Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Gus Van Sant or Bruce LaBruce - Who do you respect more?

Discuss

by Anonymousreply 6904/18/2016

Bruce LaBruce...assuming HE'S not a boy-hungry pedophile.

by Anonymousreply 103/31/2012

OP, just for future reference, in case you didn't know, it's whom do you respect more, not who.

And to everybody else out there, please note it is possible to point out a a grammatical or spelling error without being a bitch about it.

by Anonymousreply 203/31/2012

Gus has better taste.

by Anonymousreply 303/31/2012

I've noticed that effeminates tend to dislike Van Sant, probably because he's a normal gay guy.

by Anonymousreply 403/31/2012

A normal gay guy? Some of us like fucking MEN who are LEGAL.

by Anonymousreply 503/31/2012

Yeah the constant obsession about older guys is definitely a fem thing.

by Anonymousreply 603/31/2012

GVS discovered Alex Frost who was hot as fuck in Elephant.

by Anonymousreply 703/31/2012

Gus is the better artist by far, despite being a pedo creep.

BLB is a hack who likes porn who learned a tiny bit of queer theory in college and thinks it makes him an important artist.

by Anonymousreply 803/31/2012

I guess Gus likes teens but how can you be sure?

by Anonymousreply 903/31/2012

If your last name is LaBruce who would name their kid Bruce? It's like Taylor Taylor.

by Anonymousreply 1003/31/2012

I think they both fucked Keanu Reeves.

by Anonymousreply 1103/31/2012

Because he's a normal male and has good vision, r9.

What about River Phoenix, r11?

by Anonymousreply 1203/31/2012

R10, I work with a guy with a redundant first and last name. I won't say what it is, but it's along the lines of William Williams or Robert Roberts.

by Anonymousreply 1303/31/2012

Bruce LaBruce is just a stage name. His real name is Brian Bruce.

by Anonymousreply 1403/31/2012

Gus was attracted to Keanu, sexually. He said Keanu was the best looking thing North and South of the Tropicana Grill. River and Gus were friends.

Bruce and Keanu both grew up in Toronto, I think.

by Anonymousreply 1503/31/2012

[quote]He said Keanu was the best looking thing North and South of the Tropicana Grill.

Gus van Sant speaks in weirdo Forties cliches? Who knew?

by Anonymousreply 1603/31/2012

Bruce LaBruce is a poor man's Gus Van Sant.

That's all!

by Anonymousreply 1704/01/2012

Yes he does and you would know, if you read his book.

by Anonymousreply 1804/01/2012

Whom...

by Anonymousreply 1904/01/2012

Gus van Sant speaks in weirdo Forties cliches.

by Anonymousreply 2004/01/2012

I love Bruce LaBruce so much more than Van Sant. I love the fact that Bruce came up in the punk rock scene as a zine editor, and went on to make super 8 movies that were truly underground. I liked that his mission was to confront punk rockers with their homophobia, and the mainstream gay media with their acquisitional consumerist bullshit. He seems genuinely transgressive.

Van Sant strikes me as in the "transgressive chic" circle with such group-approved names as Dennis Cooper and Mary Gaitskill. They were all tricked by that chick pretending to be JT LeRoy.

by Anonymousreply 2104/01/2012

So what exactly are these stories about Gus? I love the film Milk, but it was done by a pedo?

by Anonymousreply 2204/01/2012

Dennis Cooper was insulted by JT because he really wanted to fuck him. Of fuck the 13 year old JT. Van Sant didn't let it bother him. He said he would spend hours on the phone talking to JT...what did they talk about? I'd like to quiz Laura Albert about their conversations...talk about a book, I think she could have a new one.

by Anonymousreply 2304/01/2012

Gus is not a pedo. You guys watch what you say. It's is stupid to wrongly accuse someone of doing something illegal.

by Anonymousreply 2404/01/2012

I don't think Gus fucks children but in all honesty, when I was 16 I fucked whom I wanted.

by Anonymousreply 2504/01/2012

[quote]It's is

Oh, dear me.

by Anonymousreply 2604/01/2012

I have never seen one of LaBruces' pornos, are they any good.

by Anonymousreply 2704/04/2012

It's a joke that Gus gets called a pedo here, right? No one ever backs it up with even just a rumor, all the actual gossip I read is about him and young adults.

by Anonymousreply 2804/04/2012

Whose ass did you pull out the name Bruce LaBruce? The guy made a few home movies, he is no film maker and couldn't shine Gus Van Sant's leather chaps.

by Anonymousreply 2904/04/2012

Neither. How can anyone respect anyone they don't even know???

by Anonymousreply 3004/04/2012

Very true. Van Sant is a famous successful director who has won awards...Bruce is more edgy and he's bald, where Gus has a full head of hair. It makes a difference.

by Anonymousreply 3104/04/2012

While respect is a bit far for me to have for anyone, especially someone who "directed" a shot-by-shot remake of "Psycho", Van Sant is quite a good director and recognized the beauty of The Damon Butt by lingering on it and framing it beautiful in "Gerry". "Gerry" is almost a minimal sonnet in film to The Damon Butt.

by Anonymousreply 3204/04/2012

Interesting post from the GVS Message Board on IMDB:

Unpalatable Man Making Compelling Movies.

by KameronG (Wed Sep 24 2008 00:19:17)

I live in the Portland (Oregon) area, and I think it is interesting the reputation Gus Van Sant has here as apposed to his national view. I know, he is artsy and his movies are hit or miss with most people, but that isn't the thing I really take issue with. I personally have really enjoyed some of his films.

In stark contrast, however, in the Portland area he is known as a pretty big skeez. He throws parties and sleeps with copious amounts of young gay men looking to get their break into acting. It is common knowledge that he subscribes to "casting couch" logic, and I just think it is interesting / disgusting that this hasn't really been brought to the main stream light.

I am not saying everyone my never enjoy one of his features again, I think Milk looks very compelling and many people really enjoy his style, however, he is no moral compass. It is like Wal-Mart logic, sure most companies use similar practices, but how comfortable should you be standing behind a company that does it so very brazenly?

More so than anything, I am just very upset that he is out there representing gay men: though he may be a compelling director, he as a person is foul, and I for one think that makes him pretty useless as a human.

by Anonymousreply 3309/12/2012

Other than Michael Parker and Scott Green...he slept with when they were teens (I assume), do we know who he has slept with? Scott and Mike were both rent boys, so why wouldn't he sleep with them?

by Anonymousreply 3401/01/2013

&

by Anonymousreply 3501/02/2013

I respect the one that puts more full frontal male nudity in his movies.

by Anonymousreply 3601/02/2013

I guess we could all agree on that but has Gus ever had full frontal nudity in his films?

by Anonymousreply 3702/21/2013

I've never heard of Bruce being a boy hungry pedophile...so him.

by Anonymousreply 3802/21/2013

Well obviously it's Van Sant on talent and it's LaBruce on being a non-pedophile.

by Anonymousreply 3902/21/2013

Well, Gus Van Sant is a better pedophile, and Brue LaBruce is better at being a NON-pedophile. And they both have some talent.

See how easy it is?

Oh - the question was respect. Well, I can't respect either one, considering how bad their hair looks.

by Anonymousreply 4002/21/2013

R2 is an idiot who did not study grammar beyond grade 8.

by Anonymousreply 4102/21/2013

Your pretty much out your way, huh?

by Anonymousreply 4202/21/2013

[R15] You are one master manipulator my friend, Gus never said that.

In his book PINK, Gus described "Swifty" as the best looking thing North and South of the Tropicana Grill, Swifty was a fictional character in a novel, some readers believe Swifty is Keanu, because Gus used KR's physical attributes for that character, but he never said that Swifty was based on Keanu, in fact when asked, he even denied KR was gay, so your comment is misleading to say the least...

The question is why Gus made such direct references to many pop culture icons of 90s in his book. I guess he wanted to use those references to River Phoenix, Kurt Cobain, etc to draw more attention to his otherwise very boring book, if you read PINK, you'd know what I'm talking about, the narrative is very fragmented and hard to follow, there is basically no storyline or plot in this so-called novel, just some characters resemble some 90s cultural icons. One may say PINK is a collection of GVS's wet dreams, I mean who wouldn't want to write a book about his fictional sexual conquests? Personally, I would love to write a novel featuring me and Ryan Gosling in a threesome, that would be hot ;-)) Then I might call the character "Brian Mosling" to dodge the law suits and show the world how far I could go in my sexual fantasy, but does it make it real? Of course not!

This is the case with all works of fiction, you may never know how much truth in it or what bits are pure imagination. Using pop icons in a book could be a good marketing gimmick, like some sort of artsy fan fiction and if you're really good, some might even believe everything written in your book is true, so it is obvious you're a believer [R15] but no matter what you believe, it's not cool to put words in people's mouths. Thank God we have trolldar, so it's easy to spot trolls like you...

by Anonymousreply 4301/26/2014

Doesn't Van Sant ever feel the need for a real partner?

by Anonymousreply 4401/26/2014

GVS isn't a pedophile - he's an ephebophile.

Anyone know what happened between him and Ash Stymest?

by Anonymousreply 4501/26/2014

[quote]GVS isn't a pedophile - he's an ephebophile.

That's like saying it's rape but not [italic]rape[/italic]-rape.

Unless Van Sant's partners are 18 or older (which they are allegedly often not), it's pedophilia in the eyes of the law and illegal.

by Anonymousreply 4601/26/2014

Where to begin, r46...

Pedophilia is not a legal category, but a psychiatric one. It has nothing whatsoever to do with age of consent laws. And even those aren't set at 18 in most states (to say nothing of other countries).

by Anonymousreply 4701/26/2014

Van Sant called Pink his memoir.

He described Keanu in detail called him Swifty in reference to Speed...then he said he had a longterm secretive affair with Swifty. Swifty was good friends with Felix (River) who died of an overdose outside of a nightclub.

I could go on and on but there is no need. Gus had a secretive longterm affair with Keanu.

by Anonymousreply 4801/26/2014

By the way r43, do you really think Gus would out Keanu by name? Don't be ridiculous. Gus didn't out River until 13 years after his death. This is show business, so think about it.

by Anonymousreply 4901/26/2014

One's a two time Academy Award nominated film maker, the other a pornographer. Why is this a choice?

by Anonymousreply 5001/26/2014

[R48} Or maybe that's what GVS wants everybody to think, as I said just describing an actor to a tee and making him a character in your novel doesn't mean you actually had a relationship with him anywhere other than in your mind...

I see it as a marketing gimmick, you may wanna believe whatever you want, as many people would love to read wet dreams about hunky actors, but unless GVS actually utters KR's name, it's nothing more than speculation and what you say is quite misleading as if GVS actually said that...

by Anonymousreply 5101/27/2014

Ah, Gus made two films with Keanu, let's get real. Van Sant is a widely respected film director and if he had a message to send, it was aimed directly at David Geffen. Some of you need to wise up.

by Anonymousreply 5201/27/2014

I think it's all in your mind, nobody needs to wise up or take you seriously when you act like you know everything GVS thinks or wants, he could have a million other reasons writing a book, you would never know, it could very well be self-masturbation for all I know...

by Anonymousreply 5301/27/2014

LaBruce. Because our baby-adopting, gay-marrying culture needs more of him and less of Van Sant's creepy fetishization of blank-faced pretty teenage boys.

by Anonymousreply 5401/27/2014

Hey R53, why so upset and excited? Did you think YOU were Swifty?

by Anonymousreply 5501/28/2014

Nope, I just don't like presumptious people who put words in other people's mouths or tell other people wise up and that's exactly what you are doing, you're putting words in GVS's mouth.

Why are you so invested in proving you know all the shit about GVS anyway? You sound like a smartass, did you have a long chat with GVS recently, did he tell you all his life story? I guess not, so pretty much whatever you say is pointless unless you have some insider info.

by Anonymousreply 5601/28/2014

Van Sant, wrote the book. In an interview, HE said it was his memoir and it seemed pretty obvious to me when I read it. Did you read it, r56?

by Anonymousreply 5701/28/2014

Yes, I read the book, although I have to say I didn't enjoy it, I would rather stick with his movies.

It doesn't matter if he calls it his memoir, it's still a work of fiction and he also said in another interview how there are more than one reality in the book and not all the characters exist or something like that. My point is unless he actually gives some names, you have no right to put words in his mouth, if one day GVS wants to tell about his real life sexual conquests, he is free to write a real memoir, not some comic-book/ pseudo-futurist novel peppered with pop culture references to make it more interesting. His marketing strategy actually rubbed me the other way, it was quite a disappointment, wish I never wasted my time.

by Anonymousreply 5801/28/2014

If he didn't want people to know Swifty was Keanu, he should not have mentioned the scar around his ankle.

What's it to you anyway?

by Anonymousreply 5901/28/2014

As I said before, describing an actor to a tee and making him a character in your novel means nothing, until he actually gives names, to me it is all GVS's wet dreams. In any case even GVS does not say all in his book is real, take a pick, why you keep putting words in his mouth?

What matters to me is you act as if you've solved a murder mystery or smt, it's a well-known fact GVS used all of these 90s icons in his book, to me it's an desperate attempt to sell his very boring book, nothing more than a marketing gimmick and he is not the only person doing this, those guys were the prime meat of 90s, it's normal people wanna make some bucks using their images in a novel or whatever, am I supposed to believe them all?

In short I'm not convinced until somebody writes a real memoir with some juicy bits, besides if GVS is as obsessed as you said, why wouldn't he just gives names? Because he's afraid KR would not work with him again? Then it's pretty pointless, because in any case they never worked again after River's death. KR made a very successful documentary last year or so, he has spoken with shit load of famous directors, yet GVS is not among them, I wonder why. Personally I think KR holds GVS responsible for River's death and I don't blame him.

by Anonymousreply 6001/29/2014

What the flying fuck is the matter with you, r61?

River, Rodney and Keanu were all shooting heroin while filming My Own Private Idaho, how was that Van Sant's fault? Everyone in Hollywood knew River and Keanu had serious drug problems. I do think Rodney's manager blamed Van Sant for Rodney's sad downfall. But for Keanu to blame Van Sant? Ridiculous.

As for Gus talking about celebs in his book...to sell books? Another absurd opinion on your part.

And you post all your bullshit because you are a fangirl who insist that Keanu is not gay. He's gay.

by Anonymousreply 6101/29/2014

[quote]Unless Van Sant's partners are 18 or older (which they are allegedly often not), it's pedophilia in the eyes of the law and illegal.

Sex with a 16 year old is not "pedophilia" under ANY definition, but being a moron you wouldn't understand concepts such as words having actual meanings.

Also, Rosa Parks was famous for doing something "illegal." Those who think "illegal" equates to "wrong" or deserving of punishment, really should be shot. Well, actually they should be tortured before being shot as an example to society, but let's start with the the executions first. It sure would clean some of the agenda-driven ill-motivated lying trash out of this place.

by Anonymousreply 6201/29/2014

I'm pretty sure in 2014, any 14 year old knows if they want to have sex or not and they certainly don't talk to their parents about it.

by Anonymousreply 6301/29/2014

Oldie DLers aren't getting any hot young dick and don't want anybody else getting it either.

by Anonymousreply 6401/29/2014

Wrong again, River's downfall began after MOPI, that's where he was introduced heavy drugs and yes, it's GVS fault letting everything got out of control on the set, he was the director and it was his responsibility, he should have known better.

I think you are overprotective of GVS and you sound quite bitter maybe because you cannot bear people calling you on your bs, sorry but I tell it as I see it, Keanu can be gay, bi or straight, I don't really care that much, but since he accidentally impregnated a girl, I assume he at least fucks women as well.

What's your trick anyway why you're so obssesed with these guys? Do you know them personally? If not, why do you expect people treat your posts as the law of God. personally I wouldn't mind calling even God on his bs if it's well deserved' so don't think I will show mercy in you

by Anonymousreply 6501/29/2014

River was drinking heavily before Idaho and he had also used heroin before Idaho.

I don't think Van Sant ever felt like a father figure, do you?

by Anonymousreply 6601/29/2014

?

by Anonymousreply 6702/04/2014

I had read that the person who gave River the cocktail he OD'd on was John Frusciante. Couldn't one blame the RHCP and their drug culture as much as you could blame Gus?

Re Pink, 1. Surprised Keanu didn't sue Gus' ass for his premise, true or not, that they were lovers. 2. The paragraph about Spunky's speculations that the pain of Swifty's past being both the thing holding back his acting, and the thing that also makes him fascinating and a star on screen, was interesting.

by Anonymousreply 6804/18/2016
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.
×

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed


recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!