The child will be heir no matter the sex of the child so I assume the name will have to be approved by the Queen. She's not going to accept a future Queen Estelle. Would she accept the name Diana for a girl?
What will the child of William and Kate be named?
|by Anonymous||reply 150||12/06/2012|
Henry (after his father)
|by Anonymous||reply 1||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 2||12/03/2012|
Britneigh, Kaylie or Madyson for a girl.
Tyler, Skyler, or Derek for a boy.
Will and Kate want to keep it classy.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 4||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 5||12/03/2012|
miscarried fetus # 1
|by Anonymous||reply 6||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 7||12/03/2012|
Verne if it's a boy.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 9||12/03/2012|
Whether it's a boy or girl, the name will have to recall a former British monarch. The female names are extremely limited:
Katherine or Catherine
Jane (not sure about that one?)
Am I missing any?
|by Anonymous||reply 10||12/03/2012|
There's an "Arthur" in William's and Charles' names. Who is that for?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 12||12/03/2012|
Eleanor came form the French line, didn't she?
|by Anonymous||reply 13||12/03/2012|
If it's a girl - Diana. I'm calling it now.
(She'll probably look like Princess Anne, though.)
|by Anonymous||reply 14||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 15||12/03/2012|
I think maybe not Jane.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||12/03/2012|
Upchuck. If it's a boy or a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||12/03/2012|
Yes, she was French although I'm not sure which line you mean. Eleanor was Countess of Poitiers and of the House of Poitiers. She was also Duchess of Aquitaine in her own right, inheriting the titles and the Aquitaine from her father. She was first married to Louis VII of France and was Queen of France, then Henry II (she married him when he was only a Duke) who made her Queen of England.
But back to the other names of Queens of England (leaving out the earliest weird ones): Emma, Edith, Matilda, Adeliza (or Adela), Berengaria, Isabel and Isabella, Blanche (yes, really although her husband's title is disputed), Joanna, Henrietta Maria, Sophia Dorothea, Caroline, Charlotte, Adelaide and Alexandra.
The OP is right, there are tons of Marys, Catherines, Elizabeths, Margarets, Annes, Janes, etc., it makes them easy to confuse. Since they also run through every House and family, it makes sorting all of them out confusing too.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||12/03/2012|
[quote]Whether it's a boy or girl, the name will have to recall a former British monarch.
No, there's absolutely no hard and fast rule about that, although the queen does seem to want the heirs close to succession to have names that have been used by other members of the royal families of times past (that includes previous queens consort). For example, she insisted Fergie name her daughter (who is currently fourth in line to the throne) Beatrice instead of Annabel (Annabel was without precedent, but Queen Victoria had a daughter named Beatrice
So other possible names for a girl include:
Names of previous daughters of sovereigns:
*Louise (daughter of Edward VII and also Queen Victoria)
*Maud (daughter of Edward VII)
*Alice (daughter of Victoria)
*Helena (daughter of Victoria)
*Charlotte (daughter of George III)
*Augusta (daughter of George III)
*Sophia (daughter of George III)
*Amelia (daughter of George III)
*Henrietta (daughter of Charles I)
*Margaret (daughter of James I)
Names of previous wives of kings:
*Alexandra (wife of Edward VII)
*Caroline (wives of George II and George IV)
*Charlotte (wife of George III)
*Sophia Dorothea (wife of George I)
*Catherine (wife of Charles II)
*Henrietta Maria (wife of Charles I)
*Joan (wife of Henry IV)
*Isabella (wife of Richard II and Edward III)
*Philippa (wife of Edward II)
*Eleanor (wife of Edward I, Henry II, and Henry III)
*Berengaria (with of Richard Lionheart)
*Matilda (wife of Stephen)
Plus there are more in medieval times with even weirder names.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||12/03/2012|
Wouldn't it be a riot if they named her Blanche? Assuming its a girl, of course.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||12/03/2012|
How about Guinevere, bitches?
|by Anonymous||reply 21||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 22||12/03/2012|
[quote]There's an "Arthur" in William's and Charles' names. Who is that for?
Prince Charles was obsessed with the name "Arthur" (because of the mythical king) and wanted it to be William's first name originally. (It's also the name of one of Queen Victoria's sons.) Supposedly the queen asked him not to do that since it would confuse people (since King Arthur of the Round Table seems to be mostly a myth, would Charles's eldest son have assumed the throne as Arthur I or Arthur II?). AS a compromise, Charles agreed to use it only as a middle name--supposedly he chose Arthur, Philip (after his father), and Louis (after his beloved relative Lord Louis Mountbatten), while Diana chose William.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||12/03/2012|
"(leaving out the earliest weird ones)"
Please name the wierd ones. I'm rooting for Alexandra myself. It is elegant with a touch of gravitas.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||12/03/2012|
thanks r23, but Charles has an "Arthur" in his name also (one of the ones Diana transposed during the wedding ceremony). Why would Elizabeth and Philip have picked that?
|by Anonymous||reply 25||12/03/2012|
They were big fans of Paul Lynde on "Bewitched."
|by Anonymous||reply 26||12/03/2012|
Or because they thought Chuck resembleld an aardvark.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||12/03/2012|
[quote]Why would Elizabeth and Philip have picked that?
Likely as a tribute to her great-great-uncle Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught, last surviving son of Queen Victoria, whom Elizabeth knew in her youth (he died when she was 16).
|by Anonymous||reply 28||12/03/2012|
I like Charlotte. Charlotte Diana Windsor.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||12/03/2012|
Something fierce like Clytemnestra.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||12/03/2012|
Ulysses David if it's a boy; Ulyssea Davida if it's a girl!
|by Anonymous||reply 31||12/03/2012|
How is Beatrice currently fourth in line?
|by Anonymous||reply 32||12/03/2012|
Julianne Moore, seriously
|by Anonymous||reply 33||12/03/2012|
It will be a girl, and her name will be Sophia, Caroline, or Isabella.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||12/03/2012|
How is Beatrice currently fourth in line?
Fifth in line, actually--my mistake.
(1) Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales
(2) Prince William, Duke of Cambridge
(3) Prince Harry of Wales
(4) Prince Andrew, Duke of York
(5) Princess Beatrice of York
(6) Princess Eugenie of York
(7) Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex
(8) James, the Viscount Severn
(9) Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor
(10) Princess Anne, the Princess Royal
|by Anonymous||reply 35||12/03/2012|
Boy: John Charles Phillip George Girl: Alexandra Elizabeth Diana Frances
|by Anonymous||reply 36||12/03/2012|
It almost certainly won't be named John--John is considered a very unlucky name for the British royal family.
Queen Mary had a boy named Prince John (the current queen's uncle) who was retarded or autistic, and who died young.
Queen Alexandra had a boy named Prince A;exander John who died a few days after birth.
And of course, the only King John in English history was terrible--he's widely regarded as a usurper.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||12/03/2012|
Adeliza or Adela sounds awesome
|by Anonymous||reply 38||12/03/2012|
I rather like Ava for the soon-to-be royal little princess.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||12/03/2012|
They will have to name it Diana or Elizabeth or Charlietina.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 41||12/03/2012|
Tony or Tina
|by Anonymous||reply 42||12/03/2012|
LaShaniQ'ua if it's a girl, D'onTyrone if it's a boy.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||12/03/2012|
Oh,please. That 'unlucky name' stuff is horseshit. Will may well consider it far more important to honor his mother and grandfather than pay attention to some superstitious BS.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||12/03/2012|
They should name her Camilla. LOL
That would really cheese people off. Especially since she'll be queen one day.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||12/03/2012|
Elton if it's a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||12/03/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 47||12/03/2012|
Jaden if a boy.
Britney if a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||12/03/2012|
The only reigning Queens of England are Mary I and Mary II, Elizabeth I Anne, Victoria and Elizabeth II. The others were all consorts and don't really matter. All of them except Mary II were pretty formidable, and two are the longest serving of all monarchs.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||12/03/2012|
Well, there's Matilda, but that's contested, and Jane for about 10 minutes.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||12/03/2012|
Moon Unit or Dweezil
|by Anonymous||reply 51||12/03/2012|
Tamika or Seven.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||12/04/2012|
Ulysses David if it's a boy
Ulyssis Davida if it's a girl
|by Anonymous||reply 53||12/04/2012|
[quote]Oh,please. That 'unlucky name' stuff is horseshit. Will may well consider it far more important to honor his mother and grandfather than pay attention to some superstitious BS.
Apparently Diana wanted to name her firstborn son David, after her grandfather or something, and she was vetoed by the Queen/Charles. She also wanted to use the name John but again was not allowed to, because of the superstitious reasons a previous poster already mentioned. You can bet Kate won't be allowed to choose any name she wants; she and Wills will probably have to make up a list of names they like and submit it to the higher-ups for approval.
I think if it's a girl they'll give her Diana as a middle name.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||12/04/2012|
Remember Stephanie Mills, she used to sing but sounded like a goat. I think it's called vibrato?
|by Anonymous||reply 55||12/04/2012|
Although there's already a queen named Oprah! Huzzah!
|by Anonymous||reply 56||12/04/2012|
Cuntessa Horsesia Baldina Windsor
|by Anonymous||reply 57||12/04/2012|
Chlamydia Camilla Diana Windsor
|by Anonymous||reply 58||12/04/2012|
Menses Chlamydia Camilla
|by Anonymous||reply 59||12/04/2012|
Little Asskicker. Or Judith.
|by Anonymous||reply 60||12/04/2012|
Does the Queen really go around deciding all this stuff or is there a team of advisers who chooses baby names, etc. Why can't they just name their own child?
|by Anonymous||reply 61||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 62||12/04/2012|
If it is a girl -- Honey Boo Boo.
If it is a boy -- Cletus.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||12/04/2012|
Lurleen, assuming it's a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||12/04/2012|
Alexandra Victoria Elizabeth Elizabeth Diana
|by Anonymous||reply 66||12/04/2012|
Have an F&F R64...just because...
|by Anonymous||reply 67||12/04/2012|
R61, Hopefully the future king and queen of England will not be as selfish as Hollywood celebs in choosing the name of their child, the bearer of traditions. Expect countless pap articles worldwide, analyzing the chosen name. Silly of course; but that's reality.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||12/04/2012|
[quote]You 'mos don't get this, because you're all into welfare and getting things for free and living on the government's teat.
I assume you are talking to the banksters who are living off public bailout money.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||12/04/2012|
Someone said she might have twins...which would mean they are not having sex...because why would they need invitro? I mean they are a young couple...twins? It really isn't that natural. Every one I know who has twins...invitro.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||12/04/2012|
Clearly this baby is going to be some kind of a mutant monster, so it's Fin Fang Foom if it's a boy, and Ghidrah if it's a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||12/04/2012|
Lord, R64, the Royal Family are the biggest moochers on the planet.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||12/04/2012|
Camilla, if it's a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||12/04/2012|
Replies to various comments-
to the last post- I have identical twin sisters-bor in 1966 yes there were naturally ocurring multiple births prior to in vitro
addressing the Arthur thing- Prince Arthur's (Queen Victoria's son)godfather was Arthur Wellssley-the grat Duke of Wellington, inturn Prince Arthur Duke of Connaught was the godfather of Queen Elizabeth. She chose Arthur for one of Prince Charle's middle names to hoor her godfather/uncle.
Times have changed since Queen Victoria meddled so much with royal baby names. If Diana wanted the name John-I am sure there was resistance as it wold be after her dead older brother John.
The Queen has bee pretty hands off with ames- who would have thought there would be a Zara, Savannah and Isla in the family.
With Prince Edward's son- the names surfaced again for the first time since the Stuart era.
I think Charlotte might have a reasonable chance also Elizabeth, A or Mary or even Victoria.
If a boy- any of the names from the last 100 years- but not Phillip. England had a King Phillip (of Spain) during Queen Mary 1 reign. Not a good memory. Why not Richard for Richard the Lion Hearted (although R'II ad II did not fair well.
There's also an old saying - that England will fall when a Hery IX coes to the throne- so no first name after his uncle.
My personal preferance would be Eleanor for a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||12/04/2012|
correction- the name James
|by Anonymous||reply 75||12/04/2012|
Fingers crossed for Bubba.
|by Anonymous||reply 76||12/04/2012|
R70, Many couples who fuck like rabbits in heat have invitro because the man has a low sperm count, or they want to avoid a miscarriage, or a problem-free pregnancy, etc, etc, etc.
|by Anonymous||reply 77||12/04/2012|
Queen Victoria wanted all her descendants to be named Victoria or Albert. Her oldest son, named Albert Edward, took care of that when he became King Edward VII.
England's queens have done much better than its kings: Only the two Marys were less-than successful while the various Charleses, Edwards, Georges, Henrys and Jameses were a mixed lot at best. There is a rumor that Prince Charles will rule as King George VII, is that true? Perhaps George William would be a good name for Charles's first grandchild (if it is a boy).
|by Anonymous||reply 78||12/04/2012|
Alexandra would be nice is the Queen's second name for her grt-grandmother
|by Anonymous||reply 79||12/04/2012|
They should name that evil baby Lucifer. It was spawned in monarchy hell by their young surrogate, just like poor Princess Di was used for: BREEDING the rich, privileged class for the monarchy. All the while the prince was boning that lush, Camilla, his real pick. This new demon breed with reign long after we, the wiser, are long dead. That demon spawn will be in its 70's in the 2080s when it's parents are ancient and decrepit rulers of a monarchy that should be dissolved. What will happen to that poor mother in the coming years after her children are sired? It's disturbing to think about.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||12/04/2012|
Berenice, but in private they'll call her Honey Boo Boo
|by Anonymous||reply 81||12/04/2012|
The only valid name is ... APPLE!
|by Anonymous||reply 82||12/04/2012|
Helene and/or Hyacinth for a girl
for a boy: Prince isn't using that symbol anymore
|by Anonymous||reply 83||12/04/2012|
Lucy: "I want the name to be unique and euphonious."
Ricky: "Okay. Unique if it's a boy, and Euphonious if it's a girl."
|by Anonymous||reply 84||12/04/2012|
The child needs to be named Bushetta.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||12/04/2012|
Lemonjello and Oranjello if she sires twins
|by Anonymous||reply 86||12/04/2012|
Wallis would be nice if it's a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 88||12/04/2012|
They shall name her Grace Von Cutsam Beaverhausen Mountbatten!
|by Anonymous||reply 89||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 90||12/04/2012|
And you know what, r60? Dick Cheney will still be alive.
|by Anonymous||reply 91||12/04/2012|
R90 Surely you meant to say "Precious," based on the novel "Push" by Sapphire. That second part can be her middle name.
|by Anonymous||reply 92||12/04/2012|
Prunella, if it's a girl.
Algernon, if it's a boy.
|by Anonymous||reply 93||12/04/2012|
If he is a boy, try to stay awake: Phillip,Arthur,George,Edward,Andrew,William, Charles or Henry. If it`s a girl, then thats a different story.
Variety, thy name is woman
|by Anonymous||reply 94||12/04/2012|
Tremble penisedpersons of the United Kingdom and her realms across the oceans. A new dawn cometh.
All hail Princess Boadicea Sappho Avenga!!!
Hail to thee!!
|by Anonymous||reply 95||12/04/2012|
why,certainly Wiltherin if a boy katiam if a girl
|by Anonymous||reply 96||12/04/2012|
Is Prince Harry's formal name Harry or Henry? Or Harold? Or...?
|by Anonymous||reply 97||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 98||12/04/2012|
Why is the site censoring the word
Dav i da?
|by Anonymous||reply 99||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 100||12/04/2012|
It will have to be the name of a former Sovereign, so I predict Mary if it's a girl and possibly George if it's a boy.
|by Anonymous||reply 101||12/04/2012|
Sister Euphemia of the Five Wounds. "Five Wounds" for short.
|by Anonymous||reply 102||12/04/2012|
I wouldn't be surprised if they chose a girl's name that would not result in her regnal name having a post-nomial. Think of all the books written about Queen Victoria, if the Cambridges have a little Victoria as their first-born then the original Vic would become Victoria I and the little one might reign as Victoria II. So all those books would be outdated, sort of. Well maybe I have OCD, but things like that would bug me.
Alexandra is a lovely name, but there would be an Ingrid Alexandra reigning in Norway on roughly the same time, so maybe they wouldn't want a repeat.
Matilda is a hot name right now. While technically this 12th century figure was never crowned queen of England, she did legitimately reign (briefly) as the heiress to a king plus she was Holy Roman Empress-consort. It would be a fine name and nice link to the past.
Queen Alexandra Diane sounds lovely.
|by Anonymous||reply 103||12/04/2012|
If it's a boy, will he be uncircumsized like his father or circumcised like his grandfather?
|by Anonymous||reply 104||12/04/2012|
In recognition of the child's commonly royal/royally common parentage, William and Kate should choose a name that reflects BOTH their worlds. Something like:
Elizabeth Jade Alexandra Cheryl
Arthur Robbie William Becks
|by Anonymous||reply 105||12/04/2012|
Who cares what the name will be. It will change once they become king or queen.
|by Anonymous||reply 106||12/04/2012|
Elizabeth's name did not change when she became Queen.
If Elizabeth had died before giving birth to Charles, was Princess Margaret next in line for the throne?
|by Anonymous||reply 107||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 108||12/04/2012|
thanks, r28 and r74, for the Arthur info
|by Anonymous||reply 109||12/04/2012|
Theotis. Theotis Wales.
|by Anonymous||reply 110||12/04/2012|
[quote]Elizabeth's name did not change when she became Queen.
But it could have. She was legally entitled to take the name Queen Alexandra I, or Queen Mary III, since those are her two other names.
Her great-grandfather, Edward VII (Queen Victoria), was named Albert Edward at birth and was always called "Bertie" by the others in his family. His mother and father expected him to rule as King Albert Edward I, but when his mother died he announced he was not going to use the name "Albert" but just Edward and reign as Edward VII. That's exactly what happened.
When the current queen dies, Prince Charles could take the name King Charles III, Philip I, Arthur I, or George VII (most people think he will take the latter option) based on his four names.
When then Charles dies, William can rule as King William V, Arthur I (or II is his father rules as Arthur I), Philip I (or II if his father rules as Philip I), or Louis I.
[quote]If Elizabeth had died before giving birth to Charles, was Princess Margaret next in line for the throne?
|by Anonymous||reply 111||12/04/2012|
Daz. Appropriate bor both a boy and a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 112||12/04/2012|
Think of all the books written about Queen Victoria, if the Cambridges have a little Victoria as their first-born then the original Vic would become Victoria I and the little one might reign as Victoria II. So all those books would be outdated, sort of. Well maybe I have OCD, but things like that would bug me.
That's exactly what happened when the current queen came to the throne. All books before her reign referred to just "Queen Elizabeth"; now people have to refer to her as "Queen Elizabeth I." They survived. So will you if we get a Princess Victoria who becomes Queen Victoria II.
|by Anonymous||reply 113||12/04/2012|
[quote]It will have to be the name of a former Sovereign,
No it doesn't. There's absolutely no rule that says that.
The only rule that binds William and Kate is that the current monarch has to agree to the name, and QEII would likely also agree to the name of a previous queen consort, or the name of a previous royal child. For all we know she might even agree to a name new to the royal family, especially if they choose one that doesn't sound especially foreign ("Michael," for example, or "Susan").
|by Anonymous||reply 114||12/04/2012|
Frito if it's a boy; Fajita if it's a girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 115||12/04/2012|
I love the name Berengaria!, LOL! That would be the next big trendsetter if they went there. Beatrice, btw, is 5th in line to the throne not 4th - Charles, William, Harry, Andrew, Beatrice but William's kid will push them all down one after William.
|by Anonymous||reply 116||12/04/2012|
[quote]Why is the site censoring the word Dav i da?
To THWART my wishes, and so KILL an old man!
|by Anonymous||reply 117||12/04/2012|
In the news they saying what happens if she's pregnant with twins, boy and girl and she has a C-section and her doctor will decide which child is taken out first and thus heir to the throne.
|by Anonymous||reply 118||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 119||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 120||12/04/2012|
if it is a girl...does she go behind Prince Harry?...pun intended
|by Anonymous||reply 121||12/04/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 122||12/04/2012|
[quote]if it is a girl...does she go behind Prince Harry?
No. She is automatically third in succession after Prince Charles and Prince William, even if she is a girl. Whatever the sex of the child, Harry drops down to fourth in line. This would have been true even without the new rules.
|by Anonymous||reply 123||12/04/2012|
Charles should reign as Charles II, because the other two Charles' were complete fuckups (Charles I was executed for being a tyrant and Charles II was a completely debauched whore). He'd fit right in.
|by Anonymous||reply 124||12/04/2012|
[quote]In the news they saying what happens if she's pregnant with twins, boy and girl and she has a C-section and her doctor will decide which child is taken out first and thus heir to the throne.
An article I read said that, if it is a natural birth, it will be a "...race down the birth canal...".
|by Anonymous||reply 125||12/05/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 126||12/05/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 127||12/05/2012|
The new British law says the first child born, regardless of the gender will be monarch.
Thus ending the REAL monarchy and beginning with the political PC crap.
|by Anonymous||reply 128||12/05/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 129||12/05/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 130||12/05/2012|
I think the new baby should be called Miss Sissy Boodles, a name good for a boy or a girl & a nice shout-out to Datalounge.
|by Anonymous||reply 131||12/05/2012|
Cunty if it's a girl.
Cocky if it's a boy.
|by Anonymous||reply 132||12/05/2012|
We already know it, OP. Diana.
|by Anonymous||reply 133||12/05/2012|
Either Quine Anne or Quine Camilla.
|by Anonymous||reply 134||12/05/2012|
Do you think a boy would be named Arthur? King Arthur
|by Anonymous||reply 135||12/05/2012|
R104. If it's a boy, he will be uncircumcised like William and Harry and rest of the UK and Europe. These are civilized people and don't mutilate their boys.
|by Anonymous||reply 136||12/05/2012|
They should call the baby Jermajesty. I'll be the child's godfather.
|by Anonymous||reply 137||12/05/2012|
Ah, the circumcision troll has arrived. How ARE you, darling?
|by Anonymous||reply 138||12/05/2012|
Steven Colbert's prediction if it's a girl:
Diana St. Fuquecamilla.
|by Anonymous||reply 139||12/05/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 140||12/05/2012|
R35: I thought Princess Anne gave up her right to any rights to the thrown. and her kids Zara and the boy she gave up their rights
|by Anonymous||reply 141||12/05/2012|
What if it is twins? I guess the first born twin would be the next monarch.
|by Anonymous||reply 142||12/05/2012|
[quote]I thought Princess Anne gave up her right to any rights to the thrown.
No one would give her a toss.
|by Anonymous||reply 143||12/05/2012|
What if she has conjoined twins Which one would get to reign as Monarch?
|by Anonymous||reply 144||12/05/2012|
Princess Anne did not give up her rights or her kids rights. She merely declined a noble title for her husband and kids. They can only be bumped from Succession if they marry Roman Catholics. That's it.
|by Anonymous||reply 145||12/06/2012|
According to the news, the change in the laws of succession regarding first born, the other change will be that heirs will now be able to marry Roman Catholics.
|by Anonymous||reply 146||12/06/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 147||12/06/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 148||12/06/2012|
Why the hell do William and Kit Kat have to adhere to fucking tradition when naming their kid? Elizabeth didn't come out of thin air, and neither did the names George or Edward. It's time to start making their own traditions...
Oh way...the mother comes from a family with women named Carole and Pippa. Gross.
|by Anonymous||reply 149||12/06/2012|
I hear Kate is a big sci-fi fan, so it's going to be T'Pring if its a girl, and Mace Windu if it's a boy.
|by Anonymous||reply 150||12/06/2012|