Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Anti-Gay Pastor Makes Shocking Claim About Washington's Marriage Equality Win (Audio linked)

"I said to [the National Organization for Marriage], 'You think I’m controversial because I don’t look white,'” Ken Hutcherson, senior pastor of the Antioch Bible Church in Redmond, Wash. said this week, charging NOM with racism and blaming the group’s tactics and strategies for the gay marriage win at the ballot in his state on Election Day. “I don’t talk white. I don’t act white. And I am not that milquetoast-looking kind of guy that’s is going to be calm about everything. I’ve got a passion on what’s right. I’ve got a passion, and I will stand on what I think biblical principles are. If that’s controversial, then we’ve got a problem, and we’ll never win another election on anything.”

Hutcherson, a former Seattle Seahawks linebacker who has been the leading voice for evangelicals and against gay marriage in Washington, said that NOM sidelined him, and, when asked it if was because of racial bias, he replied, “You want a percentage between 1 and 100? About 90 percent.” He believes NOM's leaders, Brian Brown and Maggie Gallagher, saw him as too extreme. “We had some of the national organizations come in here and they wanted to do it their way,” he explained. "They wanted to choose their leadership. And because of that we had a very big division of unity in the state brought on the national organizations, and we never recovered from that.” (Scroll down to listen to the full interview)

Regarding NOM's strategy to "drive a wedge between gays and blacks," which was exposed when documents were made public earlier this year, Hutcherson said, "I was totally against that approach, because it’s wrong. That’s not what we do to win, is to show our prejudice."

Hutcherson, appearing on my SiriusXM OutQ radio program, said NOM ran a weak campaign that was too “loving” and didn’t speak to religious conservatives to get them out to vote.

“I think they went weak, extremely, to the point where the national organizations wanted to be a little bit more loving,” he explained, “to look more to point of putting no bad taste in anyone’s mouth.”

Hutcherson contends that because NOM didn’t stick to “biblical principles” and instead ran TV ads that focused on the alleged effects of gay marriage “on children and schools,” religious conservatives stayed home -- despite polling showing evangelicals turned out in force in Washington and nationwide.

“The National Organization for Marriage tried to win the moderates,” Hutcherson said. “And if you’re going to win the moderates then you got to stay away from what they call hard-line biblical principles.So they tried to come with the psychological and sociological argument. That doesn’t win. What wins is that fact the we need to stand on the what the Bible says and get the values voter out.”

Hutcherson scoffed at national polls showing a shift in public opinion, with a majority of Americans now supporting marriage equality. He also said he wouldn’t reveal too much of his plan moving forward right now, but did say that “our biggest recourse we’ve got to do is change the legislature” in Washington state.

by Anonymousreply 1311/25/2012

" “I don’t talk white. I don’t act white. And I am not that milquetoast-looking kind of guy that’s is going to be calm about everything."

The anti-marriage African American preacher in Virginia also claimed that the Republican/NOm forces there basically ignored him because he was black. I'm amazed that right-wing African Americans are just realizing that many so-called republicans see color FIRST. They are neither Christian nor welcoming.

by Anonymousreply 111/25/2012

What a colossal asshole. I wonder what he thinks about other bigots?

by Anonymousreply 211/25/2012

"shocking" OP? In what way????

by Anonymousreply 311/25/2012

After Obama supported full equality, all the crazies are now being pushed to the margins of society.

This is another example of the social process of marginalization in effect. The same thing happened when women got the right to vote about 100 year ago.

by Anonymousreply 411/25/2012

Yes, so shocking that conservative white people are also racists.

by Anonymousreply 511/25/2012

What happened to Rome?

by Anonymousreply 611/25/2012

No more or less so, R5, than most of their counterparts of color!

by Anonymousreply 711/25/2012

[quote]What happened to Rome?

It went to hell under the Christian emperors.

by Anonymousreply 811/25/2012

R7 What is your problem? Yes all races are capable and guilty of racism BUT white people are particularly guilty of being hateful murderous swine. Look at your history.

by Anonymousreply 911/25/2012

My "problem", R9, is this- while there have been many too many racist, white-on-black violent crimes in our history, the fact is the opposite is (and has been for several generations) far more often the case. Only those mired in anti-white racial animus, or, worse yet, burdened by "white guilt", consistently overlook the actual crime statistics. Black-on-white violent crime is more common and no less racist. Stop race baiting.

by Anonymousreply 1011/25/2012

The preacher wanted to run, basically, a "Get Out the Crazy" campaign, and for disagreeing with this approach, NOM is being called racist?

How did NOM deal with equally homophobic, equally crazy white preachers? There are loads of the "biblically-based" white congregations out there willing to do shit like this. Has he not heard of Westboro?

[quote]Regarding NOM's strategy to "drive a wedge between gays and blacks," which was exposed when documents were made public earlier this year,

I missed this part. What docs?

[quote]“I think they went weak, extremely, to the point where the national organizations wanted to be a little bit more loving,” he explained, “to look more to point of putting no bad taste in anyone’s mouth.”

So is he saying that whites are loving and blacks are not? What's he trying to get at here? This is truly confusing.

by Anonymousreply 1111/25/2012

Referendum 74 (the Washington gay marriage referendum) got a 53.66% yes vote in Washington. If Hutcherson had been leading the "no" campaign it would have been more like a 60% yes vote.

He's a braying asshole who seems to think there's no such thing as bad publicity. The "no" campaign was pretty lame - but they did get that they couldn't win in Washington by going Biblical.

by Anonymousreply 1211/25/2012

Oh so amusing that Hutcherson is pissed that NOM is racist, because we all know that racism is so much worse than anti-gay bigotry!

R11, google "NOM blacks and gays" and you can educate yourself on the leaked documents exposing NOM's use of racism in their bigotry. What a shock, I know.

by Anonymousreply 1311/25/2012
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.