A little over a month ago, I wrote about Romneyâs unusual capacity for lying, but in the weeks that followed, have come to believe that I was too cautious. What we seem to have is not merely a bad politician but a pathological liar who is psychologically disoriented to a degree found, for example, only in about one in a thousand repeat juvenile offenders.
Consider, for example, this assessment of Romney by Michael Cohen in the Guardian:
Romney persists in repeating the same lies over and over, even after they've been debunked. This is perhaps the most interesting and disturbing element of Romney's tireless obfuscation: that even when corrected, it has little impact on the presumptive GOP nominee's behavior.
This is a pretty good description of pathological lying. Hereâs another from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry:
Falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime.
Wikipedia offers these characteristics of the disease:
The fabricative tendency is long lasting; it is not provoked by the immediate situation or social pressure as much as it is an innate trait of the personality.
The stories told tend toward presenting the liar favorably. For example, the person might be presented as being fantastically brave, knowing or being related to many famous people.
Some might argue that Romney is actually a sociopathic liar, defined by one scholarly site on deception as a person who is âoften goal-oriented (i.e., lying is focused - it is done to get one's way). Sociopaths have little regard or respect for the rights and feelings of others. Sociopaths are often charming and charismatic, but they use their talented social skills in manipulative and self-centered ways.â There is, however, something oddly robotic about Romneyâs behavior, including a bizarre smile that does not fade whatever the topic, suggesting not deliberate falsehood with a stealthily conceived goal so much as an unthinking soldier over-drilled in the art of mendacity.
Just in the past few days, Romney has been caught lying about several things that an ordinary good liar would probably avoid.
- He made up a fictional account of his time as a Mormon missionary in Paris complete with misleading descriptions of his economic conditions at the time and the state of his bathroom.
- He was found to have misstated his residency status in two states at the time that he was launching his bid for for governor there.
- His campaign has run an ad featuring an Ohio auto dealer claiming that Obamaâs auto firm bailout had cost dealer jobs in the state. While it may have caused that dealer jobs; in fact, across Ohio dealership jobs increased.
Only one of these lies â the residency issue â was significant because of the benefits it might produce, i.e. making it legal for Romney to run for Massachusetts governor. The other two were trivial, easily exposed, and ultimately pointless.
Romney â unlike, say, a Nixon or Clinton â lies out of habit and nature rather than out of perceived necessity. And he doesnât just exaggerate; he makes up wholly fictitious tales.
Romney has been greatly aided in this by the demise of American journalism, which now - like much of the country â considers any message to be a reasonable facsimile of reality and, further, one from which one may, with impunity, âwalk backâ should it prove embarrassing. The days when the conventional press was more loyal to the truth than to favored sources has well passed and now honesty has no embedded press corps to cover it.
What is not clear about Romney, however, is whether his propensity for deception is a personally developed dysfunction or whether it is the result of what can fairly be called brainwashing by the Mormon Church, where he rose from missionary to bishop.
Here again you can expect no help from the conventional media which is afraid to question the role of religion in our culture or politics for fear of seeming biased.