Why isn't this mentioned as a key reason Mitt Romney was such an unappealing candidate?
|by Anonymous||reply 36||03/04/2013|
Because white people never think of that term.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||11/09/2012|
It's even worse than that. It's superwealthy privilege. As well as hating women, Latinos and blacks, mitt hates poor white people too. mittens is an equal opportunity hater
And he doesn't really hate anyone. He just doesn't think these 'types of people' deserve any rights. Or at least not the same rights as rich people do
|by Anonymous||reply 2||11/09/2012|
Mittens never exuded it more than when he bluntly told the POTUS, "I'm speaking", several times during the second debate (and the third one as well, if I remember correctly). In the immortal words of Ms. Stephanie Tanner...HOW RUDE!
|by Anonymous||reply 3||11/09/2012|
There are no people that Mitt hates. Those he hates he does not see as people.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||11/09/2012|
White Privilege (imagine Oprah doing the same thing and what would happen):
Robert Lowell once said that whereas depression is an illness for oneself, mania is an illness for one's friends. Many of Lowell's writer friends penned anecdotes about his mania. Stanley Kunitz wrote about the time he visited Lowell at McLean's, and Lowell read him an improved version of the "Lycidas" that he'd written — firmly convinced that he, not John Milton, had written the original masterpiece as well. One friend who visited him at a London hospital told of how Lowell would entertain visitors with French liqueur he concealed in a repurposed aftershave bottle.
One of Lowell's Harvard poetry seminar students, James Atlas, wrote: "I had never witnessed one of these breakdowns, but I had heard about them in grim detail: Lowell showing up at William Alfred's house and declaring that he was the Virgin Mary; Lowell talking for two hours straight in class, revising a student's poem in the style of Milton, Tennyson, or Frost; Lowell wandering around Harvard Square without a coat in the middle of January, shivering, wild-eyed, incoherent. In the seminar room on the top floor of Holyoke Center, we waited nervously — perhaps even expectantly, given the status accorded anyone who had been present at one of these celebrated episodes — for it to happen before our eyes, watching eagerly for any manic soliloquies, references to Hitler, or outbursts of unnatural gaiety. These were the signs that Lowell had 'gone off' and would have to be put away."
After his episodes, when he'd regained his sanity, Lowell was inevitably embarrassed. He explained to a friend: "After the manic attack comes an incredible formless time of irresolution, forgetfulness, inertia, all the Baudelairean vices plus what he must never have known, stupidity."
|by Anonymous||reply 5||03/04/2013|
I'm trying to understand what the fuck r5's post has to do with anything.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||03/04/2013|
OP = insufferable troll
|by Anonymous||reply 7||03/04/2013|
OP = Black racist and troll. Kill it with fire.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||03/04/2013|
r5 is saying the white privilege extends to the reception of mental illness. If a white professor has psychotic breaks, they are legendary and termed "celebrated episodes."
If a person of color has psychotic breaks, they are often perceived in a harsh way. Even if Oprah was the subject of r5's story, the reception of her hypothetical mental illness would be subject to the latent racism of society.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||03/04/2013|
R2 is right.
It wasn't white privilege; it was wealth privilege.
Mitt seems to be the epitome of "the One Percent". Son of a millionaire, running for office because he thought he deserved it.
He was too unrelatable and unlikable in a time when millions are facing economic hardship.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||03/04/2013|
And that "Beautiful Mind" guy wouldn't have been considered so beautiful if he were of a duskier hue.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||03/04/2013|
In a perverse way, Romney was fanatically inclusive. Rich, white, heterosexual males only.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||03/04/2013|
The trolling is getting desperate. So sad.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||03/04/2013|
White lesbians are the most privileged hyppocritical people out there. I wish they would all go away. I mean it. They bring gays down.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||03/04/2013|
Take R14's post, then replace "white lesbians" with your race and sexual orientation.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||03/04/2013|
r1, only delusional kooks think of that term.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||03/04/2013|
R8 you are seriously beyond stupid if you think OP is black.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||03/04/2013|
I disagree that it was anything other than his Mormon faith. Anyone who was offended by his wealth or priviledge wasn't going to vote Republican anyway. The real problem with Mitt was that the most right-wing of conservatives and Christians couldn't support a Mormon and simply didn't vote for him.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||03/04/2013|
This trolling is ridiculous.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||03/04/2013|
Priviledge = privilege
|by Anonymous||reply 20||03/04/2013|
White privilege definitely exists, with plausible deniability being a large benefit of it. Sure you can preten things are a-okay when you're at the top of the racial totem pole.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||03/04/2013|
Maybe he would have gone over better in the 90's when the economy was much better but he is insufferable and the fact that he is a Mormon was not even in the top 5 reasons I found him so awful.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||03/04/2013|
Well then r21, since we can just make things exist by declaring it to be so, I officially proclaim Santa Claus to be real. He exists!
If you dare deny it, you just prove it to be so!
Er... that's the logic, right?
|by Anonymous||reply 23||03/04/2013|
Because there are so many other reasons that this one barely registered...
|by Anonymous||reply 24||03/04/2013|
All this white-people bashing on DL is becoming quite tiresome. You simply cannot lump poor and rich white people into the same category. Classism has made it virtually impossible for whites to be stereotyped into a single group.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||03/04/2013|
Do you think Heath Ledger was ashamed of his white privilege? I wonder abut this all the time.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||03/04/2013|
I think that the people who put up John McCain and Mitt Romney against Barack Obama were counting on their whiteness giving them an edge over his blackness, but when it came right down to it they lost because when they were actually put alongside Obama, it was clear that Obama was the alpha. Like Bill Clinton, Obama projects an image of being trustworthy and in control. In comparison to him McCain came across as a doddering idiot (which he is) and Romney as a shifty, fast-talking jerk (which he is) and no amount of anti-Obama PR from the Republican machine could override that perception.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||03/04/2013|
Some people are willfully ignorant when it comes to the subject of white privilege. They like to benefit from it but it makes them uncomfortable to think about the unfairness of such preferential treatment based solely on race. I thank god for the brave and enlightened who stand against and shine a light such injustice in inequality. People like Academy Award Winner Jennifer Lawrence who has declared that she will turn down any role if she suspects she was given it over an actress of color due to white privilege. This amazing woman considers this act of solidarity with her sisters of every ethnicity her duty as with great power comes great responsibility.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||03/04/2013|
Well, hopefully one day Jennifer Lawrence will rule the world. First she has to act in some movies to get the public to fall in love with her.
With Mitt Romney it was very rich man arrogance. It turned off plenty of white people, too.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||03/04/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 30||03/04/2013|
I am sympathetic with the idea behind the concept of "white privilege," but I think it doesn;t work well and it winds up doing as much harm as good because of its inadequacies.
For one thing, it presupposes that many things that are basic rights are "privileges": unreasonable stops and seizures, for example, are not a loss of privilege but a loss of basic human rights, so to say that white people get pulled over less by the cops is because of "white privilege" actually minimizes the injustice of what's being done to black people when they're pulled over just for being black (i.e. their civil rights are being infringed upon).
Also, it tends to lump all white experience together, as the present example shows: Mitt Romney grew up extraordinarily privileged, but to say his insensitivity stems from "white privilege" isn't really true. The life of a extremely poor white coal miner's kid in rural West Virginia has had almost nothing like Mitt Romney's life, despite the fact they are both white people. Indeed, to say that kid enjoys "white privilege" is true only in an extremely literal sense of the term: he's grown up with much greater disadvantages than advantages overall.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||03/04/2013|
I think it was just accepted from the start gate that Willard was completely out of touch with real Americans. He knows NASCAR team OWNERS and the like. He never played to the 47% he talked of.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||03/04/2013|
R27 and R31 are very insightful.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||03/04/2013|
What about the race card? I've been told it only exist in white folks mind, yet I've seen it happen. Seems to me they should offset.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||03/04/2013|
There seems to be a minority racist troll starting topics. This place is taking a hit in visitors. This isn't that type of forum.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||03/04/2013|
True, r34, except the race card rarely works with cops or the people following you around in stores, who may also be minorities.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||03/04/2013|