This weekend the show re-broadcasts a special Siskel & Ebert they did in 1980, showing the step-by-step process they used in reviewing movies. They pick one movie (The Blue Marble starring Robert Foxworth and Paula Prentiss) and follow the process from being invited to a screening to the finished review in the newspapers.%0D %0D Really interesting and really detailed, and good insight into their minds at the time.%0D %0D I recommend you catch it, especially those with opinions on Roger Ebert.%0D %0D
Ebert presents At The Movies
|by Anonymous||reply 40||04/04/2013|
that's what I think of when I think of the show.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||08/06/2011|
Rather they show old shows than the two mannequins they have now. The chick and the Russian guy with the unpronounceable name are downright boring.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||08/07/2011|
You can see it online....
|by Anonymous||reply 3||08/07/2011|
Then why do you have a TV, R1?
And "never" turned on that TV? Not during 9/11, the Olympics, The Oscars, a State of the Union speech, the election of 2000? Not once? You sound precious.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||08/07/2011|
R4, Not everyone has cable anymore. I don't. I have my 50" plasma TV connected to a computer. I watch movies (streaming only) on Netflix. I buy season passes to shows I like on iTunes. I watch The Daily Show and The Colbert Report on ComedyCentral.com.
I haven't watched broadcast TV in many, many years, and haven't watched cable for the past two years.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||08/07/2011|
That flashback reminded me how much more i agreed with Siskel than Ebert. That film was awful and Ebert gave it 3.5 stars?
|by Anonymous||reply 6||08/07/2011|
Well thank goodness you're using the time you're saving not watching broadcast television by commenting on a thread on the internet about broadcast televisionm, r1. Well managed!
|by Anonymous||reply 7||08/07/2011|
I've been watching the worst movies of the year episodes all day. I can't believe Waterworld and Showgirls came out the same year.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||08/07/2011|
I found it a very interesting look behind the scenes.%0D %0D And r6, when did you actually see the Black Marble in order to state so firmly your opinion of it?%0D %0D Excerpt from Variety review:%0D %0D With The Black Marble, Joseph Wambaugh [adapting his own novel] at last comes close to presenting police as human, even humorous, beings, capable of balancing remorse, regret and romance without becoming total psychotics. %0D %0D %0D Transferred out of homicide after too much exposure to a string of child murders, Robert Foxworth is teamed on a burglary detail with Paula Prentiss. %0D %0D %0D The crime is either terribly serious or impossibly trivial, depending on your love of animals. Barbara Babcock's showdog is kidnapped and she proves superb in the role of a lonely, sex-starved woman with her whole life wrapped up in her schnauzer.%0D %0D %0D %0D Director Harold Becker is at his best in maneuvering carefully through the minefields of animal worship. %0D %0D %0D %0D Much of the credit for making the picture work goes to Harry Dean Stanton as the dognapper, driven to his dirty deed by debt.%0D %0D
|by Anonymous||reply 9||08/07/2011|
I was just perusing the Paula Prentiss page on IMDb and I'm struck by how little acting she did after this movie. What happened to her career?
|by Anonymous||reply 10||08/07/2011|
Why the heck do they have that kid on the new show? No, I'm not talking about Ignatiy - I mean the real kid.
Did they learn nothing from the mess that was Ben Lyons? This kid has similar taste to Ben, but presents himself and speaks like he could be Lyons' elder. It's creepy and unnecessary.
Aside from him, I like the new show. Both hosts have grown on me and I like their rapport together. Unfortunately I have to watch the program online since my local PBS station chose not to carry it, but I'm happy that I have that option.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||08/08/2011|
At least he's not presenting his hole.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||08/08/2011|
I used to like Roger Ebert, and I suppose I still do, but I find it so uncomfortable to look at him with his facial reconstruction.
I know it isn't very nice, but it's true.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||08/08/2011|
I don't like that child either, R11. He actually gave his opinion on Woody Allen's latest movie, as if I want to hear the opinions of a child on Woody Allen-type flicks. I don't care whether he liked it or not: He doesn't have the wherewithal to understand more than the rudiments of the plot.
Plus, it sounds like it's all scripted for him. I have 3 sons around that age, and while their all 3 smart, with one especially good in communication, they couldn't write on that level,and if they could, they wouldn't.
I hate when shows try to make children into mini-adults. They aren't. I don't want to hear a kid's opinion on a movie unless it is animated, has a car that turns into a monster, or talking woodland creatures are involved. Even then, I want a simple thumbs up or thumbs down.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||08/09/2011|
I don't know if the kid belongs on the show, but I am surprised to find I agree with most of his opinions.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||08/09/2011|
r8 needs to be banned.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||08/09/2011|
It ain't 1980 anymore, OP, the last time I checked. Why would I give a shit?
|by Anonymous||reply 17||08/09/2011|
The hand gestures that little boy makes are creepy. Kids his age don't usually punctuate their points by thrusting their hands around. %0D %0D
|by Anonymous||reply 18||08/09/2011|
Critics are still reviewing movies every day, and probably in much the same way. I liked the look-behind-the-scenes.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||08/09/2011|
Bump for this week's show where the replay a 1982 show on homosexuality in movies!
|by Anonymous||reply 20||09/09/2011|
During which time Siskel doesn't reveal he is gay, and Ebert while no homophobe, just doesn't seem to like any of the movies, even nastily criticizing the ones he says he liked.%0D
|by Anonymous||reply 21||09/09/2011|
Still for 1982 in Chicago, which was then a Closet City, it was bold.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||09/09/2011|
Ebert liked Personal Best, Victor/Victoria, Taxi Zum Klo, La Cage aux Folles and Boys in the Band.%0D %0D He disliked Cruising, Making Love, Partners and Staircase because of their shallow characterizations and trite storytelling.%0D %0D And he hoped that gay themes and storylines were here to stay, but Gene thought they might be a fad, like black movies or Viet Nam movies.%0D %0D Worth checking out!
|by Anonymous||reply 23||09/10/2011|
The show is in trouble. I actually have grown to appreciate it a lot, but I have to watch it online because my local PBS station opted to not carry it.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||11/07/2011|
This is a pity, because it has found a groove and Christy and Ignatiy (what a pairing of names) are doing a good job.
Hope they get the funding and more stations to pick it up.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||11/07/2011|
I couldn't stand Christy at first but I think she's gotten a little bit better. I love Ignatiy. And I like how they bring in a bunch of different voices each episode - hey Chaz! - although I want to stick that kid critic's head in a toilet.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||11/07/2011|
[quote]That film was awful and Ebert gave it 3.5 stars?
I never trusted Ebert again after he gave A CHORUS LINE a four out of four stars rating.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||11/07/2011|
Gene Siskel was gay?
|by Anonymous||reply 28||11/07/2011|
Ebert is a talented guy and he seems nice but it's time for this show to die already. He can stick with his writing gigs, right?
|by Anonymous||reply 29||11/07/2011|
Ebert and Siskel had an interesting tussle over "Taxi Zum Klo". Siskel basically saying that it was homophobic, and Ebert saying that because the guy made it about his life, it was authentic. But Ebert went too far and made it sound as if all gay men lived that way. This is my recollection from the original broadcast, anyway.
I agreed with Siskel...it was the "Suddently, Last Summer" of its generation.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||11/07/2011|
More bad news. It looks like they weren't kidding around with the previous concern that the show is in financial trouble.
Enjoy your reviews of the Oscar contenders as they are released through December because the show will be on hiatus (sounds like for an indefinite amount of time) in January.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||12/02/2011|
Ignatiy Vishnevetsky is the only reason why I watch the show. Christy is nowhere near his league in terms of the vast knowledge he holds on film history. Whether it's silent cinema, Hollywood golden age, or foreign films, that boy is a walking cinematic encyclopedia. Plus, it doesn't hurt that he loves Jean-Luc Godard as much as me and he's super cute.
I wonder why he never decided to become an American citizen. He's been in America most of his life, definitely looks and sounds as American as the next person, and has an American wife. Culturally speaking, he's an American, but he refuses to naturalize.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||12/02/2011|
Have the played the last episode? I checked the website and I can't find anywhere the announced date for the final show before indefinite (and possibly permanent) hiatus.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||12/24/2011|
The show is done...for now. I'm guessing the ratings must be dismal if nobody wants to take on sponsorship/underwriting of the program. It sure can't be expensive to produce.
I watch it every week, but online only because my local PBS station doesn't carry it. If someone thought those expensive ABC soap operas could have new life on the web, I'm surprised Ebert's program can't make a go of it online only.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||12/31/2011|
I just watched the repeat of their 'best/worst movies' show. Good fucking lord. They need some hosts that have at least some connection to people who actually watch movies instead of study movies. I don't think I'd even heard of eight of the movies they picked as their top ten. It was just ridiculous. The movies they picked probably showed in three theaters throughout the entire country.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||12/31/2011|
I know what you mean, r35. This was the first year I hadn't heard of most of their choices.
At least Ebert's picks had theatrical releases and some familiarity.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||01/01/2012|
Why should they spoonfeed you R35? If those are their top choices, then that is what they should say. There are plenty of shitty shill critics who can satisfy your need to be validated in your pedestrian taste. You LOVED "Bridesmaids", didn't you?
|by Anonymous||reply 37||01/01/2012|
Actually, R37, Bridesmaids was just okay and got way too much praise as far as I'm concerned.
I bet you don't even know which movies they picked for their lists. Of course, now you'll quickly go and look them up to try to prove your superiority. Funny that your obsession with proving your superiority in an area as simplistic as movie preference shows you to be a very, very insecure person. The fact that you do it anonymously on a message board is even worse and makes me pity you.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||01/02/2012|
It looks like the TV review show will never be revived now.
And Ebert is cutting back on his workload altogether because now he is battling another round of cancer.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||04/03/2013|
Damn it! Now this program will never be revived.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||04/04/2013|