Those you from the Gulf South, wouldn't you agree this sugar tasted a little sweeter than all the others, especially that Yankee sugar, Domino.
Better than Colonial, Dixie Crystals, and Imperial, too.
I miss Godchaux Sugar and Godchaux's Department Store.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||01/04/2013|
Yankee sugar? WTF? Did the other brands own slaves and fight for the confederacy? WTfuckityfuckfuck-F???
Southerners are the most backwards assholes on the planet. The US should have let them go, they're an embarrassment to America.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||01/03/2013|
Of course Yankees can't do sugar right. Nothing sweet about Yankees.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||01/03/2013|
I've never noticed the difference in any brand of sugar, but if it doesn't say "pure cane sugar" it does not taste right. Apparently it is beat sugar unless it is labeled as "cane", and beat sugar does not have as much flavor. Soda pop and other manufactured products are sweetened with corn syrup nowadays, and the products are all inferior to when I was young.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||01/03/2013|
[quote]and the products are all inferior to when I was young.
When Pepsi was a nickel, gramps?
|by Anonymous||reply 5||01/03/2013|
r2 is a lonely, bitter Yankee who could use some sugar.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||01/03/2013|
It was CocaCola for me, R5, but it was a nickel until I was in the 4th grade.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||01/03/2013|
Maybe those Yankees @ Domino Sugar stretch their "sugar" with plain ole NaCl.
Who can say they don't?
|by Anonymous||reply 8||01/03/2013|
Ballard Flour -- never heard of it.
Where was it sold?
My father (b. 1913) used to fondly recall Uneeda Biscuits.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||01/04/2013|
[quote]Apparently it is beat sugar...
"I saw the most unsweetened minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked for sucrose, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix of real cane..."
|by Anonymous||reply 10||01/04/2013|
Never mind, I can't improve on R10.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||01/04/2013|
Additional info about French Jewish immigrant Leon Godchaux and his Godchaux Sugar Refining Company:
1) Leon owned no slaves before the Civil War. Most of his Louisiana sugar plantations were acquired after the war. (This for the South Hater at R2)
2) His sugarcane plantations were connected to each other and the central sugar refinery by his own private railroad. At least one of the Godchaux locomotives is STILL in service, in California, at Disney Land in Anaheim.
3) Cookies, cakes, pies, and good old iced tea sure seemed to taste sweeter with Godchaux's sugar.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||01/04/2013|
In other words, Godchaux bloomed during Reconstruction.
That doesn't sit well with many Southerners.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||01/04/2013|
I not only miss Godchaux, I miss Gayfers and D. H. Holmes. Those were the days!
|by Anonymous||reply 16||01/04/2013|
Why would you think that, R15?
Leon was Southerner before the war, not some goddamn Yankee carpetbagger moving down after the war to pick at the South's bones.
People needed to move on from the war and start work again .. and Leon helped immensely in this regard.
Plus he was a successful merchant on Canal Street and employed people there.
Leon Godchaux was a job creator in the finest sense.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||01/04/2013|
Godchaux's Department store was big for a century in Fresno, California. Don't know why Louisiana and Fresno. Except for the racism, the two have nothing in common.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||01/04/2013|
Duke's mayo is better as is Carmellia brand red beans. The south does food better than the north.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||01/04/2013|
It's true that beet sugar doesn't taste as good as cane sugar.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||01/04/2013|
Domino's Sugar does have a sugar refinery plant in Louisiana. So Southerners show your pride in Domino's!
|by Anonymous||reply 21||01/04/2013|
Imperial Sugar is grown and harvested with slave labor, as well as child labor even to this day in the Dominican Republic.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||01/04/2013|
This thread is why I am rich.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||01/04/2013|
GODCHAUX PRALINES (pronounced "prawleens")
3 cups Godchaux light brown sugar
1/4 cup butter
1 1/2 cups chopped pecan meats
1 cup cream
1/8 teaspoon ground cinnamon
Mix the sugar, butter and cream and cook until a small quantity dropped in cold water forms a soft ball. Add the chopped pecan meats and cinnamon. Beat until almost cold, then drop by spoonful onto waxed paper.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||01/04/2013|
Funny how R2 reinforces the coarse Yankee stereotype by trying to reinforce the ignorant southerner stereotype.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||01/04/2013|
For those of you unfamiliar with the pronunciation of "Godchaux," I've heard it spoken two ways and they're subtle variations.
If you're from New Orleans, locals there pronounced it this way: to my ear it sounded more like "God-shahs" sugar or "God-shah's" Department Store.
If you're upstate or out-of-state, as I was growing up, we pronounced it as "God-shaw" sugar.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||01/04/2013|
You kids ain't tasted nothin' sweet until you've tasted Lipschitz's Sugar. Made right here on Rivington, fifth floor, 5-B. My Bubbe used to put one crystal into her cup, and the tea was sweet all the ways through the pot.
Now THAT'S sweet, you Yam People.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||01/04/2013|
Chemically beat and cane sugar are the same thing.
In blind taste test, people can't even tell the difference between corn syrup and sugar made products.
You people are paying more for your biases.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||01/04/2013|
R28, anyone who can't tell the difference between beet sugar, cane sugar, and corn sweetener is just not trying, and is probably being paid by the corn syrup industry to participate in the taste test.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||01/04/2013|
I beg to differ, r28.
Differences may be subtle but they're significant. Corn syrup and sugar are extremely different, right down to the way they effect the brain and body. Often it can be hard to articulate, or for some people even notice, the differences but they're there. I'm guessing the research you're referring to was sponsored by some HFCS company, the same one responsible for those odd ads a few years back.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||01/04/2013|