Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995


Gay-themed film about the relationship between a gay documentary director and a publishing lawyer with a crack habit.

Got great reviews, but I found it tedious after a while. Yes, the portrayal of a man unwilling to let go of a fucked up person was probably realistic, but the director and writers didn't make it sufficiently dramatic. Too many scenes were repetitive, and the filmmaker character wound up being too sponge-like to be truly interesting or compelling. The actor playing him didn't help.

But Zachary Booth as the addict was better, and more charismatic onscreen. Plus he has one hell of a set of low-hangers.

Other opinions from DL?

by Anonymousreply 2011/24/2012

Booth played Glenn Close's son on DAMAGES.

His balls weren't on display on that show. On the other hand, Close's were.

by Anonymousreply 109/09/2012

Saw it at the film festival. Thought it was kind of rambling. A friend of mine who had been in a relationship like that seemed to get more out of the film than I did.

by Anonymousreply 209/09/2012

Worked on the release. It's good, if somber. Zachary Booth is regularly nude, as is the other guy, and you get to see at least Booth's cock. They really go for it. I'd always dreamed to see the boy from Damages a) full frontal and b) getting fucked in the ass, and you certainly get both.

by Anonymousreply 309/09/2012

Good review by Michael Musto, who says they'll probably remake it with Channing Tatum and Kate Hudson.

by Anonymousreply 409/09/2012

Another gay-themed film filled with misery. Gays are never happy in cinema.

by Anonymousreply 509/09/2012

Does Thure Lindhardt have a full frontal scene also?

The Zachary Booth character is based on Bill Clegg, right?

by Anonymousreply 609/10/2012

R6, No and yes.

by Anonymousreply 709/10/2012

Does the Clegg character get fucked?

by Anonymousreply 809/10/2012

Quite often, r8.

Lindhardt is nude but I don't recall a frontal for him.

by Anonymousreply 909/10/2012

I think the odds are pretty good that someone on DL has now seen both Zachary Booth and Bill Clegg nude. How do they compare?

by Anonymousreply 1009/10/2012

Happy people make for boring characters, R5.

by Anonymousreply 1109/10/2012

Boring movie. Who would continue dating someone who smokes crack when they first meet and then continues to smoke it constantly?

by Anonymousreply 1209/10/2012

Anyone who would watch a movie about Bill Klegg, well, deserves to watch a movie about Bill Klegg.

by Anonymousreply 1309/10/2012

R. 13. I agree. But how do you feel about watching a movie about Bill Clegg?

by Anonymousreply 1409/10/2012

Zach's balls are bigger but Bill has a bigger dick.

by Anonymousreply 1509/11/2012

Does anybody have a link to watch the movie for free? Both Zach and Thure are cute as hell!

by Anonymousreply 1609/11/2012

Clegg is well-cast in terms of looks; Sachs is more wishful thinking!

by Anonymousreply 1709/12/2012

Zachary is serious hung. He's also nude in that film Woodstock.

There's a scene in this movie where he's semi-bent over getting into bed, and omg he has the lowest hanging balls I've ever seen. I had to replay it.

Is he actually gay?

by Anonymousreply 1811/22/2012

This thread is meaningless without screen-caps

by Anonymousreply 1911/22/2012

Here's the low-hangers shot.

by Anonymousreply 2011/24/2012
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!