Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

BREAKING - Unemployment Rate Falls to 7.8%!!!!!!

October 5, 2012, 8:36 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON—The U.S. unemployment rate fell to its lowest level in more than 3½ years in September as the economy continued to add jobs, a potential boost for President Barack Obama's campaign to win a second term.

The politically important unemployment rate fell to 7.8% last month from 8.1% in August. That was the lowest level since January 2009.

U.S. payrolls, obtained in a separate survey of employers, increased by a seasonally adjusted 114,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department said Friday.

Economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires expected a gain of 118,000 in payrolls and an 8.1% jobless rate.

Friday's report is the first since the Federal Reserve's decision to commence an ambitious stimulus program—buying $40 billion a month of mortgage-backed securities until the U.S. job market substantially improves. The latest numbers offer some good news with the falling unemployment rate but also suggests that job creation, while steady, remains slower than the Fed would like.

The figures are also the next-to-last snapshot of the labor market before the November election. October's employment numbers are due out only four days ahead of the vote—possibly too late to sway many ballots.

"The September jobs report will frame the economic debate and could prove critical to the election outcome," Carl Riccadonna, senior U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank, said ahead of Friday's release.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 9310/11/2012


by 2012 Poll Trollreply 110/05/2012

BREAKING NEWS: Republicans are spontaneously exploding throughtout the nations.....

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 210/05/2012

Only in our charged, polarized political climate would a 7.8% unemployment rate be somehow celebrated as good news.

I loath both candidates. You guys do realize we're still at historically high unemployment, right? Obama hasn't made it any (or much) better in four fucking years. Romney likely wouldn't either.

Fuck them both and shame on you all for being so blind with personal politics that you'd cheer this as good news.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 310/05/2012

Great news!!

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 410/05/2012

r3, this is a board for people who support our President. You are not welcome here.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 510/05/2012

I have been uncomfortable making predictions up until now and have cautioned against Democrats getting overconfident and assuming Obama will win, but now I am prepared to predict for the first time that I think Obama will be re-elected.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 610/05/2012

I doubt R3 is welcome anywhere.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 710/05/2012

Unemployment goes down at a dramatic rate and we're blind for being happy about it? The President who gets credit for the improvement is an advocate for equality for gay people but we're not supposed to cheer for him?

Please, troll.

Hot damn, this is great news!

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 810/05/2012

On CNBC they're screaming fraud and claiming the numbers were manipulated. Not a bit of evidence to back that up, but since when do facts matter?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 910/05/2012

Jack Welch is already out with a statement accusing the 'guys in Chicago' of fixing the unemployment rate to get Obama re-elected.

The right-wing must be FURIOUS.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1010/05/2012

[quote] this is a board for people who support our President.

R5, sweety? Did you make the Webmaster aware of this? Oh, and I've been here EONS before you, trust me there.

Back to your mommy blogs, twat. If the truth hurts so much, you have no business here.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1110/05/2012

Does it really matter how long we've each been here?

I've been here since 2003.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1210/05/2012

Excellent. Curious how republicans will put a negative spin on it.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1310/05/2012

Unfortunately the rate excludes people who have stopped looking for a job. Also does not recognize the people part time employed at WalMart et al who used to have middle class jobs 45k+. Inner city "real" unemployment of 18 to 25 yr olds is over 28%. Food stamp users up 50%' and disability close.

No one is saying the numbers are manipulated but one must understand how the number is calculated.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1410/05/2012

The jobs birthers are all saying these numbers were manipulated to help Obama after his disasterous debate performance. I am woefully ignorant about these jobs reports. Is it even possible to manipulate the numbers?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1510/05/2012

Check back in three weeks as they try to quietly revise the numbers.

Also be sure to check how many new L-1 and H1-B visas have been issued.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1610/05/2012

More than 480,000 people were newly employed over July and August than were originally reported.

The unemployment rate is now lower than when President Obama took office.

Consumer confidence has been improving dramatically over the past two months but there was no clear indication why. The big shift in unemployment explains it.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1710/05/2012

Wow, what great timing! 7.8! Yay!

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1810/05/2012

Web master is not allowing replies that do not support BO

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 1910/05/2012

No R12, it doesn't, and I happen to like your threads. But R5 is one of those likely newbies who spew absurd bullshit like she does and needed to be put in check. But no, it really doesn't matter how long we've been here.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2010/05/2012

Yep, and nearly half of swing state voters who will vote in this election will have voted in October this year. This is the report that will effect the election most of all, and it is great news for Obama because 8.0 percent has been widely cited as the number he needed to get the unemployment rate down to to have a good chance at reelection.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2110/05/2012

The unemployment picture is still pretty bad. No one can deny that. But it is fantastic news that the rate is under 8%. That kills the talking point that no President with that high can be re-elected (exception FDR).

Repubs will be ready to explode with anger and conspiracy theories.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2210/05/2012

Like 7.8 is so great? In what world?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2310/05/2012

Great, r19. The Webmaster realizes this election is too important to allow rightwing trolls to spew propaganda that is against the political interests of the gay community and its allies. ANyone voting against Barack OBama is an enemy of the gay community.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2410/05/2012

No, R15. In fact, Austan Goolsbee just ripped Jack Welch a new one a few minutes ago for suggesting that.

And many other economists are doing the same.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2510/05/2012

[quote] The big shift in unemployment'

Talk about hyperbole.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2610/05/2012

And yet when it was above 8.0%, all you b-o-t-s were insisting the president has nothing to do with the unemployment rate.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2710/05/2012

It is a big shift downwards in unemployment, r26. That's why it's headline news.

Do we still have a far way to go? Absolutely. Are things improving? Absolutely.

Very good news.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2810/05/2012

From economist Justin Wolfers:

[quote]Fact for truthers: There are currently ZERO political appointees at the BLS. (Congress is yet to confirm Obama's nominee for commissioner.)

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 2910/05/2012


The U6 unemployment rate counts not only people without work seeking full-time employment (the more familiar U-3 rate), but also counts "marginally attached workers and those working part-time for economic reasons." Note that some of these part-time workers counted as employed by U-3 could be working as little as an hour a week. And the "marginally attached workers" include those who have gotten discouraged and stopped looking, but still want to work. The age considered for this calculation is 16 years and over

Spet 2012 U6 number is 14.7%. And we celebrate!

Get a clue. Understand what is really going on because it will greatly impact your life at some point.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3010/05/2012

[quote]Labor force grew by 418K, so the drop in the unemployment rate was not due to people giving up on looking for work

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3110/05/2012

PollTroll, I always check in with your threads. Thank you for being here.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3210/05/2012

[quote]You guys do realize we're still at historically high unemployment, right?

Unemployment was over 10% in Nov.-Dec. of 1982.

Nice short article on the Reagan-era recession at the link.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3310/05/2012

Thank you, Poll Troll!


by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3410/05/2012

R31, you just know the right will still tell that lie, though.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3510/05/2012

Stock futures and Treasury yields advanced as investors bet an improving job market will give workers with the wherewithal to boost their spending, helping cushion the economy from a global slowdown.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3610/05/2012

[quote]PollTroll, I always check in with your threads. Thank you for being here.

Thank-you! : )

Now that the big news of the morning has come out, I'm probably going to go to bed and be back later, but I just posted today's Rasmussen poll which has some surprisingly bad news for Romney - Obama STILL has a +2 lead. He hasn't gone down. He still could when some of the other post-debating polling comes in, but that may now be offset by the 7.8% good news.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3710/05/2012

In this one, r23. Join us here.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3810/05/2012

If the president could easily manipulate the Unemployment Rate, then he would have done it well before now.

GWB would have, too.

In fact, why even bother reporting it? If it's so easily manipulated for political purposes?

Face it, freeps: President Obama is getting things done. In fact, he may even go down in history as one of our all-time greatest presidents.

If Mitt Romney wins, it will be a very sad day in America -- because one of our greatest presidents lost because of racism.

There's no reason to fire any guy who is this successful.

The only reasons to fire our first black president who is this successful are hatred, bigotry & ignorance.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 3910/05/2012

R3 - keep reminding yourself how that unemployment rate go so high in the first place, and who's actually making it better.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4010/05/2012

We are all smart enough to know that the news could be better. However, this is good news in a non-partisan way because it increases confidence. And in a partisan way because the Republicans have sent 8% as a meaningless benchmark throughout this election and just like that Obama is under it.

Now for the Etch-A-Sketch Mittens.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4110/05/2012

Amen, R39.

Marry me?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4210/05/2012

When the 114,000 September jobs are added to the (restated/adjusted) 46,000 August jobs and (restated/adjusted) 40,000 July jobs, we get 200,000 more jobs than previously reported.

It's always essential to comprehend what the statistics are describing. Without that fundamental comprehension, then the narrow parroting of cherry-picked numbers is deceitful.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4310/05/2012

But RAZ claims that today's poll only reflects one day of post-debate polling, and post-debate poll shows "some improvement" for Romney. However, the new job reports is today's headline, not the debate.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4410/05/2012

I hope Mitt enjoyed yesterday, because these job numbers are very bad news for him. Very bad news.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4510/05/2012


Crazy old man weighs in:

[quote]Jack Welch ‏@jack_welch Unbelievable jobs numbers..these Chicago guys will do anything..can't debate so change numbers

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4610/05/2012

Who the hell is Jack Welch and why do we care?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4710/05/2012

[quote]September jobs report: Unemployment rate tumbles

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Friday's monthly jobs report changed the picture of the U.S. economy in more ways than one, showing the unemployment rate fell to the lowest level in more than three years and hiring was stronger than originally reported throughout the summer.

Unemployment unexpectedly fell to 7.8% in September, down from 8.1%, as a survey of U.S. households showed 873,000 more Americans had jobs compared to a month earlier.

The last time the unemployment rate was that low was in January 2009, the month President Obama was inaugurated.

The biggest gains came in the form of 582,000 new part-time jobs. Workers with less than a high school degree saw their unemployment rate fall the most dramatically, to 11.3% from 12% in August, whereas workers with a bachelors' degree or higher continued to have a 4.1% unemployment rate for the fourth month in a row.

A separate survey of employers, considered the key metric that Wall Street watches, showed businesses added 114,000 jobs in September. It marked a slowdown in hiring, after July and August were revised significantly higher.

Those revisions added 86,000 more jobs than originally reported in the summer. Stocks rose in morning trading. Ever since the financial crisis, the monthly jobs report has been the most intensely watched economic metric, but in election season, attention surrounding the numbers has reached new heights.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4810/05/2012


by 2012 Poll Trollreply 4910/05/2012

The naysayers on this thread and the "cooked the books" right wing pundits are slimeballs.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5010/05/2012

For those worried about the U6 unemplyment rate, there's a couple of things you're not considering - employers see the unemployment rate go down, they think the economy is improving, and they hire, and average people with jobs see the lower rate, and turn loose of some money, thinking they're going to be able to keep their job. Also, Christmas is coming, people may think the economy in general is recovering and spend some Christmas bucks.

Also, Obama is actually doing something about getting manufacturing going back in the U.S. That's going to do more to create jobs, raise wages and hours in the U.S. than anything else, but it will take time.

For those that think Obama hasn't worked fast enough, he's created 5 million jobs in less than four years, more than Bush did in eight. When he took office, we were losing 750,000 jobs a month. It took time to dig out of that hole. From the statisical point of view, 750,000 jobs a month don't just magically reappear to fill the hole. They were gone and had to be created from scratch. Business went bankrupt and new businesses had to be created.

Two years ago, I used to drive down the street and see entire strip malls almost completely abandoned, anchor stores empty and the few stores left with no customers, slowly going broke. You can actually see the progress. Those same malls are now full of open stores and the parking lot is full too. New businesses had to take their place. It took a while to dig out. Now, we have to build up.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5110/05/2012

But I'm sure you know what a Snookie is, R47.

[quote]Solid Jobs Report Spawns Crackpot ‘Job Truthers’ Movement

[quote]He had some friends in Congress too. Rep. Allen West (R-FL) tweeted “I agree with former GE CEO Jack Welch, Chicago style politics is at work here.”

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5210/05/2012

Get some persepctive.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5310/05/2012

r50, have you ever heard the phrase "you spot it, you got it?"

Because that's how I feel about the republicans.

Everything they accuse others of doing they are themselves doing.

Case in point: voter fraud.

They are saying Obama cooked the books because that is exactly what they would do if given the chance.

That's exactly how they got GWB in office.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5410/05/2012

[quote]Unemployment Rate Trutherism, and Why It Exists

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5510/05/2012

[quote]Solid Jobs Report Spawns Crackpot ‘Job Truthers’ Movement

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5610/05/2012

[quote]Case in point: voter fraud.

Have the major networks covered the fact that it has been the Republicans engaging in major voter fraud? I know MSNBC has, but what about the rest?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5710/05/2012

This is fantastic news!

This will give Obama the hold-outs he needed to secure the win.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5810/05/2012

[quote]Labor Secretary Responds to Jobs Report Truthers

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 5910/05/2012

Don't let the Republicans deflect and distract--(even though I think most people have caught on to their games by now).

This is great news for the president!

Spread the word.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6010/05/2012

Obama hit 50% approval rating.

Excellent news!!

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6110/05/2012

We’ve hit that moment in the election when people begin to lose their minds. Case in point, within minutes of the jobs report, Twitter filled with Republicans claiming the books were somehow cooked, the numbers aren’t real, etc.

Let’s take a deep breath. Jobs reports are about the economy, not about the election. Confusing the two leads to very bad analysis.

This is a good jobs report in a still-weak economy. The 114,000 jobs we added in September aren’t very impressive. The revisions to the last two months, which added 86,000 jobs to the total, were much more impressive. Those revisions also suggest that September’s jobs could get revised up — or, of course, down. So be careful about reading too much into that number. Still, these are, at best, good, not great, numbers.

The controversy, if it’s worth using that word, is over the unemployment rate, which dropped from 8.1 percent to 7.8 percent. That’s three-tenths of one percent. That’s what all the fuss is about.

Let’s get one thing out of the way: The data was not, as Jack Welch suggested in a now-infamous tweet, manipulated. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is set up to ensure the White House has no ability to influence it. As labor economist Betsey Stevenson wrote, “anyone who thinks that political folks can manipulate the unemployment data are completely ignorant of how the BLS works and how the data are compiled.” Plus, if the White House somehow was manipulating the data, don’t you think they would have made the payroll number look a bit better than 114,000? No one would have batted an eye at 160,000.

The fact is that there’s not much that needs to be explained here. We’ve seen drops like this — and even drops bigger than this — before. Between July and August the unemployment rate dropped from 8.3 percent to 8.1 percent — two-tenths of one percent. November-December of 2011 also saw a .2 percent drop. November-December of 2010 saw a .4 percent drop. This isn’t some incredible aberration. The fact that the unemployment rate broke under the psychologically important 8 percent line is making this number feel bigger to people than it really is.

The number could, of course, be wrong. The household survey is, well, a survey, which means it’s open to error. But the internals back it up. The number saying they had jobs increased by about 800,000. That seems high, but it’s counting 582,000 who say they got part-time jobs.

There’s precedent for this. As Daniel Indiviglio notes, part-time jobs increased by 579,000 in September 2010 and by 483,000 in September 2011. It might simply be seasonal hiring. You don’t need to resort to ridiculous theories like Democrats across the country suddenly deciding to lie to surveytakers in order to help Obama.

Which leads to another argument: That U6, the broadest measure of labor-market pain, didn’t move, which should make us skeptical of the fact that U3, the normal unemployment rate, did move. That’s just misunderstanding what U6 is.

U6 is not an unemployment measure. It includes part-time workers who want full-time work. So it doesn’t count the increase in part-time work. But every measure of actual unemployment — U1, U2, U3, U4, and U5 — went down. You can see them all here. Again, there’s no mystery.

This is an encouraging report. What it tells us is that the labor market has been a bit better over the last few months than we thought, and that the recovery hasn’t slowed in the ways we feared. What the response to it tells us is that the election is driving people a little bit crazy.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6210/05/2012

Jim Cramer: "I have people calling for my job" because I said I believe the BLS numbers

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6310/05/2012

Wow. They have truly lost their minds.

Plus, I love how this is now the story DOMINATING the news sites, rather than "Mitt won the first debate."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6410/05/2012

CNN headline: 'Unemployment rate tumbles'

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6510/05/2012

Interestingly enough, Rick Santelli on CNBC (usually one of the most vocal tea party style ranters), just did a little piece comparing today's unemployment numbers with Canada's.

The trend line is almost exactly the same and has been for months. No surprise given how closely the two economies are linked.

Ask the freepers how Obama managed to game Canada's numbers.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6610/05/2012

Most "swing voters" won't stay tuned-in to listen to the discourse and analysis about the numbers. They just need to hear the main point--unemployment is declining; the economy is improving.

Good enough.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6710/05/2012

Why the hell would you celebrate a massive increase in part time jobs, falling wages, and the lowest rate of workers since the Depression?

At what point do you do the right thing put politics aside and accept we are getting screwed over by both sides?!

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6810/05/2012

Re: Canada --

Canada’s Housing Bubble Set to Burst


Canada’s housing bubble is about to burst, and when it does, hundreds of billions of dollars in equity will be wiped out, unemployment will spike, and the economy will sink into a protracted slump. We know this will happen, because the same scenario unfolded in the US, Japan, Ireland and Spain. Housing bubbles always end badly.

Housing prices in Canada have more than doubled in the last 10 years while wages have remained relatively flat. That tells us that the soaring prices are not based on fundamentals, but on low interest rates, lax lending standards and speculation. What’s really driving prices is debt, that is, mortgages preferred to people who, many times, will not be able to repay their loans. As the number of defaults rises, banks will fail, housing prices will tumble, and economic activity will slow to a crawl. It’s the same everywhere.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 6910/05/2012

[quote]Impossible To Manipulate Labor Survey Data — Former BLS Head

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7010/05/2012

I don't know what Repugs are bitching about. During W.'s first term when you used up all your unemployment benefit you just fell off the rolls, you no longer existed. Obama didn't create that formula.

What's annoying about conservatives is that they have such short, selective memories.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7110/05/2012

Does the unemployment rate reflect the state of employment for people both willing and able to work only? There are plenty of lazy bastards out there who WON'T work. And then there are those who are rich enough to not need a job, except for 'chairing' different foundations.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7210/05/2012

Suck it, Repugs:

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7310/05/2012

[quote]At what point do you do the right thing put politics aside and accept we are getting screwed over by both sides?!

When that actually happens. Right now, it's only happening on the Republican side.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7410/05/2012


by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7510/05/2012

Love this and Obama is fired up again too.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7610/05/2012

More good news:

Federal court upholds Ohio early voting ruling

(CNN) - A federal appeals court on Friday sided with the Obama campaign and Democrats in their lawsuit against Ohio over a restriction the state had placed on early voting.

Judges Eric L. Clay and Joseph M. Hood ruled 2 to 1 for the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, upholding a late August injunction preventing the state from restricting many voters from casting ballots on the final weekend before November's election.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7710/05/2012

How was your One Good Day, Mitty? Your party's over.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7810/05/2012

So will Miss Fatass ask Romney about this during the town hall debate?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 7910/05/2012


by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8010/06/2012

So is this the October surprise?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8110/06/2012

It must be true, there were new additional workers at my local Walgreen's, Rite Aid and Costco, I guess more part time workers must have been hired.

I'm an Obama supporter, but the sheer fact is, unfortunately, retail hiring and cashier jobs, are the types of crappy jobs being created, minimum wage and maybe a bit above minimum wage jobs. People can't support themselves on these types of jobs. Especially not in NYC.

I know a woman who has been able to live on her retail salary, she was lucky to get an apartment in one of those 60-40 residences, a new building where 60% of the tenants pay market rents and the other 40% pay much lower rents.

If she hadn't been on a waiting list for many years, she'd be a middle aged woman with one or two roommates in a small cramped Manhattan apartment. This is no way for any single adult to live, with a roommate well into middle age.

Real jobs must be created, not retail and cashier jobs!

The high tech jobs being created are not being filled because lots of people can't do those sorts of jobs. Look at what most people major in in college, they are setting themselves up for failure.

The bottom line is, we have to stop giving enormous tax breaks to companies which continue to off shore real jobs. Nearly every item I've bought recently has been made in a foreign country, from a lamp to a pair of pants, and that is not good news for Americans who are still out of work and want much more than to stand behind a cash register the rest of their lives!

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8210/06/2012

Don't we have many unemployed nurses and engineers on this board? What about the Harvard guy that was unemployed?

What about all the post-50 people with credentials out the wahoo who are unemployed?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8310/06/2012

Throwing unemployed people off of the unemployment rolls and stopping their financial aid doesn't mean they magically have jobs all of a sudden. The real unemployment rate, not counting retirees, is closer to 30% of the population.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8410/06/2012

R84 presents such credible data for his assertions, we must all believe him.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8510/06/2012

Do you watch anything besides Hannity, R84?

The jobs number holds as real job acquisition, not those who have given up or those not getting "financial aid."

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8610/06/2012

And you are celebrating this.. why exactly? We've had an unemployment rate at around 3 % for the last five years. We never even felt the financial crisis.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8710/06/2012

I think you need to speak for yourself, R87.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8810/06/2012

R86 is a complete moron who has the the black and white reasoning of a 3 year old or an AA member.

R85, ok, you add up all the millions of people who have been kicked off the rolls over the last 6 years and still haven't found work, have been hired and let go again and all the independent contractors who have never even qualified for unemployment while no one has been willing or able to hire them for the last X number of years because we're in s fucking depression and all the young people aged 14-26 who couldn't get on the rolls because they can't even get hired for their first job to get laid off from and all the older people 40 and up who retired early because were laid off and knew there wasn't a chance in hell they'd get hired anywhere and get back to us. You really think that many people add up to less than 30% of elligible workers? Have you ever taken a math class?

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 8910/07/2012

Stop projecting, R89.

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 9010/07/2012

Krugman is right, if the GOP weren't such vile assholes, the unemployment rate would be even lower by now:

[italic]But isn’t that just because people have given up looking for work, and hence no longer count as unemployed? Actually, no. It’s true that the employment-population ratio — the percentage of adults with jobs — has been more or less flat for the past year. But remember those aging baby boomers: the fraction of American adults who are in their prime working years is falling fast. Once you take the effects of an aging population into account, the numbers show a substantial improvement in the employment picture since the summer of 2011.

None of this should be taken to imply that the situation is good, or to deny that we should be doing better — a shortfall largely due to the scorched-earth tactics of Republicans, who have blocked any and all efforts to accelerate the pace of recovery. (If the American Jobs Act, proposed by the Obama administration last year, had been passed, the unemployment rate would probably be below 7 percent.) The U.S. economy is still far short of where it should be, and the job market has a long way to go before it makes up the ground lost in the Great Recession. But the employment data do suggest an economy that is slowly healing, an economy in which declining consumer debt burdens and a housing revival have finally put us on the road back to full employment.

And that’s the truth that the right can’t handle. The furor over Friday’s report revealed a political movement that is rooting for American failure, so obsessed with taking down Mr. Obama that good news for the nation’s long-suffering workers drives its members into a blind rage. It also revealed a movement that lives in an intellectual bubble, dealing with uncomfortable reality — whether that reality involves polls or economic data — not just by denying the facts, but by spinning wild conspiracy theories.

It is, quite simply, frightening to think that a movement this deranged wields so much political power.[/italic]

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 9110/08/2012

Instant View: Jobless Claims Fall to Lowest in Four and a Half Years By REUTERS

Published: October 11, 2012 at 8:46 AM ET

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell sharply last week to the lowest level in more than four and a half years, according government data on Thursday that suggested improvement in the labor market.

"This is a positive signal for the economy. The overall trend seems to be that the labor market is improving."

"This is a lot better-than-expected. It's a number that is somewhat of a surprise and the market is going to react positively. It shows the trend that the labor market is slightly improving."

"Claims looked pretty strong, definitely a big drop down. We're starting to hear noise about companies hiring, and that's what the market is waiting for. Without labor market improvement, we can't get a sustainable rally. The numbers seem to be moving in the right direction."

by 2012 Poll Trollreply 9210/11/2012


by 2012 Poll Trollreply 9310/11/2012
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!