Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

New York City wants to let 800,000 non-citizens vote in city elections

The New York City Council is asking the state's highest court to reverse rulings that struck down a law that would let non-citizens vote in local elections.

An appeals court in February ruled the election law, passed by the council in 2021, unconstitutional. The law would have let upwards of 800,000 green card holders vote in local elections.

"The Council passed Local Law 11 of 2022 to enfranchise 800,000 New Yorkers who live in our city, pay taxes, and contribute to our communities," council spokesperson, Rendy Desamours, said in a statement. "Today’s filing to appeal the Second Department’s recent decision seeks a determination from the state’s highest court that the law is consistent with the State Constitution, Election Law, and the Municipal Home Rule Law."

Empowering New Yorkers to participate in our local democratic process can only strengthen New York City by increasing civic engagement," he added. "We look forward to the Court of Appeals’ consideration of the Council’s appeal."

The case will head to the New York Court of Appeals.

Mayor Eric Adams, who supported the law, has not commented about the appeal. Fox News Digital has reached out to his office.

Immigration activists praised the council's decision.

This case is just one more example of how Republicans are using the courts to disenfranchise Black and Brown voters across the country."

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, a Republican who represents Staten Island, was a plaintiff in the lawsuit that got it struck down.

"There is nothing more important than preserving the integrity of our election system and this unconstitutional law that has been struck down in two consecutive wins only diminished the voices of our citizenry," she said Friday in response to an immigrant activist group that is also challenging the earlier ruling. "I urge the City to not waste more taxpayer money to join this appeal and instead focus on the needs of hardworking New Yorkers who are facing so many quality of life and public safety issues."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 126April 11, 2024 1:59 AM

Quelle surprise!

by Anonymousreply 1March 28, 2024 12:31 PM

Green card holders pay taxes. Why shouldn’t they have a say in government?

No taxation without representation. An old American motto.

by Anonymousreply 2March 28, 2024 12:34 PM

R2 - Tourists and visa holders pay sales tax while here. Why not let the whole world vote in our elections while we're at it.

by Anonymousreply 3March 28, 2024 12:41 PM

[quote] This case is just one more example of how Republicans are using the courts to disenfranchise Black and Brown voters across the country."

The constitution disenfranchising them. Not Republicans.

These are deeply unserious people.

by Anonymousreply 4March 28, 2024 12:44 PM

[quote]New York City wants to let 800,000 non-citizens vote in city elections

Mass immigration = more voters for who exactly? C'mon, this has been the plan all along.

800,000 ...a LOT of people, enough to sway an election and guarantee a hold on power.

by Anonymousreply 5March 28, 2024 12:54 PM

It’s simple a citizen has a right to vote and those who are not citizens do not.

Everyone pays taxes regardless of citizenship and that does not give you the right to vote in a country where you are not a citizen.

by Anonymousreply 6March 28, 2024 12:56 PM

What a ridiculous idea. This is the primary fear Republicans have on their voters, that foreigners will control and takeover our country. Sure, try and rewrite the constitution.

by Anonymousreply 7March 28, 2024 12:56 PM

Vote here/Vote aquí

by Anonymousreply 8March 28, 2024 1:08 PM

Oy vey.

by Anonymousreply 9March 28, 2024 2:26 PM

R2 is an idiot. You see this is the type of fringe left politics I will never rock with. Next thing you know they will mandate that all voting places be in English, Spanish, AND Arabic.

by Anonymousreply 10March 28, 2024 2:34 PM

Teacake needs a hijab.

by Anonymousreply 11March 28, 2024 2:36 PM

Progressives are traitors. They want Sharia law now. That’s what will happen.

by Anonymousreply 12March 28, 2024 2:37 PM

I’ll take evangelical Christian rule over Muslim rule any day. The psycho left has caused me to pivot politically in the last 4 years.

by Anonymousreply 13March 28, 2024 2:40 PM

Thanks, NY. We had nothing to run on. Now we do - the great replacement theory.

by Anonymousreply 14March 28, 2024 3:03 PM

NYC politicians are desperate to make it a 3rd world city

by Anonymousreply 15March 28, 2024 3:05 PM

The City Council is a real mess. Please NYC stop voting for “progressives” next time.

by Anonymousreply 16March 28, 2024 3:07 PM

R16 they’ll vote in even more progressive liberals next time

by Anonymousreply 17March 28, 2024 3:09 PM

Have they considered that the Maggats would surely figure out a way to game this?

by Anonymousreply 18March 28, 2024 3:15 PM

Don't look now but you've been replaced.

by Anonymousreply 19March 28, 2024 3:35 PM

Wanting non-citizens to vote is advocating voter fraud.

by Anonymousreply 20March 28, 2024 3:46 PM

and again will see leftists shake their head and be shocked, shocked I tell you, at what the policies they voted for cause.

by Anonymousreply 21March 28, 2024 4:43 PM

When will these dangerous republicans let us just run the cities we control? When, oh, when will they let us? We hold nearly 80% or more of the seats on everything from councils to governor, but these damn republicans keep stopping us from creating a utopian paradise!!!

by Anonymousreply 22March 28, 2024 6:29 PM

LoL, r22...nobody will play with you. Well, you just keep trying, young lady.

by Anonymousreply 23March 28, 2024 6:31 PM

R23 there is no rebuttal.

by Anonymousreply 24March 28, 2024 6:36 PM

R22 Sad but true.

by Anonymousreply 25March 28, 2024 6:51 PM

I think a lot of people are starting to see through the cracks of progressive and liberal ideology

by Anonymousreply 26March 28, 2024 6:53 PM

That's nice, r26.

by Anonymousreply 27March 28, 2024 7:20 PM

How can any politician, at this moment, imagine this idea is worth any time at all? Only the loopiest of progressives could get behind this one.

by Anonymousreply 28March 28, 2024 7:33 PM

[quote][R2] - Tourists and visa holders pay sales tax while here. Why not let the whole world vote in our elections while we're at it.

Typical stupid rightwing analogy. Sales taxes paid by tourists are chicken scratch by comparison.

by Anonymousreply 29March 28, 2024 10:29 PM

Maybe you should move out of your decaying corpse of a flyover city, Defacto at r28. I live and work in nyc and have many colleagues who have green cards, and they have as much of a stake as I do. Why they can’t vote, but YOU, a weird bitter troll, can, makes zero sense. They’re worth ten of you.

by Anonymousreply 30March 28, 2024 10:33 PM

LOL, you're not much of detective, R30. Hello from Toronto. But you've got that shoot of your mouth first and runaway fast holier than thou thing down. Well done you!

by Anonymousreply 31March 28, 2024 10:40 PM

Is that the extent of your comeback, Defacto? We’ll consider that your concession speech.

by Anonymousreply 32March 28, 2024 10:52 PM

[quote] Only the loopiest of progressives could get behind this one.

But speaking broadly aren't they in control of most large American cities?

A federal judge on Wednesday tossed out a lawsuit challenging a D.C. statute letting noncitizens vote in local elections, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to prove the law has harmed them.

𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐀𝐦𝐲 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐉𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐬𝐨𝐧 in D.C. rejected an argument from seven D.C. voters that letting residents without citizenship cast ballots in local — but not federal — races dilutes the votes of citizens. She said the plaintiffs did not show that they’ve been treated inequitably or denied opportunities because of the D.C. Noncitizen Voting Act, which the D.C. Council passed in 2022.

The D.C.-based Immigration Reform Law Institute, which represents the plaintiffs, said it would appeal the decision. The nonprofit advocates for limiting immigration.

“At stake is the sovereignty of the American people over this country,” litigation director Christopher Hajec wrote in an email. “The courts’ consideration of this vitally-important case has just begun.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33March 28, 2024 10:57 PM

This makes total sense. Why wouldn’t a resident that pays state tax be able to vote on local elections? This isn’t like allowing non citizens to vote on federal elections, it’s to allow them say on their local councilmembers. This site seems to be only dickheads and trolls left at this point what a shame.

by Anonymousreply 34March 28, 2024 10:57 PM

American citizens come in last.

by Anonymousreply 35March 28, 2024 11:20 PM

[quote]I live and work in nyc and have many colleagues who have green cards, and they have as much of a stake as I do.

Green card holders can apply for US citizenship after five years, unless they are married to an American citizen, in which case they can apply after only three years. That's not very long. If they have so much invested, have such a stake, in their local government, then they can apply for citizenship and, after it is granted they can vote.

If they haven't been here for enough time yet, then let them wait; their time will come. Consider it citizenship training, as they observe politics first-hand and develop their opinions. That's more than most native-born Americans do.

If they have been here long enough to become a citizen but choose not to do so, then that's that. They've made their choice. Being an American is not just some convenient bit of paper. It's a commitment to our country. If you're not ready to made that lifelong commitment, then you don't get to vote at any level.

by Anonymousreply 36March 28, 2024 11:20 PM

R29 has trouble thinking things through, and immediately hurls insults because he/she has nothing else to give.

by Anonymousreply 37March 28, 2024 11:20 PM

R29 is mentally ill. Paranoia.

by Anonymousreply 38March 28, 2024 11:32 PM

R17, I doubt it, Most black voters are against this and other “progressive” reforms. ditto for Asians and Latino citizens. Trump showing up at the cop’s wake was brilliant theatre (sadly) and shows he knows what’s up even in NYC.

by Anonymousreply 39March 28, 2024 11:39 PM

The great replacement theory!

by Anonymousreply 40March 28, 2024 11:41 PM

The seething resentment against migrants by black New Yorkers is a not covered enough. You don’t have to be Dee Plorable to feel that way.

by Anonymousreply 41March 28, 2024 11:46 PM

R16- The same people who are quite happy to legalize theft in the city.

by Anonymousreply 42March 28, 2024 11:48 PM

R37 = R38 = this thing 👇

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43March 29, 2024 12:15 AM

[quote] Green card holders can apply for US citizenship after five years, unless they are married to an American citizen, in which case they can apply after only three years.

You’re just begging the question with this, running back to momma. “If they want to vote so much why don’t they just become citizens?” 🤡

by Anonymousreply 44March 29, 2024 12:17 AM

[quote] If they have been here long enough to become a citizen but choose not to do so, then that's that. They've made their choice. Being an American is not just some convenient bit of paper. It's a commitment to our country. If you're not ready to made that lifelong commitment, then you don't get to vote at any level.

Girl shut the fuck up. You don’t get to decide first of all, NYC is making this available so you will get to vote at some level as a resident.

Americans are afforded this benefit in almost every single other western country as residents, of course you think you’re so special you need your own rules. Typical “USA USA USA” bullshit. There’s many reasons residents might not become citizens. Maybe they don’t want to. Maybe their home country doesn’t allow dual citizenship. Maybe they don’t meet some parameters. Maybe they don’t wanna be part of your onerous taxation of non resident citizens in their later life if they plan to move 10 years down the line. It doesn’t matter.

by Anonymousreply 45March 29, 2024 12:23 AM

[quote]Americans are afforded this benefit in almost every single other western country as residents

That is not true. You're full of shit.

by Anonymousreply 46March 29, 2024 12:38 AM

I'm fine with letting green card holders vote in local elections. If they have a permanent resident visa it means they most likely have jobs and intend to stay here for a while. It's not like they're handing out ballots to everyone who gets off a plane at JFK.

by Anonymousreply 47March 29, 2024 12:41 AM

Insanity.

by Anonymousreply 48March 29, 2024 1:00 AM

Non-citizens should not be able to vote. Period.

by Anonymousreply 49March 29, 2024 1:08 AM

The council should be replaced. They are a terrible group of people who don't deserve their position

by Anonymousreply 50March 29, 2024 1:09 AM

[quote]Green card holders pay taxes. Why shouldn’t they have a say in government?

[quote]No taxation without representation. An old American motto.

Exhausting. Another moron like the idiots who scream about "free speech" but have no idea what it actually mean. Fine. If you've got a green card and don't want to pay taxes, don't work in the US and go back to your country of citizenship.

Voting is a right and perk of being a citizen. If you're not a citizen, you don't get to vote. It's like going to someone's house (uninvited) and demanding that they change the rules to suit you. No, you don't get to demand that they spend more money on food or turn the thermostat up. You don't get to decide ANYTHING in someone else's house.

by Anonymousreply 51March 29, 2024 1:09 AM

Fuck you magat

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52March 29, 2024 1:10 AM

[quote]It’s simple a citizen has a right to vote

Tell that to the hundreds of thousands incarcerated citizens in our prisons. They will be happy to know they have a right to vote form their prison cell.

by Anonymousreply 53March 29, 2024 1:11 AM

Gloria, you're always on the run now.

by Anonymousreply 54March 29, 2024 1:11 AM

[quote]Tell that to the hundreds of thousands incarcerated citizens in our prisons.

LOL - one of the punishments for committing felonies is losing your right to vote. Suggesting they be allowed to vote is like arguing that we're infringing on their right to freedom by putting them in jail.

Also, this is DL, so you know deep down that you don't want people who are stupid enough to get caught actually voting.

by Anonymousreply 55March 29, 2024 1:25 AM

Is it a felony to come here illegally?

by Anonymousreply 56March 29, 2024 1:35 AM

[quote]Is it a felony to come here illegally?

No one said anything about it being a felony to come here illegally.

Can you read - the comment was "incarcerated CITIZENS in our prison" - I don't know too many citizens who are here illegally, as the two are mutually exclusive by the conventional definitions of "citizen" and "here illegally."

Although feel free to lecture me on some bizarre situation where a US citizen is somehow in the country illegally.

by Anonymousreply 57March 29, 2024 2:22 AM

As a practical matter -

[quote]No. The act of being present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws is not, standing alone, a crime. While federal immigration law does criminalize some actions that may be related to undocumented presence in the United States, undocumented presence alone is not a violation of federal criminal law.

by Anonymousreply 58March 29, 2024 2:25 AM

[quote] Voting is a right and perk of being a citizen. If you're not a citizen, you don't get to vote.

Not in most western countries, and not for much longer in your one ;)

by Anonymousreply 59March 29, 2024 2:34 AM

Another NYC resident here who considers this a non-issue. There’s historic precedent for allowing legal citizens to vote, and the NYC law only covers local elections. You don’t need to be wildly progressive (I’m not) to understand that it makes sense to let legal residents vote for, say, the council person who represents their neighborhood.

If anything, many foreign-born residents skew toward conservative, so it’s not like this is a direct win for any single politician or political group. However, the wants of various neighborhoods can be better reflected when permanent residents are enfranchised and have a say in their representation.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60March 29, 2024 2:43 AM

We've gotten so polarized that people are defending granting voting rights to non-citizens because Republicans oppose it.

by Anonymousreply 61March 29, 2024 3:30 AM

R61, plenty of people have rationally explained why this is a good thing. You're just choosing not to listen.

by Anonymousreply 62March 29, 2024 3:51 AM

They're practically handing out tinfoil to the QAnon nutjobs by doing that.

Everytime I block that hoodrat Teacake she creates a new account. I fear she's that she's a lesbian and that she's trying to convert me! Hold me, Gregg!

by Anonymousreply 63March 29, 2024 6:20 AM

Disenfranchise black and brown people!?! The majority of black Americans are US citizens with the oldest lineage in the US with Wasps.

They’re talking about illegal brown people and always have to put black people in to look for the community’s support. And they won’t get any.

Fuck out of here.

by Anonymousreply 64March 29, 2024 6:40 AM

This is done in Europe all the time. You all just aren't used to the idea, and may be a little bit too caught up in this "we're number one" shit.

by Anonymousreply 65March 29, 2024 6:42 AM

R64.

by Anonymousreply 66March 29, 2024 7:12 AM

Good for Europe but being an American citizen has some perks. One of which is voting. This will be wildly unpopular and hopefully get rid of some of the more toxic progressives. The problem is all the action is in the Dem primaries which get a pretty low turnout. So hard core “progressives” win even though they don’t have majority support. Turnout in NYC local elections is terrible..

by Anonymousreply 67March 29, 2024 7:20 AM

I love how Americans do all this 'good for Europe' shit, seeming to forget that the entire country was founded because there was taxation without representation. Enjoy enjoy your guns, brutal instant layoffs, legislation via court cases, and two week vacations.

by Anonymousreply 68March 29, 2024 7:33 AM

[quote]This is done in Europe all the time.

No it is not.

by Anonymousreply 69March 29, 2024 10:05 AM

Yes, it is. Definitely for MEP elections and EU citizens, depends on the country for local elections. UK has made it clear they're not part of Europe, so I don't want to hear it.

by Anonymousreply 70March 29, 2024 10:15 AM

Ireland, for example, does allow non-EU citizens to vote in local elections.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 71March 29, 2024 10:17 AM

[quote]Yes, it is. Definitely for MEP elections and EU citizens

For people who are citizens of countries outside of the EU it's a big NO.

I was resident in Italy for years. I could not vote.

Allowing non-citizens to vote in the US is absurd.

by Anonymousreply 72March 29, 2024 10:23 AM

See r71. Also, in the Netherlands, you can vote in municipal elections after 5 years of residence.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73March 29, 2024 10:25 AM

"Adult residents from countries with voting agreements with Spain can also vote in municipal elections.

These countries are Bolivia, Cape Verde, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Iceland, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, South Korea, Trinidad and Tobago, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74March 29, 2024 10:28 AM

¡Me gusta votar!

by Anonymousreply 75March 29, 2024 12:04 PM

[quote] This is done in Europe all the time.

Show your work, dear.

[quote] You all just aren't used to the idea, and may be a little bit too caught up in this "we're number one" shit.

You can't possibly be so stupid as to think that other countries aren't nationalistic.

by Anonymousreply 76March 29, 2024 12:43 PM

R43 - Wrong again. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong all the time?

by Anonymousreply 77March 29, 2024 12:46 PM

Irish domiciled in the UK get to vote there.

by Anonymousreply 78March 29, 2024 1:46 PM

You can't be so stupid as to miss me giving you three links to show my work and to assume I was saying that America is the only nationalistic country in the world, are you r76?

by Anonymousreply 79March 29, 2024 1:59 PM

And here's a comprehensive map of non-citizen suffrage and an accompanying Wikipedia article.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80March 29, 2024 2:01 PM

[quote] Countries according right to vote to every resident non-EU foreigner without limit of time of residence

There are NONE within the EU.

[quote]Countries from the European Union which do not give the right to vote to non-EU foreigners

That is the majority of EU countries.

The remaining grant the right but with restrictions i.e. only to certain countries, length of residency.

by Anonymousreply 81March 29, 2024 2:19 PM

You're an asshole, r81, and live in a world of confirmation bias. I may be a cunt, but I'm an honest cunt.

by Anonymousreply 82March 29, 2024 2:22 PM

R82 The info is from the link at R80.

by Anonymousreply 83March 29, 2024 2:26 PM

You're wrong read the Ireland link and look at the deep red countries on the map.

by Anonymousreply 84March 29, 2024 3:41 PM

[quote] Tell that to the hundreds of thousands incarcerated citizens in our prisons. They will be happy to know they have a right to vote form their prison cell.

lol.

by Anonymousreply 85March 29, 2024 3:51 PM

Pinko liberals are determined to destroy what’s left of the country.

by Anonymousreply 86March 29, 2024 3:51 PM

[quote] Tell that to the hundreds of thousands incarcerated citizens in our prisons. They will be happy to know they have a right to vote form their prison cell.

Liberals: criminals first.

Liberals are no better than MAGA cultists.

by Anonymousreply 87March 29, 2024 3:52 PM

R81 - You're right. I didn't read the entire thread before posting. I realized it after but there's no edit button on this site. Nevertheless, I doubt the information you imparted is the whole story but rather cherry-picked from like-minded sources.

[quote] You all just aren't used to the idea, and may be a little bit too caught up in this "we're number one" shit.

[quote] You can't be so stupid as to miss me giving you three links to show my work and to assume I was saying that America is the only nationalistic country in the world, are you [R76]?

Now you're just being disingenuous after being called out. I have zero doubt that's EXACTLY how you feel about Americans.

by Anonymousreply 88March 29, 2024 3:59 PM

I find it disappointing when people automatically label you right wing when you disagree on some topics which is precisely why we have become so divided as a country where we can’t come to the middle to discuss things without having meltdowns and resort to name calling.

I don’t care what other countries do, I care about our country and only citizens should have a right to vote, and those who wish to vote can choose to become citizens following the law. This is not a right or left wing view it’s common sense.

by Anonymousreply 89March 29, 2024 4:04 PM

R89 - Right. You have to LOL at that list of countries that allow non-citizen voting. Guatemala? Ecuador? Bolivia? Yeah, there's millions and millions of people traversing the continent to get into those countries. Scandinavia has a HUGE problem now with radical Islamic migration so unless you want to see that Sharia Law here too, then kindly STFU.

by Anonymousreply 90March 29, 2024 4:10 PM

Okay, but do any of you “alas our country is falling” trolls apprehend that legal residents affected by NYC law can vote only in local elections that affect them directly? If someone has legal status as an NYC resident, they are likely paying high local taxes and are entitled to say how that money is spent because they are legally allowed to work and required to be taxpayers. There is no call to give non-citizens the vote in state or federal elections, so it’s not granting them key rights of citizenship. It is a local thing, and if you live somewhere other than NYC it doesn’t affect you in the slightest.

Personally, I think it’s not a bad tactic to offer privileges to people who are in the country legally, especially in a city that depends so much on immigrants. An approach being taken in New York does not make it mandatory in other areas, despite the arguments of fearmongering talking heads.

by Anonymousreply 91March 30, 2024 2:18 AM

I fail to see how this is any more of a problem than the illegals, aliases, and dead people who've been voting in presidential elections for decades.

by Anonymousreply 92March 30, 2024 2:23 AM

We already give them driver licenses.

by Anonymousreply 93March 30, 2024 3:32 AM

Before we have our newcomers vote, it would be nice to verify their general feelings toward gay rights, trans rights, women's rights, and the other progressive tenets.

There's a general belief (clearly shared by the NYC City Council) that all immigrants are highly progressive in their politics, but in my limited experience, that hasn't been the case.

by Anonymousreply 94April 1, 2024 8:41 PM

They think all POC share one progressive hive mind. Boy are they in for a surprise.

by Anonymousreply 95April 1, 2024 9:17 PM

[quote] They think all POC share one progressive hive mind

The progressive hive mind misses the good ol days

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 96April 1, 2024 9:25 PM

R96 is a typical brain dead liberal. Clinton was referring to Obama’s age and lack of experience. Continue on with your “that’s racist” bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 97April 1, 2024 9:29 PM

R94, you want to vet people’s opinions and then offer them the right to vote if their answers align with yours?

by Anonymousreply 98April 9, 2024 6:47 PM

R94 does not understand Democracy.

by Anonymousreply 99April 9, 2024 6:50 PM

Sharia Law and Catholic Latinx are quite a mix to run the gay ghettos.

by Anonymousreply 100April 9, 2024 6:53 PM

FUCK these people. The government is more concerned about taking care of foreigners who just arrived here five minutes ago instead of actual US citizens.

by Anonymousreply 101April 9, 2024 6:53 PM

R101 fuck them and the politicians.

by Anonymousreply 102April 9, 2024 6:54 PM

[quote]They think all POC share one progressive hive mind. Boy are they in for a surprise.4

They come from extremely religious and conservative cultures/societies. Not a good mix with progressive first world Western values.

by Anonymousreply 103April 9, 2024 6:55 PM

[quote]Okay, but do any of you “alas our country is falling” trolls apprehend that legal residents affected by NYC law can vote only in local elections that affect them directly? If someone has legal status as an NYC resident, they are likely paying high local taxes and are entitled to say how that money is spent because they are legally allowed to work and required to be taxpayers. There is no call to give non-citizens the vote in state or federal elections, so it’s not granting them key rights of citizenship. It is a local thing, and if you live somewhere other than NYC it doesn’t affect you in the slightest.

I'm an American who lived in London for several years and I never, ever would have expected to be allowed to vote in elections. I wasn't a native or naturalized citizen of the UK. For me to expect to be allowed to vote in their elections would've been ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 104April 9, 2024 6:57 PM

[quote]Scandinavia has a HUGE problem now with radical Islamic migration so unless you want to see that Sharia Law here too, then kindly STFU.

Their politicians really fucked up their countries by allowing that.

by Anonymousreply 105April 9, 2024 6:59 PM

As stated in the post you quoted, R104, there is not a single standard regarding voting rights that is applicable across all locations. If you were a legal citizen of an EU country, you would have had voting rights for non-national elections within the UK. If you were a foreign national of any background with legal residency in Scotland or Wales, you would have been entitled to vote in all non-national elections.

Different voting districts have different rules regarding who is allowed to vote in elections that affect those districts. That a foreign national with legal residence in NYC might vote for their neighborhood council person has nothing to do with your personal experience in London.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 106April 9, 2024 7:32 PM

r106 it's not right for foreign nationals to vote in elections.

by Anonymousreply 107April 9, 2024 7:44 PM

R106 The overwhelming majority are:

"Countries from the European Union which do not give the right to vote to non-EU foreigners"

Others have an important restriction:

"Countries according right to vote to every resident non-EU foreigner which resides in the country for a certain time"

by Anonymousreply 108April 9, 2024 7:44 PM

Wait until Muslims start voting in other Muslims who want to bring their fucked up culture into the rest of society, as is already happening in Michigan.

Progressives have their hearts in the right place, but they are totally blind and ignorant to the real world.

by Anonymousreply 109April 9, 2024 7:45 PM

This article is hilarious:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 110April 9, 2024 7:46 PM

Foreign nationals who have legal residence in a particular locality may be granted the right to vote certain elections specific to the area in which they live R107. The standards required to be a legal resident qualifying for voting rights vary between locations. It’s not like you step off a plane with a tourist visa and hop into a voting booth.

If you can’t understand that giving a legal resident of a particular city the right to vote in an election that affects their city and their neighborhood is not the same thing as allowing them to vote in state or national elections, perhaps a civics class would be in order. We don’t make laws based on your feelings about what is right and what is not.

by Anonymousreply 111April 9, 2024 9:13 PM

[quote]If you can’t understand that giving a legal resident of a particular city the right to vote in an election that affects their city and their neighborhood is not the same thing as allowing them to vote in state or national elections, perhaps a civics class would be in order. We don’t make laws based on your feelings about what is right and what is not.

Most of Europe sensibly does not allow such a stupid practice.

by Anonymousreply 112April 9, 2024 9:23 PM

Canada: "As it stands in Canada, no non-citizen is permitted to vote at any level of government, be it municipal, provincial, or fedral."

by Anonymousreply 113April 9, 2024 9:25 PM

This is a scam by the 99% Democrat City Council for more votes. Like Joe Biden pushing for kids not to pay college debt, which got the kabbosh.

by Anonymousreply 114April 9, 2024 9:27 PM

Every US citizen should have a Photo ID to vote. The same people who claim they can't get a photo ID, had no problem going to the Welfare Office to suck at the public's teat.

by Anonymousreply 115April 9, 2024 9:31 PM

NYC’s non-citizen voting law ruled unconstitutional on appeal

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 116April 9, 2024 9:33 PM

If more non citizens were allowed to vote int eh 80s & 90s then LGBT rights would never have been a thing.

Hell we'd still have sodomy laws & no gay marriages to speak of.

About 4 dozen nations still have the death penalty for LGBT folks does the DL want these folks coming here & putting those laws ion our books?

by Anonymousreply 117April 9, 2024 10:13 PM

Wow R117 you’re not the smartest.

by Anonymousreply 118April 9, 2024 10:53 PM

r118 third worlders are very backwards and conservative. They're basically aligned with our own white trash rednecks as far as social/cultural issues.

by Anonymousreply 119April 9, 2024 11:55 PM

Of course they do. How sudden and unanticipated!

by Anonymousreply 120April 10, 2024 12:41 AM

[quote] Wait until Muslims start voting in other Muslims who want to bring their fucked up culture into the rest of society, as is already happening in Michigan.

Step by step, inch by inch.

by Anonymousreply 121April 10, 2024 1:35 AM

Diversity in action!

This today is the city council of Hamtramck Michigan.

Click on the link. It says it all.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 122April 10, 2024 1:40 AM

Yes because when Americans were given the chance to vote on gay marriage they were suuuuuuuuuuper supportive 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123April 10, 2024 1:43 AM

Meh, when states and their courts are shitcanning women’s rights, this ain’t on my radar.

Also, fellow homos, when they finish with abortion rights, our asses will be next in line.

by Anonymousreply 124April 10, 2024 1:53 AM

I don't think this is what Thomas Jefferson and John Adams had in mind.

by Anonymousreply 125April 10, 2024 3:32 AM

Because of Biden's pro-Israel position, Muslims will vote for Trump and historically, they are Conservative.

by Anonymousreply 126April 11, 2024 1:59 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!