Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Anne Hathaway Doesn't Wear Underwear, Flashes Photographers at Les Miserables Premiere

And the downward spiral begins...

by Anonymousreply 8501/11/2013


by Anonymousreply 112/11/2012

She doesn't need to do this.

by Anonymousreply 312/11/2012

Ha ha!

by Anonymousreply 412/11/2012

There goes her Oscar win.

by Anonymousreply 512/11/2012

Is she muff diving these days or is she just a plain ole regular straight ho?

by Anonymousreply 612/11/2012

Well, let's see if Sally Field is up to the challenge.

by Anonymousreply 712/11/2012


by Anonymousreply 912/11/2012

I'm kind of surprised at her, but I suppose with boots like that you would be advised not to wear panties.

by Anonymousreply 1012/11/2012

What would the boots have to do with whether she's wearing underwear?

You would think every actress would know enough about the prat falls of getting out of cars in front of mobs of paparazzi that they'd all know better by now.

by Anonymousreply 1112/11/2012

EZ access bay-bee!

by Anonymousreply 1212/11/2012

So are we supposed to be offended by her lack of underwear or are offended by the fact that some dumbfuck photog too a picture and made money off it- and someone else posted it on the internet.

Personally, I think the later two assholes should get the flack.

by Anonymousreply 1312/11/2012

Ladies wear panties. Whores do not.

by Anonymousreply 1412/11/2012

She should definitely know better. Did she know what she was doing?

by Anonymousreply 1512/11/2012

Her publicist is Huvane, I'm assuming he wasn't there. Usually he removes his coat to shield his clients while they're getting in and out of limos.

by Anonymousreply 1612/11/2012

I blame Rachel Zoe who insists these girls go pantyless so they don't show through the dress.

by Anonymousreply 1712/11/2012

[quote]There goes her Oscar win.

OH, you couldn't wait to say that...HUH?

by Anonymousreply 1812/11/2012

Mildred, I can see her cunt!

by Anonymousreply 1912/11/2012

If she wore that outfit, to that event, without wearing undies, then she meet soon be 'resting' due to 'exhaustion'.

by Anonymousreply 2012/11/2012

That Oscar that was supposedly within her grasp is now firmly out of reach. You don't flash your pussy at Oscar.

by Anonymousreply 2112/11/2012

Ann Dowd is going to win supporting actress, anyway.

Buh-bye, famewhore AH.

by Anonymousreply 2212/11/2012

Can't women have unexpected bleeding down there? It seems like a risky move on her part.

by Anonymousreply 2312/11/2012

Nice pussy, bitch!

by Anonymousreply 2412/11/2012

[quote]Can't women have unexpected bleeding down there? It seems like a risky move on her part.

Unless it's that time of the month, women don't just start bleeding unexpectedly.

by Anonymousreply 2512/11/2012

Nope, Stephen was there. Anne is going to give him hell for this!

Three-time Oscar winner Sally Field. Get used to it.

by Anonymousreply 2612/11/2012

When Anne shows up to the Oscars with a bag of ice applied to her pussy area, just remember that she proved early on that she'd do ANYTHING for an Academy Award.

by Anonymousreply 2712/11/2012

What a lot of fuss about a tiny bit of pubic hair.

by Anonymousreply 2812/11/2012

LOL @ Morris Day and the Time

by Anonymousreply 2912/11/2012

r2 for W&W.

by Anonymousreply 3012/11/2012

I can see yer pussy from behind, sugar tits.

by Anonymousreply 3112/11/2012

It's obviously deliberate. No reason to show anything above her knees getting out of a car in a long dress.

It's a total famewhore move.

by Anonymousreply 3212/11/2012

Is she taking etiquette lessons from Paris Hilton. This is so 2008.

by Anonymousreply 3312/11/2012

Man, that is just sad sad sad. NO way in hell that was accidental. It always makes me think how someone's mother would react. Like "I raised you to be a lady." You have a shred of modesty. You KNOW when someone can see up your freakin' dress.

by Anonymousreply 3412/11/2012

How vagillating

by Anonymousreply 3612/11/2012

I could think of other reasons wet spots might appear. Not wearing underwear seems like a bad idea. And stinky.

by Anonymousreply 3712/11/2012

That's MISS Hathaway...if you're NASTY!

by Anonymousreply 3812/11/2012

how can you tell that it is not semi-sheer or flesh colored underwear?

Undergarments are built into these dresses sometimes and it could be a built in "foundation."

From what I see, it does not look like "lady parts."

by Anonymousreply 3912/12/2012

Forget her squishy cooze, that dress and those leggings are AWFUL.

by Anonymousreply 4012/12/2012

wow nobody never seen a twat before...ever heard of internet porn?

by Anonymousreply 4112/12/2012

Anne's response mirrors her cunt.

by Anonymousreply 4312/12/2012

[quote]how can you tell that it is not semi-sheer or flesh colored underwear?

You don't see the landing strip?

by Anonymousreply 4412/12/2012

She's dressed like Catwoman. If Catwoman had just broken her legs.

by Anonymousreply 4512/12/2012

[quote]Can't women have unexpected bleeding down there? It seems like a risky move on her part.

Britney Spears walked around with a bloody vage for photographs to catch. This was after she gave them prime access to her cooter from every angle.

by Anonymousreply 4612/12/2012

Everything's completely covered by the "censored" bubble. There is no (visible) landing strip.

by Anonymousreply 4712/12/2012


by Anonymousreply 4812/12/2012

In the uncensored pictures you can see a landing strip.

by Anonymousreply 4912/12/2012

[quote]And I'm sorry that we live in a culture that commodifies the sexuality of unwilling participants.

If you were unwilling, darling, you would have worn a pair of panties.

by Anonymousreply 5012/12/2012

That's not a landing strip, it's her giant clit.

by Anonymousreply 5112/12/2012

Oh... thanks, r48.

Is there ever a legitimate reason to go panty-less when wearing a dress, especially to a very public event? What am I missing? Seriously, what's so difficult about wearing panties?

by Anonymousreply 5212/12/2012

I believe Miss Hathaway was suffering from moldy crotch at the time and was under doctor's orders to keep the region fabric free to air out.

by Anonymousreply 5412/12/2012

I'm a woman and I would never consider not wearing panties. A woman can start her period with no notice, too. It's not like periods run like clockwork.

by Anonymousreply 5512/12/2012

Put some damn drawers on bitch.

by Anonymousreply 5612/12/2012

I like her but she's overexposed with all of this oscar buzz. I can't see it happening for her often though. Love and other Drugs was godawful, and she doesn't have the versatility of someone like Streep, Winslet, Moore or Swinton.

by Anonymousreply 5712/12/2012

The people (or singular person posting) on this thread are (is) vile and soulless. Crawl back into your lonely room and die a lonely life.

by Anonymousreply 5812/12/2012

57 replies and no mention of beef curtains?

You bitches are slipping.

by Anonymousreply 5912/12/2012

No woman does this by mistake, especially not an actress who would do anything to get more fame.

by Anonymousreply 6012/12/2012

Hathaway's Fantine sells her hair, her teeth, and her panties.

by Anonymousreply 6112/12/2012

If she doesn't want her cooter accidentally shown, why doesn't she cover it up?

by Anonymousreply 6212/12/2012

My only guess, and this is really giving her an out, is due to the fabric of the dress she didn't want to have panty lines.

by Anonymousreply 6312/12/2012

She wouldn't have had panty lines in that dress. hathaway is looking for a little extra publicity - she can scold the media and lookie-loos and come off as a mature actress to ACADEMY VOTERS.

by Anonymousreply 6412/12/2012

Which is worse, being photographed with panty lines or being photographed lips-to-the-wind? Now the whole world is her gynecologist.

by Anonymousreply 6512/12/2012

She knew what she was doing. The crotch flash is hardly a new phenomenon and she got out of that car in the exact position for maximum exposure. There is no reason for her not to have at least worn a g-string in that dress. She's also wearing "look at me" shoes, ensuring that photographers would focus on her lower area as well as her top. She could have avoided this in a dozen different ways, but instead we got the full shot, lips and all.

by Anonymousreply 6612/12/2012

Spanx panties don't leave lines. There are some others that don't either.

There's no way a floor-length gown accidentally becomes pulled up far enough to expose genitalia.

She can blame the photographers and websites as much as she wants, but she's the one who put it on display for them.

by Anonymousreply 6712/12/2012

[quote]she can scold the media and lookie-loos and come off as a mature actress to ACADEMY VOTERS.

Right, flashing your pussy in public is the sign of a mature actress. got it.

by Anonymousreply 6812/12/2012

Gag. Now I'm Le Miserable.

by Anonymousreply 6912/12/2012

Poseur. Talk to me when she marries a Nazi sympathizer.

by Anonymousreply 7012/12/2012

[quote] I like her but she's overexposed with all of this oscar buzz.

Overexposed is right!

by Anonymousreply 7112/12/2012

[quote]There's no way a floor-length gown accidentally becomes pulled up far enough to expose genitalia.

I'm a guy but I think it depends on how for the slit in the dress goes up that determines how much you have to gather to get out of a car. I think there's more to than guys would think.

I'm sorry I used the word "slit".

Good for her. Guys go commando all the time. And she doesn't need Spanx so why wear them?

by Anonymousreply 7212/12/2012

[quote] Guys go commando all the time.

But rarely do they go commando with their fly gapping open.

by Anonymousreply 7312/12/2012

When guys go commando, do they make sure their dicks hang out of their pants?

by Anonymousreply 7412/12/2012

R72, the slit is not high enough and it doesn't appear to be placed properly for involuntary flashing. She had to work at getting that skirt just right to show off her cooch.

by Anonymousreply 7512/12/2012

Shit. How the fuck do I top this? I WANT that third Oscar!! What should I do? Should I release "secret" tapes of me pleasuring myself with my two Oscars?

by Anonymousreply 7612/12/2012

Those are spectacularly ugly shoes. Boots. Whatever. They look like they came out of Baker's at the mall.

There are variations of Spanx panties that are very lightly spandexed and don't have any control. That's what women wear when they don't want panty lines to show, now that they don't wear pantyhose.

by Anonymousreply 7712/12/2012

Nice Beaver!

by Anonymousreply 7812/12/2012

Maybe in her portrayal of Fantine she sells her pubes because the customer also wanted realistic false eyelashes.

by Anonymousreply 7912/12/2012

[quote]how can you tell that it is not semi-sheer or flesh colored underwear?

I very much thought it was at first. That area is an unnatural color, and the texturing on it does not really look like totally bare vulvar material. On the other hand, it might be the lighting. And the "slit" isn't necessarily too high for it to show without her trying, If she's an outtie. HD would have been more helpful.

by Anonymousreply 8012/12/2012

Wear some underware ya dummy.

by Anonymousreply 8112/12/2012

nothing wrong with seeing a womans beautiful vagina.why is everybody treating this as some kind of tradgedy?

by Anonymousreply 8212/24/2012

R82 - Only the DL still cares.

by Anonymousreply 8312/24/2012

Ay Yi Yi! Keeds, dat girl is an amateur!

by Anonymousreply 8412/24/2012

look at joan

by Anonymousreply 8501/11/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!