Was "Will & Grace" a classic sitcom?
The Karen Walker thread reminded me of how many great lines the writers crafted for her. The writing was excellent in general and had hilarious bitchy one-liners; and some episodes are certainly classics (like the spelling bee at the gay bar, or the final episode where Beverly Lesley dies by being blown off the balcony).
But the Will character was so dislikeable and unpleasant. And though I like Sean Hayes, the Jack character, which could sometimes be very funny, was such a collection of nasty stereotypes about gay men.
|by Anonymous||reply 148||04/09/2016|
It was hugely limited by the fact that the unpleasant Max Mutchnick based Will on himself and the other major characters except Karen on real people he knew. Karen was by far the funniest character since she was basically made up on the spot by Megan Mullaly (who has great comic timing and invention).
|by Anonymous||reply 2||09/05/2011|
It was a sitcom about a gay man who's emotional life revolves around...a woman. %0D %0D Whatever the show's intentions, the underlying theme of W&G wound up being "isn't it just too bad he's gay?" No wonder Republican women turned out to be big fans of the show.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||09/05/2011|
Yes, "Will & Grace" is a classic sitcom. The show was also groundbreaking. Yes sure, there were other gay characters on television before W&G, but this show lasted a long time and had endearing, funny and memorable characters. Also, each of the four leads won an Emmy for their performancs--some even more than one Emmy. And I believe the show itself may have also won. Karen Walker is as memorable and funny as Suzanne and Julia Sugarbaker from "Designing Women"--another classic. %0D %0D Even in reruns, "Will & Grace" is still one of the best writen comedies on television. I wish it were still on the air with new episodes.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||09/05/2011|
I'm not sure why it ended. Ratings were decent. And it's not like any of them shot to stardom afterwards.%0D %0D Did the Fundie letter writing campaign finally wear NBC down?%0D %0D Bet they'd like to have that couple extra season's worth of money now, hmm?
|by Anonymous||reply 5||09/05/2011|
There were so many issues with the show, not the least of which was that it was written as if the characters were straight.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||09/05/2011|
Yes, just like "Amos and Andy".
|by Anonymous||reply 8||09/05/2011|
The Karen character was funny, but she was really just a watered-down imitation of AbFab's Patsy Stone.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||09/05/2011|
Sadly, the lame, forgettable episodes far outweigh the classics. Too many guest-star cameos that added nothing, too much stunt-casting for love interests and family members, too much Rosario. One of those shows where the writing could be great yet no real memorable/classic episodes stand out. The Karen Walker thread is full of fantastic one-liners or exchanges but what episodes are they from?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||09/05/2011|
Has not held up, except moments with Karen. R2 summarizes it's problems very well.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||09/05/2011|
It was probably the single most varied in quality series EVER.
Some episodes were as funny as anything ever on TV, and some were so awful I couldn't believe it.
Peaked in Seasons 2-4.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||09/05/2011|
I think the actors, although appealing and talented, were a little too old to start out. That made the producers feel the need to add the dreary Harry Connick (although I did feel Woody Harrelson was a good fit) for the aging Grace. He turded in every puchbowl.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||09/05/2011|
For all its problems, it still holds up as very funny. And Karen was hysterical.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||09/05/2011|
No, far from classic. They took a good premise, with a marginally talented (besides Megan Mullaly) cast but started too quickly to rely on stunt casting and plot devices that took away from the heart of the show. It had a ton of promise and had some really good episodes, but it will largely be forgotten in years to come. I don't even think it's playing in reruns anywhere, which is weird when you consider how many other shows of the time are!
|by Anonymous||reply 17||09/05/2011|
Clever as hell, but not an ounce of genuine humanity to be found. It'll be a footnote at best.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||09/05/2011|
Bump. The show was referenced by the vice president of the United States. I think it's a classic. Nobody can deny how groundbreaking it was.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||11/15/2012|
"Please don't come here with your bullshit questions and made up words."
Do you think he'll apolypsize?
|by Anonymous||reply 21||11/15/2012|
Could not stand Messing and McCormick but LOVED Mullaley and Hayes...they were the only reason I watched it..
|by Anonymous||reply 22||11/15/2012|
I'm on the fence about whether it's a classic, but it certainly had its moments. Megan Mullally was definitely the stand out due to both the way her character was written and her comedic delivery. Sean Hayes did a decent job as well. Will and Grace were just dull as dishwater. Love Deb Messing, especially on "Smash", but she's just not funny.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||11/15/2012|
For the dislik(e)able poster posting bullshit at r20:
|by Anonymous||reply 24||11/15/2012|
I think it deserves the classic label as much as any other recent series. There were shows that were funnier, and quirkier, but W&G was something new for the American audience.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||11/15/2012|
Pretty much ignored Will and Grace, only watched it for Karen and Beverly Leslie. Because I reek of gin and desperation.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||11/15/2012|
[quote]No wonder Republican women turned out to be big fans of the show.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||11/15/2012|
I get up early every weekday morning just so I can catch an hour of W&G reruns with my morning coffee.
Never watched it while it was in production, but love it now. Definitely a classic.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||11/15/2012|
It's overdramatic, I know -- but I thought as this, in conjunction with "Queer Eye", as the day gays gave up on fighting the cliche. Maybe everyone was just too damn tired during the awful Bush years -- but I never knew why GLAAD existed anymore if this stereotype-driven show was deemed "progressive".
flamboyant Jack or neutured Will? which one you wanna be...
|by Anonymous||reply 30||11/15/2012|
I think it's one of the 5 best sitcoms ever, together with Cheers, Frasier, Simpsons and Spin City. I even find it the 3rd best TV show, all genres combined.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||11/15/2012|
[quote]I think it's one of the 5 best sitcoms ever, together with... Spin City.
I don't think I've ever cringed quite like I just cringed.
You have the worst taste ever.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||11/16/2012|
I hated the show and didn't find it funny. However, I recognize its significance, and I would consider it classic TV.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||11/16/2012|
I agree with the stunt casting, but the fact that really held it back is that the characters were so unpleasant to each other. I remember when it ended a reviewer said the show should have been more like Friends, but it became more like Seinfeld where all these damaged unlikeable people hung out with each other as no one else would.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||11/16/2012|
I agree with the poster who said its quality was extremely varied. From one moment to the next, it could go from wickedly funny to cheesy, trite, and...just bad.
But there were also a few good-stupid moments.
"Oh, I dthon't dthrive. I keep on thakingh the thesth over and over, but I'm all...thisth isth hard!"
"Hurt so good! Come on, baby, make it hurt so good!"
|by Anonymous||reply 35||11/16/2012|
It was an extremely mean-spirited show but without the intelligence of something like Absolutely Fabulous. So we were left with a bunch of unfunny, mediocre "talents" being nasty to each other.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||11/16/2012|
I don't know squat but I could not abide 5 minutes of "Friends" yet found this show the funniest thing on TV at the time.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||11/16/2012|
I was too young to watch it live, but I love it now. I find Friends horrible. But I actually record Fraser and Will & Grace eps. Both are better than any current sitcom, save Parks & Rec and (sometimes) Community.
I think Karen Walker is the best sitcom character ever and she makes the inconsistent Will, Grace, and "star" cameos tolerable.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||11/16/2012|
I think I'm one of the only people who likes the later seasons more after Kohan and Mutchnick left. It became more surreal, over-the-top, and satiric. The characters of Will and Grace were much more palatable when they became parodies of their former selves and similar to Jack and Karen.
While I think the quality of the dialogue was some of the highest ever, the fact that the show was never really able to find a long-term storyline that worked may prevent it from being considered a classic.
It was groundbreaking though, maybe not for gay representation, but in changing straight people's opinions of gay people. And while many gay people may Jack offensive, he's the mainly the reason for this.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||11/16/2012|
R30 I totally agree, especially with "Queer Eye". It has never been given proper credit for introducing "gay" into a main stream audience. Despite what everyone on this board thinks, up to just a few short years ago, many people had not been exposed to gays in their everyday lives. Like all differences, what was not understood, was not accepted. It's wonderful to see that change. I give "Queer Eye" and W&G their props for being instrumental in the movement.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||11/16/2012|
Thought is was bad. You lose me at "sitcom." The only intelligent sitcoms were Norman Lear sitcoms, and even those relied on a lot of hackneyed slap stick story lines. My mom used to say, rightly so, that most sitcoms ripped off I Love Lucy, and that Lucy herself ripped off Red Buttons, who was ripping off Buster Keaton, who probably ripped off some Vaudeville comedian. It's all old and stale and TV in general panders to the lowest common denominator of intelligence.
I find my friends who try to elevate television shows in honor of their camp value to be pretty apathetic and unintelligent for the most part, although I still accept them because I try to keep an open mind about stupidity even though my eyes glaze over when they discuss some stupid show that I just have to watch.
Pick up a damn book, people, and shut off the mind control machine!
|by Anonymous||reply 43||11/16/2012|
What a load of pretentious twaddle, R43.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||11/16/2012|
Lol, R44. The best part was when he said he had friends.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||11/16/2012|
Extemely funny show! Yes, a classic! Still watch it in reruns and laugh my ass off. Great writing! Really great. And very ground breaking. I think it led to an acceptance of gay people in a big way.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||11/16/2012|
I loved it, and my opinion is the only one that matters!
|by Anonymous||reply 47||11/16/2012|
Not pretentious at all, just different from the mainstream, watered down, milquetoast view that popular culture means more than it does. Sure, I like popular culture as much as the next person, but please do not try to tell me that it is actual mental nutrition, it is not.
I have heretofore tolerated the dominant culture of anti-intellectualism that pervades the United States because I've always supported people's right to choose whatever they wished to entertain themselves.
Now that stupidity is the overwhelming attitude of the day, and people are becoming more and more illiterate and proud of it, I am actively combating it in my own quiet way, in my life and online. If you see this as pretentious, that is your choice. I was offering a different view point from the common one, I thought that was allowed here.
Will and Grace used stereotypes of gay culture to sell products, much as reality shows do. No, I was not fond of it, nor will I be fond of it in retrospect. I would like to set the bar higher in culture in general and not be happy to get mere crumbs from the establishment. I don't buy the argument that any representation is better than no representation at all, and I agree with the poster up thread who likened the show to Amos and Andy. Most of the gay people I know are fully rounded people with a wide variety of interests who just so happen to be gay also. Even the ones who have what could be called more stereotypical traits use those as a foil for commenting on gender and society. Will and Grace had no such self awareness.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||11/16/2012|
OP lost me when he stated that he considered the episode where Beverly Leslie flew off the balcony to be a classic. One of the more stupid moments from, quite possibly, the worst season.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||11/16/2012|
R48, there's a time for Proust and a time for harmless fun. Sitcoms, or whatever you'd like to call them, fall under the latter category. Unclench. Not everything we watch or enjoy has to be The Abyss or The Way of the Flesh.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||11/17/2012|
All the shows were directed by James Burrows, who also co-created Cheers. There were also other people from Frasier and Cheers involved in the show, and I find it reaches a similar level. The three have also something of a trilogy. I think I have read though that Eric McCormack has been in the book 'Room 23' by Diane Jenkins, not good.
|by Anonymous||reply 51||11/17/2012|
[quote]My mom used to say, rightly so, that most sitcoms ripped off I Love Lucy, and that Lucy herself ripped off Red Buttons...
Your mom needs to discover the facts that Red Buttons and Red Skelton are not the same person.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||11/18/2012|
I took groups of paid audience members as a fundraiser for the LAGLC the first and second seasons of W&G. The tapings were done at the Radford studios in Studio City.
That is until they got really popular and stopped the non-profit buy-in. I wonder if they resumed the program when the writing wasn't on the wall...
|by Anonymous||reply 54||11/18/2012|
"Will and Grace" was misogynistic and, in a weird sort of way, not terribly fond of gay people either.
|by Anonymous||reply 55||11/18/2012|
"Will & Grace" only became popular because there was nothing else on television. Same goes for "Friends" which played second fiddle to "Seinfeld." Once "Seinfeld" was off the air, everyone watched these sitcoms like they did with the iconic, must-see "Seinfeld." "Friends" had a lot of viewers, but not the amount it drove up until "Seinfeld" was off the air. "Will & Grace" premiered soon after "Seinfeld" departed.
|by Anonymous||reply 56||11/18/2012|
I wouldn't call it a classic. It was a show about two gay people and two straight people that was written for a straight audience. People who look like Will and are stable and successful are usually in a relationship. In eight seasons, Will had virtually no love life. The producers did everything to avoid showing two men expressing desire. In order to compensate for that, they turned Grace into a slut...she even had a sex scene with Woody Harleson. Grace simply wasn't a likeable character; she's far to irritating, shallow, and needy. Jack wears his sexuality on his sleeve and his entire identity seems to revolve around his sexuality. If a woman behaved they way he did, I'd find it tiresome. I found Karen to be the best actor of all four and the most entertaining. She's the archetypical mature rich bitch with a drug problem, an image that's very appealing to gay men everywhere. The show had its moments, and I do have all eight seasons on my hard drive; however, I'd watch Cheers, Taxi, and The Golden Girls before Will and Grace.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||03/12/2013|
The worst part about this sitcom is that the people weren't real. To be a good sitcom it should involve realistic characters involved in realistic events. Why does everyone think a sitcom should be funny?
Oh, wait! Nevermind!
|by Anonymous||reply 58||03/13/2013|
Why does season 8 freeze up on my DVD player?
|by Anonymous||reply 59||03/13/2013|
Will and Grace is about the only sitcom I have liked. I loathed Friends yet loved this show.
|by Anonymous||reply 60||03/13/2013|
R59, your DVD is trying to tell you that Season 8 has no redeeming qualities.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||03/13/2013|
I like it but I can't really recall an episode that stood out or can be consider a classic.
Seinfeld has several of them. So does Golden Girls.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||03/13/2013|
[quote]"Will and Grace" was misogynistic and, in a weird sort of way, not terribly fond of gay people either.
Kind of like DataLounge.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||03/13/2013|
They peaked in Season 6. Every episode is good.
|by Anonymous||reply 64||03/13/2013|
[quote]I can't really recall an episode that stood out
"The Sound of Music" episode was hilarious. I nearly fell off my chair when Ralph opened the closet and aimed his flashlight at them, just like Rolf did in the cemetery.
The episode with Chita Rivera and Michele Lee as lesbians was great, too. That also featured Leslie Jordan/Beverly Leslie (I forget which is his real name).
|by Anonymous||reply 65||03/13/2013|
The quality of the show may have varied over the years, and the stereotypes and de-sexualization could be maddening, BUT no other television program has done more, over time, to make straight people less afraid of gay people.
From both sides of political spectrum -- Joe Biden and now Rick Santorum -- you'll hear that Will & Grace has been instrumental in moving forward acceptance of gay marriage. And its influence will continue.
Whether you enjoyed watching the show or not, it's still a pretty rare and impressive legacy for a sitcom.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||03/31/2013|
I was always surprised that there didn't seem to be an attempt to do a Jack and Karen spin-off when the series ended.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||03/31/2013|
Classic? No way. It could be funny sometimes but nothing great. I stopped watching it after season 4.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||03/31/2013|
That's because neither Sean nor Megan wanted to be trapped forever (although that sort of happens anyway for sitcom actors) as Jack and Karen. They ALL were ready to MOVE ON.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||03/31/2013|
I never liked this show. The only time I tuned in was when a celebrity I liked was going to be on (the numerous celeb guests were pretty much the only reason this show stayed on for so long).
|by Anonymous||reply 70||03/31/2013|
They should have thought twice then. Especially Sean.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||03/31/2013|
Not a classic at all. Jacks character fell right into every straight persons stereotype for gays. Will would have been coupled in real life. I thought it did no favors for the ay community as a show. Karen could be funny though. I agree that the last couple of seasons sucked out loud.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||03/31/2013|
This show was almost like a variety show with the way they relied so heavily on celebrity guest stars - there was a guest star almost every week.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||03/31/2013|
Ha, Sean is doing just fine. He starred last year on Broadway in Promises, Promises. He executive produces Hot in Cleveland. He is richer than shit. And he is pitching a new sitcom pilot for CBS with him in the lead role. He can leave Jack McFarland behind except for the occasional reunion, I am quite sure.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||03/31/2013|
I'm with 73, I couldn't stand Seinfeld either. And actually quite liked Friends and Will & Grace. But the best sitcom of the 90's was Fraiser.
That being said, I actually think that the last few years have great Comedy series have been produced. I actually like Modern Family, Parks, Big Bang (it's first seasons were better), The Middle (yeah, I like that show, mostly because of the Children).
|by Anonymous||reply 76||03/31/2013|
It took him five years after the show finished to really do/get anything. And I don't think he'll ever really be anything other than Jack to anyone.
|by Anonymous||reply 77||03/31/2013|
Yeah and most of the stunt casting was just bad. I did love the Glenn Close episode though and the Michael Douglas one had some funny moments.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||03/31/2013|
Sean Hayes was an embarrassment on SMASH. And while I give him credit for finally coming out, he wasn't very good in the PROMISES PROMISES revival. I'm glad he's moved into producing, and wish him well, but I think his days as a performer are behind him.
I liked the show in its initial run, with reservations. When I see the syndicated repeats, it feels 200 years old.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||03/31/2013|
[quote][R30] I totally agree, especially with "Queer Eye". It has never been given proper credit for introducing "gay" into a main stream audience.
You do realize r30 was actually discrediting "Queer Eye" for perpetuating the male gay stereotype.
Although I don't agree with him that we gave up fighting more than we saw there was a wider range of homosexual representation in the media so that we could relax about this particular one.
However, W&G's constant reliance on fashion, grooming, and female icon jokes did grate on my nerves, not for the politics but for the lame, predictable humor.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||04/01/2013|
Karen was a great character.Jack was a good character..Will was an ok character, but they never gave him anything to do. Until like the last season he never had a love life. Grace was the worst character in my opinion.
|by Anonymous||reply 81||04/01/2013|
It wasn't. But it now is.
|by Anonymous||reply 82||04/01/2013|
As most everyone has noted, the writing varied greatly but, when it was good, it was very good. My only problem was Will's love life. The producers obviously wanted Will not to have one and that lack of bravery will ruin the show in the long term. Will obviously would have been partnered in real life and would have made a relationship work. And then, if Will had more of a life, they could have toned down the worst part of the show: Grace's self-involved, pitiable "relationships" and "marriage." Every time she turned around there was another man in her life and each relationship was worse than the other.
|by Anonymous||reply 83||04/01/2013|
No. Nor is Friends. If you watch old Seinfeld episodes, they're still really funny. Friend and W&G are not.
|by Anonymous||reply 84||04/01/2013|
Karen Walker was a vicious stereotype of a New York socialite. I have dear friends on the Upper East Side who wouldn't watch the show for that reason. Did it never occur to the creators of Will & Grace that socialites are people too?
|by Anonymous||reply 85||04/01/2013|
This thread has made me curious about the show...watched the first 2 seasons, then never could catch it regularly...where can one watch the entire series online? Netflix/xbox video/hulu doesn't seem to carry them
|by Anonymous||reply 86||04/01/2013|
[quote]there's a time for Proust and a time for harmless fun. Sitcoms, or whatever you'd like to call them, fall under the latter category. Unclench. Not everything we watch or enjoy has to be The Abyss or The Way of the Flesh.
This is the truth. Some people do not seem to have the capability for harmless, meaningless fun. They are bores.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||04/01/2013|
W&G had its moments sure, and Karen was wonderful, but other than that... I never cared for the characters and I guess that's why it was a show I only watched if I remembered or nothing else was on. For me it certainly wasn't something I'd watch every week, eventhough I really wanted to love it.
That being said, I think it was a classic sitcom in a way it had an ensemble cast and despite being groundbreaking at the time FOR the gay characters, it was still a very much a show that relied on classic tropes and what not.
|by Anonymous||reply 88||04/01/2013|
"I think it's one of the 5 best sitcoms ever, together with Cheers, Frasier, Simpsons and Spin City."
Says r31, who has never seen "Taxi," "I Married Joan" (television didn't begin in the 1980's), "Dobie Gillis," or "The Honeymooners."
|by Anonymous||reply 89||04/01/2013|
r85, your "dear friends" ARE stereotypes if they didn't howl over Karen Walker. People can have a sense of humor about themselves, you know. Humorless self-important cunts wouldn't watch Will and Grace, no.
|by Anonymous||reply 90||04/02/2013|
Lifetime seems to have returned to showing a two-hour, four-episode block of Will and Grace, now from 11:00AM-1PM daily.
|by Anonymous||reply 92||04/09/2013|
it was annoying to me that they gave Grace such an active love life, but couldn't do the same for Will. Wow how original, a straight women has alot of relationships..
|by Anonymous||reply 93||04/12/2013|
Nathan was such an insensitive ass.
|by Anonymous||reply 94||04/19/2013|
I'm rediscovering it. It's super loose with the F words. And mo and all the other slurs.
|by Anonymous||reply 95||04/08/2014|
[quote]just like "Amos and Andy".
Whoa! I didn't know they were gay. Radio in that era must have really been out in front.
|by Anonymous||reply 96||04/08/2014|
I loved the Sound of Music episode, especially the snack bar manger, Ralph/Rolf, shining his flashlight into the closet and finding them hiding there.
|by Anonymous||reply 97||04/08/2014|
[all posts by childish idiot removed]
|by Anonymous||reply 98||04/08/2014|
W&G featured one of the only acting appearances by Madonna that I actually found funny. She was good enough for me to wish they would spin her off.
|by Anonymous||reply 99||04/08/2014|
[quote] She was good enough for me to wish they would spin her off.
Really? I am no Madonna hater but she was so painfully unfunny that I find that episode virtually unwatchable. But, you could say that about most of the one-off guest stars that polluted the show in its later years.
|by Anonymous||reply 100||04/08/2014|
I didn't see the Madonna episode. I loved the one with Patti LuPone. Ellen as a nun was the worst guest star ever.
|by Anonymous||reply 101||04/08/2014|
Matt Damon sparring with Jack in the choral group was a great episode.
|by Anonymous||reply 102||04/09/2014|
A lot of cameos by "gay icons" (Madonna, JLo, Elton John, Martina Navratilova,...) were largely pointless but the episode where Jack mistakes Cher for a drag queen impersonating Cher was hysterical.
|by Anonymous||reply 103||04/09/2014|
The interactions of Grace and her mother Bobbi were always hysterical. The ep when Jack puts on a wig and tries to emulate Bobbi was only funny when Grace grabbed the wig off his head and started beating him with it. And any episode with Leslie Jordan as Beverly Leslie was always fun.
|by Anonymous||reply 104||04/09/2014|
Will was the worst character. He turned out to be totally unlikeable.
|by Anonymous||reply 106||04/09/2014|
[quote] Karen Walker was a vicious stereotype of a New York socialite.[/quote]
There wasn't much continuity as far as Karen's actual background.
IIRC, initially Karen was presented as coming from old money, but was working for Grace for 'something to do'. Then her background appeared to be that of a social climbing grifter type who married a very wealthy, but tremendously obese man. (Anyone know why we never got to see Stan?)
Remember the episode where Karen was supposed to do one last grift with her waitress mother, played by Suzanne Pleshette?
Let's not forget Karen's S&M film!
|by Anonymous||reply 107||04/16/2014|
I thought Stan made her work and Grace put up with her for her connections to potential clients. I didn't remember the old money bit.
Not seeing Stan worked much better than any actor could hae. And Rosario functioned well as her husband of sorts when we needed to see Karen's home life.
|by Anonymous||reply 108||04/16/2014|
I would say it was definitely ground-breaking, but not classic.
|by Anonymous||reply 109||04/16/2014|
Like some others here, I loathed Seinfeld. Can't stand it. Liked Friends a lot and always watched Will & Grace. It was maddeningly uneven, but I do believe W&G is a classic and it's the one old sitcom I still watch in reruns.
Classic episodes include the ones with Cher, Matt Damon, Mira Sorvino (probably my all-time favorite, it's just hilarious start to finish), Patrick Dempsey (the one with Will telling Jack what to say over the headphones at Banana Republic), the Sound of Music one.
Karen Walker is, to me, the most quotable character ever on TV and M. Mullally was amazing in the part; Jack & Sean Hayes were not far behind. It's a shame Jack & Karen were written & performed so badly in the final few seasons and that Hayes & Mullally have never really caught on in anything else.
And as a gay lawyer in a LTR myself, I agree with the criticism that Will would have / should have had a white collar partner within a reasonable time after he was supposedly dumped before the series began.
|by Anonymous||reply 110||04/16/2014|
[quote]I thought Stan made her work and Grace put up with her for her connections to potential clients. I didn't remember the old money bit.
Karen said things like: 'this was how it was done in the past', when talking about service people etc, she seemed to be referencing how old money did things compared to how the nouveau riche were presently doing things. She alluded to new money being gauche.
Then the next thing, she's revealed to have a grifting mother and she had made that S&M tape. Then there were the scenes of her social climbing days clubbing with celebs and scenesters. So, what was it, what was her back story?
I loved Karen, she had the best lines, unfortunately I found her back story to be very inconsistent.
I also didn't see Will as coming from money. The way his mother went on about 'poor people' was ridiculous, then again, look who portrayed his mother!
|by Anonymous||reply 111||04/16/2014|
Seinfeld has aged badly, whereas W&G still seems fresh.
|by Anonymous||reply 112||04/17/2014|
True, the fashions still seem current. Every once in awhile they'll make a weird pop culture reference and you're reminded how old it is.
|by Anonymous||reply 113||04/17/2014|
Add James Earl Jones to the list of best guest actors. One of the funniest episodes I've seen on ANY series. Jack could annoy me every now and then (I know im in the minority, but I actually preferred Jack and Karen in smaller doses, before it became the Jack and Karen show. It thrw off the balance), but my favorite Jack scenes are easily when he's teaching his "Jack-ting" class. Love Emily Rutherford in that, too.
|by Anonymous||reply 114||07/29/2014|
God I loved Karen and the shocking things she said about her step kids.
|by Anonymous||reply 115||07/29/2014|
r107 We got to see what were supposed to be Stan's feet in one episode, when he and Karen shared a bubble bath. THAT was as close as we ever got to the big man himself.
Always wanted more of Rosario, they really sidelined her.
|by Anonymous||reply 116||07/29/2014|
[quote]it was annoying to me that they gave Grace such an active love life, but couldn't do the same for Will. Wow how original, a straight women has alot of relationships..
The reason for that is because of the backlash that ELLEN received. If you don't recall or are too young to know, in 1997 Ellen DeGeneres made history when she famously came out, as did her character in her eponymous sitcom. That made Ellen Morgan the first gay lead character on a TV show and Ellen DeGeneres the first gay actor to headline a show. It was controversial and Ellen got a lot of kudos, but when the show resumed for its fifth season (1997-1998), there was some backlash when the season focused on Ellen Morgan discovering the gay community and dating women. The audience didn't want to see a gay character date or have some semblance of a love life, so ABC began putting a viewer discretion notice before every episode that featured Ellen dating or kissing a woman. This angered Ellen, and she ended the show.
Anyway, Ellen (the woman and the show) were in the tabloids during the 5th season, mainly about Ellen vs. ABC. It was no surprise when the show announced its cancellation. And it made other networks take warning. That's why Will is celibate by choice in the first season and has not much of a love life for the first few years. Also, making a hetero woman the co-lead and casting a straight, married man as the gay male lead all made it palatable to flyover audiences. I think if ELLEN's fifth season had been better received and applauded, then Will Truman would've certainly been dating and kissing men from the get-go.
|by Anonymous||reply 118||04/08/2016|
I thought it was funny (not really) that Jack McFarland was often described as this big nympho, but we never got to see him in action. Meanwhile, we ALWAYS saw Grace and Megan's love scenes.
|by Anonymous||reply 119||04/08/2016|
The Matt Damon gay men's chorus was a great episode: Jack; " What's your boyfriend's name?". Matt Damon character; "Ben".
|by Anonymous||reply 120||04/08/2016|
The live show at Karen's birthday party is one of the best. Even with the Matt Lauer cameo.
|by Anonymous||reply 121||04/08/2016|
I always thought the name of the show should have been Will and Grace and Jack and Karen
|by Anonymous||reply 122||04/08/2016|
R122 but Jack and Karen were not initially the focus of the show. They were just side characters who became fan favorites who were then given more to do.
|by Anonymous||reply 123||04/09/2016|
I watched bits of an episode in syndication and didn't laugh once. Not so much as a smile. Generic str8whiteboy Eric McCormick has a way with taking a funny line…and making it fall miserably flat; it makes me wish even more that Tom Villard hadn't died because he could have brought so much more to the role. Even Alex Karras did a better job playing gay in [italic]Victor/Victoria[/italic]! Grace wasn't that interesting and the show's focus on her sex life over Will's made the show look both unbalanced and condescending to gay people. Karen is an annoying racist bitch who should have been smacked hard by the maid, and how did Jack manage to avoid becoming HIV-positive the way he slutted around, especially during the early 2000s meth epidemic? And considering our differing historical circumstances and the fact that it was illegal for us to get marriage licenses in some states at the time this show was on the air, I do not find the slut-shaming of gay men funny the way I do when it's done to heterosexuals like Blanche Devereaux. Since then, I have hated this show and have been offended by so much as the slightest mention of it. And I couldn't care less about [italic]Seinfeld[/italic] and hate [italic]Friends[/italic] with an even greater passion. [italic]Frasier[/italic] was okay but it just never did as much for me as [italic]Cheers[/italic] did and if it had started as a separate show instead of a spin-off, it would have been gone by the year 2000. Most of the best sitcoms of the 1990s were either animated or late 1980s holdovers.
What made me really hate it was the way the press acted like it was another [italic]I Love Lucy[/italic] when it barely reached the level of [italic]Here's Lucy[/italic]. All the hype about it being groundbreaking was just that, hype, while the critical acclaim for this just lowered TV critics' credibility even further. I'm no sitcom snob unlike some on this thread (*cough* R43 *cough*), quite the opposite as a matter of fact, but this one left me cold. Ice cold, in fact. It's one of my "change the channel instantly" shows. And as for the [italic]Amos 'n' Andy[/italic] analogies, I'd honestly rather watch that.
|by Anonymous||reply 124||04/09/2016|
[/italic]And as for the [italic]Amos 'n' Andy[/italic] analogies, why don't you watch it and tell me:
|by Anonymous||reply 125||04/09/2016|
[quote]Generic str8whiteboy Eric McCormick has a way with taking a funny line…and making it fall miserably flat; it makes me wish even more that Tom Villard hadn't died because he could have brought so much more to the role.
How do you think John Barrowman would've done? The part came down to McCormack and Barrowman. IMO, it would've been nice if a gay man had played Will, though Barrowman wasn't out himself at the time. In fact, Sean Hayes wasn't out, so as far as the flyover viewers was concerned, all the actors were straight.
|by Anonymous||reply 126||04/09/2016|
Barrowman is so much hotter. It would' ve been far less believable to have kept him single in NYC as a (moderately?) successful lawyer for that length of time. Also, I couldn't see Barrowman as such a neurotic queen that they made Will out to be half the time.
|by Anonymous||reply 127||04/09/2016|
R43, sadly, passed away this day in 2014.
|by Anonymous||reply 128||04/09/2016|
It is a study in what results when Hollywood Jews are free to beat a premise to death.
|by Anonymous||reply 129||04/09/2016|
Will was obviously a bottom, and it's not remotely unrealistic that a mid 30s bottom in New York would be long term single.
|by Anonymous||reply 132||04/09/2016|
R132 how do you mean 'obviously'? The actor who played him was striaght.
|by Anonymous||reply 133||04/09/2016|
On my back in Iraq, on my knees in Belize
|by Anonymous||reply 134||04/09/2016|
Grace: Jack's mother doesn't know he's gay
Karen: What, is she headless?!
|by Anonymous||reply 135||04/09/2016|
[quote] Barrowman is so much hotter. It would' ve been far less believable to have kept him single in NYC as a (moderately?) successful lawyer for that length of time. Also, I couldn't see Barrowman as such a neurotic queen that they made Will out to be half the time.
It might have been written differently, and possibly more realistically, with him in the role.
|by Anonymous||reply 137||04/09/2016|
No. Not classic. And basically for this reason. When faced with a line that was funny but might compromise a character's believability, the writers always chose funny. That's great for the laugh but over time it eroded the reality of the character and ultimately the show.
|by Anonymous||reply 139||04/09/2016|
R139, we're you fired from the show or something?
|by Anonymous||reply 141||04/09/2016|
R133 Are you new? Take a walk down the street once and a while and observe people. Either you're trapped in a high school fantasy or you have a pussy.
Will was clearly a bottom both in and out of the sheets.
|by Anonymous||reply 142||04/09/2016|
Will and Grace were by far the most important person in each others' lives. If we follow Christopher Isherwood's dictum that your orientation hinges on whom you fall in love with, it was a sitcom about a bisexual male title character.
|by Anonymous||reply 143||04/09/2016|
I don't think it's a "classic sitcom." It had its moments but it wasn't all that. I watched it a few times. I thought it was kind of stupid: a gay man and a straight woman who are so emotionally involved with each other that it seems like they're lovers without the sex. Will was a handsome, well off guy who never seemed to have any gay lovers. And of course Jack and Karen are cartoon characters.
It had one of the lamest, dumbest finale episodes of all time.
|by Anonymous||reply 144||04/09/2016|
The "leaders" who applauded Will and Grace were the same "leaders" who allowed the Ts to overrun our Gay Movement
|by Anonymous||reply 146||04/09/2016|
Beverly Leslie didn't die! He is now Senior Pastor at Dallas First Baptist Church.
|by Anonymous||reply 147||04/09/2016|
I am surprised so many people like Karen. Her lines were too predictable and she gave the most homophobic jokes. I did enjoy the show when it aired, but I don't think it ages well. Also too many jokes hinged on how "novel" it was to be gay. And as already mentioned it was basically about two celibate gay men who were too emotionally invested in the women in their lives. They even ended the show with Karen and Jake living together till they died. WTF. They should have just made Will bisexual if they were going to make him obsessed with Grace.
|by Anonymous||reply 148||04/09/2016|