Why is it That Men Who Are "Uncut" (Uncircumcised) Typically Have Bigger Penises?
[italic]One of many articles[/italic]
Men who have not been circumcised typically have larger penises than men who have been circumcised. What is the reason for this?
Circumcision is a surgical process usually performed when the male is in his infancy. It removes the foreskin from his penis. It is a traumatic process for the infant and some researchers believe that it creates deep-based psychological fears, as the male is so young.
When the foreskin is surgically removed it creates scarring and scar tissue. If a circumcised male looks at his penis he can usually see the scarring between the shaft of the penis where it meets the corona (the corona is at the base or back of the head of the penis). The scarring is usually visible because the skin will have a different color than the rest of the penis.
This scarring damages the tissues in this area of the penis and will impede penis length on erection. Because this is done in infancy (usually) and before puberty, this will affect the size of the penis when it gets its growth spurt during adolescence.
An Australian scientific study measured 158 men for penis length. They compared circumcised and uncircumcised men. They found that the average penis length in circumcised men was 5% less than non-circumcised men. This, of course, is the average. Some men lost less and some men lost more of their size. It's also worth noting the research of Dr. John Taylor who revealed that 51% of an infant's penile skin is removed with circumcision.
But affecting penis size isn't the only problem with circumcision. The foreskin is rich in sensory nerve endings and is one of the main areas of the penis that increases a man's sexual pleasure. When it is removed this decreases the sexual pleasure a man will feel during intercourse. The foreskin is also rich in tactile nerve endings, like those found in the fingertips that can perceive very fine sensations through feeling. With removal of the foreskin, the male loses this very fine touch sensation in his penis. This is important because he won't be able to "feel" the vagina with his penis.
The scarring of the penis cannot be reversed, unfortunately, but there are methods of natural penis enlargement that can help increase a man's size if he was robbed of it through this surgical procedure.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 44||06/30/2016|
It's okay, I'm good with it. I don't have psychological issues about being circumcised. It's just normal to me. I don't crave to have foreskin. I love my penis. It works beautifully.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 1||12/22/2011|
OP, on behalf of all of us at Datalounge, I'd like to thank-you for defining UNCUT for us.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 2||12/22/2011|
Why is this topic such an obsession for some?
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 3||12/22/2011|
Seriously, R3. I never give a thought to circ v. uncirc at all, ever. Some guys are, some guys aren't. BFD. The trolls on DL who make it an issue are very odd and obsessive about it.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 4||12/22/2011|
I hear you r4. It makes you wonder if they have the uncut discussion with everyone they meet.
'I'll have a burger and fries. Are you cut or uncut? Because if you are uncut, I have got some facts for you! And I don't want you serving me, freak!'
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 5||12/22/2011|
The research quoted (regarding penis size) does not provide statistics that prove that uncircumcised men have larger penises. But, there is extensive research showing that circumcision greatly reduces the sensitivity of the penis, especially of the glans. This has become an issue because there is no reason for the procedure. The United States is one of the few countries in the world that regularly practices circumcision. The others do this because of religious beliefs (which I believe are antiquated). There is a constant uproar about the circumcision of women, but there is very little opposition to the circumcision of men. I believe both are barbaric mutilation, and these practices should be abandoned and outlawed.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 6||10/07/2013|
Isn't that like putting on an unrolled turtleneck and claiming your neck length extends all the way up to your lips?
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 7||10/07/2013|
I think uncut is sexy, unless you roll back the skin and get one of those shiny red heads. Eeeeew.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 8||10/07/2013|
the male equivalent of female circumcision would be cutting off the entire penis. the female equivalent of male circumcision would be trimming back the clitoral hood. they are not comparable.
that aside, I'm with r1 and r3. I'm cut and happy, and wish all the raging "intactivists" would find a more meaningful outlet for their righteous indignation.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 9||10/07/2013|
The proper term is "intact." There is nothing "un" about an all-natural penis with a foreskin.
You don't define something as "un" by what it naturally has and with which the male was born. I suppose 'cut' is okay for those where it applies since they are cut.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 10||10/07/2013|
To quote Woody Allen, my worst orgasm was right on the money. My circumcised dick feels pretty damn good. In fact, my orgasms are so intense that if I had any more nerve endings I don't think I'd be able to take it.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 11||10/07/2013|
All the penis growth DNA is in the foreskin.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 12||10/08/2013|
The two tiniest penises I ever saw were Mexican and uncut. Before I get any "racist" comments, I am also Mexican (but not tiny).
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 13||10/08/2013|
Go to Cam4 and you'll see hundreds of average uncut dicks at any given time.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 14||10/08/2013|
Woody Allen likes incest, so...
The majority of men in the world are uncut.
And yes, circumcision is a blood ritual based on superstition. You might as well advocate cutting off the clitoral hood and labia. Women have worse smegma than men. It's amazing the length the American medical community will go to try and support circumcision, even saying things as outrageous as it with give women cervical cancer.
The US medical community pushes it for religious purposes. Jews will cry antisemitism if you dare try to outlaw the barbaric practice. Muslims practice it too, however, they don't do it when the male is a baby. Rabbis suck the blood off the baby's penis. It's disgusting. We had a few babies in NY getting Herpes from it.
Even Dr. Spock came out and changed his opinion on circumcision after advocating it after WWII. He said it was unnecessary and apologized.
Circumcision came to the US thanks to a famous Christian fundamentalist who claimed it would stop little boys from touching their private areas.
If you want to get circumcised as an adult, go right ahead. Circumcision on youth should only be done in extreme cases.
I love the people who agree with all this but then state that if you outlaw it it'll continue to happen. Right, let's just get rid of all child laws then.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 15||10/08/2013|
Actually, R9, the male equivalent of female circ, would be a child held down against his will and forcefully circumcised. In that regard, female and male circ are comparable.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 16||10/08/2013|
According to Pfizers sales stats, American males use more Viagra than the next 10 countries combined. Considering the next 10 countries outnumber the male population of America, it's clearly not a population, or accessibility issue. Something is causing American males to pop boner pills by the fistful, and it could very well have something to do with the 80% circ rate.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 17||10/08/2013|
R17, Americans are typically worse lovers than foreigners. I'm South American and where I came from life was all about falling in love and being in love. I was taught that a person needed love in their life to be happy. When I came here to the USA, people here are more focused on their careers or work. They're nowhere near as romantic and passionate as where I'm from. Here, I was taught a person needed money/power in their life to be happy.
Meanwhile, white europeans are much better lovers.
When I first came to this country, and guys would ask me if I was cut or uncut, I'd always answer that I was cut (I'm actually uncut). To me, cut=ripped, and uncut=fat. I never got any complaints because the truth is that as long as it's big and thick, guys don't really care whether is cut or uncut. I don't. :)
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 18||10/08/2013|
So do these hyper sensitive uncut dicks cum faster?
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 19||10/08/2013|
I have only been with four guys I know of who were uncut. Only one had a "bigger penis."
Between his legs, a Brazilian had the sort of peenstravaganza the headline suggests. Definitely one of my "Big Five." He fit so nicely inside me. And such a nice guy. If I'd been staying in town, we probably would've moved in together.
Another guy had an uncircumcised dick of normal length and width, smaller than my own, but satisfying. He was a crazy Englishman who broke into my apartment, so it was not a lasting relationship.
The other two uncut guys, Puertorriqueños, sported two of the smallest dicks I have ever had in my mouth. One was as long and as thin as my pinky. I thought of him as "Q-Tip dick." A one-nighter.
The fourth uncut penis was the length and width of my ring finger. His was the only uncut penis that smelled. I thought of him as Señor Queso. Another one-nighter.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 20||10/08/2013|
Some things grow better in the shade, OP.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 21||10/08/2013|
 Jesus, someone who actually talks about us Europeans, yes it's quite right, we do care a lot about love! and I'm glad you brought us into it :)
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 22||02/27/2014|
It's because a penis that's intact with a foreskin is allowed to grow.
Some of the penis length and circumference because its double-layered wrapping of loose and usually overhanging foreskin is now missing, making the circumcised penis truncated and thinner than it would have been if left intact. An Australian survey in 1995 showed circumcised men to have erect penises an average of 8mm shorter than intact men. [1. R. D. Talarico and J. E. Jasaitis, "Concealed Penis: A Complication of Neonatal Circumcision," Journal of Urology 110 (1973): 732-733. 2. Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Why do condoms break or slip off in use? An exploratory study. Int J STD AIDS. 1995; 6(1):11-8. ]
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 24||03/04/2014|
R19 nope. Men who have foreskin have more control of when and how they ejaculate but it's always been that way for me and men I know who are not cut. Meanwhile all the cut men I have been with besides my ex all came very fast.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 25||03/04/2014|
[quote] My circumcised dick feels pretty damn good. In fact, my orgasms are so intense that if I had any more nerve endings I don't think I'd be able to take it.
Ditto. Cut and happy. Aesthetically, far prefer cut. In practice, either way doesn't really matter to me.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 26||03/04/2014|
R25 - you uncut guys need to take a page from the FOX NEWS playbook. Make sure everyone knows your talking points.
Just to be clear cut men have smaller less sensitive dicks - and cum faster.
Does the foreskin contain the "don't cum" nerves?
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 27||03/04/2014|
If anyone is wondering why these obscure threads from two or more years ago keep getting bumped, it's because someone has done a search, the threads either contain the names Woody Allen or Mia Farrow, and the shills have arrived to defend Woody's "good" reputation.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 28||03/04/2014|
These threads are started by uncut men who were ridiculed at school for having an ugly dick and are trying to show that they are no longer ashamed.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 29||03/04/2014|
It seems that there may never be agreement on whether a man should be cut or intact; most men who are intact prefer that state and most who are cut prefer being cut. But common ground can easily be found in one area: men need to take steps to maintain their overall penis health. One easy way to maintain general penis health is to regularly use a first rate penis health cream (health professionals recommend Man1 Man Oil). The best creams for the job will include a wide range of vitamins (A, B5, C, D and E); applying them directly to the penis in a topical cream helps them target the penis more efficiently. Also valuable in a penis health cream: alpha lipoic acid, an antioxidant which fights premature penis cell aging.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 30||07/11/2014|
This isn't true. I've seen huge dicks in my time, and they've been both cut and uncut.
The only certainty when it comes to dicks, is if he's from Cuba, he's going to be really, really thick.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 31||07/11/2014|
R30, you're an idiot for bumping a three year old thread that hardly got any replies during that time.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 32||07/11/2014|
Nothing is grosser than uncut dicks. I'd rather suck a 2" cut cock than an 8" uncut one.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 33||07/11/2014|
I have already pontificated. I shall not shriek again, other than to say that I never thought about this before DL. Now I wonder every time I go out of the house: is he? isn't he?
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 34||07/11/2014|
Is anyone concerned over 5% less or less or 8 millimeters?
Even if it's true - so the fuck what? And it's cleaner to be cut.
There's a reason why some religions did it.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 35||07/11/2014|
What a crock of shit. Cut it.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 36||07/11/2014|
Of the ten largest penises with which I've had congress, only one was uncut. Sorry, OP.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 37||07/14/2014|
Ooooooh thuck it babyyyyy
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 38||01/26/2015|
God some people are stupid here. An intact penis is as it says, natural, the way it was meant to be. Of course if you remove a big chunk of skin off of it the penis will be smaller. Simple biology! Oh, and some men are cut so tight that there's no room for the penis to grow. Another point, cut or intact, if you wash it, it's going to be clean and if you don't it's going to be dirty. Simple hygiene! Finally, circumcision is an unnecesserary procedure that like any other procedure as it's risks. The reality is babies die every year because of circumcision, so what's the point.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 39||05/30/2015|
The very first penis I put in my mouth that was uncircumcised was as thick and as long as a Q-Tip. My other "smallest" was cut.
I had two boyfriends who were uncut. Only one of them could honestly be described as well-hung (it was so pretty, it slid right in). The odds are really no different than with cut penises. What a silly assertion, OP.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 41||05/30/2015|
*yawwwn* only in the DL microcosms is this topic discuss this much. Some of you don't get laid much to be up in arms about such a stupid thing.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 42||05/30/2015|
I feel like only guys and immature girls have a problem with it being cut and uncut. To me it doesn't matter as long as it's clean I've had both it's all about the person I feel. Like what if the love of ur life is uncut are you gonna just say hey ur perfect but ur not circumcised so I can't be with you...and sometimes you don't even notice unless they are soft and sorry not sorry both cut n uncut look gross soft.
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 43||06/30/2016|
At least I don't call anyone "ur."
|by Cut guys: you lost up to 70000 erogenous nerve endings||reply 44||06/30/2016|