It looks really good. 100% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Going to tonight's 9:15pm showing.
I love David Dastmalchian so it should be fun.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | March 22, 2024 12:36 AM |
I enjoyed it...
The commitment to the 1977 aesthetic was great including the graphics and music.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | March 22, 2024 4:27 AM |
I'm going to see it tomorrow night. I love horror movies.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | March 22, 2024 4:33 AM |
Stupid "controversy" over the use of AI.
The AI consists of three still images used as commercial break bumpers during the broadcast.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | March 22, 2024 12:52 PM |
I saw it last night and loved it. Original and freaky.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | March 23, 2024 5:26 AM |
Made a spur of the moment decision to see this Sunday night. There were more people there than I'd expected. Apparently word-of-mouth has done the film well, as it marked the most profitable opening weekend in history for IFC Films.
I really loved the movie—it's a unique, wacky ride, and the period details were nicely executed. The ending went a bit off the rails, but still all good fun. One of the more entertaining experiences I've had in the theater for a long time. I may go see it for a second time.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | March 27, 2024 2:24 AM |
I found David Dastmalchian weirdly sexy in this film
by Anonymous | reply 7 | March 27, 2024 2:28 AM |
This reminds of “Repossessed”, a satire of “The Exorcist” starring Linda Blair and Leslie Neilson - a live exorcism on tv.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | April 19, 2024 2:44 AM |
On Shudder as of tomorrow 4/19.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | April 19, 2024 2:50 AM |
Thanks r9, I've been meaning to see this, but am too lazy.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | April 19, 2024 3:19 AM |
a nasty and delicious, unapologetic pastiche with a flair for menace. I had a blast.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | April 19, 2024 3:45 AM |
My goodness this was so much fun. I love the commitment to being fully immersed in the show. Reddit says....
SPOILER SPOILER That you can see the ghost of his wife in a lot of shots, in reflections. Guess it was more apparent on the big screen.
I'll ave to watch it again.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | April 20, 2024 1:08 AM |
I’m gonna watch tomorrow.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | April 20, 2024 1:28 AM |
I thoroughly enjoyed this film. David D. was eye candy.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | April 20, 2024 1:40 AM |
I see it's free on AMC. I'd watch now, but it's probably better if I watch it during daytime.🐓
Thanks, OP.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | April 20, 2024 1:56 AM |
That was my thought, R15
by Anonymous | reply 16 | April 20, 2024 1:59 AM |
R14 I thought so too. I saw it in the theater and getting to see his ass and thighs in those slacks at such a high resolution was distracting.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | April 20, 2024 2:05 AM |
Has echoes of that awful movie that ended Jodie Foster's directing career.. How interesting can "taking over a studio" be?
by Anonymous | reply 18 | April 20, 2024 2:25 AM |
Not a bad film. What was the ending about?
by Anonymous | reply 19 | April 20, 2024 2:36 AM |
R12, the film made that explicitly clear.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | April 20, 2024 2:36 AM |
[quote] [R12], the film made that explicitly clear.
I am laughing—imaging R20 saying that in the voice of Bette Davis.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | April 20, 2024 3:01 AM |
I did a week free trial of Shudder so I could watch! I just started it 5 minutes ago!
by Anonymous | reply 22 | April 20, 2024 3:23 AM |
Very good. Did they clarify the tall trees meeting part or is it meant to be a mystery where they first met.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | April 20, 2024 4:35 AM |
R20, I only saw her once, before she put her hand on his shoulder.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | April 20, 2024 5:54 AM |
[quote]Very good. Did they clarify the tall trees meeting part or is it meant to be a mystery where they first met.
The "tall trees" meeting was referring to the Bohemian Grove type secret society that Delroy belonged to. His involvement was mentioned in the opening segment of the movie. They conjured the demon to gain riches but it demanded a sacrifice -- Jack's wife Minnie.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | April 20, 2024 3:26 PM |
Some of the acting was flat out terrible. The skeptic and the producer were way too hammy.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | April 20, 2024 5:29 PM |
It was meh.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | April 20, 2024 10:48 PM |
For what it was, I thought it was great. The budget was less than two million. Imagine if David Fincher did this film with $100M.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | April 20, 2024 11:57 PM |
[quote]The budget was less than two million
The fact that budget was so small and yet there were still 90 seconds worth of production company logos at the start pretty much sums up how fucked the film business is
by Anonymous | reply 29 | April 21, 2024 12:27 AM |
This movie blew chunks. I hate how dumbed down society has become that crap like this is considered masterful.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | April 21, 2024 10:26 PM |
Who exactly was manning the b/w camera between commercial breaks? How did they get up right into everybody’s face while they were having private conversations and nobody seemed to mind?
by Anonymous | reply 31 | April 21, 2024 10:29 PM |
Maybe everything is happening in Jack's mind right before he stabs Lily.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | April 21, 2024 10:33 PM |
Some of the acting was terrible. The psychic, the skeptic..,
by Anonymous | reply 33 | April 21, 2024 10:40 PM |
r31 I thought that choice was really odd - just have them stay on set and say the TV cameras continued to record during the breaks.
There's a British TV show called Inside No. 9, which is written by two of the League of Gentlemen, Reece Shearsmith and Steve Pemberton, and I would've loved to see them do this story. They've done period TV stuff before and really nailed it, and I think they could've come up with a more satisfying ending.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | April 21, 2024 10:49 PM |
The ending left me wanting. It started off promisingly. They needed to explore/clarify his involvement in the dark arts.
The acting was meh.
I know it's an arthouse film but it could have been better.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | April 21, 2024 11:08 PM |
This movie was so bad, I'm surprised A24 didn't release it.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | April 21, 2024 11:25 PM |
I thought that choice was really odd - just have them stay on set and say the TV cameras continued to record during the breaks.
Plus the fact that this was supposed to be a "found footage" movie. They even say at the beginning that they found the broadcast of this buried somewhere after 40 years. If that's so, then forget about the stuff during the commercial breaks (which is rule breaking enough), how on earth would we have seen the host's whole little breakdown and montage of explanation since it's only happening in his head.
Massive failure of a movie.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | April 21, 2024 11:28 PM |
During one of those backstage conversations with his producer, you could see his dead wife in the reflection of the mirror as they walk away.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | April 22, 2024 2:58 AM |
I loved it, and the girl who played Lilly was fantastic.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | April 25, 2024 7:47 PM |
Terrible film that promised what it clearly could not deliver and then didn't deliver it. The male lead was fine as someone harried and vulnerable, but he lacked the charisma needed to convince as a late night host and his supposedly witty banter was run-of-the-mill put-downs. The girl playing the possessed character was very good, however - her weird mannerisms were completely believable as the surviving victim of a suicidal cult.
The ending made no sense, and neither did our ability to skip from "found footage" to the backstage drama and the host's final vision.
Not sure how to solve the problem save for not inventing it in the first place (no reason to pass this off as found footage).
3/10
by Anonymous | reply 40 | April 25, 2024 11:24 PM |
I thought it was a lot of fun merely for the novelty aspect. I found it very entertaining. I saw it and "Immaculate" in the theater during the same weekend. Originally I thought "Late Night with the Devil" was the better film, but I rewatched both and I now have a higher opinion of "Immaculate" than I did upon first viewing. Still thought both were great though.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | April 26, 2024 1:35 AM |
The host sort of reminded me of Jay Leno.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | April 26, 2024 2:02 AM |