Michael Fassbender: "It's Just A Peen!"
Michael Fassbender (the "F" is silent) plays a fuck addict of Gerard Butler proportions in Shame and one of the opening scenes features him sprawled on top of a bed with a clear shot of his sleeping peen in a post-cum state. That scene earned the movie an NC-17 rating and Michael thinks the whole thing is ridiculous, because who hasn't seen a dick before? Put down your hand, Justin Bieber, you don't count, girl!
Michael explained his thoughts on the rating system's anti-cock policy to Huffington Post (via Towleroad) like this: "Half of us have a penis and the other half have probably seen one, and so why should it be more normal to, like, chop people's heads off and shoot people? Does that mean that that's more acceptable or closer to us as human beings?" Assbender is nothing but right. What humanity really needs from the world of cinema is less cut heads and more cut AND uncut heads if you know what I mean.
And I'm guessing that Michael Fassbender doesn't have a problem with putting his dick situation in front of the cameras, because he's a brave thespian and is attracted to emotionally damaged characters who have built walls around themselves and must expose their raw vulnerability to the audience by stripping away the layers that hide their pain. Or bitch just has a big dick.
Here's Assbender with Eli Roth and Rose McGowan at the GQ Men of the Year Awards last night.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||12/13/2013|
Every time I look at that pic I get all tingly and my legs begin mysteriously to rise off the ground.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||11/19/2011|
He is so incredibly charismatic, but...he is not aging well. He looks 10 years older than his alleged 34 years.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||11/19/2011|
[quote]on the rating system's anti-cock policy
Straight males are to blame for that.
They don't like to compare themselves and they definitely don't want their wives/gfs to compare.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||11/19/2011|
r4 He's a heavy smoker and drinker and god knows what else.
I see him going the way of Colin Farrell if he's not careful. I hope he drags himself out of it like Farrell did.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||11/19/2011|
I absolutely agree. The whole anti-penis shit is unhealthy in so many ways.
1) It's homophobic. The only men who are squeamish about seeing another's dude's penis are homophobes. 2) It's prude. The only women who are squeamish about seeing a dude's penis are well- prudes who need to lighten up and get a grip.
3) It's a total double standard. Women can be but-ass naked from head to toe and oh, "that's classical beauty" but often it's for pointless reason and it's objectification.
A penis is just another part of the anatomy. America needs to grow up.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||11/19/2011|
r8 I agree, but it also comes down to how actors feel about doing it, i.e. how it will affect their careers.
I think a lot of actors look down on it as beneath them, yet they expect the women to as a matter of course. Actors are also notoriously insecure.
The closet is also ridiculous for entertainers, but as long as the industry is invested in it, it won't disappear. Same with a ban on male full frontal.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||11/19/2011|
The thing is, Michael Fassbender's penis is not just a penis. It is a god-sized super-appendage that strikes us all blind and dumb upon sight. My hair went gray at a screening of Shame. My friend turned into a pillar of salt.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||11/19/2011|
Does he only date in Europe?
Anyway, even if what he and others say about the peen thing is true and men start showing more dickage in movies, what will actors with tiny dicks do?
|by Anonymous||reply 14||11/19/2011|
We don't need that sort of vulgarity in motion pictures.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||11/19/2011|
r7, all the drinkers and smokers I know look years younger than their actual ages while the health nuts look decidedly older.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||11/19/2011|
The penis in non-sexual repose is OK for an R rating, but tumescence, either pre-, post- or active coital, is cause for the more restrictive rating.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||11/19/2011|
I do not need to see this kind of filth. Do you know how many people take their kids to the movies? Do you think parents want to see this filth pop up during the coming attractions?
|by Anonymous||reply 19||11/19/2011|
R19 those kids were made with the help of a penis.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||11/19/2011|
r18, that's simply not true. The sight of a penis gets you a restricted rating or beyond. You should look at the guidelines.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||11/19/2011|
The more the merrier I say.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||11/19/2011|
r21, you agree with r18 that the sight of a penis gets you at least a restricted (R) rating, so I don't see the point of your post.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||11/19/2011|
Some of you are missing the point: why is it ok for an R-rated movie to feature people getting killed in graphic imagery, but a naked man or explicitly implied sexuality gets smacked with an NC-17? To me, such a value system is completely upside down and non-sensical
|by Anonymous||reply 24||11/19/2011|
R24, just playing devil's advocate here, the people getting killed in graphic imagery is fake, they're not really being dismembered, whereas a penis in this case is real. It's really his dick. Marky Mark's full frontal in BOOGIE NIGHTS was talked about but didn't earn the movie an NC-17 rating 'cause it wasn't a real penis.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||11/19/2011|
Because in sexy scenes you are looking at real body parts -- tits, asses, pussy, cock...
But in violent movies it's just special effects. No real limbs or heads are harmed in the making of the production.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||11/19/2011|
How movies like Saw or Hostil get R ratings is beyond me. Both movies feature the disembowelment of naked women.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||11/19/2011|
Did anyone read that interview around the time Jane Eyre came out with Mia W? She said they kept having a problem with the horse that Fassbender was riding, cause every time he got on it, the horse would get a massive erection and they couldn't shoot. True story, she said that. I can't get that out of my mind now whenever he is mentioned.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||11/19/2011|
[italic][R21], you agree with [R18] that the sight of a penis gets you at least a restricted (R) rating, so I don't see the point of your post.[/italic]
No. What I'm saying is, the penis doesn't have to be semi-hard to get a higher rating. A flaccid penis makes the board lose their marbles as well.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||11/19/2011|
Male full frontal scenes are rated more harshly because you see actual genitalia. With women, all you see is bush. The last taboo in films is showing cunt.
Also, why are female breasts are given an R rating? They should be shown in G-rated films.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||11/19/2011|
R12 said: The thing is, Michael Fassbender's penis is not just a penis. It is a god-sized super-appendage that strikes us all blind and dumb upon sight. My hair went gray at a screening of Shame. My friend turned into a pillar of salt.
Did anybody else have this problem while viewing Shame? (lol)
|by Anonymous||reply 31||12/06/2011|
[quote]My hair went gray at a screening of Shame.
I hate it when that happens.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||12/06/2011|
New rule: no bumping Fassbender threads without a high res screen cap.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||12/06/2011|
I agree R33 this Fassbender bitch is a cocktease!! (lol)
(Chanting "where is the cock, where is the cock)
|by Anonymous||reply 34||12/06/2011|
[quote]My hair went gray at a screening of Shame. My friend turned into a pillar of salt.
Christ you two are a couple of pussies.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||12/06/2011|
does he discuss in any of these interviews whether he enjoys being uncut and having his foreskin licked and teased?
|by Anonymous||reply 36||12/06/2011|
No R36 he hasn't shared that with us yet.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||12/08/2011|
I've got to assume you're feigning outrage here r35, otherwise you are one of the most humorless morons I've ever encountered.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||12/08/2011|
[quote][R19] those kids were made with the help of a penis.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||12/08/2011|
The underlying problem is that the Religious Right still has it's claws in almost everything - including the movie rating industry. And unfortunately, no one will stand up and challenge the way things are done.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||12/08/2011|
Totally agree with R24- all murder and mahem and sex in films is "make believe". That craven violence is deemed less damaging than penises, breast, vaginas, asses etc is simply astounding... and very American. As a friend of mine loves to say "cover your shame".
Speaking of Shame- I know nothing of this film- something coming out soon, or did I miss it?
|by Anonymous||reply 41||12/08/2011|
I assume that last sentence is meant to be sarcastic, charlie ?
|by Anonymous||reply 42||12/08/2011|
Would he have taken on the role if he wasn’t so well-endowed: “Well I didn’t really know… I mean I don’t have any reference points really, uh… I had a sister growing up so you know I wasn’t sure. I figured I was uh, average.”
What was going through his head when he realized he was going full frontal: “Well you know, it’s sort of um, do I need to sort of trim…I’m obviously a red-head…
Starts at 3:20
|by Anonymous||reply 43||12/12/2011|
and what a peen it was too !!!!!!!!!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 44||12/29/2011|
Anyone have a screen shot of the scene in the movie?
|by Anonymous||reply 45||12/29/2011|
Why don't you just buy a fucking ticket to see the movie. There's more to the film than his dick!
|by Anonymous||reply 46||12/29/2011|
The threesome has been leaked.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||01/13/2012|
"of Gerard Butlerproportions"?
I had no idea Gerard Butler was a manwhore.
He's sort of ugly, you know.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||01/13/2012|
The movie was sooooo boring.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||01/13/2012|
[quote]Also, why are female breasts are given an R rating?
They're not. See Titanic.
You can show penis and still get an R rating as long as its not sexualized. See Bruno or Wild Things or Eurotrip.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||01/13/2012|
Good film - and a seriously nice peen, even non-erect.
I agree with him. Enough with America's tendency to overindulge in gratuitous violence but freak out about nudity/sex.
|by Anonymous||reply 51||01/13/2012|
He's right. It's especially hypocritical because full frontal nudity of women is very common.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||01/13/2012|
But we don't see lips, R52. I think that's where the line is drawn at women's nudity. If a man hides his junk between his legs (like Ryan Reynolds did in some movie--Cash Cow?--I don't remember), then it's the same as a woman doing a "full frontal" but not showing the flaps.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||01/13/2012|
Here's what I was thinking of.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||01/13/2012|
Reminds me of Hugh Jackman in the locker room at NYSC when he did Boy from Oz. He was getting dressed when this man obviously began to stare at his dick.
He said "It' just a wanger, look down, you've got one too."
|by Anonymous||reply 55||01/13/2012|
R55. How do you know that happened?
|by Anonymous||reply 56||01/13/2012|
I saw the film (Shame) quite good and he is quite good in it. Yes he "shows", yes he is gorgeous. And he is perfectly right, nothing wrong with nudity. Rather there is something wrong with those who try to spin nudity into something dirty or evil or frightening. Such people usually think sex is also something dirty, evil or frightening and for some reason something children should be shielded from. Why?
|by Anonymous||reply 57||01/13/2012|
R56 because I was there.
I was behind Hugh so did not see the look on his face but he did get a laugh.
|by Anonymous||reply 58||01/13/2012|
The ratings board overeacted about the whole thing.
|by Anonymous||reply 60||01/30/2012|
The ratings board is as corrupt as they come. Watch "This Film is Not Yet Rated", it's an EXCELLENT doc. Streaming on Netflix.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||01/30/2012|
[quote]Would he have taken on the role if he wasn’t so well-endowed: “Well I didn’t really know… I mean I don’t have any reference points really, uh… I had a sister growing up so you know I wasn’t sure. I figured I was uh, average.”
|by Anonymous||reply 62||01/30/2012|
Saw the film. Yes, his cock is shockingly big. Even in the pissing scene, he looks like a bull from behind. It looks like it must weigh ten pounds. It's not the first time he showed it off.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||01/30/2012|
He has a weird cock. It's difficult to tell whether he is uncut.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||01/30/2012|
Looks to me like he's uncut and his foreskin is just retracted.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||01/30/2012|
Why am I getting 'this page is forbidden' when I click the link R63/R64?
|by Anonymous||reply 67||01/31/2012|
Why would he be retracted?
Press return in the URL bar after the page loads to make the forbidden message go away.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||01/31/2012|
Better cockshots scroll down.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||02/08/2012|
Some genius adjusted the contrast, etc. and gives a much clearer view of little Michael...
|by Anonymous||reply 71||02/08/2012|
Not just a peen it's an impressive sausage! At least that's what the Top Gear guy says.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||02/28/2012|
It's just not a peen it's a "notre dame bell ringer"
|by Anonymous||reply 74||06/19/2012|
R62, I know, right?
[quote]Would he have taken on the role if he wasn't so well-endowed: “Well I didn’t really know… I mean I don’t have any reference points really, uh… I had a sister growing up so you know I wasn’t sure. I figured I was uh, average.”
So he didn't know he was hung until he was 34? Really? Snort. He'd never been in a locker room and his girlfriends hadn't been wide-eyed? He'd never seen any other male nudity on film? He was completely clueless? That's what he's peddling? BS Of course he knew he was hung and it had everything to do with his willingness to strut his stuff on film.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||09/27/2012|
I just hope we continue to see his peen in action. The swinging is most enjoyable.
|by Anonymous||reply 77||10/02/2012|