Meet Prince William’s Alleged Mistress, Rose Hanbury

Yikes!

I'm guessing she gives good head, but I'd be afraid of those chompers.

Kate is a very pretty girl. This girl looks like Mary Gross.

Heterosexual men do not understand beauty. At all.

She looks like Sofia Coppola

OP has awoken from a six year coma?

William must be having a hell of a time getting away to fuck Rose with Kate home everyday lately.

Yes I have, r4, and I’m so glad Trump is no longer president!

Where's her chin?

When I see her face all I can think of is the toff character John Cleese played, Nigel Incubator-Jones.

The POW traditionally has a horse faced mistress.

And this one just looks like his wife if you squint.

Y’all are vicious. Rose is a lovely girl.

You all keep speaking about her looks but maybe sex between him and Kate is dry now. A lot of women lose their sex drive as they age, especially after having children. That’s when men are even more likely to cheat.

Even this shameless trashy article has to point out that "Despite the speculation, the rumored affair has never been verified".

It could be that Kate had ovarian cysts. I understand that sex is agony with those. They may have been the reason she had the surgery.

Well, one must insert one’s phallus SOMEWHERE. It’s a royal prerogative.

She looks twinkish.

Homely. Very.

Isn’t is the norm for the men in the Royal Family to end up with a mistress? It seems inevitable.

William has always been just like his father. Wouldn’t shock me at all. Apple didn’t fall far from the tree with that one.

Harry never took after his father.

She’s a thorn not a rose.

How do you pronounce Cholomoneldeley? What the hell.

Butterface.

Must be a Diana and Camilla situation. The relationship with his picture perfect wife has cooled, and now his heart is with the infinitely less attractive mistress who understands him.

"Isn’t is the norm for the men in the Royal Family to end up with a mistress? It seems inevitable."

I sure hope so!

I don’t believe for one minute he had an affair with her.

[quote]Isn’t is the norm for the men in the Royal Family to end up with a mistress?

More evidence of the total worthlessness of royalty in the twenty-first century.

Not R 23, but I don't for one minute believe ANYONE has ever married into nobility, without the knowledge that fidelity is not to be expected.

She’s very attractive overall, as is Kate. I think her coloring is a little prettier than Kate’s and her eyes are larger and more striking. Her lips are fuller, but maybe her teeth stick out a little and the chin’s not great. Kate’s features are more consistently sized, but she can look a little haggard when she’s caught off guard and not done up, and that’s been true since she was in her late 20’s. I don’t know, but I doubt Hansbury is as fit as Kate. She has boobs, though.

I can see why a lot of people jump to the conclusion that Kate is much better looking and a good photo of Kate is going to be better than a good photo of Hansbury. But I suspect IRL it’s a pretty close call. What’s interesting is how similar they are, not the relatively minor differences.

Her husband is fairly good looking… if older than her.

But I guess he’s not into pegging, and she had to take her tastes elsewheres.

Her chin won't get in the way of giving a right proper blow job.

[quote]R26 She’s very attractive overall

She certainly is! To Sasquatch.

It’s a bit of a stretch (pun intended) to believe that Prince William enjoys getting pegged.

Alleged by whom exactly? Dave down the road who has a mate that once walked past Buckingham Palace in 1997?

I'm going to call it as utter horse shit.

She looks like an Irish barmaid.

r17 Well Harry's obvious personality disorder clearly comes from his mother. Given the number of marriages in which Diana was the third one it always surprised me that she dared to publicly play the wronged wife card and that Susssex squad members still push the same line.

It seems Ari, one of the chiefs of Meghan’s entertainment agency WME has called in a favour with this publication because the timing of this article seems unlikely to be random.

She's probably got a lot of personality.

She looks like a horse and her eyes are on either side of her head. Brit standards of beauty are sad.

She looks like a young Eleanor Roosevelt.

[quote]How do you pronounce Cholomoneldeley?

I think it's "Chum-ley."

Butter face

Those Royal men sure like their horse-faced side pieces, don't they?

Sacha? That’s what kids play here at school.

R38 Yeah it's definitely Chum-lee.

[quote] How do you pronounce Cholomoneldeley?

R38, refer to the London based "Queer Historian" @ R28

All that money and no taste, tsk tsk. She's wall-eyed as a fish.

There is smoke , there is fire

She looka lika lady boi

No way is he sticking the royal dick in that. Nope.

[quote]Even this shameless trashy article has to point out that "Despite the speculation, the rumored affair has never been verified".

OP is trolling by sourcing from a tabloid. In Touch Weekly ? Seriously ?

She's disgusting. He could have his pick of women and he goes for that ugly thing? STRAIGHT MEN! Ugh.

Yes, but Camilla. The ugly gals do the weird stuff. That pegging rumour is true based on what she looks like.

[quote]The POW traditionally has a horse faced mistress.

Fuck you, R9!

R31 Why is it hard for you to believe that he would enjoy getting pegged? He is precisely the type of man who needs to seek it out.

[quote]R50 That pegging rumour is true based on what she looks like.

Yes. What man could face her head on??

R47 That's not the attraction.

R19. Definitely Chumley.

She looks like Pamela Springsteen as Angela Baker, The Angel of Death in Sleepaway Camp 2: Unhappy Campers.

She’s not very pretty

[quote]How do you pronounce Cholomoneldeley? What the hell.

R19. Surprisingly, the pronunciation is: "Chumley"

[quote]How do you pronounce Cholomoneldeley?

I was saying Chalamet.

Sure William could have his pick of women, but he needs to have a woman who can be discreet and never cause him problems. She would also need to be in the same social orbit, so to speak. It can't look terribly odd for a steady side piece to be at the same parties or events as he would be.

[quote]How do you pronounce Cholomoneldeley? What the hell.

[quote][R19]. Surprisingly, the pronunciation is: "Chumley"

Ah, now I see why all the "Keighleigh" and "Madyssohn" spellings come from. They think they're copying British nobility.

[quote]Her husband is fairly good looking… But I guess he’s not into pegging

Isn't he into men? I thought that was the rumor.

He has a type

Oh Noooo, that markus guy is charge of smegs "PR" again, back with his nasty ,vile ,childish threads.

Not to derail. But thinking about Wills getting pegged has me curious. Do that many straight men really get pegged or does it just delight us so much that we like saying they do.

It’s a niche activity. I imagine.

She looks like an emaciated beaver.

With an emaciated beaver.

[quote]He has a type

Nah, more like father like son.

The father also preferred to bang the less attractive woman over the more attractive wife.

He has a type.

Would there be scandal if he married Rose after Kate Middleton’s death?

Whore

Not so much a scandal as surprising, R71 - there hasn’t been a “Kate Middleton” since April 2011.

That’s what we call her in the U.S. Just like it will alway be Ben Kingsley rather than Sir Ben.

We do less ass kissing here.

Bitch stole my act.

🤣⬆️!

R74 not so much “ass kissing” as stupidity, right?

It has always interested me how much a certain type of American is so proud of their ignorance. R74 being a perfect example.

She is ugly. Don’t believe the affair rumour.

She has special talents.

Because ugly is a deal breaker with the Windsors?

If you're going to screw around do it with a voluptuous blonde so at least you get something different than at home.

[quote] No way is he sticking the royal dick in that. Nope.

Every Rose has it's thorn.

Apparently Rosie is sticking her dick/peg into Willy

Rose Hagbury

That poor lil ole girl got beat with the ugly stick

R77 R78 The sheep are uneasy.

He cheated on Kate with that big nosed harlot? Kate must deny him sex unless she wants to get impregnated.

Knock knock

Who's there?

Rosie

Rosie who?

It has always interested me how much a certain type of Briton is so proud of their servility. [R78] being a perfect example.

There was no "affair."

At least not in the sense of the one that brother Harold had with the chub sports woman when he lost his royal virginity over two minutes in the grass behind some caravans, which is now the true measure of Windsor romantic interludes.

R74 You probably don't think Ariel or Jasmine are princesses either and you know they are.

It's kinda funny, because Harry was the one first linked to Rose Cholmondeley when he sat next to her at a state banquet in 2017. Meghan wasn't able to attend as she was only dating Harry at the time. It makes you think - is Harry's seeming "loss for words" while seated next to Rose the reason why the Meghan camp then started to spread this false story that William was having an affair with her?

[quote]Prince Harry sits next to Kate Middleton's glamorous friend as he attends his first State Banquet

[quote]Rose Hanbury has become a firm friend of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge over the years - and even owns property right next door to the Royal couple

[quote]By Kara O'Neill Reporter

[quote]11:49, 13 Jul 2017

[quote]Last night marked Prince Harry's first ever State Banquet, which could be a sign of things to come as the young Royal takes on more duties with his family.

[quote]But it was Harry's table partner that stole the attention, when the younger prince was spotted next to a mystery brunette woman, wearing a very extravagant tiara.

[quote]The official seating plan has put Prince Harry next to Kate Middleton's pal, Rose Hanbury, the Marchioness of Cholmondeley.

[quote]Rose, 33, is married to David Cholmondeley (pronounced Chumley), the 7th Marquess of Cholmondeley.

[quote]The couple announced their engagement in June 2009, revealed Rose was pregnant one day later, and married the following day.

Poor Harry, he fucked up all his chances of being a young and then old royal, performing royal and state duties.

Harry looking rather flummoxed whilst standing next to Rose in 2017, when he was dating Meghan.

Rose Hanbury.

Rose Nasty!

Prince Harry seated next to Kate's model friend at Spanish state banquet

Rose Hanbury is close to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

13 JUL 2017

Prince Harry attended his very first state banquet on Wednesday – and found himself seated next to a former fashion model, who also happens to be a close friend of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Harry, 32, was paired with Rose Hanbury, the Marchioness of Cholmondeley, for the royal procession into the ballroom at Buckingham Palace, looking very dapper in white tie and tails. The pair chatted easily as they walked into the banquet together, before taking their seats; the Marchioness was seated on Harry's left, while the Spanish Prime Minister's chief of staff, Jorge Moragas-Sanchez, was on his right.

[quote]R94 Harry looking rather flummoxed whilst standing next to Rose in 2017

I’m sure she gets that a lot.

She’s quite startlingly hag-ish.

[quote]R93 Rose is married to David Cholmondeley… The couple announced their engagement in June 2009, revealed Rose was pregnant one day later, and married the following day.

The Hanbury Whore

So as been discussed before on other threads: The affair rumour was started by Giles Coren, a food critic, who later admitted on his IG that it was a joke.

Weak chins make good criminals.

It just means they'd been in a relationship before they married, r99. I guess the idea of a relationship is a strange concept for you.

Quite big tits. Tony gets around.

Assuming she's not a lesbian and not in a lavender marriage, could she have done better or as well as Rocksavage in terms of looks and money? I shudder to think of a 25 year old marrying someone twice her age. I know, I know the life of fabulous wealth, etc., etc.

[quote]R102 It just means they'd been in a relationship before they married, [R99]. I guess the idea of a relationship is a strange concept for you.

The couple has never denied William is the father.

Maybe you royalists don’t think it’s whorish to open your legs to married men on command just because they’re in line to be king someday, then waddle down the aisle heavily pregnant with a bastard child. I can assure you that in America, however, we have QUITE a different view on the matter.

^ sounds like a Christian Nationalist from a red state.

Yes R104, in America you have quite a different view on such matters. How then, to explain the fact that the endorsed Republican candidate is a three times married convicted rapist, undischarged bankrupt and leader of an attempt to overthrow the last election?

Don’t be so fucking suburban you stupid frau and fuck off back to mumsnet or wherever you came from.

R104 is a bovine frau as evidenced by its extensive use of “kiddos” in its posting history.

Prince William isn't much to look at either.

Why the fuck should the couple deny some stupid, deranged false rumour, r104? The kid looks just like Cholmondeley anyway.

Some affair, that's apparently been going on since at least 2009, before William married Kate. If he and Rose were such lifelong soul mates and parents of a child, then why didn't he marry her then?

What part of : Harry was not married at the time do you doltish deluded Royalass psychos not get?

Hilarious how you mental Royalass fraus try to project every cock up of your sacred royals on to the Sussexes. You're the definition of cultists.

To be completely fair and accurate, there’s no claim or admission that William has ever had “a cock up him”

Pegging is administered with an artificial phallus.

Are you fuck’n kidding me - that fugly cunt.

At least Wills and Rose have the decency to look guilty when Kate interrupts them:

[quote] her eyes are larger and more striking

Her bug eyes? Must be a straight/bi guy thing.

Big eyes are totally unattractive on men, that’s for sure.

I’m going to call HER utter horse shit!

[quote] Poor Harry, he fucked up all his chances of being a young and then old royal, performing royal and state duties.

Trust me performing silly Royal & State duties are the last things Harry wanted for his future.. And if he told the truth William would admit that he hates performing them too. I can't envision William waking with glee on a day he has to attend a new Tesco opening or pretending to be interested in all the wares presented at some country fair. One thing about Royal duties is, they ain't all pomp and circumstance.

Example of the most recent opening of a Tesco by a member of the BRF please, R117. Bonus points if it was William.

He opens petrol stations! Car washes!

I’ve [italic]seen it!

I'd love to know the last time William attended a Tesco grand opening. Was it when he was in Anglesey, Wales stationed as rescue pilot? Their most famous resident did it as a special favor to the community?

It never happened.

Roses’s husband is rumored to spend a lot of time with a boyfriend in France.

Not sure what you're referring to, r110, but Harry was dating Meghan at the time he looked so flustered sitting next to Rose.

Is he r122? Where did you hear that?

R117, the royals don't open supermarkets, they do things like work with disadvantaged kids, environmental projects, help vulnerable communities. The monarch is the head of state and thus officially represents the country, especially diplomatically. Royals who do official visits abroad are officially representing the country abroad. Harry was sitting next to Rose at a state banquet for the Spanish King and Queen, who were on an official state visit to the UK, attended by top British and Spanish politicians (William was sitting next to the British prime minister), business leaders, community leaders, artists, public figures, actors, etc. But, yeah, trivialise all that to "opening a Tescos".

Considering how much Harry is insisting on keeping his royal titles, how he insisted that his kids were given the titles prince and princess, and how Meghan is marketing herself as "Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex" with faux royal insignia, I'd say Harry wants the trappings of royalty a lot. Don't forget their first effort was to market themselves as "Sussex Royal" with all sorts of spew about how they would be representing the Queen. There was also the "half in, half out" plan that they had to scrap. So, I'd say that, yes, Harry likes the trappings of royalty a lot. He just can't be bothered with the work, duties and responsibilities that go along with it.

Moreover, you know absolutely fuck all about what William does. Yesterday he was hanging out with kids at a youth centre, in the evening he was at the Diana Awards. The day before he had been at the Commonwealth service at Westminster Abbey. And he was attentive, giving, aware, listening, curious, giving at every event, as he always is.

Thank you, R125. Of course it will almost certainly fall on deaf ears around here - jokes about pegging, anorexia etc are so much more entertaining, apparently.

Here’s some old gossip about David and his ladykiller pal:

David Rocksavage and Francois Marie Banier:

She reminds me of Aunt Sally from the beloved old UK children’s series Worzel Gummidge, about a West Country scarecrow who has different heads for when he has to do different tasks.

Aunt Sally is a fairground doll. Worzel loves her, but she thinks she is better than him.

Fuck, she’s plain. She’d better have a magic vagina to divert attention from that face.

Yet posters like r73 will still refer to Meghan as Meghan Markel.

Actually R131 if I refer to her at all it’s by her first name only, however if I did refer to her by the surname with which she was born I’d at least get the spelling right.

You’re an idiot.

[quote]could she have done better or as well as Rocksavage in terms of looks and money?

I think he's handsome.

She resembles the original Gladys Kravitz on Bewitched, Alice Pearce.

Also, she's not his mistress. Doubt Pippa would have named her daughter Rose if that was the case.

R73 Off island, we will call the clowns in your shit show whatever we want. Thanks so much.

Camilla redux. Beautiful wife, hag mistress. The Princes of Whales are doing it wrong.

R135 “we”? Who is “we”, R135? You and your pals in the asylum?

Here is Giles Coren admitting he made the affair rumours. He's never even met members of the royal family.

oh Look! another person for you to hate on.

and yes, we all know that the ONLY thing in life that counts is looks.

R137 Empire's gone, hon. The world is laughing at what you revere. Now you're going to have to give up a lot more shit. Good luck.

Exactly, R138. Unfortunately the people who believe the rumour (most of the people on these threads) are also the sort of people who read with their index finger while slowly mouthing the words. Maybe include a “tl;dr” version for the average Datalounger.

R140 there hasn’t been a British Empire since the 1940s. It was superseded by the Commonwealth. Not that I expect you’ll understand the difference. Either way it’s not up to me to “give up more shit” as you so intelligently put it. Of course you assume that I’m British for questioning some of the lunatics on this thread. I’m not.

But you’re obviously American.

R142 I think you're trying to say that the people who don't play along with your monarchist fantasies are the lunatics. Is that correct?

Wrong again, R143. I’m a republican, (note that that’s not the same as a “Republican”. Google it - I don’t have the energy to educate you on this).

The only monarchist fantasy that I have is that one day one of my countrymen or countrywomen can aspire to be our head of state instead of the British monarch.

I am on this thread because I make it a point to point out when the majority of the posters demonstrate their complete lack of understanding about the British royal family and the UK in general. And that includes idiotic rumours which you lot swallow hook, line and sinker.

That’s all.

But you're obviously a cultist lickspittle R142

R125 You should apply to be Peggy's publicist you're doing a better job than who he's got now.

R142

Ooh R145! Someone’s discovered Merriam-Webster! You don’t understand what you read but well done for typing multi syllable words.

She sho’ is ugleee!

R144 We know you think she's a 'princess'. We don't share your reverence. We find it quaint and funny.

That’s ok, R150 - these are difficult concepts for some people to grasp. So does “we” include the other voices in your head?

R151 It's not difficult to grasp the concept of a princess. They are everywhere. It's hard to imagine an adult taking this seriously in 2024.

If it brings comfort, enjoy it.

Father and son have a type.

(horse-faced from the looks of it)

Bird works a mean peg.

THIEF!

R155 This Rose chick looks unkempt. And the complete lack of chin makes her look inbred. Both father and son have horrible taste in mistresses.

How do you know that “this Rose chick” - as you call her - is William’s mistress, R156?

^^ foul woman, and family. Just give the looted furniture back.

If Wills eventually marries Rose, what she did (or chose not to) do re: this will always be yet another black mark against them.

^^ re:

[quote]R155 THIEF!

Fuck you’re stupid, aren’t you, R158?

r117 dont know where you get your information about royal duties but opening supermarkets aint one of them.That gig goes to tv soap stars, reality tv stars etc. Your claim about what Harry wanted is also inaccurate because he asked for a half in half out with the monarchy and those royal duties you say he didnt plan on doing. No one forced them to ask for half in half out, they didnt go for the total clean break from monarchy and give up their titles and renounce Harrys place in the line of succession. Nope. The we are big victims and fleed for freedom from a cruel monarchy is a disney fairytale type narrative that came later when they were denied half in half out.

In the real world very few people find every aspect of their job super exciting.All jobs have some boring bits which is why your post comes off as immature or entitled to me. The fact Harry thinks having dull parts of his day job makes him one of the worlds biggest victims is beyond laughable.

r135 I will give you an example of a real shitshow and on a huge huge scale. A country were it is even a remote possibility for Donald Trump who tried to lead a violent coup in 2021, just 3 years ago , to be reelected as President .He should be a social pariah and frankly only in a fucked shitshow of a country would it even be possible.

R157 I'm not British and I don't follow the BRF closely. Usually where there is smoke there is fire. Where are the rumors coming from?

If the Markles want to be relevant, they need to hire Kris Jenner.

R162 Look over there!

You can curtsey all you want, it's funny to watch.

r164 Its not a case of look over there but a valid point of people in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.I think someone of Trumps known character possibly being elected again to be President speaks to the shame of a country and of its dysfunction. You cant critique another countrys democracy and way of selecting a head of state but expect your own country to not receive scrutiny on the same basis and be a sacred untouchable cow. Few UK citizens actively curtesy or bow but you can believe in the american dream despite the US being a plutocracy were the wealthy donor class to political parties have more say than than voters in the land of the free - as you say its funny to watch!

R163 the rumours came from a 2019 drunken tweet from an English food writer called Giles Coren who retracted what he had posted the next morning stating that he was drunk when posted after a long boozy lunch and that what he posted was untrue.

Since then and most recently, American media (why is it always Americans who are interested in this?) have dredged this tweet up, quoting Coren as a “British royal reporter” which he isn’t - he reviews restaurants. As recently as this week he has tweeted again reiterating that it was a drunken joke that go out of hand.

As far as “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”, all that I can ask is if you’re not British and don’t follow the BRF closely, why do you care, why do you think that your opinion matters and why are you here?

R163 you say that you don’t follow the BRF closely - your posting history says otherwise.

I think she proved she was his mistress by issuing a statement through her lawyers that she wasn't his mistress or was it there was no affair. But I'm the one who goes, so what if he fucked her? What if he's still fucking her. It changes nothing for grown adult people who live in the real world. And it sure as hell doesn't change anything for Will and Kate. They are together and they are going to be together and he can drown in a different pussy every night and it still won't matter. That arrangement is solid.

R165 That's not what the thread's about, hon.

You seem to think that you can dictate and control what others think and say around the world about your royal family, which you believe was placed on earth by God to rule you.

R16 Ugly ones at that

[QUOTE]As recently as this week he has tweeted again reiterating that it was a drunken joke that go out of hand.

Coren is a dipsomaniacal (Google his picture) restaurant reviewer who made a joke. Why this one? It would be so very fanciful of him to come up with it out of thin air on his own, right? Or did he hear society scuttlebutt and commit a mortal sin that could have locked him out of certain social circles? Gabbing about aristocratic business directly to the hoi polloi on Twitter is not a good look, so he nervously and quickly withdrew his "joke."

Rose has initiated legal proceedings against CBS and Stephen Colbert.

Long neck and not much chin. Dorothy Kilgallen with less severe features and a better hairdo.

Smart Rose, real smart.🙄

Yes, it is smart of Rose. Colbert can go fuck himself.

Giles Coren is one of the world's oldest brats. Total asshole. Dreadful, small man. He makes Piers Morgan look accomplished.

23 minutes ago Kate posted a YouTube video saying she has cancer and is going through surgeries and finding more cancers. She’s on chemo now.

The thread is about complete bullshit, r169.

Go away, Meghan.

[quote]Kate posted a YouTube video saying she has cancer

I'm as good as queen!

r169 I believe none of those things and maybe you should direct your comments of that's not what this thread is about hun to the person I was replying to who like you is making the way a head of state is selected THEE issue but then wants that conversation not to draw on comparisons with other countries method of selecting a head of state for fear it will show America and its systems and myths in a bad light. That kind of points towards you trying to be the one who controls what other people say not me. I have no problem with people saying their opinions on the royal family and you should have no problem in me exercising my right to respond to that and giving my opinions on America. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. You don't get away with criticising our way of doing things but try to prevent people criticise the USAs way of doing things by trying to say its off topic. I am merely comparing the US system with ours- a totally valid tool in a discussion.

R182 Nobody is defending Donald Trump here. You can say whatever you like.

Your panties are all bunched up because somebody used Kate Middleton's last name, and you are compelled to go about correcting people for it.

They look quite similar. William certainly has a type for anorexic brunette women.

Both women are getting their affairs in order.

You mean like Rose's legal action against that lying moron Colbert for spreading false rumours about her, r185?

Just like daddy. Cheats on an attractive wife with a snaggle-toothed hag

Hot little number, 20 years ago

r183 I never accuses anyone of defending Donald Trump nor did I say anything about people calling her Kate Middleton. You clearly either can't do nuanced conversation or you are avoiding the points being made because they don't suit your agenda and jar with it. Your one of these people who can dish it out but can't take it back. None of the points I made required anyone in the thread to be supporters of Donald Trump and if you interpreted it that way than frankly you ain't the sharpest tool in the box.

Meghan isn't attractive, r187, but, yeah, given Harry's raucous past he is likely to cheat.

R189 Jesus, how you prattle on. We both think Trump is bad. I think your monarchy is a fraud. You don't.

Learn to write proper English before resorting to ad hominem attacks.

Why do you, as a foreigner and hence incredibly uninformed about the royal family, think they are a "fraud", r191?

Must be strange for you, all these world leaders, sports stars, actors, etc. making public statements in support of this woman you think is a "fraud". Are they - many of whom have met her personally and even worked with her - so naive as not to see the fraudulence while you, who know nothing and have experienced nothing, are so smart you can see the "truth" that they can't?

R190 you don’t have to think Meghan is attractive but I think her face is very pretty, certainly better looking then 90% of royal women.

What about the monarchy is a fraud?

R156 that’s their type. That’s why Brits are obsessed with horses. They remind them of their wives, mothers, sisters, and girlfriends.

r191 If what I posted was prattling on then so was your post. What you mean when you say prattling on is now that your crap argument received more pushback than you like you are going to try and dismiss the validity if my point by describing it as prattling on. The american dream is arguably a huge fraud and american society certainly seems permanently polarised , angry and very bitterly divided over politics to the point of dysfunction. Perhaps your system ain't the dogs bollocks you think it is.

Meghan Markle is an utterly beautiful woman. (Though apparently not white enough for the klan grannies here.)

She's definitely attractive. It's once she opens her mouth or when her winged monkeys take flight that she doesn't look so good.

I can't stand Meghan but she is objectively a very pretty woman.

Only after a shitload of work, r199. She's had at least two nosejobs.

Looks like Beth Howland.

Megan is a very attractive woman and so is Kate. Rose is not ugly but she certainly is no beauty.

Slag.

Markle has beautiful coloring, whether it's applied or natural.

But she's no world-class beauty, not in the league of Jolie in her prime, Halle Berry, you get the idea.

But she's pretty. Even prettier than Kate, if we're going by sheer facial features.

BUT Markle lacks Kate's Star Power and presence. You can hate on the concept of Royalty all you want to, but Kate just has that regal bearing and aura to her.

Even Reese Witherspoon talked about how star-struck she was when meeting Kate.

[quote]r204 Markle’s no world-class beauty, not in the league of Jolie in her prime, Halle Berry, you get the idea.

Well, that’s a rather impossibly high standard.

My impression is that straight men don't find Markle pretty or attractive or intriguing.

^Well good thing you aren't a real straight man with some weight behind that impression R206. It's absolutely delusional to think that straight men wouldn't find Meghan attractive, as if she resembles Quasimodo. Even on her worst day she's far more attractive and fuckable than the average obese soccer moms of America, and these are just the facts in the real world, but obviously not here on datalouge. This is why it's hard to take the royal loonies seriously, you can't even be objective about Meghan's looks even to the point of assuming that no straight man but Harry would want her which is just laughable honestly. The complaints about Meghan's style are observations that a real straight man wouldn't give a shit about, but it will guarantee a 600 reply thread on datalouge. When you log into the real world, you'll find plenty of men who see Meghan as very attractive.

[quote] Kate finds the rumors hurtful, obviously, and hates the thought that one day her children will be able to read about them online,” a source told Us Weekly in 2019. “It forced her and William to sit back and examine their relationship, which they realized they should have been doing more often.”

This “source” while attempting to be helpful and deny the rumor actually makes the situation worse. “Forced to examine their relationship “? Not the phrase you use when everything is hunky dory.

Rose is quite pretty, with a fetching figure. But I have no reason to believe in an affair between her and William.

Markle has a soft, pretty face. Kate's is a strong, striking face. Entirely different bone structure. Kate, of course, knows how to dress, which Markle evidently never will.

Quite the basic whore.

[quote]BUT Markle lacks Kate's Star Power and presence. You can hate on the concept of Royalty all you want to, but Kate just has that regal bearing and aura to her.

Kate also lacks Markle’s extensive level of crazy.

I find it really odd when people suggest that Meghan isn’t pretty. You could argue that she’s not beautiful, but she’s very, very pretty. She doesn’t have a great figure and her clothes often work against her.

Kate, overall, is physically more impressive. She has a terrific figure, occasionally too thin and legs that could be longer, but almost perfect. In a good photo, she is beautiful. But her face isn’t that great. It’s more that no features are objectionable. And she relies a lot on hair that occasionally verges into desperate housewives territory (but Meghan has done this, too).

Kate and Meghan are interesting contrasts in how they dress. Kate will compromise style to dress is a way that accents her slimness. Meghan chooses outfits that are nice, but inappropriate for the weather and her build. Kate’s approach is better, but a little boring and predicable. That’s the job, though.

LOL... make of this what you will... 100 statues of naked men installed on the Cholmondley (sp?) estate...

My impression is that straight men don't find Markle pretty or attractive or intriguing.

—Anonymous

R206.

Stop fantasizing that Harry must be gay....

R202 Meghan is much more beautiful than all the royal women. That’s part of the problem. Bitches be jealous.

Meghan and Harry aren't really royalty anymore. They do no royal functions and have a private citizen life in California. Meghan can do her lifestyle blog and podcasts. It's totally fine, and Harry's always a legacy royal, and can do his Invictus games and they can do their speaker circuits but they moved on. The bridge is broken and they will never be royals of Britain again.

Then R217 why don’t they drop the Sussex titles and just trade as plain ol’ Meghan Markle and Harry Mountbatten-Windsor? The hypocrisy of slagging off the British royal family while trading on their titles is staggering. Not to mention the committed feminist Markle referring to herself as Duchess of Sussex, and littering the American Riviera Orchard merch with a faux royal monogram.