Prince Harry named in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs sexual assault lawsuit

Son of a bitch.

Has he been accused of anything?

Sex trafficking parties? Is this like Black Panther parties?

Oh, my.

J’accused

A pathetic name drop to get people to read the article…beyond lame.

[quote] The Duke of Sussex has been named in a $30 million US lawsuit alleging that Sean “Diddy” Combs, the rapper, used his name to give his sex trafficking parties legitimacy.

The implication I get from the wording is he was at the slave orgy which doesn't sound great for him.

Fake news!

[quote] The Duke is named just once in the lawsuit. It does not suggest he had knowledge of the allegations or was involved, but instead names him as an example of the type of well-known people to whom the defendants might have had access. The Duke has only met Combs once, The Telegraph understands, and has never attended any of his parties or concerts.

This fall on Lifetime:

Meghan Markle is Meghan Markle in The Montecito Molester: Escaping a Pervert Prince

R8 sure, Jan!

Yuck.

Did Diddy get that Royal Dick? Puffy loves a good raw ass pounding.

r8 Oh now we trust the British press about Harry. 2 weeks ago they were in the thrall of the Royal family and trying to kill him.

So Diddy is the Black Epstein? Anyone and everyone who was in his book will be accused whether true or not.

This is a throw everything and everyone in the mix to get a hit.

Sex TRAFFICKING or prostitution whoring? It's not the same.

R13 Yahoo is British press? The court filing is in America. Are you okay or has the Yasss Kween Syndrome got to your brain?

Harry won’t shake this stench. Shit is just getting started too. Diddy is still on the lam.

[quote] The Telegraph understands, and has never attended any of his parties or concerts

r16 Unless there's another major newspaper company called the Telegraph.co.uk

I think they have the wrong royal. Andrew liked his orgies, I bet.

R18 yes they’re reporting on it, as are Americans which is where it started. They didn’t make up the lawsuit. Not sure your point.

The complaint. See item q.

r20 That you're trusting the British press with notorious libel laws and that Harry sues once a months views on what happened, and that Yahoo has pretty much ripped their entire article from them.

Feathers will be flying at the House of Most Exalted Sussexry tonight.

r21 I bet both Harry and the Royals would have rather rather wasn't the only person name dropped in that entire section as "British royal Prince Harry".

R22 are you suggesting that the whole Diddy thing is a ruse by the British press to defame Harry and Meghan? Take your meds, sweetie.

I’ve heard that “take your meds” line from several anti-Meghan and Harry haters, most of whom I’ve blocked. Yet the phrase keeps popping up.

Sockpuppets anyone?

R26 I’ve heard it from every type of poster on here. But sure every opposing view is the work of one singular “troll”. Whatever makes you feel like your bubble is intact. 😵‍💫

You tried r27. Sockpuppets. But you do you boo…

I write this as one who is no fan of the Harkles: FUCK OFF, OP. This was revealed in the main Diddy thread.

Tired of your shit-stirring threads.

FF

R28 you’re beyond redemption

The legal definition of sex trafficking has been changed. It can mean anything now. It’s so broad.

The Royals are coming apart at the seams. Who will save them?

Harry never went to a Diddy party or concert and met him only once. Probably at an awards event and still gets dragged in. Horseshit. Yahoo you suck.

R33 how the fuck would you know?

It's part of Markle's new home brand.

Yeah! More publicity!

[quote]The Royals are coming apart at the seams. Who will save them?

All the king's horsemen and all the king's men?

Well surprise surprise surprise....

Is Meghan throwing herself on the floor weeping or does she just do that when someone is hesitant to share their lip gloss?

Harry really reminds me of his mother as he ages, he seems to have picked up a lot of stuff from the Spencer genes regarding his naivety. I mean she was a nice woman, she did a lot of good in this world but she was as dumb as shit.

^^Harry is dumb, bitter and vindictive. Diana was none of that.

Well at least I'm not wearing a colostomy bag.

R41, Diana was certainly bitter and vindictive. Don't try to rewrite history. She's the source of his behavior.

R43. Diana supported the monarchy. She was nothing like Harry.

Diana was pissed at Charles and Camilla for good reason.

And she was bitter and vindictive about it, R44, not to mention she also carried on with married men, sometimes stalking them.

R45 What would you know about "carrying on with men" Tiny ?😂

Oh, Mary R46, you have to do better than that.

R34. I actually read the entire article.

The amount of people who post comments without actually reading a link is truly amazing!

They met once at a Diana charity concert not an awards event. My mistake.

[quote]This fall on Lifetime:

PBS bitch!!

Maybe Oprah will take my call now!

The article states: The Duke is named just once in the lawsuit. It does not suggest he had knowledge of the allegations or was involved, but instead names him as an example of the type of well-known people to whom the defendants might have had access.

The Duke has only met Combs once, The Telegraph understands, and has never attended any of his parties or concerts.

In 2007, Prince Harry posed for photographs with Prince William, Combs and Kanye West after the two rappers had performed at the Concert for Diana at Wembley Stadium in London.

Someone is taking a jab at a sitting duck, just because he/she can.

R33, Rodney Jones dragged Harry into this by mentioning his name in his lawsuit.

R53, the "someone" is Rodney Jones. Of course Rodney Jones is exaggerating in the lawsuit, as he calls Harry an " international dignitary", which he is not in any sense of the term

This just makes Megan and J-Jo besties, so it's fine! Everything's cool! Dope, even! What's that freak Tom Cruise doing?

Shit Harry. Watch what the fuck you're doing and who you're around.

Buy my nut butter.

Puffapiddy voted for both Clintons. Can we get a post-POTUS impeachment a-goin'?

Rodney Jones' lawyer seems to think homosexuality is "deviant". Specifically in relation to Diddy being naked around and allegedly groping Jones, he writes:

[quote] Through these sexually deviant acts, one would say Mr. Combs has a pattern and practice of engaging in such nefarious activity. This ongoing conduct shows that Mr. Combs cannot be rehabilitated.

He doesn't call the heterosexual stuff "deviant". He also makes sure to describe Jones as "a heterosexual Christian man".

Isn't the lawyer describing forced sex as devant?

Devant quoi, r60?

Deviant. Why can't spellcheck make an obvious correction?

There's no such thing as bad publicity.

Will Harry finally be held accountable?

[quote]Is Meghan throwing herself on the floor weeping or does she just do that when someone is hesitant to share their lip gloss?

She's adding this to her "How to Divorce Harry" notebook. She'll grab the money and the children and head to NYC.

It is so scary

They know there’s so much insane hatred out there for Harry and Meghan, the reference to him would attract a ton of media attention/coverage.

𝐅𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐋𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐍𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐃𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐅𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠

Stevie J (Steven Aaron Jordan), a music producer and television personality

A redacted name of a Philadelphia rapper who dated Nicki Minaj

A Grammy Award-winning R&B singer who had trouble with law enforcement after assaulting a Bajan billionaire, whose name was also redacted.

Yung Miami, who was not labeled as a celebrity in the filing

Prince Harry

Bishop T.D. Jakes

Cassie Ventura, a singer and dancer

Georgia Mass Choir

Donald Lawrence, songwriter and music producer

The Clark Sisters

Smokie Norful

Faheem Muhammad

DeForrest Taylor

Jose Cruz

Among the benefits enjoyed by music industry parties, Jones' lawyers claimed, was "affiliation and access to Mr. Combs' popularity."

In the court filing seen by Newsweek, it is alleged that through this popularity, Combs' associates gained access to "celebrities such as famous athletes, political figures, artists, musicians, and international dignitaries like British Royal, Prince Harry."

---------------------

Including an entire choir at an orgy seems especially ambitious

[quote] Including an entire choir at an orgy seems especially ambitious

They were probably the entertainment to his Angels & Devils orgy. There are two questions to ask the choir:

What did you sing?

How many downlow black men joined in after the choir was finished?

There isn't any "insane hatred" for Harry, r67. If you want to see insane hatred, take a peek at the insanity and vile allegations directed against Catherine and William in the past few weeks, which went off the charts in the US, much of it driven by Megstans.

This file is incendiary enough in its own, Harry's name doesn't need to be mentioned to garner publicity. Perhaps Harry's name was mentioned because Diddy did indeed claim he'd be able to get these people access to Harry, and he claimed that because it sounds believable.

Prinsharree?

[QUOTE]They know there’s so much insane hatred out there for Harry and Meghan, the reference to him would attract a ton of media attention/coverage.

Oh, come on, FFS. Do you think a bunch of busy propeller head career prosecutors are scouring the tabloids, magazines, newspapers and social media to understand how a small subset of gossips regard the Duke of Sussex? You must be under 21 to conjure up such nonsense.

He's mentioned in this complaint for the simple fact that Rodney Jones brought him up in his lawsuit against Diddy. There are other plenty of other named celebrities to cream yourself over.

From the tweet at R66. I'm not sure their logic is completely sound here.

[quote]Do you remember Some genealogy records stated that Prince Charles is a descendant of 15th-century Romanian prince, Vlad the Impaler—the man who inspired Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel, Dracula. That would also make Princess Charlotte a vampire.

r73 That feels like it was written by a DL'r. Or is Charlotte being a serial killer a known meme on other sites too?

R68, r69 the choir is not alleged to have taken part in any orgy, they are simply mentioned because Rodney Jones performed with them. Not everyone mentioned in the file is alleged to have taken part in the "sex parties", including that dumb idiot Harry.

[quote]Throughout the duration of his career, Mr. Jones has worked the south side of Chicago Music scene, playing with the following legendary greats: Georgia Mass Choir, Donald Lawrence, The Clark Sisters and The Smokie Norful.

[quote]That feels like it was written by a DL'r. Or is Charlotte being a serial killer a known meme on other sites too?

While I wouldn't put much past Charlotte, that tweeter is just a garden-variety loon. Go read the whole thing, but be prepared to lose a few brain cells.

No, r60, the lawyer is only and specifically using the word "deviant" to refer to gay sex.

Having read through a lot of this lawsuit, while many of the allegations sound plausible, there is a lot of obvious bullshit in it too. E.g. it contains "screenshots of the video of Stevie J anally penetrating a Caucasian male, that Mr. Combs provided to Mr. Jones" but it's never stated anywhere that this was not consensual sex. So, why show the screenshots?The whole thing is pretty salacious and homophobic.

[quote]the choir is not alleged to have taken part in any orgy, they are simply mentioned because Rodney Jones performed with them. Not everyone mentioned in the file is alleged to have taken part in the "sex parties",

The truth will out.

And the choir members will find out why some of the tenors were so excited to perform for P. Diddy. “Refreshments in the anteroom” means different things to different people.

R77, one of the allegations is that Diddy has cameras all over his house and (illegally) records everything. This is very much a “pay me now or it will get worse” lawsuit.

R79, the screenshots were from a video taken on a mobile phone by the people having the sex. There don't appear to be any images from any cameras that were allegedly all over the house. Perhaps read the lawsuit before commenting on it?

R78, the choir is mentioned only once in the lawsuit in relation to Rodney Jones having been a member of it in the past.

Diddy looks like he's as dumb as Harry. An actual mouth-breather.

So, when are they coming for JLo?

Prince Harry was never good looking even when he was young. No wonder he's so bitter. William did have a period of time in his youth when he was very good looking before the genes kicked in as did Andrew and Edward.

Wake me when there are actual charges.

R80, the complaint alleges that Diddy has hidden cameras throughout “his properties” and has “compromising foiotage” of everyone who has attended his parties. The cellphone photographs are the subject of separate allegations.

Prince William is in that group photo of Harry and Diddy at top of thread. Why is the focus on Harry? Just sayin'.

Because Harry was mentioned in the lawsuit pertaining to events that took place in the US in 2022 and 2023, r86. Why on earth would there be any focus on William for that?

Personally, I believe the reference to Harry in the lawsuit is complete bullshit. It doesn't even allege that he had anything to do with these alleged "sex parties", just that Diddy allegedly claimed he could introduce the "sponsors" of them to people like Harry. But, r86, if you want to "just say" then maybe you should make just the tiniest effort to learn what's being claimed.

R87, you obviously didn't understand what I said at r77. On page 12 of the lawsuit there are screenshots of two unrelated male individuals having consensual sex. They are unrelated to any claims Rodney Jones is making. The only reason they are included in the lawsuit is for salaciousness, based on homophobia.

Do a search for Diddy+lawsuit+pdf

R26 “Haters.” How old are you? Twelve?

R86 Prince William isn’t mentioned in the lawsuit.

He should be in jail for lookin like that

[quote]On page 12 of the lawsuit there are screenshots of two unrelated male individuals having consensual sex.

Who are they? Name them and shame them DL.

Why shame two consenting adults, r92? One of them is named. You can fund out for yourself by doing a search for the lawsuit. I can't link it because it's a pdf and don't get a direct link.

[quote]Why shame two consenting adults

Because they were careless enough to get their picture in legal papers. Oh, the shame!

So what is Diddy's main preference? I always he was using JLo as a beard, but is he mainly into underage males?