican or supporting the Libertarians. If you vote Democratic, fine, good. But do more.
Support a picket line, join a single payer group, demand fair treatment for all workers not just gays and lesbians, demand loan forgiveness for students and mortgage holders, join a peace rally, demand free public education for all with adequate funding.
If we leave it up to the Democrats and the Democrats only, politicians in both parties will move to the right.
"When a social movement adopts the compromises of legislators, it has forgotten its role, which is to push and challenge the politicians, not to fall in meekly behind them." -- Howard Zinn
|by Anonymous||reply 39||01/24/2013|
And a few of the idiots in here, along with OP, will wonder why this thread was deleted. READ, simpletons!
|by Anonymous||reply 40||01/24/2013|
[quote]Your inability to articulate any argument shows how stupid you are.
ROFLMAO.... Oh, the irony, coming from this particular moron.
[quote]If you are denying that you worship the government then you are the one not worth debate.
Q.E.D. Of course, out here in the real world, nobody "worships" the government. I wonder what it's like to live in that fantasy world of his?
[quote]Groupthink was invented for idiots like you.
ROFL.... Says the libertarian nut who unquestioningly believes everything he reads on those websites he frequents.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||01/24/2013|