Jon Hamm goes commando
Apparently, he''s had some close calls on Mad Men.
http://www.celebitchy.com/122992/jon_hamm_loves_to_let_his_junk_swing_his_lack_of_underwear_is_causing_problems/
- [quote]"During filming, his character has had to wear some very short shorts, and that''s when everyone''s especially on edge. Some of the actresses and crew members wouldn''t mind a sneak peek, but the majority of the cast and crew don''t want Jon to accidentally expose himself."
- He is so hot!
- hmmm, a rival.
Phil K.
- wow! that''s one hot stud!
- OK, guys in the know, what would wearing boxer-briefs do to the line of his suit? Are these more comfortable for the guy who has to cover up a bit?
- My horse-hung acquaintence prefers boxers to boxer-briefs or jockey shorts.
- Don''t your pants irritate your skin? That''s what I don''t understand about going commando.
- Also, the constant dry cleaning if you have to wear suits.
- I would think for sanitary reasons one would prefer underwear at least most of the time. I''ve gone commando on occasion, but after pissing, I''m always aware that droplet of piss are going to get on my pants. I''d prefer that the piss droplets end up on my underwear.
- It''s all bullshit and those photos are obviously doctored.
- Going commando is not good on the fabric of expensive trousers. All that cock sweat eats away at the fabric. He must have a staggering dry cleaning bill in order to keep his nice clothing sanitary. And I certainly hope he doesn''t buy off the rack after trying things on the shops. People don''t want to try on trousers after some guy''s had his junk all over them. That''s just nasty.
- Even people who clean up after using the bathroom leave stains on their underwear sometimes. I can imagine what his pants look like. Lovely.
- I''d suck the rotten crotch of his pants clean.
- That is one handsome man.
- Speak for yourself, r11.%0D
- As if anyone who reads the National Enquirer actually watches Mad Men.
- love this shot
- People who don''t wear underwear are stupid. Underwear was designed for a reason.
- I call bullshit. As period persnickety as this show is (the cast even told not to work out), wardrobe would not dress an executive in the 60s without underwear.
- When they do show him in his underwear, it is always white boxers. Men wore colored/patterned boxers in the 60''s. White or gray was popular during WWII
- Hottttt
- He is perfection.
- Men who don''t wear underwear are unattractive to me.
- I have always found men who went commando knowing full well their junk was on display for everyone to see do it because they''re exhibitionists, not because they just don''t like to wear underwear.\
\
Truth be told, Hamm is a perv.
- Does anyone else smell . . . cookies?
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:L13Ke3lXLZyw7M:http://socialitelife.celebuzz.com/bfm_gallery/2009/10/jon_hamm_on_the_set_of_the_town_-_october_21_2009/gallery_main/gallery_main-jon-hamm-the-town-set-10212009-04.jpg&t=1
- IFHH and ILHFMH. IRHA and ILHRMA.
Hole Troll
- Ewwwwwww. Underwear is used for a reason.
- My ex was incredibly hung, I mean OBSCENELY hung with a set of balls that were almost like two limes. He rarely wore underwear, and if he did it was boxers or boxer briefs. There were simply no jeans that would fit his bulge - if he''d worn regular briefs, he''d have looked deformed all that junk wadded up into one small space. He could get away with no underwear, letting his cock snake down his pants leg. It wasn''t AS obvious as having a massive bulge. By the way - he was ASHAMED of his size... Can you imagine?
- R28. If he were that huge, what were the dimensions of your ex''s dick? Balls as big as two limes, really? You should share a photo of the whole x-package with us.
- I think Jon Hamm is putting all of you on.
- r25, quit trying to make "cookies" happen. It''s not that funny. Or at least not to self-respecting gay people.
Cookie Monster
- he''s my dream top