Join the Bitchfest >>

Dylan goes ring-a-ding-ding on Woody Allen and #metoo

Honestly, Sammy Davis Jr. has done more good for the Jews than Woody Allen.

Harvey Weinstein and other accused celebrities have been cast out by Hollywood, while Allen's latest feature was released theatrically last week.
latimes.com
--Anonymous
replies 245Dec 7, 2017 8:38 AM +00:00
Why has the #MeToo revolution spared Woody Allen?

...Because you are the only one who has accused him.

--Anonymous
replies 1Dec 7, 2017 8:43 AM +00:00

Woody Allen was spare because he's the biggest genius who ever lived. Anybody who disagrees is going to burn in hell.

--Anonymous
replies 2Dec 7, 2017 8:48 AM +00:00

This is a major problem for #metoo -- the ball got rolling, or at least picked up speed, due to being pushed by someone who was programmed by his vindictive mother to claim sex abuse by his father*.

*well whatever

--Anonymous
replies 3Dec 7, 2017 8:50 AM +00:00

Woody's case is complicated by how vindictive Mia Farrow (and son Ronan) are. It's suspicious. If a lot of girls and women came out and accused Woody of assault or pedophilia, it would be different (I guess). Roman Polanski seems to be doing great too - didn't they recently do a festival/celebration of his work at Cannes or some such place? Maybe the Europeans don't give a shit about this? OR some people are just beyond the fray - either being so old it doesn't matter or people thinking that different standards applied back in the day. WTF was Mel Gibson feted at the Oscars? That bothered me too. If Trump lives to 80-something, they'll give him some sort of goddamned Emmy for his great work on the Apprentice...

--Anonymous
replies 4Dec 7, 2017 8:59 AM +00:00
OR some people are just beyond the fray - either being so old it doesn't matter or people thinking that different standards applied back in the day. WTF was Mel Gibson feted at the Oscars? That bothered me too. If Trump lives to 80-something, they'll give him some sort of goddamned Emmy for his great work on the Apprentice.

John Conyers is 88, and began his career in the Mad Men era. So where's his pass?

--Anonymous
replies 5Dec 7, 2017 9:07 AM +00:00

He basically was fucking his underage daughter. And don't give me the "he wasn't Woody's shit". Anyone that is some kind of parental figure just doesn't go where Woody for.

He's a pig.

--Anonymous
replies 6Dec 7, 2017 9:07 AM +00:00

Politics is different from entertainment and judged differently

--Anonymous
replies 7Dec 7, 2017 9:09 AM +00:00

Do we know for sure Woody was fucking his stepdaughter when she under the age of consent? They why did the judge drop the case?

--Anonymous
replies 8Dec 7, 2017 9:11 AM +00:00

Why is Mel Gibson being compared to these guys?

As far as I remember, he was stinking drunk and said bigoted things while drunk.

And there were some nasty phone calls to his girlfriend?

I suspect there are plenty of people in Hollywood who have said stupid things while drunk and have said nasty stuff to people.

I don't recall there were harassment claims against Gibson. He does not belong in the same group as these other sleazy people.

--Anonymous
replies 9Dec 7, 2017 9:21 AM +00:00

Whether or not Woody Allen abused Dylan Farrow is known only to the two of them. And conflating that alleged abuse with his later relationship with Mia's adult adopted daughter is ludicrous. Soon yi was not Allen's stepdaughter by any definition of the term. Further, he didn't live in Mia's house, and evidently had very little interaction with Mia's kids.

--Anonymous
replies 10Dec 7, 2017 9:43 AM +00:00

And she was a hot piece of ass.

--Anonymous
replies 11Dec 7, 2017 9:45 AM +00:00

I don't know how anyone could take sides with these two. I think it's a bit hysterical to suggest Woody was a parental figure to Soon Yi but dear god there must have been one other barely legal Asian halfwit (according to Mia) he could have latched onto other than Mia's kid. On the other hand, three of Mia's kids have now killed themselves. Nothing I've read about her suggests that she's that stable a character/parent or that she's particularly well acquainted with the truth.

--Anonymous
replies 12Dec 7, 2017 9:51 AM +00:00

Perhaps Dylan Farrow should start the #lookatmetoo movement.

--Anonymous
replies 13Dec 7, 2017 10:50 AM +00:00

ouch r13

w&w

--Anonymous
replies 14Dec 7, 2017 10:58 AM +00:00

One has to wonder if screwing Woody was Ronan's motivation for writing the article in the first place...

--Anonymous
replies 15Dec 7, 2017 11:03 AM +00:00

This is worth a quick read. Among other facts: Mia didn’t go to the police, the pediatrician did; Woody had been in therapy for alleged inappropriate behavior toward Dylan with a child psychologist before the abuse allegation was presented to the authorities or made public; and the state prosecutor told the writer that he did have probable cause to press charges, but declined to do so due to the fragility of the “child victim.”

Maureen Orth responds to the columns that have been published in the wake of Dylan Farrow's public allegations.
The Hive
--Anonymous
replies 16Dec 7, 2017 11:06 AM +00:00
someone who was programmed by his vindictive mother

This is the biggest laugh I get out of all the anti-Mia crap that gets spewed on DL.

No one with any sense believes Mia Farrow is some kind of genius mind-control expert who "programmed" all her children to think alike.

--Anonymous
replies 17Dec 7, 2017 11:20 AM +00:00
On the other hand, three of Mia's kids have now killed themselves.

That is not even close to true. What the hell are you even talking about? Lark and Tam had been ill for years and died from long-term chronic health problems. Thaddeus also had severe health problems, which is reportedly why he killed himself.

What a fucking thing to say. You are supremely screwed in the head.

--Anonymous
replies 18Dec 7, 2017 11:24 AM +00:00

R18 Munchausen's by proxy?

--Anonymous
replies 19Dec 7, 2017 11:28 AM +00:00

She adopted the kids who already had serious health issues, R19.

But if you're one of those "Mia Farrow is a psychotic demon who can control minds" folks, then sure. She sent magic brain waves to these kids before she adopted them, making them sick, so that way after 20 years of spending thousands of dollars keeping them alive they would die anyway. Makes total sense.

--Anonymous
replies 20Dec 7, 2017 11:30 AM +00:00

Some people are "beyond the fray"!

--oh dear
replies 21Dec 7, 2017 11:46 AM +00:00
Roman Polanski seems to be doing great too - didn't they recently do a festival/celebration of his work at Cannes or some such place? Maybe the Europeans don't give a shit about this?

They give a shit. Campaign is building.

Exposing Child Molester Roman Polanski
I Met Polanski
--Anonymous
replies 22Dec 7, 2017 11:50 AM +00:00
Woody Allen was spare because he's the biggest genius who ever lived. Anybody who disagrees is going to burn in hell.

I thought he was basically an atheist.

--Anonymous
replies 23Dec 7, 2017 11:52 AM +00:00

Mia Farrow needs to get her allegiances straightened out.

FIVE more women have come forward to accuse convicted child rapist Roman Polanski of sexual abuse, according to the founder of a website called imetpolanski.com. If verified this would take the tot…
The Sun
--Anonymous
replies 24Dec 7, 2017 11:52 AM +00:00

R18

It was tanna root. Did you see what they'd done to the kids' eyes?

--Anonymous
replies 25Dec 7, 2017 12:35 PM +00:00

R18 - it's R12. Mea culpa - I only half read a headline about the suicide and had a brain fart about the others. Not the sort of shit I should put out there even if I do think Mia Farrow is an unstable flake. Thanks for the correction.

--Anonymous
replies 26Dec 7, 2017 12:51 PM +00:00
Mia Farrow needs to get her allegiances straightened out.

She's not allied with Polanski. Even when she was called as a witness in Polanski's case against Vanity Fair, she apparently did it via video conference and didn't travel to London for the trial.

Allen's people or maybe just some usual MRAs claim she's best friends with Polanski and that makes her a hypocrite, but there's no evidence she's spoken with him and she certainly has never issued a statement in support of him. Go get mad at the people who gave Polanski a standing ovation, they've been more supportive than Farrow has.

--Anonymous
replies 27Dec 7, 2017 1:02 PM +00:00

Was this during his Bergman period or his Chaplin period?

--Anonymous
replies 28Dec 7, 2017 1:25 PM +00:00

OP What's this got to do with Jews?

--Anonymous
replies 29Dec 7, 2017 1:51 PM +00:00

R20, none of what you said would exempt her from Munchausen by proxy. People with that illness would have no problem adopting kids who were already sick. Three is a bit suspicious.

--Anonymous
replies 30Dec 7, 2017 2:00 PM +00:00

Woody is a creep.

--Anonymous
replies 31Dec 7, 2017 2:23 PM +00:00

He hasn't been spared. The spotlight has been bouncing around and just hasn't fallen on him yet. Give it time.

--Anonymous
replies 32Dec 7, 2017 2:29 PM +00:00

The DA dropped the case because their experts (Yale-New Haven Hospital) said Dylan's story was not believable. Her story was not consistent and she showed signs of being coached. When the DA dropped the case, he tried to spin in as saving Dylan from having to testify but the reality is the DA knew the case was not winnable because their own experts said the molestation didn't happen.

With this article, Dylan is attempting to piggy back on the current #metoo campaign wherein sexual harassment/abuse allegations are accepted as fact without any proof or trial.

The change of heart of Moses Allen is notable because he was was one of Allen's fiercest critics when this scandal went down and infamously said,"You have done a horrible, unforgivable, needy, ugly, stupid thing. I hope you get so humiliated you commit suicide." In his recent interviews, he has recounted the abuse from Mia to him and her other kids that people have long suspected.

And it's worth noting that the articles that people frequently cite as proof of Allen's guilty were written by Mia's good friends (Maureeen Orth at Vanity Fair and Nicholas Kristof at the New York Times).

--Anonymous
replies 33Dec 7, 2017 2:55 PM +00:00

R33 = pervy child-molesting Woody

--Anonymous
replies 34Dec 7, 2017 3:18 PM +00:00

I would like to hear from the 2 girls he adopted with his girlfriend's daughter.

--Anonymous
replies 35Dec 7, 2017 3:20 PM +00:00

I believe Dylan Farrow. She's intelligent, articulate and is entirely credible. No "brain washing" there. She was molested by Woody Allen. It's amazing she never turned to drink and drugs to deal with it.

--Anonymous
replies 36Dec 7, 2017 3:23 PM +00:00

You can't hear from them. Mouths full.

--Anonymous
replies 37Dec 7, 2017 4:16 PM +00:00

R33, your statement that the case was dropped because the hospital's finding was deemed not reliable is inaccurate. The hospital found that the child had not been sexually abused. The judge and Connecticut state prosecutor found that report to be unreliable.

And about the accusation of collusion by Mia's friends, see the VF article cited above:

10. I am not a longtime friend of Mia Farrow’s, and I did not make any deal with her. I have been personally accused of helping my “long-time friend” Mia Farrow place the story that ran in *Vanity Fair’*s November 2013 issue as part of an effort to help launch Ronan Farrow’s media career. I have also been accused of agreeing to some type of deal with Mia Farrow guaranteeing that the sexual-abuse allegation against Woody Allen would be revisited. For the record, I met Mia Farrow for the first time in 2003, more than 10 years after the first piece was published, at a nonfiction play she appeared in for a benefit in Washington, D.C. I saw her and Dylan again the next day. That is the last time I saw her until I approached her in April 2013 to do a story about her family and how they had fared over the years. I talked to eight of her children, including Dylan and a reluctant Ronan. There was no deal of any kind. Moses Farrow declined to be interviewed for the 2013 piece.

--Anonymous
replies 38Dec 7, 2017 4:29 PM +00:00

The Maureen Orth Vanity Fair article that practically every story relies on is garbage. Just one of the many errors in it:

"The November 1992 article titled Mia’s Story is aptly titled, I suppose. She [Maureen Orth] starts off by referring to a psychotherapist named Susan Coates who had been treating Woody Allen for “inappropriate” conduct with Dylan. In the next sentence, Orth adds that “He could not seem to keep his hands off her.”

If you take the trouble to do a little research on Coates, you will discover that she testified under oath that she “never observed him acting in a sexual way toward her.” She also stated that she warned Woody Allen that she feared for his safety because of threats made by Mia Farrow. What’s more, in an evaluation of Dylan she conducted in 1990 she found the girl easily “taken over by fantasy” when asked to describe something as simple as an apple tree. That’s according to the March 30, 1993 New York Times. Somehow all this failed to be reflected in Orth’s article."

Maureen Orth The main purpose of this article is to take a close look at Maureen Orth’s reporting on the Allen-Farrow controversy but I want to preface that with some comments on three of the princ…
Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist
--Anonymous
replies 39Dec 7, 2017 5:21 PM +00:00

The claim that the DA dropped the case because Dr. Leventhal of Yale said Dylan was coached by Mia is incorrect. This is what the DA officially said, per the NYT in 1993:

A state's attorney in Connecticut said yesterday that he had "probable cause" to prosecute Woody Allen on charges that he sexually molested his adopted daughter, but had decided to spare her the trauma of a court appearance.

A DA would not state that they had probable cause unless they did; they would open up themselves to lawsuits (and worse) by falsely stating such a thing. The DA would lose their job if not their law license. All Allen would have had to do was launch a formal complaint and ruin DA Frank Maco's life. Allen didn't. His lawyers called Maco "cheap and scheming" but that was all they ever did in regards to Mayo's public announcement. You may want to ask yourself why.

The entire defense in this instance depends on Allen being targeted by an entire DA's office out to get him, by a judge who didn't like him already for personal reasons, by a vindictive wife and a bunch of kids who were brainwashed. What are the odds of a filmmaker earning the ire of all those disparate people for no reason other than general "scheming"?

--Anonymous
replies 40Dec 8, 2017 11:00 AM +00:00

The Allen apologists/obfuscaters are rancid/good at what they do.

I've some memory of reading here of WA some years ago collecting a girlfriend of sorts... from high school, people seeing it happen.

--Anonymous
replies 41Dec 8, 2017 11:47 AM +00:00

I don't understand anyone thinking that Mia Farrow, a person who has helped very needy children all of her adult life, would compromise a child, her own daughter no less, for revenge against someone. She is someone who obviously cares deeply about people, not someone who wants to hurt anyone.

--Anonymous
replies 42Dec 8, 2017 11:55 AM +00:00

Yes Woody Allen used to pick up his girlfriend Stacey Nelkin (inspiration for Mariel Hemmingway in Manhattan) from high school

This is well known.

--Anonymous
replies 43Dec 8, 2017 11:56 AM +00:00

That would be Stacey Nelkin, who now claims to have been 17 when she started dating Allen but others have said she was 15 -- he met her when she was a background extra in Annie Hall. People saw Allen hanging around the high school to pick her up.

Mariel Hemingway also said Allen invited her to a sexy weekend when she was 17, and of course Soon-Yi was 17.

--Anonymous
replies 44Dec 8, 2017 11:57 AM +00:00
I don't understand anyone thinking that Mia Farrow, a person who has helped very needy children all of her adult life, would compromise a child, her own daughter no less, for revenge against someone. She is someone who obviously cares deeply about people, not someone who wants to hurt anyone.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

--Dory Previn
replies 45Dec 8, 2017 11:58 AM +00:00

Yeah, the people who say Mia is vengeful and a liar and master manipulator have no evidence for it other than their opinion of the Woody Allen situation.

With any other celebrity asshole there are rumors, blind items about someone being a jerk to salespeople, reports of tantrums on the set, being seen yelling at a kid in public, etc. There is nothing out there about Farrow save Dory Previn's accusations that she stole Andre away from her in 1968, nearly 50 years ago.

--Anonymous
replies 46Dec 8, 2017 12:02 PM +00:00

Poor dylan. Hollywood’s continued support of Allen is hypocritical and problematic

--Anonymous
replies 47Dec 8, 2017 12:13 PM +00:00

If Mia Farrow was my Mom, I’d kill myself too.

--Anonymous
replies 48Dec 8, 2017 12:13 PM +00:00

Dylan will continue to be tortured by the fact that Woody Allen will never be totally shunned, barring of course another allegation of sexual assault.

--Anonymous
replies 49Dec 8, 2017 12:15 PM +00:00

Nobody in Hollywood believes Woody is a pedo, they all believe Mia went nuts over the Soon-Yi relationship. I just wish one of them would have the balls to say it instead of this treacly “we don’t know what really happened, there are two sides of the story” crap. Alec Baldwin came pretty close to plainly stating it but others would follow.

--Anonymous
replies 50Dec 8, 2017 12:16 PM +00:00

That's ALL Allen has been saying about it for years. That's where the "she's just a bitter old woman upset that I exchanged her for hot young snatch" comes from, straight from Allen and his lawyers.

Well, except that the hot young snatch was the teenage adopted sister of his own children, the daughter of his girlfriend, a girl who he was fucking and taking nude Polaroids of while in the same house as the kids, and while he was in therapy for being inappropriate with Dylan.

But yeah, it was just a plain old, basic woman scorned situation and "everyone in Hollywood" knows it.

--Anonymous
replies 51Dec 8, 2017 12:20 PM +00:00
No one with any sense believes Mia Farrow is some kind of genius mind-control expert who "programmed" all her children to think alike.

Yes, a mother certainly can't do that!

One angry mother can't turn the children completely on their father, including implanting memories? Now that's the best laugh I've had all day!

In the McMartin case, the students all together joined in the weird abuse fabrications, and they weren't even all children of the same mother -- they were influenced by highly leading interviews. And we all saw what happened there. Now put them all under the same mother in the same house ....

--Anonymous
replies 52Dec 8, 2017 12:20 PM +00:00

Like I said, R52, no one with any sense.

--Think about it for a minute; you'll eventually figure it out.
replies 53Dec 8, 2017 12:22 PM +00:00

R46? You don’t know the facts bitch. One of the household babysitters testified that Mia tried to get her to back up false accusations and another babysitter admitted it to her as well. Three separate doctors found no evidence of physical trauma on Dylan. Woody passed a lie detector test, Mia refused to take one. Mia tried to videotape Dylan describing what happened. Mia could never get her to make a statement aligning with Mia’s claim. When Mia asked her where daddy touched her Dylan pointed at her shoulder.

--Anonymous
replies 54Dec 8, 2017 12:22 PM +00:00

Yes, Mia isn't at all calculating about her adoptions. I mean, look at this which she posted online, not realizing that her search terms were embedded in the image....

i.dailymail.co.uk
--Anonymous
replies 55Dec 8, 2017 12:23 PM +00:00

The only thing we've figured out r53 is you're such a Mia stan that you're arguing with a straight face that a mother can't completely manipulate her children!

Next you'll be arguing that water can't freeze into ice -- "if you think about it you'll realize there's no such thing as ice AT ALL."

--Anonymous
replies 56Dec 8, 2017 12:25 PM +00:00

Mariel Hemingway was 18 when woody invited her on that weekend. AFTER filming was completed on Manhattan. That whole story exhonerates woody as a predator.

--Anonymous
replies 57Dec 8, 2017 12:26 PM +00:00

Say what you want about Mia, at least she properly charges her phone.

--Anonymous
replies 58Dec 8, 2017 12:26 PM +00:00

Mia smear campaigned her own daughter. That’s not crazy at all.

Q. How old are you? A. This October I will be 22. Look at my driver's license and passport. I was not raped, molested or manipulated as Mia has hysterically charged, nor am I retarded or mentally slow...
TIME.com
--Anonymous
replies 59Dec 8, 2017 12:29 PM +00:00

They didn’t want these women to testify.

Lawyers for Woody Allen said Monday that a former nanny who worked for Mia Farrow has testified she was pressured by the actress to support charges that the filmmaker molested their 7-year-old...
latimes
--Anonymous
replies 60Dec 8, 2017 12:31 PM +00:00

My, my. Woody's sycophantic PR shills are busy today, aren't they?

--Anonymous
replies 61Dec 8, 2017 12:32 PM +00:00

Both Woody and Mia are twisted in their own ways. I cannot imagine the dysfunction those kids endured.

I don’t doubt Woody is a perv. He’s neurotic. He seems to work out his demons and dilemmas in his work. He definitely likes young women. I don’t think he gets off on little little girls, because they’re not impressed with his intellectual theses.

Mia’s pathology leaves me breathless. She’s frightening. No. For real.

--Anonymous
replies 62Dec 8, 2017 12:34 PM +00:00

About 10 replies from the last 15 minutes are missing. I can't even imagine what is going on that I'm not seeing... and I'm not going to go look.

--Anonymous
replies 63Dec 8, 2017 12:35 PM +00:00

R54, you're an asshole Woody Allen apologist, bitch. Your "facts' are don't mean squat. Dylan Farrow has said that Allen molested her, and she's described how he did it. Unless you're a retard who thinks that she's been "brainwashed" by Mia Farrow ( your certainly fit in that category) it's pretty evident that is very believable, especially in light of Allen's attraction to very young girls., including the daughter of the woman he'd been having a relationship with for years.

Mia Farrow doesn't need to "smear" Soon-Yi. Soon-Yi's own actions reveal what a cunt she is. Mia Farrow literally saved her life, took her off the streets and gave her a privileged life. And what does she do? She starts fucking her mother's partner, a repulsive little creep decades older. Some people account for Soon-Yi's actions by mentioning her mental disability; the girl is, to put it kindly, not very bright. Her IQ was tested and it was 90. Somehow she's managed to get a college degree, but that means nothing, you can buy a degree if you have the right connections. At any rate, Soon-Yi is as despicable as Allen; they have than in common, anyway. And where did they get those two girls who are their "daughters?" Bought them, no doubt, in order to make it seem like Woody Allen is a GOOD man, a GOOD father, just a swell guy and that he and Soon-Yi and the two bought girls are one big happy family. But actually it makes the whole situation even weirder. Woody Allen and Soon-Yi are both sick fucks.

--Anonymous
replies 64Dec 8, 2017 12:39 PM +00:00

Bitches Ronan found the thread

--Anonymous
replies 65Dec 8, 2017 12:41 PM +00:00

Dylan has come so far since his wrestling days.

--Anonymous
replies 66Dec 8, 2017 12:41 PM +00:00

Woody and Mia are both nuts and weird and no one will ever know the truth for certain.

--Anonymous
replies 67Dec 8, 2017 12:44 PM +00:00

Mia is a quintessential narcissist. Everything is done for the purpose of her public image. The kids were collected to transform her image from that of home wrecker to earth mother. Very similar to Angelina Jolie in fact. Oh. And what happened in the aftermath of the Pitt-Jolie breakup? Accusations against the father of child endangerment and abuse and attempt to get full custody of the kids. Narcissists will try to utterly destroy those that get in their way or humiliate them like Mia was humiliated over Soon-Yi and Jolie over gossip Brad fathered Marion Cotilliards baby.

--Anonymous
replies 68Dec 8, 2017 12:44 PM +00:00
Mariel Hemingway was 18 when woody invited her on that weekend. AFTER filming was completed on Manhattan. That whole story exhonerates woody as a predator.

And this one indicts him as one:

"THE YEAR I WAS 13, MY ONLY friend was a famous man who lived far away and wrote me letters in plain brown envelopes that I told my mother were from 'a girl from camp... That year I floated along on pride and wonder at the thought of this, at the exquisite surprise of my pen pal's identity. His name was Woody Allen. In 1978 Woody was 42."

Woody wrote letters to a 13-year-old girl. It reminds me so much of Michael Jackson corresponding with that boy whose family sued him. Also, Muriel Hemingway stated that Woody came to visit her at home when she was 16, and he wanted her to go on a trip with him but her parents said no. He had predatory ways, much like what we learned about Michael Jackson.

THE YEAR I WAS 13, MY ONLY friend was a famous man who lived far away and wrote me letters in plain brown envelopes that I told my mother were from ``a girl from camp.`` Hiding behind the stacks in...
tribunedigital-sunsentinel
--Anonymous
replies 69Dec 8, 2017 12:46 PM +00:00

^ Mariel

--Anonymous
replies 70Dec 8, 2017 12:48 PM +00:00

I stand corrected. Mariel Hemingway said no to Woody's invitation to Paris. She was 16 and and didn't go because she was afraid she wouldn't get her own room. Her parents were actually encouraging of the trip.

"After wrapping filming on the 1979 movie, Hemingway says then 43-year-old Allen flew out to her parent's home in Idaho for a visit, during which he asked her to go to Paris with him. 'Our relationship was platonic, but I started to see that he had a kind of crush on me, though I dismissed it as the kind of thing that seemed to happen any time middle-aged men got around young women,' Hemingway writes.

She then went to Allen's guest room, shook him awake and asked: 'I'm not going to get my room am I?'

While he fumbled to put on his glasses, Hemingway made up her mind before he could even respond.

'I can't go to Paris with you,' she said.

The next morning, Allen ordered a private jet and left the family's ranch."

The granddaughter of Ernest Hemingway says Allen asked her to go to Paris after they filmed 'Manhattan,' and that she declined because she wasn't sure she'd get her own room.
Mail Online
--R69
replies 71Dec 8, 2017 12:54 PM +00:00
Woody's case is complicated by how vindictive Mia Farrow (and son Ronan) are. It's suspicious.

Oh, yes, how dare someone be vindictive after the man who raped their daughter (and sister) at the age of 7 not only got away with it but is still lauded as a genius that he never was. Very suspicious.

Also, the story is corroborated by the fucking nannies who were clearly instructed never to leave her alone with her (who does that?!) and he was in therapy at the time for his predatory behaviour towards his own daughter. On what planet is that not an open-and-shut case? His lawyers and cleaners have done and are still doing a tremendous job, here on DL and elsewhere.

--Anonymous
replies 72Dec 8, 2017 12:55 PM +00:00

Side-stepping the molestation thing I do wonder - how do you think Soon-yi has kept Woody to herself all these years anyway? You'd think that his alleged need for baby snatch would've come back to haunt now that she's a nearly 50 year old withered up old crone. I mean if he suddenly left her for an 18 year old do you think his career might've actually been over? If the only thing keeping people hanging on is that it really seems like it might have been love between these two crazy kids?

--Anonymous
replies 73Dec 8, 2017 12:56 PM +00:00
how do you think Soon-yi has kept Woody to herself all these years anyway?

Sad to say, R73, but maybe she didn't. They adopted two girls.

--Anonymous
replies 74Dec 8, 2017 12:58 PM +00:00

So can a father, r56, something you never seem to bring up.

Moses's story has changed over time, it differs from the stories several of his siblings have told, he wasn't actually there during the incident with Dylan but makes statements implying he was, and he's also a family therapist who spoke publicly about his adopted sister's abuse in a way that every family therapy knows is unethical.

He's the only one who has defended Woody. It's not compelling.

--Anonymous
replies 75Dec 8, 2017 1:01 PM +00:00

I am positive that Moses' change of heart has absolutely nothing to do with the big fat inheritance that is no doubt coming his way.

--Anonymous
replies 76Dec 8, 2017 1:03 PM +00:00

Moses was in the House at the time of the alleged molestation

The adopted son of Allen and Mia Farrow responds to his sister Dylan’s sexual abuse allegations
PEOPLE.com
--Anonymous
replies 77Dec 8, 2017 1:05 PM +00:00

Allen has said some sketchy stuff recently about how he's "paternal" to Soon-yi and how taken he was with an underaged Miley Cyrus.

This is a flattering article about it and it's still kinda creepy.

The director reveals how his bride has blossomed under his paternal influence.
HWD
--Anonymous
replies 78Dec 8, 2017 1:06 PM +00:00

R76 Dylan’s motivation could be the same

--Anonymous
replies 79Dec 8, 2017 1:06 PM +00:00

R77, is he saying he was in or near the attic, too? Or nearby when Allen was caught by the nanny with his head between Dylan's legs?

--Anonymous
replies 80Dec 8, 2017 1:07 PM +00:00

R80 the nannies who lied on Mia’s behalf?

--Anonymous
replies 81Dec 8, 2017 1:11 PM +00:00

Mariel Hemingway was 18 when he invited her on that trip. And she is NOT condemning Allen.

Mariel Hemingway bid a farewell to Woody Allen.
NY Daily News
--Anonymous
replies 82Dec 8, 2017 1:12 PM +00:00

You Jews and your pathetic Jew-splaining are gross:

Woody Allen spotted with millionaire convicted child sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein on Upper East Side stroll The former hedgefunder was 'hugging (Allen) and taking close to his ear' in Manhattan on Sunday, a source told The New York Post The pair were accompanied by the eccentric film director's effective step daughter-turned-much younger wife, Soon-Yi, 42

The former hedgefunder was 'hugging (Allen) and taking close to his ear' on Sunday, a source told The New York Post. The pair were accompanied by the eccentric film director's step daughter-turned-much younger wife, Soon-Yi.
Mail Online
--Anonymous
replies 83Dec 8, 2017 1:13 PM +00:00

If you think these Jews and their defense of Woody Allen is creepy now, wait until 10 years after Woody Allen has died, and they shift their propaganda campaign into overdrive.

These Jews will probably even produce a Broadway play in which poor innocent Woody Allen is persecuted by the evil shiksa Mia Farrow, and the New York Times will write a glowing review.

s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com
--Anonymous
replies 84Dec 8, 2017 1:16 PM +00:00

Woody Allen never even intended to have a serious relationship with his retarded step-daughter. He just planned to fuck her a few times, and crush Mia by leaving the nude photos of the retarded girl out for Mia to see.

Woody only married Soon because of public relations concerns, and he encouraged his retarded "child bride" to fuck other men, while Woody palled around with Jeffrey Epstein and the 14 year old Russian sex trafficking victims.

www.trueactivist.com
--Anonymous
replies 85Dec 8, 2017 1:20 PM +00:00

You PR bitches work hard for your money! Mia is not very well off by celebrity standards, R79. She hasn't been a working actress for some time now and caring for all those kids with their private school tuitions, medical bills, etc. took a toll. Also she never made very much from all those Woody Allen films she starred in. He's notorious for barely paying his actors anything. They work for scale "for the prestige."

Woody OTOH is loaded. He's been making a film a year for years and also does celebrity endorsements overseas. And unlike her, he owns prime Manhattan real estate. Also, too, his estate is not going to be divided 14 ways or whatever (I forget the number of kids in Mia's brood).

--Anonymous
replies 86Dec 8, 2017 1:23 PM +00:00

R82, she was 16. Read the article at R71.

--Anonymous
replies 87Dec 8, 2017 1:35 PM +00:00

Children are sexual creatures

upload.wikimedia.org
--Allen GinsBERG
replies 88Dec 8, 2017 1:37 PM +00:00

Am I bad person since I just don't care about these people (ppl) at all? I couldn't prevent it, can't fix it, don't want to know about it. It is fun to watch the two sides, both convinced they're right, go at it.

"The truth is unimportant, it's just what you believe."

----Me
replies 89Dec 8, 2017 1:40 PM +00:00

The Washington Post said that asshole's new movie is "too symbolic." Pretentious bastard.

--Anonymous
replies 90Dec 8, 2017 1:40 PM +00:00

Same [R89]

--Anonymous
replies 91Dec 8, 2017 1:42 PM +00:00

R87 she says in her own words she was 18. She filmed Manhattan when she was 17 and woody persued her after filming was over and AFTER she turned 18.

--Anonymous
replies 92Dec 8, 2017 1:43 PM +00:00

Am I a bad person for not caring that Woody Allen raped his 4 year old daughter, and then married his other, retarded, step-daughter, and encouraging her to sleep with other men?

--r89, Jewishly
replies 93Dec 8, 2017 1:44 PM +00:00

r92 is a Woody Allen style gentleman. He starts grooming them early, but sometimes waits until the day they turn 18 to pounce.

r92 used to check IDs at Bryan Singer's parties too.

--Anonymous
replies 94Dec 8, 2017 1:45 PM +00:00

I don't care, R93.

----Me
replies 95Dec 8, 2017 1:46 PM +00:00

Those pictures of him clutching his "daughters" are so hilarious. Those girls look like they'd rather be anywhere in the world than their daddy's loving arms.

--Anonymous
replies 96Dec 8, 2017 3:34 PM +00:00

'Sure I was obsessed with Dylan, but it was an intellectual obsession.'

assets.nydailynews.com
--Anonymous
replies 97Dec 8, 2017 4:15 PM +00:00

'I adopted a couple new intellectuals. Fascinating!'

images.closerweekly.com
--Anonymous
replies 98Dec 8, 2017 4:16 PM +00:00
www.chinadaily.com.cn
--Anonymous
replies 99Dec 8, 2017 4:17 PM +00:00

'I jokingly call her my child bride. We're not even biologically related!'

c8.alamy.com
--Anonymous
replies 100Dec 8, 2017 4:19 PM +00:00

"The heart wants what it wants"

i.pinimg.com
--Anonymous
replies 101Dec 8, 2017 4:21 PM +00:00

r6, she was Andre Previns daughter and he was Mia's boyfriend not husband.

It's a poor moral choice but she was never his daughter.

--Anonymous
replies 102Dec 8, 2017 4:45 PM +00:00

Raping toddler Dylan Farrow was also a poor moral choice.

--Anonymous
replies 103Dec 8, 2017 4:50 PM +00:00

Eventually Woody will have enough flop movies that Hollywood will stop supporting him. Hollywood doesn't care about diddling your own daughter if you are bringing money in, when the money stops coming, he will be done.

--Anonymous
replies 104Dec 8, 2017 4:51 PM +00:00

Woody’s a disgusting pig. He should be castrated.

--Anonymous
replies 105Dec 8, 2017 4:52 PM +00:00

Bechet maybe wants to follow in Woodys footsteps?

iPad in hand and lanyard around her neck, Bechet certainly looked as if she was learning the ropes of the movie industry. Bechet followed her father closely as they stepped side-by-side the set together.
Mail Online
--Anonymous
replies 106Dec 8, 2017 4:53 PM +00:00

Manzie and Woody

i.dailymail.co.uk
--Anonymous
replies 107Dec 8, 2017 4:54 PM +00:00

Both Ronan and Dylan need to go the fuck away.

No one cares about Ronan. Tptb tried to make him happen a few years ago with zero success.

--Anonymous
replies 108Dec 8, 2017 4:55 PM +00:00

Many photos show Bechet and Woody holding hands. Not like a typical teenager but most teens dads don’t get falsely accused of the worst things.

assets.rbl.ms
--Anonymous
replies 109Dec 8, 2017 4:57 PM +00:00

As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, I find it shameful that Dylan and Ronan use this allegation to attract media attention for themselves. Ronan deserves zero praise for his Weinstein article.

--Anonymous
replies 110Dec 8, 2017 5:00 PM +00:00

Give it up, goyim. You're not taking down this Jew.

--Anonymous
replies 111Dec 8, 2017 5:04 PM +00:00

Fuck off with the faux self-righteousness, R72. It's shameful that Ronan used his sister's alleged abuse to launch a career in journalism. Their reasons aren't altruistic. Let me guess...You look up to Rose McGowan too?

--Anonymous
replies 112Dec 8, 2017 5:05 PM +00:00

R111 = Matthew Anscher

--Anonymous
replies 113Dec 8, 2017 5:05 PM +00:00

r110 is pulling out all the Jewish tricks, then posting again at r111.

--Anonymous
replies 114Dec 8, 2017 5:09 PM +00:00

At least now we know that Matthew Anscher was molested, probably by his rabbi. Or was it a councilor at Hebrew Camp?

--Anonymous
replies 115Dec 8, 2017 5:10 PM +00:00

"As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, I find it shameful that Dylan and Ronan use this allegation to attract media attention for themselves."

They're not attracting media attention to THEMSELVES, you idiot. They're attracting media attention to the sexual misconduct of famous men, and in their case it was personal. Woody Allen is a self-serving perv who has been shown incredible leniency, mostly due to a smear campaign against Mia Farrow. Dylan Farrow stated that they always come after Mia, not her, because it wouldn't look good to rake the child victim over the coals. So they say the vindictive crazed Mia Farrow "coached" Dylan to accuse Allen of sexual abuse. But it's obvious that Allen DID do atrocious things to Dylan and she makes no bones about the fact that he made her suck his thumb and "buried" his face in her crotch after taking off her underwear, among other things. Woody Allen reminds me of Jimmy Savile, who went to his grave without ever having been held accountable for horrific sexual abuse of young women and children. I think old Woody will be the same way; he'll die denying his behavior and will never be held accountable for molesting a child and lusting after teenage girls.

--Anonymous
replies 116Dec 8, 2017 5:48 PM +00:00

We don’t “go after” Dylan because she IS a victim. But of her mother not her father.

--Anonymous
replies 117Dec 8, 2017 6:49 PM +00:00

Woody may have waited until Mariel Hemingway turned 18 to ask her to go to Paris with him, but she was in his movie when she was 16 and had her first kiss in that movie and it was with 44 year old Allen:

"She also has spoken about how her first kiss, which was with Allen in the film, was an anxiety-ridden one. “I had never kissed anybody. So the kiss in the cab around Central Park terrified me. I was worried about it for weeks,” she told The New Cinema Magazine in 2010. Fortunately it was a long shot and I didn’t have to do much . . . he attacked me like I was a linebacker.”

Also, when Mariel was 16:

"“In real life, Woody and I didn’t have a romantic relationship, but he did make me feel incredibly intelligent. He took me to museums and concerts. He gave me his wisdom, and you can see that in the character.”

In that letter to the 13-year-old posted above, and scenes in Crimes and Misdemeanors and Husbands and Wives, Woody seems to have a thing for pre-teen to young teenage girls; he takes an intellectual interest in them which makes them feel smart. I assume this is grooming of some kind.

--Anonymous
replies 118Dec 8, 2017 7:14 PM +00:00

The letters he wrote to the 13-year-old are referenced at R69.

--R118
replies 119Dec 8, 2017 7:16 PM +00:00

And he never once acted inappropriately with the pen pal did he? So nothing to it.

--Anonymous
replies 120Dec 8, 2017 7:35 PM +00:00

"We don’t “go after” Dylan because she IS a victim. But of her mother not her father."

Oh go suck Woody's withered inchworm, you stupid fuck. You know you want to.

--Anonymous
replies 121Dec 8, 2017 7:39 PM +00:00

Woody seems like a creep, but she's literally his only accuser. Even by the standards of the current frenzy it's not enough to exile him forever.

--Anonymous
replies 122Dec 8, 2017 7:41 PM +00:00

What 42-year-old man has any interest in a 13-year-old girl, and enough to write letters back and forth with her? That's inappropriate, R120.

--Anonymous
replies 123Dec 8, 2017 8:46 PM +00:00

No it’s not. It’s not that uncommon for well known figures to correspond with fans.

--Anonymous
replies 124Dec 8, 2017 9:57 PM +00:00

Another thread for DL's legion of bigoted scum to spew.

--The downfall of America
replies 125Dec 8, 2017 10:17 PM +00:00

Any Woody supporters are fucking pigs, just like him. His parents should have died in the ovens, so he would never have existed.

--Anonymous
replies 126Dec 8, 2017 10:55 PM +00:00

R126 = Mia, Dylan and Ronan, spewing bile and bigotry.

--Anonymous
replies 127Dec 8, 2017 10:59 PM +00:00

Out of 127 replies, approximately 100 of them are made by the same crazed Frau - yes, I 'outed' you, dear. The grammar and choice of words ( eg. " retarded") are spewed ad infinitum. Do you not think gay men have frau-dar, silly?

Who cares about the topic at hand ? This thread makes for fascinating reading about how to detect a Cluster B personality disorder through the tireless rewording of the same point and the numerous pics to back up the violently vitriolic rhetoric that Mia and Dylan are saints and Soon-Yi is a (gasp) " retarded cunt".

Enough! In the words of Eminem "I just don't give a fuck!!!"

--Anonymous
replies 128Dec 8, 2017 11:36 PM +00:00

Have you noticed Mia and co. come out like clockwork to peddle their slander to people too lazy to read any facts about the case, every time Woody comes out with a new film? Mia, aka the Wicked witch of the East, is probably more pissed she doesn’t get cast in movies any more than anything.

--Knowledge Lover
replies 129Dec 9, 2017 12:06 AM +00:00

dylan farrow mia and Not Frank's Son: shut the fuck up. No one wants to listen toy our shit over nad over and over....

--Anonymous
replies 130Dec 9, 2017 12:18 AM +00:00

A former girlfriend who admits to having sex with Woody Allen when she was 17 and he was in his 40's.

At the end of the video, there's a "never before seen" report from medical investigators in 1993 saying it is their expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Woody Allen. Hmmmm...

Following Dylan Farrow's recent open letter, alleging that Woody Allen sexually assaulted her as a little girl, ET caught up with Allen's ex Stacey Nelkin, w...
YouTube
--Anonymous
replies 131Dec 9, 2017 12:35 AM +00:00

More accurate wording: an investigative report from medical professionals

--R131
replies 132Dec 9, 2017 12:38 AM +00:00

Woody's interview with 60 Minutes. This is a situation that is convincing on both sides. Very strange and interesting.

In 1992, Woody Allen gave a no-holds-barred interview to Steve Kroft to defend himself against accusations by Mia Farrow that Allen molested their then-7-yea...
YouTube
--Anonymous
replies 133Dec 9, 2017 12:41 AM +00:00
peddle their slander to people too lazy to read any facts about the case

The facts aren't kind to Woody Allen, though. The court documents, the entire case itself makes Allen look AT BEST like a shitty and selfish parent who never should have had access to kids simply because of his lack of caring and incompetence.

I do notice lately more and more people saying "read the facts, educate yourself, the court documents exonerate Woody!" when the exact opposite is true. There's a definite movement by someone, I'm assuming the MRAs who have adopted this case as an example of how women are all bitch cunt lying fuckwhores, to try to convince the lazy people not willing to look anything up that Allen was railroaded.

So your comment is pretty ironic, considering.

--Anonymous
replies 134Dec 9, 2017 3:12 PM +00:00
Woody seems like a creep, but she's literally his only accuser. Even by the standards of the current frenzy it's not enough to exile him forever.

His predilection for dating girls ages 15 through 17 is more than enough, as is fucking a teen Soon-yi and taking those Polaroids in the house where his little kids and current girlfriend lived, including 6-year-old Dylan, who he had been inappropriate with to the point of being asked to go to therapy.

When it comes to this situation, you literally do not have to believe Dylan to know something sketchy as hell is up with this guy. He's a creep and a predator. He hung around high schools waiting for his underage girlfriends and the court issued public statements saying he never should have been around Mia's kids in the first place. The sexual abuse allegations are just one tiny piece of a much larger picture that paint Allen as a perv.

--Anonymous
replies 135Dec 9, 2017 3:18 PM +00:00

Mia thought she and Woody were in a very committed relationship, making movies and raising children together. Meanwhile, Woody was actually having sex with her teenage daughter, who he had helped raise, and who was his son's sister, and the sister of the rest of Mia's children. He seduced Mia's daughter and the children's sister.

How could he do this to Mia? To the children? He threw a bomb into the family's life. But why? Yes, Mia behaved strangely, but who wouldn't? She was completely blindsided and the entire family dynamic had just changed, and her career was suddenly in shambles. The man she was in love with had cheated on her, and with her daughter.

Woody Allen could have found another woman so easily. If he was over Mia, he could have broken up with her like an adult. He deliberately hurt her and tried to ruin everything she cared about, and, as that 60 Minutes interview shows, he didn't care at all.

Great filmmaker, but a man with no character.

--Anonymous
replies 136Dec 9, 2017 7:31 PM +00:00

^ Mia behave strangely after she found out about Woody's affair with Soon Yi.

--R136
replies 137Dec 9, 2017 7:32 PM +00:00

And even if M. Hemingway or someone else is 18 years old by two seconds or four months, I ain't no prude, but that stuff's disturbing.

I've not had kids, but I have been very close to my nieces. I'm glad some adult in his 30s or 40s didn't try to fuck 'em when they were 18, am among those who think the piggy men deserve to get hit with baseball bats.

--Anonymous
replies 138Dec 9, 2017 7:40 PM +00:00

PS: For perspective, a cousin's daughter is 18, freshman at a good college. She was born in France to American parents, grew up there and in Dubai, has traveled all over the place, reads, writes songs, plays guitar, etc.

She's about as wise and mature as it gets for 18, but it is ludicrous to suggest she's anywhere close to ready and emotionally equipped to go to bed w. some guy in his 30s or 40s, much less someone famous.

I hope Allen dies a slow, painful death.

--Anonymous
replies 139Dec 9, 2017 7:44 PM +00:00

I don't know enough about pedo's (thankfully) to know if it is unusual that Allen has only been accused of abuse by one victim. I presumed that most of these freaks went after multiple boys/girls over the course of their lives. I wouldn't put it beyond Allen but Farrow is so consumed by her hatred for him that it is easy to see how she could slander him this way as the ultimate form of revenge. What a mess.

--Anonymous
replies 140Dec 9, 2017 8:25 PM +00:00

Woody Allen is a revolting, morally bankrupt piece of shit. His apologists are no better than he is. Defending THIS guy? Yeah, the Woody lovers are as sick as he is.

--Anonymous
replies 141Dec 9, 2017 8:36 PM +00:00

"Both Ronan and Dylan need to go the fuck away."

No, Woody is the one who needs to go the fuck away. You need to go the fuck away too, Woody lover. You're disgusting.

--Anonymous
replies 142Dec 9, 2017 8:37 PM +00:00

Louise Lasser, Diane Keaton and Mia Farrow are hardly women a pedo or even a guy fixated on youth, would consider being in long term relationships with.

--Anonymous
replies 143Dec 9, 2017 8:53 PM +00:00

“Mia thought she and Woody were in a very committed relationship,” R136 Mia’s idea of commitment obviously includes fucking ex husbands continuously and birthing their babies.

--Anonymous
replies 144Dec 9, 2017 8:55 PM +00:00

They're all three rather girlish, R143. Girlish, not womanly.

--Anonymous
replies 145Dec 9, 2017 8:55 PM +00:00
“Mia thought she and Woody were in a very committed relationship,” [R136] Mia’s idea of commitment obviously includes fucking ex husbands continuously and birthing their babies.

I'm guessing Mia regrets offhandedly making that joke.

--Anonymous
replies 146Dec 9, 2017 8:57 PM +00:00

Woody is a tiny man. Maybe he feels more manly around young women., making up for his lack of height and manliness. He obviously likes to teach, and young women are likely more fawning and impressed with his intellect, his greatest asset, than mature women with minds of their own. He's always exuded confidence, but maybe he has deep-rooted insecurities and young women are his comfort zone. It might be less about sex and more about acceptance.

In the 60 Minutes video, Mia pretty much told him she was going to re-pay him by taking his daughter. She said, "You took my daughter, now I'm going to take yours." She also said, "I have something very nasty planned for you." She may have used his penchant for young adult women to create a story about pedophilia.

--Anonymous
replies 147Dec 9, 2017 9:06 PM +00:00

Comments like R58's are why I still love this fucking site.

So random, so clever, so DL!

--Anonymous
replies 148Dec 9, 2017 9:06 PM +00:00
His parents should have died in the ovens, so he would never have existed

He was born in 1935.

--Anonymous
replies 149Dec 9, 2017 9:17 PM +00:00
His parents should have died in the ovens, so he would never have existed

Maybe Woody has psychological scars from hearing comments like this growing up.

--Anonymous
replies 150Dec 9, 2017 9:21 PM +00:00

When Woody adopted 2 more girls, one Asian, one white, I wondered if he was trying to create a new little Dylan and a new little Soon-Yi.

--Anonymous
replies 151Dec 9, 2017 9:22 PM +00:00

Soon-Yi is Woody's soulmate. It's true love. Their two halves make a complete whole. They couldn't help but get together. Woody is a very happy man to have found his other half. Most people don't.

--Anonymous
replies 152Dec 9, 2017 9:40 PM +00:00

I always wondered if Soon-yi posted here, and thanks to r152, now I know.

--Anonymous
replies 153Dec 9, 2017 9:41 PM +00:00

I don't think Woody has ever had a "soulmate" who is over 21. Not even in his movies.

--Anonymous
replies 154Dec 9, 2017 9:43 PM +00:00

I'm sure R152 is being cloy.

Mia tries to do good in the world. I think Woody acknowledges this in Alice and Hannah and her Sisters, especially Alice. Why he wanted to destroy her is known only to him and his lifelong analyst. It's interesting he made not one but two movies about a man murdering his girlfriend and getting away with it.

--Anonymous
replies 155Dec 9, 2017 10:38 PM +00:00

He wants to destroy her? He is the one who has moved on with his life. It’s the trio of Mia, Dylan and Ronan who can’t Every time Woody releases a movie we get a renewed call for making him accountable for something with no proof.

--Anonymous
replies 156Dec 9, 2017 10:46 PM +00:00

Mia Farrow is a bitch. First she marries some mob-connected guinea thug who used music as a front for organized crime, then she pulls some strings to get her competition rubbed out. Think about it. SINatra offered to have Woody rubbed out years later when the Soon-Yi business revealed what a fucking pig he is. And Mia and Sharon were likely up for the same roles. Why wouldn't he have hired some low-level dirtbags to rub out his wife's competition?

Woody's also a Palestinazi sympathizer, and regarding the Jewish religion I don't think he has been in a synagogue in decades.

--Anonymous
replies 157Dec 9, 2017 10:47 PM +00:00

Mia's had an interesting life. A famous actress mother, a famous director father, polio as a child (sad), became an actress, went to India and the Maharishi made a pass at her, hung out with John Lennon, was friends with Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski, married Frank Sinatra, Andre Previn, and was with Woody Allen for years, adopted very-needy children and gave them a better life, had children with Previn and Allen, has done philanthropic work all of her adult life.

--Anonymous
replies 158Dec 9, 2017 11:15 PM +00:00

What's funny is MIA didn't want to break up with Allen and even showed up to film his next movie. It wasn't until Woody left her that suddenly she wasn't ok with the SoonYi affair.

And she admits this in her autobiography.

Frankly they probably deserved each other - two narcissistic nuts.

--Anonymous
replies 159Dec 9, 2017 11:31 PM +00:00

Woody and Soon-Yi's 20th wedding anniversary is coming up in exactly two weeks. Happy Anniversary to the happy couple!

People should just let it go now. No one knows the truth, and Woody should be given the benefit of the doubt about Dylan Eliza Malone Farrow.

www.slate.com
--Anonymous
replies 160Dec 10, 2017 1:07 AM +00:00

Ronan and his bussy buddy definitely post here...

--Anonymous
replies 161Dec 10, 2017 8:39 AM +00:00

Ye;s, the happy couple look SO happy in that photo at R160. Especially Woody; doesn't he look like a man in love, thrilled to be at the side of his other half, his soulmate? Actually he looks like he has a case of bad indigestion. And Soon-Yi looks blank, as always.

--Anonymous
replies 162Dec 10, 2017 8:44 AM +00:00

They look fine.

--Anonymous
replies 163Dec 10, 2017 10:06 AM +00:00

"I've got something very nasty planned for you," Mia Farrow told Allen a month after she discovered the affair with Previn. "You took my daughter, and now I'm going to take yours."

FACT.

Allen never did a thing to Dylan Farrow. Mia engineered the entire thing and coached Dylan methodically to tell this story about "Daddy touching you."

--Anonymous
replies 164Dec 10, 2017 10:50 AM +00:00

R136 and others: the polaroids were taken in Woody's apartment, not Mia's. Both Mia and Woody have been consistent over the years that Woody did not "help raise" any of the children, and had very little relationship with the older children. Soon-yi was/is not Ronan's sister; she is his stepsister. Ditto Dylan. Only three people have direct, first-hand knowledge of what happened with Dylan, and all three appear to be unbalanced. Move on.

--Anonymous
replies 165Dec 10, 2017 10:59 AM +00:00

Ronan and Soon-Yi both share the same mother so they are more than stepsiblings, R165. The same goes for Dylan. All 3 share the same mother - Mia.

--Anonymous
replies 166Dec 10, 2017 11:07 AM +00:00

Legally, Ronan and Dylan are full siblings as they share the same mother and father - Mia and Allen. (Forgot if Allen rescinded his adoption of Dylan?)

Legally, Ronan and Soon-Yi are half-siblings as they share the same mother (Mia) but different fathers (Woody Allen and André Previn).

Stepsiblings don't share the same mother or the same father. Stepsiblings are just people whose parents happen to be married to each other.

--Anonymous
replies 167Dec 10, 2017 11:12 AM +00:00

'A plague on both your houses.'

--William S.
replies 168Dec 10, 2017 12:24 PM +00:00

"Allen never did a thing to Dylan Farrow. Mia engineered the entire thing and coached Dylan methodically to tell this story about "Daddy touching you."

FACT.

You don't know any such thing, you blithering Woody lover. And Dylan is now an adult, not a child, and she continues to say unequivocally that she was molested by Allen. So you think she's a brain washed adult? She also says people like you (Woody lovers) continue to spread the lie that she was "coached" and continue to portray her mother as some crazed vindictive mad woman, which of course she is not.

You Woody lovers are such blatant liars. Despicable, just like your beloved Woody.

--Anonymous
replies 169Dec 10, 2017 4:02 PM +00:00

As the 170th post on this thread, let me finally ask: What does "goes ring-a-ding-ding" mean?

--Anonymous
replies 170Dec 10, 2017 4:08 PM +00:00

According to the the Urban Dictonary, "ring a ding ding" is:

A phrase used to express positive affirmation upon thing, idea or person. Often, followed with the term of endearement, "baby."

Or:

An enthusiastic expression of joy similar to "Hussar!"

--Anonymous
replies 171Dec 10, 2017 4:12 PM +00:00

Mia running around the house screaming, "Woody's been fucking Soon Yi!" to all the kids probably wasn't the best way to handle the situation after she saw the nude photos of Soon Yi. Her instinct to protect her children seemed non-existent. (Most parents would never say the "f" word around their kids, let alone in the context of its true meaning.)

--Anonymous
replies 172Dec 10, 2017 5:32 PM +00:00

^^ The children were young.

--R172
replies 173Dec 10, 2017 5:34 PM +00:00

I wonder if any of the other kids picked up the vibe that Woody was having a weird relationship with their sister Soon-Yi.

--Anonymous
replies 174Dec 10, 2017 5:36 PM +00:00

I don't care what anyone says, nothing will make the Woody and Soon-Yi thing OK to me.

"But... but... but..."

I don't care!

--NOPE.
replies 175Dec 10, 2017 5:46 PM +00:00

If Woody were into little kids why did he only go after Dylan? He only had multiple other girls from Mia’s brood to pick from, hmmm?

--Anonymous
replies 176Dec 10, 2017 5:59 PM +00:00

Sometimes pedos just target 1 child in the family. Like when you hear those stories where the family starves 1 child but the rest are fine.

I wonder which of the 2 new girls he got is his "favorite" now.

--Anonymous
replies 177Dec 10, 2017 6:08 PM +00:00

Mia found split beaver photos Allen had taken of Soon-Yi, ostensibly for a "modeling portfolio" he was helping her with. Yeah, right! No modeling portfolio would be complete without photos of the subject with her legs open and her pussy lips on prominent display.

--Anonymous
replies 178Dec 10, 2017 6:20 PM +00:00

It’s strange that Mia allegedly reacted to Soon-Yi as if she were the ‘other woman’ and not her child.

Also, there is another possibility in addition to Dylan being brainwashed. It is possible that she is confabulating. This does not mean that she is consciously fabricating anything. Confabulation is very common amongst children and the fact that Dylan was subject to repeated interviews (as many as nine if I recall correctly) about the allegations would raise this possibility for an expert witness if the case had ever gone to trial. Subjecting young children to multiple interviews is very much against best practice. Child witnesses are highly suggestible.

--Anonymous
replies 179Dec 10, 2017 6:28 PM +00:00

Remarkable that when these sorts of posts appear (anywhere), allen defenders appear in some haste, relating remarkably similar things. I might bet my lunch money that allen's employed a company to do this.

It's all too consistent, predictable.

If that ain't happening, it's disturbing that people are so invested, so enthused about this person.

--Anonymous
replies 180Dec 10, 2017 6:33 PM +00:00

No I’m not employed by Woody. I’ve been defending him since that nanny testified that Mia asked them to fabricate the allegations. Woody is infuriatingly absent in defending himself.

--Anonymous
replies 181Dec 10, 2017 7:12 PM +00:00

Posters here who think the posts that give Woody Allen some benefit of the doubt must be created by people on his payroll don't seem to understand that people come from all walks of life and different life experiences, and form their opinions accordingly. Everything isn't black and white, and, since the public does not know what the truth really is, it's normal that some members of the public believe him. That doesn't make them evil.

I lean toward believing Mia, but I do see reasons to believe Woody.

--Anonymous
replies 182Dec 10, 2017 7:18 PM +00:00

"... since the public does not know what the truth really is,..."

So this thread shouldn't even exist.

--Anonymous
replies 183Dec 10, 2017 8:04 PM +00:00

Dylan, Ronan and Mia will not be satisfied until Woody is made a pariah in the film industry. Since Mia has already gone through the court system, and has written a book with all the lurid details about Woody Allen, is this now Plan C? Is it a sort of non-violent vigilante justice?

--Anonymous
replies 184Dec 10, 2017 8:19 PM +00:00

Since Dylan was so young, I wonder if it's possible that Uncle John (Mia's child-molesting brother) did something to her, and in the confusion of Mia screaming that Woody "fucked Soon Yi" and the ensuing hysteria of Mia making artwork with needles stuck in hearts, the poor child confused those moments with moments with Woody, in order to please Mia.

--Anonymous
replies 185Dec 10, 2017 8:24 PM +00:00

There's a helluva difference between giving him a minuscule amount of benefit of the doubt, challenging as that may be, what with his shenanigans w. a high=school gal and M. Hemingway, and the approach some people here take.

And of course it's over-stating things to say there's a view that giving him some benefit of the doubt "must" be paid for.

Interesting though, that R182 does well to obfuscate, generate some sympathy for wa and cast aspersions on a comment noting some remarkable similarities -- around the internet -- in ways pro-allen people address all this.

--Anonymous
replies 186Dec 10, 2017 8:53 PM +00:00

A 7-year-old would probably not remember someone putting his thumb in her mouth or laying his head on her lap. It's a shame Mia and Woody didn't handle those problems privately, and allow Dylan to forget all about it.

--Anonymous
replies 187Dec 10, 2017 9:27 PM +00:00

Imagine defending Woody Allen, of all people, right NOW.

--Anonymous
replies 188Dec 10, 2017 9:33 PM +00:00
He basically was fucking his underage daughter. And don't give me the "he wasn't Woody's shit".

Uh, you see what you did there? Idiot.

Soon Yi was NEVER Woody's "daughter", nor step-daughter, nor any relation at all. If your outrage is to stay fiery hot after 25 years, you might want to start with facts.

Here's one: Mia Farrow is a loon, and a number of her actual children are dead. Are any of Woody and Soon Yi's children dead? No.

--Anonymous
replies 189Dec 10, 2017 9:35 PM +00:00

Yeah man, marrying your girlfriend's daughter that you've known since she was 9 years old is cool. Okay. Woody, go to bed.

--Anonymous
replies 190Dec 10, 2017 9:41 PM +00:00

R170 - *snort* I would venture to guess that 'goes ring-a-ding-ding' means that a dime has been dropped, you dig?

"Urban Dictionary", 171? *snort*

--Ernestine
replies 191Dec 10, 2017 9:43 PM +00:00

I like the implication in this thread that Mia shouldn't have been upset about her boyfriend fucking her daughter.

--Anonymous
replies 192Dec 10, 2017 9:51 PM +00:00

Mia absolutely had every right to be upset. But she also had a responsibility towards her family. Involving your children in your relationship with your partner is a perilous enterprise and shows a lack of boundaries. (And before I am accused of being a bought-and-paid-for Woody apologist, none of this absolves Allen for pursuing a sexual relationship with a vulnerable much younger woman who should have remained off-limits to him.)

It seems likely that there are no good guys here: both Mia and Woody appear to be a mess in different ways, IMO.

--Anonymous
replies 193Dec 10, 2017 10:04 PM +00:00

R192 so upset that she was willing to stay with him and showed up to star in his next movie until he decided to break it off with her..

Again...

--Anonymous
replies 194Dec 10, 2017 10:08 PM +00:00

Mia lived with Woody for over 12 years, knowing he had dated a teenager. In fact, Mia tried to get that woman to testify that she was underage when Woody dated her, but the woman refused because she wasn't underage.

Mia was 21 when she married 51-year-old Sinatra.

Woody took (and passed) a lie-detector test, and Mia refused to take one.

After a very thorough investigation, experts said that Dylan was not molested by Woody, but had been caught up in a troubled family and likely coached by Mia.

There was a very thorough vetting before Woody and Soon Yi adopted their two daughters, and the agencies found Woody to be highly qualified to adopt.

Interesting information in this article by Allen three years ago.

I'll add that Mia really wanted, and pushed for, Woody to adopt some of her children, and then she really wanted to have a biological child with him. If he was being inappropriate with Dylan, why would she do this?

Of course it's sleazy and awful for Mia and the family that Woody and Soon Yi had an affair and went on to get married, but some human beings do things like that. Mia got pregnant with her friend's husband and it drove her friend to an insane asylum. So, there's that.

I naïvely thought the accusation would be dismissed.
www.nytimes.com
--Anonymous
replies 195Dec 10, 2017 10:10 PM +00:00
Here's one: Mia Farrow is a loon, and a number of her actual children are dead. Are any of Woody and Soon Yi's children dead? No.

That's really unfair, and I doubt anyone would want you defending them with this kind of attitude. Mia's children were often unhealthy to begin with.

--Anonymous
replies 196Dec 10, 2017 10:13 PM +00:00

I think some of the Allen stans in this thread are the PR whores and some are just the usual crew of DL misognyists.

About Woody putting his thumb in Dylan's mouth: actually, that behavior is not in dispute! The alleged abuse in the attic is what's in dispute. It is well-known that Allen's behavior towards Dylan was so creepy and obsessive that he agreed to go into therapy to treat it. He does not deny that. And multiple witnesses saw this behavior and testified about it. As Dylan writes in the op-ed at the link:

Allen’s pattern of inappropriate behavior — putting his thumb in my mouth, climbing into bed with me in his underwear, constant grooming and touching — was witnessed by friends and family members. At the time of the alleged assault, he was in therapy for his conduct towards me. Three eyewitnesses substantiated my account, including a babysitter who saw Allen with his head buried in my lap after he had taken off my underwear. Allen refused to take a polygraph administered by the Connecticut state police.

It boggles the mind that people are still defending this sick freak. Some of you who are, are sycophantic PR shills and the rest are "men's rights" misogynists or very old men with the same antediluvian victim-blaming attitudes that Allen has. But it's 2017 now, bitches.

--Anonymous
replies 197Dec 11, 2017 8:36 AM +00:00

Princess Di, pedophile!

i.pinimg.com
--Anonymous
replies 198Dec 11, 2017 8:47 AM +00:00

Always, always, always be skeptical about anyone who’s humanitarian and charity work is conspicuous. It’s a form of image-manufacturing and it almost always conceals something dark and sordid. On top of that, Mia also fetishises race.

--Anonymous
replies 199Dec 11, 2017 8:55 AM +00:00

R197, which part of the following do you not understand? Rather than hateful misogynistic PR people on Woody's payroll, perhaps the people who disagree with you are basing their opinions on the facts and conclusions of discovery. Isn't this possible, and even rational? Or should they just throw out the facts and instead share your emotions and hate Woody Allen because you're angry?

"Meanwhile the Connecticut police turned for help to a special investigative unit they relied on in such cases, the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of the Yale-New Haven Hospital. This group of impartial, experienced men and women whom the district attorney looked to for guidance as to whether to prosecute, spent months doing a meticulous investigation, interviewing everyone concerned, and checking every piece of evidence. Finally they wrote their conclusion which I quote here: “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen. Further, we believe that Dylan’s statements on videotape and her statements to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4th, 1992... In developing our opinion we considered three hypotheses to explain Dylan’s statements. First, that Dylan’s statements were true and that Mr. Allen had sexually abused her; second, that Dylan’s statements were not true but were made up by an emotionally vulnerable child who was caught up in a disturbed family and who was responding to the stresses in the family; and third, that Dylan was coached or influenced by her mother, Ms. Farrow. While we can conclude that Dylan was not sexually abused, we can not be definite about whether the second formulation by itself or the third formulation by itself is true. We believe that it is more likely that a combination of these two formulations best explains Dylan’s allegations of sexual abuse.”

--Anonymous
replies 200Dec 11, 2017 10:57 AM +00:00
It is well-known that Allen's behavior towards Dylan was so creepy and obsessive that he agreed to go into therapy to treat it.

This is Mia's contention, yet this is the same man she wanted to adopt her children, and to have a biological child with. That doesn't make very much sense.

--Anonymous
replies 201Dec 11, 2017 11:01 AM +00:00

She wanted all that before he went into therapy, R201, probably not after.

As far as Allen being "highly qualified" to adopt, that's because damning paperwork the judge saw in the 1993 case went missing and wasn't on file when he applied to adopt. Maco, the DA, has been furious about that for two decades. But there are references to that paperwork in the original court cases so you know it existed at one time.

--Anonymous
replies 202Dec 11, 2017 12:20 PM +00:00

"Uh, you see what you did there? Idiot."

That doesn't even make sense, you idiot.

"Here's one: Mia Farrow is a loon, and a number of her actual children are dead. Are any of Woody and Soon Yi's children dead? No."

Some of Mia Farrow's adopted children had serious handicaps and health problems when she adopted them, you dumb fuck. It's no wonder that some of them died premature deaths. And yes, Woody Allen and Soon-Yi's "children" are still alive. No doubt they were birthed from some healthy wench who was was payed handsomely for providing children to a perverted old man and his dimwit other half. You're the loon, Woody lover, as are all of your ilk.

--Anonymous
replies 203Dec 11, 2017 1:53 PM +00:00
they were birthed from some healthy wench who was was payed handsomely

Oh, dear.

--Anonymous
replies 204Dec 11, 2017 3:53 PM +00:00

World Jewry doesn't need to be on Woody Allen's payroll to act like it. Study the Talmud, and the last 1,000 years of Ashkenazi Jewish culture.

--Anonymous
replies 205Dec 11, 2017 4:54 PM +00:00

^^ Yeah, not gonna do that. How about giving us the "World Jewry for Dummies" version?

--Anonymous
replies 206Dec 11, 2017 5:55 PM +00:00

r206 The Talmud teaches Jews to stick together at all costs. Reporting a fellow Jew to the police carries a death sentence in Jewish law.

Notice how the entire Jewish community (World Jewry) believes that the Jewish community has never done anything wrong to non-Jewish communities in 3,000 years. Jews have been kicked out of 109 places (and counting), but all Jews pretend that their anti-goyim attitudes, laws, and religious beliefs have NOTHING to do with that.

Every time Jews lose a war of Jewish aggression, they just re-write history and call it persecution.

Just look at Germany in the 1920s. The entire economy was dominated by heartless Jews, who starved and sexually trafficked German children by the millions

--Anonymous
replies 207Dec 11, 2017 6:05 PM +00:00

r206 In Jewish law (The Talmud) , a 3 year old baby is fair game for sexual purposes.

Jews even suck the bleeding penis of Jewish babies after they ritually mutilate their baby genitals.

And why do Jews even circumcise/mutilate their boys? To separate them from the lowly inferior goyim.

"Two New York City infants were diagnosed with herpes after undergoing a traditional Orthodox Jewish circumcision, NBC4 reports. According to the Health Depa...
YouTube
--Anonymous
replies 208Dec 11, 2017 6:08 PM +00:00

Woody is a perv.

Soon-Yi is a cretin.

They deserve each other.

--Anonymous
replies 209Dec 11, 2017 6:09 PM +00:00

Just listen to a rabbi when there aren't any goyim around.

Pedophilia allowed in Talmud

The Talmud source for this Halakha regarding screwing boys below 9 years, is Sanhedrin 54b https://web.archive.org/web/20170315091418/http://www.come-and-hea...
YouTube
--Anonymous
replies 210Dec 11, 2017 6:12 PM +00:00

R166 Mia birthed Soon Yi? I think your fervor and deep-seated attachment to this work out saga is getting to you.

--Not posting multiple times like you, Frau.
replies 211Dec 11, 2017 6:44 PM +00:00

Woody Allen describes himself as a "strict Freudian atheist", so your points are irrelevant, R207/208/210.

--Anonymous
replies 212Dec 11, 2017 6:45 PM +00:00

r212 Freudian atheist just means Masonic/mystical Jewish pervert.

Freud appears to have been a Frankist/Kabbalah Jewish mysticism Jew. And he was a member of the Jewish masonic organization B'Nai B'Rith in Prague.

And Freud's creepy incestuous relationship with his daughter is exactly what is/was practiced by the Frankists.

Promoting sexual degeneracy was also one of the Frankist religious values, and Freud was the King of that.

The movie Eyes Wide Shut was based on a short story written by one of Freud's Jew friends in Prague.

All rights reserved. Stanley Kubrick Productions, Hobby Films, Pole Star & Warner Bros.
YouTube
--Anonymous
replies 213Dec 11, 2017 7:08 PM +00:00

"Purification through transgression"

Jacob Frank 1726 – December 10, 1791) was an 18th-century Polish-Jewish religious leader who claimed to be the reincarnation of the self-proclaimed messiah Sabbatai Zevi and also of the biblical patriarch Jacob. The Jewish authorities in Poland excommunicated Frank and his followers due to his heretical doctrines that included deification of himself as a part of a trinity and other controversial concepts such as neo-Carpocratian "purification through transgression".

Unlike traditional Judaism, which provides a set of detailed guidelines called halakha that are scrupulously followed by observant Jews and regulate many aspects of life,[4] Frank claimed that "all laws and teachings will fall"[5] and following antinomianism asserted that one's most important personal obligation of every person was the transgression of every boundary.

en.wikipedia.org
--Anonymous
replies 214Dec 11, 2017 7:13 PM +00:00

I follow TV's Frankism.

images3.wikia.nocookie.net
--Push the button, Frank
replies 215Dec 11, 2017 7:17 PM +00:00

.......

This is the theme song for the TWILIGHT ZONE series 1962. Does that take you back or what?
YouTube
--Anonymous
replies 216Dec 11, 2017 7:17 PM +00:00

We keep hearing Woody and Dylan were in counseling because of Woodys supposed strange obsession with her. But that’s only from the Mia camp. Has Woody said why? It seems normal for the person he is to be in therapy for everything. An adopted child adapting to a new home and parents would be a reason for family therapy. I want to hear his POV about it.

--Anonymous
replies 217Dec 11, 2017 7:29 PM +00:00

In the early days of his career, Woody freely admitted that he regularly saw an analyst. In Mia's book she says that Woody was in therapy most of his adult life. She also said that the children each had a therapist, at Woody's behest. (He also paid for each child to study under a master chess instructor.) He doesn't sound like someone trying to hide anything.

--Anonymous
replies 218Dec 11, 2017 7:38 PM +00:00

Seems like a well-adjusted guy, lol

Woody was in England filming "Casino Royale" when he guested on a British TV show. He finished his set with his "moose" routine, but had to change the punchl...
YouTube
--Anonymous
replies 219Dec 11, 2017 7:54 PM +00:00

The LAST person who should be weighing in on who or what is "well adjusted" is you, R219 (and all the other numbers containing your anti-semitic posts this evening).

--Anonymous
replies 220Dec 11, 2017 8:33 PM +00:00

r220 is too narcissistic to ever conceive that Jewish behavior might ever merit disgust.

--Anonymous
replies 221Dec 11, 2017 8:35 PM +00:00

Why do you keep flooding threads with your bigotry, R221?

--Anonymous
replies 222Dec 11, 2017 8:37 PM +00:00

Ronan is just still pissed that Woody had sent him to therapy back in the day because of his "gay tendencies".

--Anonymous
replies 223Dec 12, 2017 11:56 AM +00:00

R221 is too blinded by antisemitism to realize Woody is an atheist.

--Anonymous
replies 224Dec 12, 2017 12:07 PM +00:00

Dylan Farrow Calls Out Kate Winslet & Justin Timberlake For Working With Woody Allen On The Day Of Wonder Wheel's Release!

--Anonymous
replies 225Dec 16, 2017 7:35 AM +00:00

The man who stole my childhood: Dylan Farrow shares her grief at the release of Woody Allen's new movie being celebrated by stars Kate Winslet and Justin Timberlake

Dylan, who claims she was sexually abused by the director as a child, sent out a flurry of tweets to coincide with the release of Wonder Wheel, Allen's latest film which stars Justin Timberlake.
Mail Online
--Anonymous
replies 226Dec 16, 2017 7:35 AM +00:00

Dylan Farrow is here to remind us why we shouldn't go see Woody Allen's new movie

“Today I will be triggered by every movie ad, every review, every mention of the man who stole my childhood from me”
NYLON
--Anonymous
replies 227Dec 16, 2017 10:31 AM +00:00

I saw it last night. Good show and Kate’s best performance in years.

--Anonymous
replies 228Dec 16, 2017 11:27 AM +00:00

Woody and all his enablers need to go to jail. Heterosexuality is wrong, Wrong, WRONG!

--Anonymous
replies 229Dec 16, 2017 11:30 AM +00:00

Link or it never happened, R223

--Anonymous
replies 230Dec 16, 2017 11:32 AM +00:00

Why bother, R230, when you'll dismiss it sight unseen anyway unless it's enabler propaganda.

--Anonymous
replies 231Dec 16, 2017 11:34 AM +00:00

The Farrows are a tad obsessed with Woody Allen, no?

--Anonymous
replies 232Dec 16, 2017 7:03 PM +00:00

"The system worked for Harvey Weinstein for decades. It works for Woody Allen still," said Dylan Farrow.

--Anonymous
replies 233Dec 17, 2017 11:52 AM +00:00

Every time I hear people say "trust the system," I roll my eyes. They say "the system" like a mantra.

--Anonymous
replies 234Dec 17, 2017 11:56 AM +00:00

Dylan Farrow: "Although the culture seems to be shifting rapidly, my allegation is apparently still just too complicated, too difficult, too 'dangerous'"

--Anonymous
replies 235Dec 17, 2017 12:05 PM +00:00

With all of the #MeToo outings going on lately, i think it's appropriate to remind everyone that Frank Sinatra almost had the mafia murder Woody Allen after he allegedly sexually abused Mia Farrow's 7 year old daughter.

“With all of the #MeToo outings going on lately, i think it's appropriate to remind everyone that Frank Sinatra almost had the mafia murder Woody Allen after he allegedly sexually abused Mia Farrow's 7 year old daughter. https://t.co/Hn47hxKwXA”
Twitter
--Anonymous
replies 236Dec 17, 2017 12:07 PM +00:00

I never heard that Sinatra "almost had the Mafia murder Woody." That sounds ridiculous. I DID hear that he offered to have Woody's legs broken. That seems more plausible. I wish he had. That would have been so cool.

--Anonymous
replies 237Dec 17, 2017 4:52 PM +00:00

Then why didn't he rub out the Mansons so Angie could save us from LucyMAME.

--Anonymous
replies 238Dec 17, 2017 4:53 PM +00:00

. = ?

--R238
replies 239Dec 17, 2017 4:54 PM +00:00

Dylan Farrow: You can't support #TimesUp and Woody Allen

Hollywood is smack bang in the middle of a revolution against sexual harassment and abuse, but Farrow has had it with some stars' apparent hypocrisy.
Mashable
--Anonymous
replies 240Jan 8, 2018 5:19 PM +00:00

Dylan Farrow reveals she hopes the #TimesUp movement will affect her father, Woody Allen

"In order for things to meaningfully change, they need to change unequivocally," Dylan Farrow tweets on Golden Globes Sunday of her father Woody Allen
Rolling Stone
--Anonymous
replies 241Jan 8, 2018 5:24 PM +00:00

Dylan Farrow ‏ @realdylanfarrow Retweeted NYLON

"Wearing black means nothing if you’re not willing to denounce those in power—no matter how much they might mean to you."

“"Wearing black means nothing if you’re not willing to denounce those in power—no matter how much they might mean to you." https://t.co/MLl4QZL6SJ”
Twitter
--Anonymous
replies 242Jan 8, 2018 8:23 PM +00:00

Girl needs to get a life. So fucking tiresome.

--Anonymous
replies 243Jan 8, 2018 10:22 PM +00:00
Dylan Farrow: "Although the culture seems to be shifting rapidly, my allegation is apparently still just too complicated, too difficult, too 'dangerous'"

Right, which was a PR move on Woody's part, done on purpose back during the trial. Now everything is all confused and jumbled and there's no way to extricate the truth from the publicity. After nearly 25 years of "Mia was just a scorned old woman upset that her husband wanted fresh new tang" and "Mia was the real monster" it's become way too easy for actors to tell themselves that Allen hasn't done anything wrong.

--Anonymous
replies 244Jan 9, 2018 4:30 AM +00:00
Ronan is just still pissed that Woody had sent him to therapy back in the day because of his "gay tendencies".

I mean, I've never heard this rumor, but if it was true it would be a really fucking good reason to hate Woody Allen, wouldn't it? A homophobe who tried to psychoanalyze the gay out of his son sounds like a real asshole to me.

--Anonymous
replies 245Jan 9, 2018 4:31 AM +00:00