Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Young Girls Attack/Strip 11-Year-Old Boy

Times have changed!

by Anonymousreply 3312/11/2011

I wonder what kind of adult he will grow up to be?

by Anonymousreply 106/08/2011

Damn, boys doing that to boys is one thing, but girls doing it to a boy--and then posting it. Fucking kids nowadays.

by Anonymousreply 206/08/2011

Which do you enjoy more, R3, the boy's shrieks of panic and fear or his cries of humiliation and sorrow?%0D %0D

by Anonymousreply 406/08/2011

R3 likes that he's 11.

by Anonymousreply 506/08/2011

those girls were ANIMALS

by Anonymousreply 806/08/2011

Ask your NAMBLA chat friends, R7. I would have thought filming and distributing this would constitute child pornography. But, given they're girls, they'll probably get counselling. If two boys had done this to a girl, they'd be in prison now.

by Anonymousreply 906/08/2011

estrogen kills

by Anonymousreply 1106/08/2011

Censoring nudity of an 11 year year old boy who didn't consent to his being filmed without his clothes on is unreasonable to you, R10? Go back to your man-boy love convention.

by Anonymousreply 1206/08/2011

I doubt it would have been censored if it had happened in Europe

by Anonymousreply 1306/09/2011

I doubt it would be censored in Europe

by Anonymousreply 1406/09/2011

It would absolutely have been censored in Europe. They have very strict privacy laws.

by Anonymousreply 1506/09/2011

could we flag that as inappropiate? the world doesn't need another rape video

by Anonymousreply 1606/09/2011

They allow child nudity there all the time - they know it's not always something evil

by Anonymousreply 1706/09/2011

This is disturbing enough, but did the local news have to show the video? How did this not make it worse for the boy?

by Anonymousreply 1806/09/2011

Europe allows non-consensual child nudity to be broadcast, R17? Cite examples.

by Anonymousreply 1906/09/2011

They say the video is pulled.

by Anonymousreply 2006/09/2011

If it's so innocent and unimportant R7/10/13/14/17, why are you so rabid to see it?

by Anonymousreply 2106/09/2011

I hope the FBI has a tap on R7/10/13/14/17/22 (all the same poster) internet connection.

by Anonymousreply 2306/09/2011

It looks like black girls attacking a white boy.

by Anonymousreply 2406/09/2011

Those girls should have been arrested.

by Anonymousreply 2506/09/2011

This kid will probably have nudity issues for the rest of his life now.

by Anonymousreply 2706/09/2011

R27, why did he get so upset? All they did was pull his pants down and exposed him naked for a few seconds. I had the same thing done to me at school, and so did other kids. It was annoying but it wasn't a huge deal.

by Anonymousreply 2906/09/2011

Doesn't mean he isn't either, R28.

by Anonymousreply 3006/09/2011

Did the people who stripped you film it and put it on the Internet for the entire world to view, R29. The idiocy of some people is astounding.

by Anonymousreply 3106/09/2011

[quote]Just because someone wants to know what the original uncensored video looks like does not make them a pedo.

Yes, George Rekers, no doubt your interest in that boy's genitals is purely academic.

by Anonymousreply 3206/09/2011

The names of the three girls have been posted several places on the internet. names are Allie Bailey Johhna Cadena Ariana Delatorre

by Anonymousreply 3312/11/2011
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.