Relationship was already confirmed.
Harry Styles and Taylor Swift's "7 Hours of Sex"
|by Anonymous||reply 246||12/15/2013|
I'd call her a tramp if it weren't for the fact that every guy she's dated has either been underaged or gay.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||12/04/2012|
Anything that gets her out of the music industry is good....yeah shes a nasty anti-vigin. God will be angry if you buy her music --- stop now and save your soul!!!!
(What ever gets Taylor Swifts music off the radio can only be a good thing)
|by Anonymous||reply 5||12/04/2012|
Give her some credit. Operating a strap-on for 7 hours straight can't be easy.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||12/04/2012|
[quote]She fucked Taylor Lautner who has a big cock.
Are you serious, R3? You really believe that?
|by Anonymous||reply 7||12/04/2012|
She did the KISS 102.7 Jingle Ball last Saturday in LA. It was terrible! Imagine all the white screaming teenage girls living in LA, in one room at the same time.
Music is DEAD!!! in the USA.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||12/04/2012|
As if. Surely the PR teams can come up something remotely plausible.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||12/04/2012|
The lengths publicists and marketers will go to to make something happen is outrageous and hilarious. They made sure the "couple" were photographed going into HER hotel at 4 A.M. Harry conspicuously carried and overnight kit and a clean t-shirt.(Maybe he doesn't wear underwear or maybe he doesn't change them.)
This morning they are photographed as both conspicuously left, separately, to make sure everyone knew they spent the night together. Under the same roof, if not in the same bed. I'd bet Harry's boyfriend was already lubed up and waiting for him.
The fangurls and the fanbois are lapping it up. Mostly his fans are calling her a slut. So poor Taylor has made a grand bargain with the Devil: She gets to have a new, public "boyfriend" to help promote her album, and Harry gets the additional publicity and expanded markets her fans open up to him.
The onyl thing is Harry is considered aplayer, and a "stud" (don't laugh) and Taylor has promoted a goody goody image which is now at risk. I guess we are the only ones who realize Harry is gay.
The powers that be must have figured the Selen and Justin thing might be getting ready to explode and the Robsten Twilight is finally over or definitely in it's deaththroes. So Taylor and Harry are the new IT couple. Except they aren't.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||12/04/2012|
[quote]She fucked Taylor Lautner who has a big cock.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||12/04/2012|
Dating Taylor Swift automatically makes you a punchline.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||12/04/2012|
R11, that was probably written by Taylor Lautner's PR team. No way is that boy straight.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||12/04/2012|
DL is not even able to keep up with this girl's actions. Now that's saying something.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||12/04/2012|
Maybe at 42 I'm too old to appreciate it, but I remember being 18 very well, so I can see Harry being attractive to another young guy. I can. But he's too young for me.
I can't even picture them kissing. Kissing Taylor would have to be like kissing a 12 year old who is imitating "sexy." Harry looks like one of those demons who used to try to get the 15 yr old virgins to give it up, while he secretly lusted for the captain of the football team. There is no way these two are getting it on.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||12/04/2012|
That 'insidery' creature (with a too-invested whilst not being close enough-sounding story) that appeared on the Nick Grimshaw thread about a month ago dropping hints on some unnamed girl would have been laughed out of town had they named Swift there and then.
Shady piece anyway, because there's no way Nick Grimshaw has invested all that time and effort for the past year+ to act as gooseberry so Harry Styles can use him to 'talk to' Taylor Swift. What planet these PR people are on I've no idea.
There's some talk that Harry has no say in this and is being forced to do it but who knows. Maybe he's taking the heat off someone else. I do know the things being said about he and Grimshaw in particular lately would have been worrysome for his brand-hungry backers and reps.
But, still, hooking up with Taylor Swift is akin to donning a giant rainbow flag. What better place to start, I guess?
It is obvious the park stroll and hotel pictures were ready-to-go camera ops though. Harry can disappear for days on end with discretion (so can Taylor) even around other big stars so it's no real stretch to assume he could visit Taylor Swift more discreetly than making it look like a sex call at the front door twice in a row.
Despite what it's being made to look like though, there's nothing to say they aren't friends. A guy can have a girl friend, though of course they will know the way it looks to the outside world. I'd expect some PDAS soon, to make it look extra ridiculous.
Only good thing of late was an interview with Louis wanking an indoor plant off in front of Harry. I still hope those two are knocking boots.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||12/05/2012|
[quote]The fangurls and the fanbois are lapping it up. Mostly his fans are calling her a slut. So poor Taylor has made a grand bargain with the Devil: She gets to have a new, public "boyfriend" to help promote her album, and Harry gets the additional publicity and expanded markets her fans open up to him.
Seriously, I do wonder if Taylor Swift girl is gay?
No sarcasm. Just the modus is always the same. She took absolute howls of derision from the internet for 'dating' Jake Gyllenhaal. Literally, about 3 people bought it and their PR brought it to an abrupt end because people were just laughing. Not to mention the rest.
But then she bounces back to seemingly pick up (or that's how it's being played out) yet another strongly-rumoured fruity type. A real person would have more of a sense of self, no? But if you are gay, and desperate to cover for yourself too, then you'd go to those lengths time and again imo.
Also, her and Harry's backstory is ludicrous. You'd never trust this guy again if you buy that he dumped Taylor and went off with at least one other chick at around the same time.
The press' desperation to link her and Styles is also interesting. They're assured of stories and pics for months. She spent far more time with Ed Sheeran recently. The DM did hint at something there but it was never blown into epic proportions after 1 day like this.
All pretty atypical of the media and PR behaviour. I hear Modest! Management are absolute cunts as well. One Direction is their main, if only, cash cow.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||12/05/2012|
R18, what do you think of the Taylor Lautner thing?
|by Anonymous||reply 19||12/05/2012|
I would bet the farm that Swift is lesbian or bi, leaning strongly towards women. So, any of her "boyfriends" are immebiately suspect...
|by Anonymous||reply 20||12/05/2012|
Taylor Swift IS a virgin. She only has anal sex!
|by Anonymous||reply 21||12/05/2012|
I don't know anything about that, r19. I suspect Taylor Lautner is man-friendly given the numerous rumours and hints on it?
I saw a chart of men Taylor had been linked to yesterday. Many of those named had had gay rumours or were the type to be aspiring or looking for a career boost: Chace Crawford, Zac Efron, Lautner, Jake G, John Mayer (remember the 'kiss' with Perez that got buried?), among others.
Taylor possibly being gay herself was something that came to me over time, just watching the way her life gets played out. There was also a blind item awhile back with people guessing her. Speculative, and could be someone else, but if I can find it I'll link it.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||12/05/2012|
Did Taylor Lautner & Taylor Swift beard for each other?
|by Anonymous||reply 23||12/05/2012|
Totally planned out PR bullshit, her makeup and hair are perfect. If the sex was that great you would stay in bed as long as possible and throw on a hat and sunglasses.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||12/05/2012|
Good point, r24. Her makeup alone looks like it took hours.
And we're all in for weeks of this crap.
God bring back Grimmy.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||12/05/2012|
Look at the zits on his forehead with his hair pulled back and the obvious pancake makeup he has on while casually out with friends.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||12/05/2012|
R24, Taylor Swift's next photocall with Harry will be stepping out with a dishevelled hairdo. They monitor us, but of course you know.
Those shades he wore the first hotel day look like the ones he said he once dropped down the toilet.
This is nothing compared to the Rob Kardashian/Rita Ora Twitter drama of today, unless they can find some way of writing Harry into that one too.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||12/05/2012|
The only thing that throws the gay and beard theories off is her relationship with disgusting straight pig John Mayer.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||12/05/2012|
[quote]Taylor Swift IS a virgin. She only has anal sex!
|by Anonymous||reply 29||12/05/2012|
I remember that storm about Mayer tonguing Perez at a party, that Perez went on about at the time. The internet was like, John Mayer's gay! for weeks.
What an unholy combo.
Think I prefer he and Perez.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||12/05/2012|
The Taylor Lautner connection is definitely a red flag.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||12/06/2012|
I think you mean a red fag, r31.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||12/06/2012|
"The Taylor Lautner connection is definitely a red flag."
Actually, I think you mean a PFLAG
|by Anonymous||reply 33||12/06/2012|
"Taylor possibly being gay herself was something that came to me over time, just watching the way her life gets played out."
But wouldn't she be writing songs like: "She Looked My Way (The Girl In The Orange Depot Apron)" and "Angry Little Muffin Top"
|by Anonymous||reply 34||12/06/2012|
[quote] Her makeup alone looks like it took hours.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||12/06/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 36||12/06/2012|
This thread literally FEELS infested by the loons who've moved into the Prancing Pony Inn: London Branch on the (endless) threads re: One Direction and some BBC radio host.
[quote]They made sure the "couple" were photographed going into HER hotel at 4 A.M. Harry conspicuously carried and overnight kit and a clean t-shirt.(Maybe he doesn't wear underwear or maybe he doesn't change them.)
Actually, Taylor got home at 4am BY HERSELF and was photographed by all the paps staking out her hotel. Harry arrived an hour LATER, clearly hoping the paps had left, but unfortunately a few stragglers remained, enough to capture all of two seconds of video of him walking in. He was carrying a large bag, not a "kit," which had more than enough room for a full change of clothes and Dopp kit. Finally, the hotel in question is the Bowery Hotel in NYC and has no "back door" of any sort.
Do try to keep your fangurl facts straight, hon.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||12/06/2012|
People actually believe these two are fucking?
|by Anonymous||reply 38||12/06/2012|
Funny thread. This is like all the hot sex Ricky Martin used to have with nubile young female dancers and TV presenters. They broke records, you know.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||12/06/2012|
Wrong, r37, it was the Greenwich Hotel.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||12/06/2012|
R37 To be fair, you're talking about Tuesday night and the person you quoted was talking about Monday.
Gay or straight or something in between, this can't be real.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||12/06/2012|
All of you sound like a bunch of nutcases on this thread.
In fact, you must be nutcases to write what you are writing on this thread.
Such delusions and hackneyed theories and just plain dumb.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||12/06/2012|
[quote]People actually believe these two are fucking?
R37 (angry paid shill) does.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||12/11/2012|
Two nights running - I leave you alone for 5 minutes .....Any idea what we are doing wrong?
|by Anonymous||reply 52||03/12/2013|
OR could someone just let us know why and if we have to leave?!
|by Anonymous||reply 53||03/12/2013|
WTF is going on around here?! The title of this thread made me laugh again though. Weren't those fun times?!
|by Anonymous||reply 54||03/12/2013|
Well, we can either make our own forum or move to livejournal or something.
|by Anonymous||reply 55||03/12/2013|
oh dear. well I still would like discussion...is there another forum people want to meet up in that can talk about it?
|by Anonymous||reply 56||03/12/2013|
153, that sounds technical? Do you have those skills?! (I certainly don't!!)
|by Anonymous||reply 57||03/12/2013|
Well, we could try this thread for a while, it seems redundant and there is an advantage that the title is rather misleading...
|by Anonymous||reply 58||03/12/2013|
tumblr? without tagging things I suppose..
|by Anonymous||reply 59||03/12/2013|
Yeah LJ's usually a good option.
Moderator's can also close threads, right? I didn't even know OPs could.
|by Anonymous||reply 60||03/12/2013|
This is the best thread title ever. We should stay here just for the name.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||03/12/2013|
does anyone have a membership or is willing to buy one?
|by Anonymous||reply 62||03/12/2013|
somebody post somewhere to continue quickly before this one is closed too. DS appreciation maybe?
|by Anonymous||reply 63||03/12/2013|
could you give a link as I have no clue where that is?
|by Anonymous||reply 64||03/12/2013|
I could open one on digital Spy in the appreciation section, slightly nutty, but no nuttier than us?
|by Anonymous||reply 65||03/12/2013|
Ughh not tumblr. Too many crazies over there.
I like LJ. Been a long while since I've been over there. But it's good for maintaining privacy.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||03/12/2013|
DS is probably a better shout for a short term solution.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||03/12/2013|
yes open one in digital spy and we can post here for now until we're kicked out...
|by Anonymous||reply 68||03/12/2013|
Yeah, I think LJ would be good for sure, Links but I've never made a community, have you? It can be an anon one too, so not everyone has to make an account.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||03/12/2013|
LJ is good for the non-techies too I think if anon comments are allowed. more private than DS too
|by Anonymous||reply 70||03/12/2013|
I've found an old one on digital spy:
|by Anonymous||reply 71||03/12/2013|
Yes, R65, and please post the link and we can decide what to do long-term there.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||03/12/2013|
What is LJ and is it easy to join / post in?
|by Anonymous||reply 73||03/12/2013|
I'm afraid the webmaster must simply have become annoyed with these threads. All the other explanations are nonsensical.
Maybe they've come to see them as the heir to the notorious "Prancing Pony" threads of old (obsessive LOTR shippers), which were banned as well after a while. I'd consider this a very unfair comparison, because those threads were all over the forums, and had a very fanatic tone (at least that's what I've heard - I didn't visit DL much at the time), whereas the Nick/Harry discussion has always restricted itself to one thread at a time, and has (in spite of some "shipping" tendencies) kept a compratively objective tone (or at least not a batshit crazy one.)
But then DL has always been run somewhat arbitrarily. (Discussions of soap operas are banned as well for some reason.)
I was going to suggest continuing the discussion in the general 1D thread (and then in consecutive general threads), and tolerate non-Nick related contributions, because this might avoid giving off the "cultish" vibe the more specific threads seems to have given off.
But now this one has been closed don as well. Apparently the webmaster doesn't want the discussion to continue at all. Rather annoying.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||03/12/2013|
Yes, but LJ comm will take longer to sort out so if we need somewhere everyone can organise that on now, it's best to use DS.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||03/12/2013|
R65 good plan
|by Anonymous||reply 76||03/12/2013|
LJ is livejournal LG and it is very easy to post comments, especially anonymously.
|by Anonymous||reply 77||03/12/2013|
You can't post in DS unless you're a member? I tried to join and it didn't work.
Can we stick here until the LJ thing is sorted?
|by Anonymous||reply 78||03/12/2013|
I just registered on DS as dlpost153, haha.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||03/12/2013|
I say we migrate to LJ.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||03/12/2013|
Well when the LJ is set up and if this thread is closed, will someone ensure they post a link to DS so that I can find it. I'm not ready to drop this discussion!?!
|by Anonymous||reply 81||03/12/2013|
you are in 24 hour moderation if you make an account. I'm L94 once I get approved. is there age restriction? I remember there was a 17 year old regular poster
|by Anonymous||reply 82||03/12/2013|
Thanks 153. Do you have to register or can you just jump on and post like you can here?
I propose someone keeps starting threads on here until it's set up? They haven't for time to track and delete them all, surely?
|by Anonymous||reply 83||03/12/2013|
Created a ds account but it takes 24hrs to post, of course.
To LJ or not to LJ can be discussed in full over there, though, as it takes more logistics organising and linking for people. If R74 is right, we haven't got the time or posts to do that here.
|by Anonymous||reply 84||03/12/2013|
We'd need to go into the appreciation subforum otherwise the ds crowd are nastier thanany on here. It's free to register with DS for most people.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||03/12/2013|
I just wish someone would post and tell us what's going on! I'm glad most of the regular posters are still wanting to conntinue but upsetting we'll probably lose NW3 for good and other potential insiders if we migrate
|by Anonymous||reply 86||03/12/2013|
I have registered at DS, but apparently there is up to 24 hours before the account is valid. Will be DLsmallc, for obvious reasons! Am a member of LJ already if we go there.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||03/12/2013|
Joined DS but won't let me post. Have we actually broken some serious forum rule somewhere? Insane
|by Anonymous||reply 88||03/12/2013|
Ah, okay, R82. That explains why I couldn't post either.
|by Anonymous||reply 89||03/12/2013|
153 you are genius. lJ people - can you post a link and we can try both?
|by Anonymous||reply 90||03/12/2013|
No, R88, you have to be approved. It takes 24hrs and then you can post.
Someone posted a link to the thread on DS on the previous page, for those asking where we're going.
|by Anonymous||reply 91||03/12/2013|
I'm fairly sure we can't just stay here, LG.
If someone can rustle up a quick LJ comm, great; I've never done one myself before, though I am a member, so I thought it was a complicated process.
|by Anonymous||reply 92||03/12/2013|
DLcastoff here on DS.
|by Anonymous||reply 93||03/12/2013|
Appreciation thread for Harry and Nick.
For want of a better idea, it is in the X-factor section as there isn't an appreciation in the showbiz section.
|by Anonymous||reply 94||03/12/2013|
If I'm unable to register at DS or LJ (highly likely given my low level tech skills) It was fun chatting to you all!
|by Anonymous||reply 95||03/12/2013|
Here is the page to create an lj comm...it seems simple enough.
|by Anonymous||reply 96||03/12/2013|
Excellent Isis. was just going to suggest the music section forgot xfactor had its own. see you guys over there once my moderation comes through.
|by Anonymous||reply 97||03/12/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 98||03/12/2013|
You'll find everyone LG, I may have been highly annoyed by some of your posts in the passed, but you have definitely given the threads something to talk, even if most of us thought it illogical at times!
DS is easy to join, just a waiting period for verification. LJ can't be that hard.
|by Anonymous||reply 99||03/12/2013|
Isis you and I have crossed paths on DS before. lol. I joined august 09 and you in September. I will say no more. Mortifiction.
|by Anonymous||reply 100||03/12/2013|
r15 I think you're a loon. Attractive people don't stop being attractive once you're old. You're just trying to justify that you can't get anything that hot anymore.
|by Anonymous||reply 101||03/12/2013|
Thank you, R98.
|by Anonymous||reply 102||03/12/2013|
Thanks Isis. I think I'll find everyone. Just not so confident about my ability to join! (I failed last time I tried DS)
My involvement may be reduced to reading rather than posting (some may find that a blessing)
|by Anonymous||reply 103||03/12/2013|
R100 that you are going to have to share! Am registered on DS but waiting for authentication. Am posting on LJ now. Shame we will lose so many outsiders - (the fuel to our fire)
|by Anonymous||reply 104||03/12/2013|
Well I now have an LJ account too, I am isis2013, please link the thread over there so I can keep in the loop.
Can I set it up maybe, if nobody else in on the case.
|by Anonymous||reply 105||03/12/2013|
Personally I'd prefer DS to LJ - I fear the latter might become too incestous.
|by Anonymous||reply 106||03/12/2013|
LG and others, You are able to post anonymously on LJ (if it's turned on in the comm) if you guys don't want to register. That might make it more accessible to those who don't want to admit who they are. Haha.
Anywho, I'm pixieviolet over there.
|by Anonymous||reply 107||03/12/2013|
R106 agreed - its either subject to DS torment or isolation
|by Anonymous||reply 108||03/12/2013|
Sitting here a little pink, oh dear, will I ever grow up!
We aren't friend son FB too? I have a whole host of people I met in that group who ended up being friends with on FB friends too!
|by Anonymous||reply 109||03/12/2013|
JJ, if we stay in the appreciation section it should stay relatively civil. It's the main forum which gets vicious. Fun sometimes but vicious.
|by Anonymous||reply 110||03/12/2013|
DS tormentors can easily be dealt with!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 111||03/12/2013|
R109 I don't think so as I had two separate fbs. I deleted one and kept a few people on the personal one. I have met up with a few people from there since. They are great craic especially the amazing Damanda.
|by Anonymous||reply 112||03/12/2013|
We can stay in DS for now and keep lj as a back-up if people prefer that? I personally don't mind either way.
|by Anonymous||reply 113||03/12/2013|
Can we use LJ till people's authentication comes through?
|by Anonymous||reply 114||03/12/2013|
R112 Still have her as a FB friend, she is amazing, love BB! Shame it is not the same anymore:-(
|by Anonymous||reply 115||03/12/2013|
The thing with DS is they can be quite strict about what you can post. If you post anything potentially libellous the thread would get locked. That's why their blind items thread is mostly in code. Just worth keeping in mind.
|by Anonymous||reply 116||03/12/2013|
Yeah, I think lj will be easier in that sense, Pringle.
|by Anonymous||reply 117||03/12/2013|
Have we been posting anything potentially libellous in our discussions?
|by Anonymous||reply 118||03/12/2013|
Just a suggestion, but could we set up the other forum (so it's ready as a backup) but try and stay on here until we are forced off?
You never know, they might just be having an off day? No point moving until we have to. It's so easy to post and if someone opened a new thread with a more ambiguous title it might work?
If it doesn't we can migrate to the new forum at that point?
|by Anonymous||reply 119||03/12/2013|
Equally though Pringle, their gay celebs thread is completely open and is on it's third part so I don't think it would be a major problem with what has been posted in these threads.
|by Anonymous||reply 120||03/12/2013|
I agree LG I started the LJ account but have no idea how to make it work well and would prefer to stay on here if possible
|by Anonymous||reply 121||03/12/2013|
wish we had someone tech saavy who could make a forum site for us, then we could avoid the time outs on this and not worry about being shut down (here and on DS). LJ is confusing.
|by Anonymous||reply 122||03/12/2013|
No problem, LG.
|by Anonymous||reply 123||03/12/2013|
I would appreciate the no lock-out with DS or LJ, but don't mind staying here it is is comfortable.
|by Anonymous||reply 124||03/12/2013|
I think proboards are easy to run and use and people could be blocked by moderators. the forum could even be closed to new members if need be
|by Anonymous||reply 125||03/12/2013|
If a site is also set up on DS, those of us who aren't already registered can set up accounts for both that and the LJ site.
then, at least, we will be set up to continue our conversation elsewhere if / when forced?
|by Anonymous||reply 126||03/12/2013|
Oh LG, nightmare isn't it. I know have 3 DS thread and 1 LJ thread open on my phone - no idea what I'm doing in any of them and have utterly lost my insane train of thought from earlier.
I just wish someone would say what's wrong. Maybe if we just slow down on here (like maybe I should post less than 100 per day. :)
I love it here!
|by Anonymous||reply 127||03/12/2013|
R127 I'm with you I'm refreshing like 5 tabs. LG did you find us on LJ?
|by Anonymous||reply 128||03/12/2013|
Ideally love to stay here on dl too. I love all the varied opinions, and the anonymity is quite fun. It's been home for many months for me (and over a year for some it seems).
|by Anonymous||reply 129||03/12/2013|
Sorry JJ at R127 - anyway I've got them all bookmarked so if this gets closed - there are options.
|by Anonymous||reply 130||03/12/2013|
R125 I've had a proboard before. I would be willing to make one again if you want. Might take a while though.
|by Anonymous||reply 131||03/12/2013|
You guys are Prancing Ponies v2.0 (or more, dunno). I don't know what you're doing on the DL.
Surely these two idiots have fansites or hate-them-sites where you can do nothing but discuss them all day, every day. What fun!
|by Anonymous||reply 132||03/12/2013|
R128, I'm not sure what I'm looking for? Is there already a discussion going on over there now?
JJ, I don't even understand the tech language? What is a 'proboard' ?! I'm a complete technophobe (mobiles weren't even around in my childhood!)
|by Anonymous||reply 133||03/12/2013|
R131 - Its kind of you to offer. it depends what everyone else thinks. we have DS and LJ as options atm.
|by Anonymous||reply 134||03/12/2013|
R132 - aha believe it or not thanks for the info. Had no idea we'd reached that level. Many of us post elsewhere in DL I assume we have outstayed our welcome - honestly thought we might be in the right place as we mostly discuss UK and US media interpretation of rumoured closet dwellers in the mainstream. I don't think any of us meant to be a pain.
|by Anonymous||reply 135||03/12/2013|
Looking at the General 1D thread which was closed (because we barely posted there before it was so it's somewhat quicker) only one of the previous queried subjects was mentioned by name, so it seems likely to be that one, although I suggest we avoid both to be sure. For those unsure check the last few posts over there. I can't think there can be any other reason after the vast number of threads we have gone through so far.
|by Anonymous||reply 136||03/12/2013|
LG go to the link below and press "leave comment" you can do anon
|by Anonymous||reply 137||03/12/2013|
Yeah, maybe a separate forum is a better idea, R131. I don't really like DS and lj will get confusing when it comes to following different conversations. It's good to have them as back-up though. It would be lovely if you could set it up, if everyone else thinks it's a good idea too.
|by Anonymous||reply 138||03/12/2013|
agree with 153, I can already see the problems with LJ
|by Anonymous||reply 139||03/12/2013|
LJ is fine if u dont comment with rely and just leave a normal comment
|by Anonymous||reply 140||03/12/2013|
Okay, I'll set it up I can always delete it if it doesn't work. Might take a while, but I'll be as quite as I can. I'm pretty sure I can set up anon posting LG so don't worry. I think we'd all miss you if you didn't come along.
|by Anonymous||reply 141||03/12/2013|
I seriously don't get all this cloak and dagger angst-y shit. Why doesn't one of you just start a blog or a facebook page or whatever?
Why is this such a problem for you? They may be incredibly dull, stupid and fake but Harry Styles and Taylor Swift are both public figures. They are fair game for gossip, innuendo and general internet discussion.
The same holds true for whatever "closeted celebs" you have devoted yourselves to discussing.
|by Anonymous||reply 142||03/12/2013|
R132 - Yes, that's why we are a little puzzled as why three threads have been closed on the subject today. If you have any ideas upon why they would be welcome
As to the cloak and dagger stuff, it is more general confusion than anything else!
|by Anonymous||reply 143||03/12/2013|
C, are you talking about the jackets?
R137, thanks. Have just posted. Already hate it.
Can all agree on just the one place to post? (Although preferably as a back up for here only?)
|by Anonymous||reply 144||03/12/2013|
And no one ACTUALLY say it, please ...
|by Anonymous||reply 146||03/12/2013|
R132 - I know most of us are mystified by our own interest but currently the UK press is absolutely obsessed.. Real mix of posters gay/straight 20s - early forties
a few reasons 1) hiding from the evils of fan tumblr girls who insist on bombarding threads/chat with crap if we go near there 2) Brit boards are a bit more sensitive particularly around things like Dom/sub discussion, graphic chat and drug use (DS in particular) 3) wanted to keep the discussion open to anons whilst avoiding teen girls
As I said its probably one of the the best threads I've been involved with; witty, well researched; occasionally bitchy and I had hoped that while a bit single minded and in the gentler side of DL we fit right in. It appears I was misguided.
The only thing in our defence I would say is that we never invaded any other thread, only had one going at once and viciously defended DL against fangirlis.
|by Anonymous||reply 147||03/12/2013|
C, oh I see! Well they have let this one remain open so maybe we can stay here now? (with a new thread?)
R141, thanks (apologies for being such a tech imbecile)
|by Anonymous||reply 148||03/12/2013|
I think R32 has been kindly trying to explain the thread closure. Prancing Ponies is DL history referring to a group of posters obsessing and taking up residence (a good story actually). Anyway, I think we will probably be closed down altogether soon but suspect our new friend is giving us time to relocate.
I suggest the LJ becomes a permenant last resore backup as it is least likely to ever be closed.
From tomorrow or when we get shown the door from here, I'll be posting in the newly created DS thread as I think that's our best chance to continue the open nature of this discussion. If we get locked out elsewhere or anyone manages to conquer our own forum post on the live journal page and we can head there.
Absolutely gutted -
|by Anonymous||reply 149||03/12/2013|
Goodbye and good riddance, crazy cat ladies.
|by Anonymous||reply 150||03/12/2013|
You have to admit it's strange that the widespread rumours about one of the biggest pop stars in the world being in a long-term gay relationship should be one of the few topics banned from discussion on a gay gossip forum.
|by Anonymous||reply 151||03/12/2013|
Yeah, I prefer the DS option - soon as I'm approved. Question - are we using the old NG and HS thread there, or creating a new one?
|by Anonymous||reply 152||03/12/2013|
So are we:
- Staying here until pushed (gets my vote)
- going to DS and If so where?
- going to LJ (& is it one big thread? Multiple threads or what?)
- going to to the proboard thing? (How will we know when it's ready?)
And how are we going to tell everyone where we are going? I get the impression everyone is already somewhat dispersed?
|by Anonymous||reply 153||03/12/2013|
R151 one of the best things about DL is its arbitrary nature and acerbic wit. If you look at their popular threads it's random, sometimes topical but mostly original. After 50+ threads about a predominantly Brit story based in London I imagine they got bored of us clogging the front page. They don't tend to do in depth detailed discussion in my experience. To understand better this may help.
|by Anonymous||reply 154||03/12/2013|
LG - I think the general feeling at the moment is to wait and see how DS goes once everyone can log on. The link to the thread is a couple of pages back, I imagine the LJ will stay semi active as backup until a decision is made.
|by Anonymous||reply 155||03/12/2013|
LG this is my plan
1. Go to bed - am freaking knackered 2. Post in DS at link below tomorrow and continue until pushed or a PROBoard (whatever that is) appears.
3. Keep LJ bookmarked - if we get pushed from DD or I lose everyone I'll head back there and post.
|by Anonymous||reply 156||03/12/2013|
So nobody even wants to try and stay here and only go over to DS when absolutely necessary? (It's by far the easiest option)
|by Anonymous||reply 157||03/12/2013|
Okay board is ready might have a few teething problems. If it's not to your liking I'll delete, no hard feelings.
|by Anonymous||reply 158||03/12/2013|
LG - pretty sure we have a stay of execution though happy to see what happens.
|by Anonymous||reply 159||03/12/2013|
Oh, I've been on DL for many years and know it quite well, JJ - including the hundreds of threads examining every detail of Anderson Cooper's life (in his closet days), which I tended to skip because I'm more interested in the sex life of pretty and internationally famous people. Acerbic enough? ;)
|by Anonymous||reply 160||03/12/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 163||03/12/2013|
I like the board!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 168||03/12/2013|
V possible that Mediapolis was sent cease and desist. If so, there's your proof that the rumors are not intended/damaging/even true.
|by Anonymous||reply 174||03/12/2013|
TriBeCa, sorry, can you explain?
|by Anonymous||reply 179||03/12/2013|
Ok, I'll go with here first, proboard as backup (LJ no longer works for me?)
Do you have to sign up to post on proboard?
|by Anonymous||reply 200||03/12/2013|
Yeah, that is a common lj problem, LG. When you're not logged in not all posts are visible for some reason.
|by Anonymous||reply 201||03/12/2013|
LG, no you don't have to sign up
|by Anonymous||reply 202||03/12/2013|
R200 No you don't, I've made it that guests can post. I'll talk you through it tomorrow.
|by Anonymous||reply 203||03/12/2013|
Well - its been a day of extraordinary amounts of clothing analysis. a tumblr invasion, a discussion of those roles. A bizarre Flack theory. A mankini bet, an attempted ousting, the creation of 4 or more backup plans and a last minute reprieve.
This fricking closet is gonna be the death of us all.
|by Anonymous||reply 204||03/12/2013|
I plan to stay here on DL. I have no desire to go to LJ or DS where the censorship is sure to be rigid and one-sided. I'm so sick of the "Nick and Harry ONLY" bullshit and I'm sure it would only be worse over there.
I have been saying for several threads now, why can't there just be a general 1D discussion where Nick can be discussed too in relation to Harry? It was much more fun back in the old AssofLouis threads, there were so many more points of view. Besides, you can't discuss Nick without discussing Harry, and you can't discuss Harry without discussing 1D. This has been proven over and over in all of the Nick threads. Can't help but wonder if Nick himself has been behind all of this somehow (adjusting tin hat as I type).
Anyways, I will be camping out here on DL. L Girl, I have pitched a tent and collected some firewood... would you mind getting the fire started? I will be in the woods setting traps and collecting berries for breakfast, be back soon...let me know if anyone else plans to camp out (stay on DL) too and I will collect extra.
Seriously, I have the $18 to join and start a new thread, LGirl/others let me know if you want me to start a new thread and I will do it tomorrow (Wednesday). And if so, lets decide on a "safe" title for the thread.
|by Anonymous||reply 205||03/12/2013|
LG, you're such an idiot about gayness it's unbelievable. Why do you feel so entitled to post on this board? Typical lesbian-fearing lady who wants to coo over cute gay boys but can't give actual gay people the space to have a few places on the internet that aren't overrun by straight people.
|by Anonymous||reply 206||03/12/2013|
Wait, let me explain... when I spoke of censorship I was not referring to DataLounge, I was referring to certain posters here who "censor" discussion of anyone else but N/H. Just wanted to make that clear.
|by Anonymous||reply 207||03/12/2013|
MOC, I tried to get the general 1D thread going but no one was interested :(. But yeah I'd definitely love wider discussion. I'm just not sure how many others would be interested.
|by Anonymous||reply 208||03/12/2013|
MOC, happy to get the fire started (if it means we can stay here!!)
If you could open a new thread tmw, many would appreciate it! (think of a boring name that won't attract too much attention though)
R206, I have no problem with gay people?! I have friends, colleagues and family members who are gay? It's a non issue.
|by Anonymous||reply 209||03/12/2013|
I've been on DL for 10 years. Have followed all the Nick/Harry/Louis threads. Prefer to stay here. Haven't paid for a membership in years, but will be happy to so those who want to can stay here. I prefer a general 1D/Breakfast show thread as well. I'm a fan of all of them.
|by Anonymous||reply 210||03/12/2013|
Sorry for the typos, posting quickly.
|by Anonymous||reply 211||03/12/2013|
The thing with me is I have been here the whole time as a Nick fan, I dont give a crap about 1D, so if this is going to turn into a general I really dont want to be around for that.
|by Anonymous||reply 212||03/12/2013|
LG think that's someone trying to make you decamp. Not sure how you can be lesbian fearing when I'm out on this board and we have had lots of interaction.
MOC - I really hope I haven't shut down any non NH chat. If I did it was entirely unintentional and due to overexcited debating analysis. I really hope if I do it again people would pull me up on it. I know I go a bit OTT.
Ive paid a sub and am happy to start a post tomorrow.
|by Anonymous||reply 213||03/12/2013|
JJ the thing with me is I really dont want to talk about the other members of 1D and what im getting from all of this is a lot of people want that.. and I have been here since the first thread
|by Anonymous||reply 214||03/12/2013|
JJ, oh that makes sense! I was a bit taken aback by their accusations!
|by Anonymous||reply 215||03/12/2013|
R214 shed loads of people have joined the forum which is titled N and H so you aren't alone. I'm sure there is room for more than one discussion. Clearly we were all too much for 1 thread anyway :) we'll work it out, I'm sure.
|by Anonymous||reply 216||03/12/2013|
RM, I know you did. The problem is that it is too hard to segment 1d/Harry/Nick because they have become so intertwined. As I said earlier, you can't discuss one without eventually discussing the other(s). So the various threads succeeded in going nowhere and likely pissed off the DL community/admin.
R210, I agree a 1d/nick/BreakfastShow thread would be great. Without restrictions on who/what is discussed. I will give it some time to hear other's input as to whether they would be interested in the thread and suggestions on title name.
I decided to scoot over to the new LJ board they created...lol they are already planning to do away with the anon option and locking the board so no new members can join without approval. LOL what is the fun in that???? I WANT TO GOSSIP ANONYMOUSLY AND UNCENSORED DAMMIT! :) My guess is they will all be back over here within a few days.
|by Anonymous||reply 217||03/12/2013|
From the last few responses it seems there would be a place for a broader discussion thread and a Nick/Harry thread. I don't think people would be happy to have Nick chat in amongst 1D stuff and fair enough.
But I'm just wondering if two new threads would annoy the admins and be shut down again? I suppose we can only try.
|by Anonymous||reply 218||03/12/2013|
Just saw your post MOC. I guess what I was thinking would go in a 1D thread was stuff I've mentioned before. How they're doing on tour, in interviews, their achievements, what they're doing in their spare time etc. That would have a bit of Nick in relation to Harry, but the focus for me would be 1D.
As much as I love following the H/N stuff, I'd like to talk about the others independent of Harry/Nick on occasion.
But you're right that that stuff would probably lead back to H/N as it's so interlinked (plus H/N is juicy gossip wise), so perhaps there's no point in trying to seperate them. Your idea of a 1D/breakfast show thread is good.
|by Anonymous||reply 219||03/12/2013|
Have followed all the Nick/Harry/Louis threads. Prefer to stay here. Haven't paid for a membership in years,
Exactly. These theads were attracting tons of non-DLers to the site. The H/N posters were posting constantly, many of them not DL regulars, with no intention of paying.
The footballers in love threads may be the next to go but they do discuss homosexuality in football.
I think any Prancing Ponies (as the Harry threads came to.be viewed) or soaps threads are going to be shut down. Sad, as--I pointed out earlier--it is gay gossip.
Sadder still, as the Days thrrads were discussing a real plot on a broadcast network daytime soap, an open attempt to have a gay "supercouple," which had never happened.
|by Anonymous||reply 220||03/12/2013|
"Exactly. These theads were attracting tons of non-DLers to the site. The H/N posters were posting constantly, many of them not DL regulars, with no intention of paying."
I agree, that is what is probably behind the closure of the grimmy/1d threads. And really, I don't blame DL at all. I also enjoy many other threads here and have been planning to join for awhile but never got around to it... until tonight. I think if more of the regular 1d/grimmy posters fork over the measly $18 then maybe the threads would stay open. But even if they don't, I will still be here for the many other threads so whatever.
LGirl, what "interesting post" over here were you referring to on LJ?
|by Anonymous||reply 221||03/13/2013|
Those threads started sucking when everyone was being so bossy about who could be talked about and who couldn't. Who cares.
If anyone is interested I'd like to talk about how badly Louis fucked up his knee the other day, and how it will affect the tour because he's currently hobbling around.
Harry's new? publicist that may or may not work only for him, and now issues denials. Part of a new strategy since Taylor and Villain of the Year Award?
Nick's new show, and if we think it will be successful, also will he be stretched too thin.
And, Tina Daheley, the news reader on the Breakfast show, she and Nick have a great banter. Anyone know anything about her?
|by Anonymous||reply 222||03/13/2013|
She has absolutely terrible taste in men...she and Katy Perry must have very similar DNA in that regard.
|by Anonymous||reply 223||03/13/2013|
I thought she didn't like his uncut cock?
|by Anonymous||reply 224||03/13/2013|
IMHO, the silly fighting between the Larry and Grimmy folks ruined it for everyone.
I don't think the WM was worried about a name being mentioned. Most of the posters seem to be passing allong UK rumors.
This is a US site and most of the gossip alluded to here is still surrounding H & L. No one knows Nick.
One of the funniest things I read recently was how Harry got hit in the cock by a flying shoe and Louis couldn't wait to kiss his boo-boo.
|by Anonymous||reply 225||03/13/2013|
MOC, the post R170.
|by Anonymous||reply 226||03/13/2013|
Has the thread on DS vanished too, it was there last night.
Agree about bossy people dictating what could be talked about, it ruined the whole thing.
|by Anonymous||reply 227||03/13/2013|
R227 link below - but it's been ditched.
|by Anonymous||reply 228||03/13/2013|
Is there going to be a new general DL thread, then?
|by Anonymous||reply 229||03/13/2013|
I think people are migrating here
|by Anonymous||reply 230||03/13/2013|
Where is everybody?!
|by Anonymous||reply 231||03/13/2013|
R231, see post r230
|by Anonymous||reply 232||03/13/2013|
Well it looks like many have migrated to the freeforum board. I will just be hanging around here on DL. If anyone wants to discuss here I will be glad to start a thread. But I think it should be a general thread to include harry/1d/nick/brkfst show and keep it to one thread so that we don't upset other DL'ers with numerous scattered threads. As I said before, it's hard to separate them anyways as the discussion topics overlap and you can't discuss one without eventually bringing up the others. Here's my suggestion for a thread if we decide we want one:
Or, we can just take a break from posting on those topics on DL for awhile if that's what people want.
|by Anonymous||reply 233||03/13/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 234||03/13/2013|
Moc - someone has made one already.
|by Anonymous||reply 235||03/13/2013|
R235 Where? I dont see it. Link please.
|by Anonymous||reply 236||03/13/2013|
Oh jesus, L girl, you really are clueless. It's nice that you have gay friends, now get out of gay space because you're not gay.
|by Anonymous||reply 237||03/13/2013|
R237 could you kindly f*** off hassling L Girl. she's done nawt to you, except maybe float her admittedly crazy shit (but no crazier shit than elsewhere on DL)
No one is hogging anything . Fangirlis and keenos have gone to a forum, 4 regulars have joined and paid. What f***in more do you want, my constantly rotting ovum plucked directly through my stomach wall.
Seriously pissed London lesbian looking to put someone to rights. I have straight friends because I am capable of more than one dimension to my life, you twat. And I'd like somewhere to discuss gay chat with more than one fricking type of person.
Thanks and best regards
|by Anonymous||reply 238||03/13/2013|
Jesus Christ R237. You sound like a bigot from the 1950s. Catch yourself on you complete fuckwit.
|by Anonymous||reply 239||03/13/2013|
Thanks JJ and R239. You wouldn't beleive it's 2013?!
MOC, look for his 'show'
|by Anonymous||reply 241||03/13/2013|
Wow, this is still open.
Mayne the secret to keeping a Harry thread safe is to reference an imaginary het romance in the title.
|by Anonymous||reply 242||03/13/2013|
don't believe it - no way was H and TS any more than a PR stunt, that's what TS does, and thats' what H needs , to keep interest from young fanbase going,- thank goodness this thread isn't bossin every one around saying who can and can't post on here, that was just so aggressive and don't want people like that on any forum
|by Anonymous||reply 243||03/14/2013|
I want to have hard sex
|by Anonymous||reply 244||06/18/2013|
I want to have hard sex with her.
|by Anonymous||reply 245||06/18/2013|
Taylor Swift hasn't had sex!! Who's stupid enough to believe that?!?! I'm a big swiftie and she hasn't had sex!! Don't believe that she's had sex, don't be that stupid!!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 246||12/15/2013|