Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

The best Best Actress from the naughts

Who was the most deserving winner?

by Anonymousreply 1512/09/2012

Who the FUCK voted for Winslet?

by Anonymousreply 112/09/2012

I voted for Charlize but wished I could have also voted for Marion.

by Anonymousreply 212/09/2012

Who the FUCK voted for Reese Witherspoon?

by Anonymousreply 312/09/2012

1. Theron

2. Cotillard

3. Mirren

4. Winslet

5. Kidman

6. Witherspoon

7. Swank

8. Bullock

9. Roberts

10. Berry

Just my opinion. After Kidman is was comparable to trying to choose which Republican I like most.

by Anonymousreply 412/09/2012

I voted for Bullock, simply to screw with the "Who the FUCK" troll.

by Anonymousreply 512/09/2012

I voted for Charlize Theron because she proved to everyone in Hollywood that she is a talented actress when she won for "Monster." She hit that role right out of the park.

by Anonymousreply 612/09/2012

I voted for Cotillard, but Swank would be my second choice. I have no desire ever to see her in a movie, but she was good in 'Million Dollar Baby.'

by Anonymousreply 712/09/2012

Charlize and Marion were both so utterly brilliant that I wanted to vote for a tie.

I ended up voting for Charlize because she improved so much on her previous work, which had ranged from weak to awful. I know it's a stupid reason, but there are no good reasons to pick one or the other.

by Anonymousreply 812/09/2012

R4's top three are right on the money, but I would swap Winslet for Swank. The Reader was mediocre Oscar bait, even though I like her as an actress.

Charlize Theron is definitely one of the top Oscar winning performances of all time.

by Anonymousreply 912/09/2012

Charlize Theron...no contest.

by Anonymousreply 1012/09/2012

Who the FUCK voted for Julia Roberts?

by Anonymousreply 1112/09/2012

Charlize, but Kidman and Cotillard were also deserving.

by Anonymousreply 1212/09/2012

Don't you mean "aughts?"

by Anonymousreply 1312/09/2012

Bullshit! Nicole Kidman was NOT deserving. She had less screen time than Julianne Moore, who was nominated for Best Supporting Actress in the same film; therefore, she shouldn't have been nominated as Best Actress (she also had less screen time than Meryl Streep, who also gave a strong performance, but was nominated for "Adaptation" instead). Had the most worthy actress won in 2003, Diane Lane would be getting the 3rd largest number of votes in OP's poll (behind Charlize Theron and Marion Cotillard).

by Anonymousreply 1412/09/2012

RELAX, r14. I loved Kidman in The Hours and found her to be deserving of the oscar win, regardless of category or screentime. It's just my opinion (and the globes, AMPAS, and BAFTAS)

by Anonymousreply 1512/09/2012
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.