Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Josh Hartnett Taking Agency Meetings…What Happened To That Guy?

Josh Hartnett has left CAA, and he has been making the rounds of agencies looking for new representation. Even though they might be unexcited by his recent movies like Bunraku and Girl Walks Into A Bar, the agencies are all over him. Who can blame them? This is a strapping young guy who can act and is only 33. I thought he was going to be a big star when he made Pearl Harbor and especially Black Hawk Down. While occasional films reminded of his potential–how great was Hartnett in 30 Days Of Night, maybe the coolest vampire movie since From Dusk Till Dawn?–for the most part he has leaned toward indie, artsy fare.

I can still remember in the early 2000s when Hartnett was offered the Superman role by Warner Bros in a three-picture deal that potentially could have paid him $100 million. He turned it down because he didn’t want to be defined by that iconic role. Sometimes shuffling the deck with reps works, but only if the actor doesn’t reject the occasional big picture to go along with the art films, something Ryan Gosling is now doing. Agents tells me that a couple of good studio roles puts Hartnett right back on the map, and that is why they’re racing to sign him. He’s still with Management 360.

by Anonymousreply 12112/08/2012

You think Josh is actually a good actor???

by Anonymousreply 103/30/2012

It's from the Deadline article, R1.

by Anonymousreply 203/30/2012

Last I heard from Josh was that he was fucking Rihanna

by Anonymousreply 303/30/2012

I love how the Deadline comments are chewing the writer (and Josh) out...

by Anonymousreply 403/30/2012

Has Josh had the ugly black mole removed from his neck?

by Anonymousreply 503/30/2012

Isn't he with Amanda Seyfried?

by Anonymousreply 603/30/2012

He's bland and has no charisma. I'm really surprised Hollywood still thinks they can make him a star. That ship has passed.

by Anonymousreply 703/30/2012

He also had (hopefully it is in the past tense) some drug problems which stalled his career.

by Anonymousreply 803/30/2012

The Deadline writer seems a little giddy with enthusiasm, but in the few films I've seen with Hartnett, he's been somewhere between more than adequate (30 Days of Night) and actually rather good (Lucky Number Slevin.) The couple of times I've seen him interviewed or on chat shows, he comes off well: polite, quiet, unassuming, self-effacing, interested in what others have to say, and not a dim bulb.

His might not be the greatest talent or career of our lifetimes, but he seems unfairly shouldered with a lot of contempt for "failing" to live up to the great deal of hype that was hoisted on him at one point.

by Anonymousreply 903/30/2012

How popular would he be if he ventured into porn? Gay porn or straight porn?

by Anonymousreply 1003/30/2012

He's an okay actor. Bet if he applied himself and chose better projects, he'd actually be a decent actor.

"30 Days of Night" is really under-rated though, damn terrifying vampire movie.

by Anonymousreply 1103/30/2012

He's not memorable (kind of like that other hyped up actor from the early 2000s, Jake Gyllenhaal). No screen presence whatsoever. I've seen a bunch of Josh Hartnett movies but he made no impression at all. He's as bland as white bread.

Those Deadline comments are right. He's been replaced by Channing Tatum.

by Anonymousreply 1303/30/2012

He is as good looking as Tatum and as talented IMHO. He's crush worthy.

by Anonymousreply 1403/30/2012

[quote]He is as good looking as Tatum and as talented IMHO.

That's not saying much.

by Anonymousreply 1503/30/2012

Looks good in period clothes in "The Black Dahlia" - also shows his ass.

by Anonymousreply 1603/30/2012

I think he's better looking that Tatum Channing, same talent wise.

by Anonymousreply 1703/30/2012

All he needs is do frontal (a la Fassbender) and all DL queens will flock to him

by Anonymousreply 1803/30/2012

What's wrong with that, R18?

by Anonymousreply 1903/30/2012

Nothing, R19

I want him to do it.

by Anonymousreply 2003/30/2012

His cock is currently in the same place Ryan Phillippe's once was.

by Anonymousreply 2103/30/2012

If every actor was a well-endowed as Fassbender they would have no issue going full frontal. That is why Fassbender wasn't "brave", dude is blessed and he knows it.

Most actors don't really give a fuck about nudity, it is all about the reaction to said nudity. They know their manhood is going to be judged hardcore and a lot of them don't want to deal with that.

by Anonymousreply 2203/30/2012

Channing is his look-alike or doppelgänger and now taking roles he should have gotten. IMO, Josh is better looking but it's probably his own fault because I heard about the drug thing too.

by Anonymousreply 2303/30/2012

True, R22. And you only have to look at DL for proof of that. The few times a mainstream actor goes naked, if he isn't hung like Jeff Stryker he gets torn to shreds and made fun of. What actor wants to see a bunch of vicious size queens laughing at him because he isn't as hung as a porn star?

Ewan McGregor is one of the few mainstream actors to show his cock a lot, and like Fassbender, it's probably not coincidental that he has a big one.

NSFW

by Anonymousreply 2403/30/2012

I don't think Josh is interested in the spotlight anyway. He still has millions from his earlier films and is happy to just work every few years.

And he got a lot of positive reaction from "Lucky Number Slevin", not to mention getting to work with 2 Oscar winners in Morgan Freeman and Ben Kingsley.

by Anonymousreply 2503/30/2012

After Josh broke up with Rhianna, she got involved with Chris Brown. Do the math.

by Anonymousreply 2603/30/2012

I know I'll get flamed for this, but Josh was excellent in The Black Dahlia, and even better, and so sexy, in a little known film called August. If you haven't seen the latter, check it out.

by Anonymousreply 2703/30/2012

I agree that Josh was good in "The Black Dahlia". And as I posted above, he looks good in 1940's clothes, too. He's about 6'3 - much taller than the average leading man.

Josh Hartnett underwear bulge:

by Anonymousreply 2803/30/2012

[quote]I don't think Josh is interested in the spotlight anyway. He still has millions from his earlier films and is happy to just work every few years.

If he's looking for a new agency is sounds like he's not too happy with his career. It's not like he's doing good indie films. He's making crap nobody sees. That can't be fun for any actor.

by Anonymousreply 2903/30/2012

Do you think he's meeting with Sean Cody, Corbin Fisher, or Jake Cruise?

by Anonymousreply 3003/30/2012

[quote]His cock is currently in the same place Ryan Phillippe's once was.

You must be very slow. Everybody knows she's fucking Ashton Kutcher now.

by Anonymousreply 3103/30/2012

Lucky Number Slevin was a piece of shit. People actually liked that? Maybe the most pathetic wannabe Tarantino I have ever seen, and I've seen a few. And holy shit the homophobia was off the charts!

That said, he is cute and far better looking than Tatum.

by Anonymousreply 3203/30/2012

R31, Josh is currently with Amanda Seyfried, who used to be with Ryan Phillippe. Get it?

by Anonymousreply 3303/30/2012

[quote]He still has millions from his earlier films and is happy to just work every few years.

Looking at his IMDB I don't think he's really that rich. He's only made a few big movies and those were years ago. He certainly doesn't have enough cash to never work again.

Those Deadline comments are right on. He's wooden and boring. That's why he doesn't have a career. Even the fangurls have moved on.

by Anonymousreply 3403/30/2012

I'm surprised he hasn't tried his luck at TV. His movie career is going nowhere.

by Anonymousreply 3503/30/2012

[quote]Josh is currently with Amanda Seyfried, who used to be with Ryan Phillippe. Get it?

And Josh used to fuck Rihanna, who was also with Philippe. They've both shared the same pussy.

by Anonymousreply 3603/30/2012

So Josh and Ryan should just do each other so finish everything off

by Anonymousreply 3703/30/2012

[quote]And he got a lot of positive reaction from "Lucky Number Slevin", not to mention getting to work with 2 Oscar winners in Morgan Freeman and Ben Kingsley.

Um, no he did not get a lot of positive reaction. It got crappy reviews. That movie sucked, and it doesn't matter if there were 2 Oscar winners involved in it.

by Anonymousreply 3803/30/2012

That would be hot, R37.

But Josh seems to be one of the few male actors who is totally straight. I don't think I've ever seen any gay rumors about him - a rarity for DL.

by Anonymousreply 3903/30/2012

[quote]Looking at his IMDB I don't think he's really that rich. He's only made a few big movies and those were years ago. He certainly doesn't have enough cash to never work again.

[quote] It's not like he's doing good indie films. He's making crap nobody sees. That can't be fun for any actor.

This might ease his pain:

[quote]Josh Hartnett is an actor and producer with a net worth of $45 million. Josh Hartnett earned his net worth through his acting roles on stage, screen and television, as well as his appearance in commercials, the movies and music video’s he has produced.

by Anonymousreply 4003/30/2012

Well R39 - Josh was caught receiving oral sex from a woman in a NYC bar (trhere's a Gawker article somewhere) so maybe someone should tell him that gay guys give the best oral

by Anonymousreply 4103/30/2012

Josh's naked ass:

by Anonymousreply 4203/30/2012

That website has been found to be highly inaccurate, R40.

by Anonymousreply 4303/30/2012

Yum:

by Anonymousreply 4403/30/2012

[quote]Josh Hartnett is an actor and producer with a net worth of $45 million. Josh Hartnett earned his net worth through his acting roles on stage, screen and television, as well as his appearance in commercials, the movies and music video’s he has produced.

What a bunch of bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 4503/30/2012

Oh please, celebrity net worth.com is so full of shit.

by Anonymousreply 4603/30/2012

He's Ashton Kutcher, if his career had not gone well . Cute, not particularly talented. No charisma. Besides the drug problem, I also heard he didn't bath- or is that just part of the whole druggie thing ?

by Anonymousreply 4703/30/2012

He's not worth anywhere near $45 million. More like $5 million if he's lucky.

by Anonymousreply 4803/30/2012

Yum

by Anonymousreply 4903/30/2012

How do you know that he's not worth that much? Have any of you seen his tax returns? Many actors begin investing immediately after the first big scheck. I personally have no idea what he's worth, but I wouldn't rule anything out.

by Anonymousreply 5003/30/2012

With Rhianna

by Anonymousreply 5103/30/2012

naked ass

by Anonymousreply 5203/30/2012

Why does Rhianna look good with everybody?

by Anonymousreply 5303/30/2012

Naked ass

by Anonymousreply 5403/30/2012

[quote]He's Ashton Kutcher, if his career had not gone well .

He's a combination of Ashton and Channing Tatum. That's not a good combo.

by Anonymousreply 5503/30/2012

[quote] Maybe the most pathetic wannabe Tarantino I have ever seen, and I've seen a few. And holy shit the homophobia was off the charts!

Uh, you must never watched The Boondocks Saints.

by Anonymousreply 5603/30/2012

How many women has Josh been with? It seems like he gets a lot of pussy.

by Anonymousreply 5703/30/2012

When you have guys like Tom Hardy, JGL, Michael Fassbender and Ryan Gosling why bother with Hartnett, he doesn't belong to the new generation of leading men, even Ryan Reynolds is more relevant than him.

by Anonymousreply 5803/30/2012

He left? Sure, he did.

by Anonymousreply 5903/30/2012

With his new neck tattoo he'll be a shoo in for all those motorcycle gang member roles that pop up so often. He'll look so good in black leather that no one will care that he can't emote a note.

by Anonymousreply 6003/30/2012

I liked Lucky Number Slevin. It surprised me because I did really like Harnett in it. He seemed better than I've always perceived him to be as an actor. And it made me curious to see other dramas he'd been in to see whether it was a fluke or not. I remember there were major plot points involving a gay character and there were homophobic characters who acted out of their homophobia, but I don't remember all of the specifics. I may have to watch it again.

I could see him carving out a spot as a villain. Or if he were able to steal roles from Channing Tatum that's fine with me. I would rather look at him than Tatum.

For a while he was the next big thing. I suppose if he lived modestly and saved/invested his money he could be worth 45 million. Of course that blurb is so badly written it makes me dismiss the idea completely.

by Anonymousreply 6103/30/2012

How bad was his drug addiction?

by Anonymousreply 6203/30/2012

There's a DLer who knows him, talked about him in an old thread. Can't remember what he said about Josh though.

by Anonymousreply 6303/30/2012

[quote]When you have guys like Tom Hardy, JGL, Michael Fassbender and Ryan Gosling why bother with Hartnett, he doesn't belong to the new generation of leading men, even Ryan Reynolds is more relevant than him.

Exactly.

He should really try for TV. His movie career is over. Maybe an HBO drama or some cop procedural.

by Anonymousreply 6403/30/2012

He never worked out enough and went from too thin to doughy.

The man needs a trainer.

by Anonymousreply 6503/30/2012

It was kind of refreshing that he didn't have the overly-muscular body that a lot of actors have today, and he is 6'3, so his above-average height compensated for his average body. But he admits he isn't a muscular guy. As he has said in interviews, "I have no pecs. My best feature is my butt".

by Anonymousreply 6603/30/2012

Never found him attractive. And his acting is wooden.

by Anonymousreply 6703/30/2012

r39 there are a few rumors of him getting blown by guys in Minneapolis. Whether or not that was just a matter of any port in a storm is another question..

by Anonymousreply 6803/30/2012

"there are a few rumors of him getting blown by guys in Minneapolis"

Where do they originate?

by Anonymousreply 6903/30/2012

[quote]How do you know that he's not worth that much? Have any of you seen his tax returns? Many actors begin investing immediately after the first big scheck. I personally have no idea what he's worth, but I wouldn't rule anything out.

Um no they don't. You really believe that website. Honey, lets see the tax man, agent, publicist, manager, lawyer etc... all take a cut of what he gets. He had a 3 year run of being in big budget movies, most of them were ensemble films and the ones that the had to carry bombed. That was 7-10 years ago which is a lifetime in Hollywood.

Hartnett in 2011.

by Anonymousreply 7003/30/2012

I think the drug rumours were about him smoking opium. There was a blind item a few years ago and he was the main guess (but in hindsight it could have been Wes Bentley).

by Anonymousreply 7103/30/2012

R12, you're saying he's stupid? The conspiracy stuff?

by Anonymousreply 7203/30/2012

I don't know about blind items but I know someone who has no reason to lie about it that said Harnett was into heroin. This was like 2-3 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 7303/31/2012

The problem also lies with CAA. They'll milk a cash cow then discard it. All the sentiment about agents who look after you, and guide your career is B.S.

They're a legalized Ponzi scam, and only want to get paid. They no longer have a long term plan for their "products." Everything is short term gain for maximum profit and then move on.

Once you hit a "valley" in your career, they are hard to find and don't return phone calls. CAA is proabaly the worst place you can go if you're an actor. They sign up people who are hot, and ignore people who aren't.

The smart actors leave them and move on. Josh is a decent actor and really would do a good job on TV. The stigma from doing TV is gone. Unless you do junk TV. Quality TV is good. The only actors who get anything out of being with CAA are the ones big enough to demand and intimidate the agency.

by Anonymousreply 7403/31/2012

[quote]The smart actors leave them and move on. Josh is a decent actor and really would do a good job on TV. The stigma from doing TV is gone. Unless you do junk TV. Quality TV is good. The only actors who get anything out of being with CAA are the ones big enough to demand and intimidate the agency.

No he's a wooden actor who was very lucky for a few years. Black Dahlia pretty much 86ed his career as a leading man. He's in the same pile as all of the other late 90's teen stars that faded out after 2003.

by Anonymousreply 7503/31/2012

"The stigma from doing TV is gone."

Not true.

by Anonymousreply 7603/31/2012

His performance in "The Black Dahlia" will go down in history as a prime example of an actor imploding from sheer ineptitude and hubris. With his slack chest and bland musculature, he is a shoe-in for most undeveloped pretty boy of the 21st century.

by Anonymousreply 7703/31/2012

R77, why is it today that actors are expected to look like athletes and have muscular bodies and ripped abs? That's not the way average men look. In the old days, guys like Humprhey Bogart, Clark Gable, Cary Grant etc. just had normal bodies - they weren't that muscular or defined.

by Anonymousreply 7803/31/2012

he was very handsome when he first came on the scene, though he has always looked a bit rough. Even more so now. There's something rather unrefined about his looks, considering how good looking he almost is. As far as his career goes...maybe he wanted to take it slow, do less showy but more interesting projects. Who knows. Anyway, it sounds like he's ready to take it more seriously now. But he's aging. Fast.

by Anonymousreply 7903/31/2012

Bogart, Clark Gable, Cary Grant were men. Hartnett still has the presence of a boy.

by Anonymousreply 8003/31/2012

There is definitely no stigma for someone like Hartnett to do TV.

[quote]I remember there were major plot points involving a gay character and there were homophobic characters who acted out of their homophobia, but I don't remember all of the specifics. I may have to watch it again.

His job was to kill a gangster's son. Now SPOILER at the point he kills the son he is still presented as a basically harmless nice guy and it is supposed to not upset the audience much - but rather amuse them - because the victim is a ridiculous homo who had the audacity to ask Hartnett on a date. Ewww gross. I couldn't single out a character as especially homophobic, it's the movie, it's the script itself.

by Anonymousreply 8103/31/2012

[quote]The problem also lies with CAA. They'll milk a cash cow then discard it. All the sentiment about agents who look after you, and guide your career is B.S.

I guess that's why Jake Gyllenhaal left CAA a few months ago.

by Anonymousreply 8203/31/2012

[quote]why is it today that actors are expected to look like athletes and have muscular bodies and ripped abs? That's not the way average men look. In the old days, guys like Humprhey Bogart, Clark Gable, Cary Grant etc. just had normal bodies - they weren't that muscular or defined.

Because beauty standards have changed. Back then Clark Gable's body was thought of as "hot." He certainly wasn't considered average. Now people like lots of muscles and abs and toned bodies. Hollywood hasn't changed, just what's considered attractive to audiences.

by Anonymousreply 8303/31/2012

He's always reminded me of a young Nick Nolte. I hope he gets another chance because I think if he's taken care of himself he'd be better looking now then he was as a twenty year old kid.

by Anonymousreply 8403/31/2012

[quote]When you have guys like Tom Hardy, JGL, Michael Fassbender and Ryan Gosling why bother with Hartnett, he doesn't belong to the new generation of leading men, even Ryan Reynolds is more relevant than him.

He's been eclipsed by all of those guys, who have shown REAL talent. And as others have said, Channing Tatum ran away with his career, plus it looks like Tatum is better at comedy. Really, TV is the only place for him.

by Anonymousreply 8503/31/2012

He is as untalented as Freddie Prinze Jr.but is worse because he actually takes himself seriously.

by Anonymousreply 8603/31/2012

NO ONE is as untalented as Freddie Prinze, Jr. Except his wife.

by Anonymousreply 8704/02/2012

Neither Freddie nor Sarah seemed to go anywhere after "I Know What You Did Last Summer".

by Anonymousreply 8804/02/2012

Wrong, R88. SMG still had Buffy, which kept her relevant until the show ended in 2003. It was after that, when she tried to build a movie career and failed, that she fell off the radar like her husband.

That said, she rocked as Buffy, she was great on All My Children and she played a great campy villain in Cruel Intentions. She's a thousand times more talented than FPJ, she just made a lot of bad choices.

by Anonymousreply 8904/02/2012

R89, the point is that it was the beginning of her decline. 'Cruel Intentions' was the last film anyone remembers her from. Ryan Phillippe went on to become a bigger star than her and get a lot more work since.

by Anonymousreply 9004/02/2012

and Ringer wasn't awful.

She needs to be on a real network series. Like Revenge, et al

by Anonymousreply 9104/02/2012

Totally agree with RE : 55 . His time passed. See a '24' type series in his future. Other than that - he may just fade away. He always seems like a humorless bore, in TV interviews. Good luck Josh . Take a shower - being smelly is not cool.

by Anonymousreply 9204/02/2012

I would say the beginning of SMG's decline as a potential movie star were those stupid Scooby Doo movies. I Know What You Did Last Summer came out in 1997. Buffy was just beginning and really became a cultural phenomenon right around that time. That certainly didn't start her 'decline.' That time was the high point of her career.

As for Ryan Philippe, he was looking around for a TV show because his movie career, much like Josh Hartnett's, is a joke. But Ryan is too lazy to even commit to TV (he's lucky he can live on Reese Witherspoon's money).

by Anonymousreply 9304/02/2012

R93, reports say Ryan did not ask for any money from Reese in the divorce settlement

by Anonymousreply 9404/02/2012

RE. 93 = Ryan Gosling

Of course he asked for half - that would be standard community property in Ca. anyway. I don't blame the guy - Reese is a piece of work . A true spoiled BITCH. He put up with her for a long time - and she , his cheating.

by Anonymousreply 9504/02/2012

Yes, he would have been entitled to half and they had no pre-nup. And two children, so a nice amount of child support each month too.

by Anonymousreply 9604/02/2012

Ryan did not ask for anything in the divorce settlement.

by Anonymousreply 9704/02/2012

Yeah. Right. Of course he didn't.

by Anonymousreply 9804/02/2012

That's what the reports of the case said at the time.

Do you have court reports stating otherwise? Link them here.

by Anonymousreply 9904/02/2012

Please post the link that says RP got nothing in the divorce.

We'll wait.

by Anonymousreply 10004/02/2012

Found this post on TWOP about Josh Hartnett. God, he sounds like a douche. His decline was well deserved.

Gladly! It was several years ago, so Ill paraphrase as best as can.

I was on a shoot for Mozart and The Whale, and hadn't met him before. He showed up on set an hour late and totally strung out from partying (whether is was from drinking or something harder Ill never know). First thing he does is yell (and I mean cause a damn scene) at the director for not having something ready for him (never did hear what it was) and for the remainder of the day he acted like a complete jerk to Petr (The Director) and everyone else on set who wasn't an actor (he was generally polite to us actors for some reason). Just generally rude and entitled. You hear about this kind of thing, but seeing it firsthand was very enlightening. I had always promised myself that when I have the opportunity to speak to a movie star I would ask them how they got their break in the business. His response was something to the effect of; 'I had to do this stupid play when I was in college. I didn't want to do it but I had to take an acting class (I guess he was studying visual arts or something). So after one of the performances a scout from the studio approached me backstage and asked if I wanted to move to Hollywood and star in movies. So I did.'

After hearing this I was totally shocked. It wasn't just the words he used, it was the way he said it with such cavalier disregard and lack of appreciation for the opportunity he was presented. He never starved, or auditioned, or put any effort into his success, and therefore became this POS because he felt it was his right.

Was I jealous? Sure! And normally, the grown up way to react to someone telling this story is to congratulate them on their good fortune and be happy for them. But what truly made this offensive to me, and cemented my deep loathing of him in my mind, was the attitude about it all. It's very difficult to articulate, but if you've ever met someone who is difficult to deal with and goes out of their way to make their co-workers miserable while they lord their success over you that they had nothing to do with building; it makes you realize that they are just another A-hole in the world validated by an establishment with no soul.

YMMV on my interpretation of this convo. Just reading it myself here I can see I haven't explained it very well, but there it is.

by Anonymousreply 10106/24/2012

Josh always seemed like an easy-going guy to me, but I don't know him personally so one can never know these things for sure.

by Anonymousreply 10206/24/2012

I'll take him under my wing...

by Anonymousreply 10306/27/2012

One of the impressive things about Josh is how tall he is. He's 6'3 and often towers over the other people in the cast. Many actors are short, but he's not one of them.

by Anonymousreply 10406/27/2012

I know a few porn studios that'd take him on. How do we start a petition?

by Anonymousreply 10506/27/2012

[quote]I think he's better looking that Tatum Channing, same talent wise.

Lately, Tatum has proven that he can act. In fact, Channing is fast becoming a better actor with each movie release.

I don't know if Channing has been taking acting lessons, but he sure has improved.

by Anonymousreply 10606/27/2012

I was shocked at how large Josh's head is, and how small his teeth are...

by Anonymousreply 10706/27/2012

[quote]Josh Hartnett Taking Agency Meetings…What Happened To That Guy?

I have NO idea.

by Anonymousreply 10806/27/2012

I agree, R106. I used to ignore Channing Tatum in movies before, but now I pay more attention.

I also think Channing did a decent job in "The Eagle" a couple of years ago when he played a Roman solider opposite Jamie Bell.

by Anonymousreply 10906/27/2012

What was that movie where he went without sex for ages?

by Anonymousreply 11006/27/2012

There is no "there" to his acting.

Should return to modeling.

by Anonymousreply 11106/27/2012

R110, I think it was "40 Days & 40 Nights".

by Anonymousreply 11206/27/2012

Tatum has charm that Hartnett lacks. Hartnett is more controlled and appears smarter, but in the end, it's Tatum's career that's going strong. That said, I do think JH decided to coast, so it's not as though there's a competition between the two.

by Anonymousreply 11306/27/2012

Tatum will win an Oscar one day. Mark my words.

by Anonymousreply 11406/27/2012

Josh tried to take the high road artisically, and it cost him. WTF was wrong with being Superman? Had he made it a success, it would have allowed him to do those dull indie films he tried to build his career on.

But before he does anything, he needs to get the fuck off of that smack.

by Anonymousreply 11506/27/2012

Tatum's career may be considered successful, but I don't see him becoming the next Brad Pitt (eg. a mega-hunk superstar) or a serious actor (eg. Anthony Hopkins, Robert De Niro).

by Anonymousreply 11606/27/2012

34 and hot!

by Anonymousreply 11712/06/2012

I have always been a big fan of this guy

by Anonymousreply 11812/08/2012

Josh Hartnett is so hot. I love guys with dark hair and dark eyes. I'm also a fan of him.

by Anonymousreply 11912/08/2012

Any gossip on him lately?

by Anonymousreply 12012/08/2012

Lohan needs a partner for her first foray into adult entertainment and wants equally hasbeenish Harnett to be her partner! The name of the film, Liz and Dickless.....

by Anonymousreply 12112/08/2012
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.
×

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed


recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!