Join the Bitchfest >>

The New York Times dumps on Woody Allen's latest film - Wonder Wheel

'Wonder Wheel, Woody Allen’s latest movie, is one of his more unfortunate contributions to cinema.'

Kate will never get that second Oscar now!

Kate Winslet plays an unhappily married woman whose affair with a local Romeo is derailed when he falls for her stepdaughter.
www.nytimes.com
--Anonymous
replies 20Nov 30, 2017 9:58 AM +00:00

The NYT will never again give Allen a good review. Very un-PC, and they're very leftist.

--Anonymous
replies 1Nov 30, 2017 10:02 AM +00:00

Kate will never be the the best "c/kate".

--Cate "the great" blanchett
replies 2Nov 30, 2017 10:05 AM +00:00

The sheer number of sympathetic puff pieces they've done on Trumpsters and Nazis suggest they are anything but "leftist."

Are they still doing that weekly editorial specifically designed to say one good thing about Trump?

--Anonymous
replies 3Nov 30, 2017 10:06 AM +00:00

Manhola's review is fantastic, and I think she's right: no one wants to psychoanalyze his dippy movies, but year after year he's practically begging us to.

--Anonymous
replies 4Nov 30, 2017 10:12 AM +00:00

Isn't Timberlake too old to be playing a lifeguard?

--Anonymous
replies 5Nov 30, 2017 10:16 AM +00:00

Haven't watched a Woody Allen since the Soon Yi scandal decades ago. Too creepy. This man is in no position to philosophize about life, relationships or the human condition. If his films were dark and honest they might be interesting, but he insists on presenting his perverse worldview as "normal." Ick.

--Anonymous
replies 6Nov 30, 2017 10:52 AM +00:00

Does anyone want to even see this film?

--Anonymous
replies 7Dec 1, 2017 8:41 AM +00:00

I guess no.

--Anonymous
replies 8Dec 1, 2017 2:35 PM +00:00

Yikes--that's Jim Belushi?! I thought it was John Goodman!

--Anonymous
replies 9Dec 1, 2017 2:43 PM +00:00

The Boston Globe (Ty Burr) pans it. " Timberlake gives the most vapid, awkward performance of his career. "

www.bostonglobe.com
--Anonymous
replies 10Dec 6, 2017 5:31 PM +00:00

At this late date, I find everything about and around Woody Allen--him, his films, his stars, his fans, his detractors--unspeakably tiresome. And that includes Mia and Ronan. I wish all concerned would just go awaaaaaaay.

--Anonymous
replies 11Dec 6, 2017 5:36 PM +00:00

Jussie Timberfake also has a career because of a kiddie fiddler.

--Anonymous
replies 12Dec 6, 2017 5:37 PM +00:00

There's a reason "Manhattan" was his high watermark, you know.

--M
replies 13Dec 6, 2017 5:41 PM +00:00

The last time I saw a Woody Allen movie was about the same time I gave away my Michael Jackson CDs.

--Anonymous
replies 14Dec 6, 2017 5:45 PM +00:00

BLUE JASMINE anyone? I'm sorry. It was an excellent film. The performances all were brilliant. With Cate Blanchett giving one of the most extraordinary film performances by an actress ever really. Another level. The script which uses the STREETCAR parallels, mixed with the Madoff scandal. It was a perfect idea that totally worked. And I'm not trying to defend anything about Woody Allen's life here. At all. But simply as a film, BLUE JASMINE was a knock-out all around.

----anon
replies 15Dec 6, 2017 6:05 PM +00:00

r15=Soon Yi.

--Anonymous
replies 16Dec 6, 2017 6:08 PM +00:00

R16=true hilarity at its finest. A rich mind. A genius scope. And exciting possibilities.

--Anonymous
replies 17Dec 6, 2017 6:12 PM +00:00

Look, just because the passable BLUE JASMINE was light-years better than the pure garbage that makes up the rest of Allen's late oeuvre, that's still no need to get your panties in a twist.

--Anonymous
replies 18Dec 6, 2017 6:15 PM +00:00

Cate the cunt played a demented social climber well, I wonder if she just played herself.

--Anonymous
replies 19Dec 6, 2017 6:16 PM +00:00

At least Mel Brooks knew when to quit.

--Anonymous
replies 20Dec 6, 2017 6:39 PM +00:00